sources
Data license: CC-BY
1 row where datasetId = 3033 sorted by id descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: createdAt (date), updatedAt (date)
id ▲ | name | description | createdAt | updatedAt | datasetId | additionalInfo | link | dataPublishedBy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15579 | Estevadeordal, Frantz, and Taylor (2003) | { "link": "https://www.jstor.org/stable/25053910?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents", "retrievedDate": "20/07/2018", "additionalInfo": "Notes on the calculation of the lower and upper bound estimates from the authors: \"1500\u20131800: Trade growth rates from O\u2019Rourke and Williamson [2002, Table 1; volume estimates only]. Level index derived, and scaled by world GDP levels from Maddison [2001, Table B-18]. The \u201cupper bound\u201d series is then scaled to the benchmark 8 percent European trade-GDP ratio for 1780 due to O\u2019Brien [1982], probably an overstatement of the world trade-GDP ratio. The \u201clower bound\u201d series is scaled to the benchmark 2 percent world trade-GDP ratio for 1820 due to Maddison [1995, Table 2-4], possibly biased downwards relative to the long-run trend because of the blockades during the Napoleonic Wars.\"", "dataPublishedBy": "Estevadeordal, A., Frantz, B., & Taylor, A. (2003). The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870-1939. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 359-407. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25053910", "dataPublisherSource": "Historical data and scholarly sources." } |
2018-07-20 17:07:58 | 2018-07-20 17:07:58 | World trade - upper bound (% of GDP) (Estevadeordal, Frantz, and Taylor (2003)) (split) 3033 | Notes on the calculation of the lower and upper bound estimates from the authors: "1500–1800: Trade growth rates from O’Rourke and Williamson [2002, Table 1; volume estimates only]. Level index derived, and scaled by world GDP levels from Maddison [2001, Table B-18]. The “upper bound” series is then scaled to the benchmark 8 percent European trade-GDP ratio for 1780 due to O’Brien [1982], probably an overstatement of the world trade-GDP ratio. The “lower bound” series is scaled to the benchmark 2 percent world trade-GDP ratio for 1820 due to Maddison [1995, Table 2-4], possibly biased downwards relative to the long-run trend because of the blockades during the Napoleonic Wars." | https://www.jstor.org/stable/25053910?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents | Estevadeordal, A., Frantz, B., & Taylor, A. (2003). The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870-1939. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 359-407. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25053910 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "sources" ( "id" INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT, "name" VARCHAR(512) NULL , "description" TEXT NOT NULL , "createdAt" DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP , "updatedAt" DATETIME NULL , "datasetId" INTEGER NULL, additionalInfo TEXT GENERATED ALWAYS as (JSON_EXTRACT(description, '$.additionalInfo')) VIRTUAL, link TEXT GENERATED ALWAYS as (JSON_EXTRACT(description, '$.link')) VIRTUAL, dataPublishedBy TEXT GENERATED ALWAYS as (JSON_EXTRACT(description, '$.dataPublishedBy')) VIRTUAL, FOREIGN KEY("datasetId") REFERENCES "datasets" ("id") ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT ); CREATE INDEX "sources_datasetId" ON "sources" ("datasetId");