sources: 15579

This table contains all the sources for our datasets. The description column contains JSON encoded as text that contains useful additional fields like a longer descriptive text "additionalInfo".

Data license: CC-BY

This data as json

id name description createdAt updatedAt datasetId additionalInfo link dataPublishedBy
15579 Estevadeordal, Frantz, and Taylor (2003) 
{
    "link": "https://www.jstor.org/stable/25053910?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents",
    "retrievedDate": "20/07/2018",
    "additionalInfo": "Notes on the calculation of the lower and upper bound estimates from the authors: \"1500\u20131800: Trade growth rates from O\u2019Rourke and Williamson [2002, Table 1; volume estimates only]. Level index derived, and scaled by world GDP levels from Maddison [2001, Table B-18]. The \u201cupper bound\u201d series is then scaled to the benchmark 8 percent European trade-GDP ratio for 1780 due to O\u2019Brien [1982], probably an overstatement of the world trade-GDP ratio. The \u201clower bound\u201d series is scaled to the benchmark 2 percent world trade-GDP ratio for 1820 due to Maddison [1995, Table 2-4], possibly biased downwards relative to the long-run trend because of the blockades during the Napoleonic Wars.\"",
    "dataPublishedBy": "Estevadeordal, A., Frantz, B., & Taylor, A. (2003). The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870-1939. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 359-407. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25053910",
    "dataPublisherSource": "Historical data and scholarly sources."
}
 2018-07-20 17:07:58 2018-07-20 17:07:58 3033 Notes on the calculation of the lower and upper bound estimates from the authors: "1500–1800: Trade growth rates from O’Rourke and Williamson [2002, Table 1; volume estimates only]. Level index derived, and scaled by world GDP levels from Maddison [2001, Table B-18]. The “upper bound” series is then scaled to the benchmark 8 percent European trade-GDP ratio for 1780 due to O’Brien [1982], probably an overstatement of the world trade-GDP ratio. The “lower bound” series is scaled to the benchmark 2 percent world trade-GDP ratio for 1820 due to Maddison [1995, Table 2-4], possibly biased downwards relative to the long-run trend because of the blockades during the Napoleonic Wars." https://www.jstor.org/stable/25053910?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Estevadeordal, A., Frantz, B., & Taylor, A. (2003). The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870-1939. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 359-407. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25053910

Links from other tables