posts: 50161
Data license: CC-BY
This data as json
id | title | slug | type | status | content | archieml | archieml_update_statistics | published_at | updated_at | gdocSuccessorId | authors | excerpt | created_at_in_wordpress | updated_at_in_wordpress | featured_image | formattingOptions | markdown | wpApiSnapshot |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50161 | Humans destroyed forests for thousands of years – we can become the first generation that achieves a world in which forests expand | global-forest-transition | post | publish | <!-- wp:html --> <div class="blog-info"> <p>Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world’s largest problems.<br>This article draws on data and research discussed in our entry on <strong><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Forests and Deforestation</a></strong>.</p> </div> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>For thousands of years humans have destroyed forests. At the end of the last great ice age, an estimated 57% of the world’s habitable land was forested.{ref}57% of the world’s habitable land was forested and habitable land accounts for 71% of the world’s land surface. This means (0.57*0.71=0.4047) that 40% of the total land surface was forested.<br>For more information on the data see see Hannah Ritchie’s Our World in Data article <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/world-lost-one-third-forests">The world has lost one-third of its forest, but an end of deforestation is possible</a>.{/ref} Since then, people in all regions of the world have burned and cut down forests. The chart shows this. The forested land area declined from 6 to 4 billion hectares. That means our ancestors <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/world-lost-one-third-forests">destroyed one-third of the former forests</a> – a forest area twice the size of the US was lost. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There are two big reasons why humans have destroyed forests and continue to do so – the need for land and the need for wood:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>We need wood for many purposes: as construction material for houses or ships, to turn it into paper, and – most importantly – as a source of energy. Burning wood is a major source of energy where there are trees but no modern energy sources available. Still today about half of extracted wood globally is used to produce energy, mostly for cooking and heating <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/energy-poverty-air-pollution">in poor households</a> that lack alternatives.{ref}<strong>Today about <em>half</em> of all wood extracted from forests globally is used to produce energy, mostly for cooking and heating.</strong> See: FAO (2017) –<a href="http://www.fao.org/3/i6934e/i6934e.pdf"> The Charcoal Transition</a>. In<a href="http://www.fao.org/sustainable-forest-management/toolbox/modules/wood-energy/basic-knowledge/en/?type=111"> FAO – Wood Energy - Basic Knowledge</a> the authors write “The annual removal of wood worldwide was estimated at about 3.7 billion m3, of which 1.87 billion m3 was used as fuel.<br><br><strong>On the African continent the reliance on wood as fuel is the single most important driver of forest degradation.</strong> See: FAO and UNEP. 2020. The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome.<a href="https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en"> https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en</a> The same report also reports that an estimated 880 million people worldwide are collecting fuelwood or producing charcoal with it.<br><br><strong>In addition to the destruction of the natural environment, the reliance on fuelwood also contributes between 2 and 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions.</strong> According to the 2017 FAO publication<a href="http://www.fao.org/3/i6934e/i6934e.pdf"> The Charcoal Transition</a> the use of firewood and charcoal contributes between 1-2.4 gigatons of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases annually, which is 2-7% of global anthropogenic emissions.{/ref}</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>By far, the <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/what-are-drivers-deforestation">most important driver</a> of the destruction of forests is agriculture. Humanity cuts down forests primarily to make space for fields to grow crops and pastures to raise livestock. We also cut down forests to make space for settlements or mining, but these are small in comparison to farming. </li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The land use for farming did not only come at the expense of the world’s forests, but also led to the huge decline of the world’s other wild spaces, the shrub- and grasslands. The chart shows this too.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":50169,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age.png" alt="" class="wp-image-50169"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In many countries forests continue to be destroyed. The series of charts shows this. In all of these countries the forest cover today is lower than three decades ago.{ref}<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/forest-area-as-share-of-land-area?tab=chart&time=1990..latest&facet=entity&uniformYAxis=0&country=BRA~IDN~COD~MYS~MDG~COL~ECU~PNG~ZMB~LAO~KHM">Here is the interactive version of this chart</a> in which you can download the data, compare these countries with other countries, and in which you find information on the data sources.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":50170,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/deforestation.png" alt="" class="wp-image-50170"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Most of the forests that are destroyed today are in the tropics, some of the most biodiverse regions on our planet. Why is this happening?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The following chart shows what is driving the ongoing destruction of the world’s largest tropical forest: the Amazon. The expansion of agricultural land to raise cattle is the most important driver, by far.{ref}The land use of different beef production systems varies. A big reason why beef drives so much deforestation in Brazil in particular is that Brazil has very low-density cattle-ranching (very few cows per unit of land). </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>On this point see the following studies:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Feltran-Barbieri, R., & Féres, J. G. (2021) – <a href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201854">Degraded pastures in Brazil: improving livestock production and forest restoration</a>. Royal Society Open Science, 8(7), 201854.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The authors find that “the Brazilian cattle sector has performed far below its biophysical potential. The observed average productivity is 89 kg ha−1 yr−1. However, biocapacity exceeds 172 kg ha−1 yr−1. Despite significant regional heterogeneity in technology adoption and production specialization, extensive and inefficient production systems are unfortunately common in the country.”</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Schmidinger, K., & Stehfest, E. (2012) – <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-012-0434-7">Including CO2 implications of land occupation in LCAs—method and example for livestock products</a>. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(8), 962-972.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>One key finding of this study that is relevant here is that “The highest CO2 implications of land occupation are calculated for beef and lamb, with beef production in Brazil having a missed potential carbon sink more than twice as high as the other GHG emissions.”</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Also see Cederberg, C., Persson, U. M., Neovius, K., Molander, S., & Clift, R. (2011) – <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es103240z">Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>One reason that explains part of the poor performance of beef production in Brazil is that in other cattle agricultural systems – such as in Europe – there are more mixed-dairy herds than in Brazil. So that the environmental impacts per nutritional value of beef production are shared between beef and dairy in these systems. In Brazil, more cattle are exclusively used for beef which means a higher footprint per kilogram of beef.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Finally also see the text <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/carbon-opportunity-costs-food">on carbon opportunity costs</a> by my colleague Hannah Ritchie. The first chart there makes this point well.{/ref} </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>I wish this was more widely understood. Land use for agriculture is the main threat to the world's biodiversity.{ref}Williams, David R., Michael Clark, Graeme M. Buchanan, G. Francesco Ficetola, Carlo Rondinini, and David Tilman (2021) – ‘Proactive Conservation to Prevent Habitat Losses to Agricultural Expansion’. <em>Nature Sustainability</em> 4, no. 4 (April 2021): 314–22.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5"> https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Also see <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/yields-habitat-loss">Hannah Ritchie’s ‘Our World in Data’-essay on this research</a>, with interactive visualizations of the data.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":52290,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/07/Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon.png" alt="" class="wp-image-52290"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Most of the destruction of tropical forests is due to consumers in the region, but <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/exporting-deforestation">about 12% of the deforestation</a> in the tropics is driven by demand from high-income countries. Beef-eaters around the world are contributing to the destruction of the Amazon rainforest.{ref}Most beef produced by Brazil is consumed by people in Brazil. At the time of writing the latest data was for 2018 when about 80% was consumed domestically: <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/global-food?tab=chart&facet=none&Food=Meat%2C+beef&Metric=Exports&Per+Capita=false&country=~BRA">Exports of beef</a> in 2018 were about 2.1 million tonnes; <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/global-food?tab=chart&facet=none&Food=Meat%2C+beef+and+buffalo&Metric=Production&Per+Capita=false&country=~BRA">production of beef</a> was about 10.2 million tonnes.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The data on <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/deforestation-co2-trade-by-product?country=~BRA">Annual CO₂ emissions from deforestation in Brazil by product</a> is also useful to see in this context.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This huge impact of meat consumption on deforestation is also visible in the first chart that showed the history over the last 10 millennia – 31% of the world’s habitable land is now grazing land for livestock. This is an extremely large part of the world; taken together it is <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/land-use">as large as</a> <em>all of the Americas</em>, from Alaska in the North down to Tierra del Fuego in the South.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Meat consumption is such a large driver of deforestation because it is a very inefficient way to produce food. The land use of meat production is <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/food-footprints?facet=none&country=Bananas~Beef+%28beef+herd%29~Beef+%28dairy+herd%29~Cheese~Eggs~Lamb+%26+Mutton~Milk~Maize~Nuts~Pig+Meat~Peas~Potatoes~Poultry+Meat~Rice~Tomatoes~Wheat+%26+Rye~Tofu+%28soybeans%29~Prawns+%28farmed%29&Environmental+impact=Land+use&Metric=Per+1000+kilocalories&By+stage+of+supply+chain=false">much higher</a> than plant-based foods. Reducing meat consumption is therefore a way to increase the agricultural output per land area. A shift away from the land-intensive production of meat, especially beef, would be a major way to make progress and end deforestation. One possible way to get there is to make clear how large the environmental impact of meat production is. Another – complementing – way is to produce meat substitutes that people prefer over beef.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>The end of deforestation?</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>After thousands of years of deforestation is there any hope that it could be different?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Yes. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In fact there are many countries that brought their history of deforestation to an end. Several even turned it around so that forests there are now expanding. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This reversal, from deforestation to reforestation, is called a <em>Forest Transition</em>. The chart shows the data for some of the countries that have achieved this.{ref}<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/forest-area-as-share-of-land-area?tab=chart&time=earliest..latest&facet=entity&uniformYAxis=0&country=England~FRA~Scotland~JPN~USA~CHN~IND~CRI~VNM">Here is the interactive version of this chart</a> in which you can download the data, compare these countries with other countries, and in which you find information on the data sources.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>As mentioned before, while it is the case that several countries have achieved this transition, it is also the case that consumers in these countries contribute to deforestation elsewhere.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":50166,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/forest-transition-countries-small-multiple.png" alt="" class="wp-image-50166"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Crucial for these turnarounds was technological progress that reduced the demand for fuelwood and agricultural land.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>The demand for wood as a source of energy <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/long-term-energy-transitions?country=~FRA">decreased</a> when modern energy sources became available – initially fossil fuels, and more recently renewables and nuclear power.</li><li>The need for more and more agricultural land decreased when existing farmland was used more efficiently – when an increase in food production was achieved by a <em>higher output per area of land</em>.<br>The increased productivity of the land thanks to modern agriculture allowed more and more countries to spare the forests that would otherwise be converted into agricultural land. Innovative modern crops, fertilizers, pesticides and irrigation make this increase of crop yields <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/crop-yields">possible</a>. </li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>These two technological changes can be complemented by effective policies and regulations. Zero-deforestation policies restrict deforestation and programs like <a href="http://www.fao.org/redd/overview/en/">REDD+</a> of the FAO compensate poorer countries and farmers to make forest protection economically more attractive than deforestation.{ref}For an evaluation of such policies (via an RCT) see Jayachandran, Seema, Joost de Laat, Eric F. Lambin, Charlotte Y. Stanton, Robin Audy, and Nancy E. Thomas (2017) – ‘<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568">Cash for Carbon: A Randomized Trial of Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Deforestation’</a>. Science 357, no. 6348 (21 July 2017): 267–73.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568"> https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568</a>{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Can we achieve a Global Forest Transition in our lifetime?</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If we want to protect our planet’s forests the world as a whole would need to achieve what many countries have achieved already, the turnaround from deforestation to reforestation – a global forest transition.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Countries around the world have made the end of deforestation their explicit goal: At COP26 in Glasgow, countries with about 85% of the world’s forests pledged to end deforestation by 2030.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The last chart shows where the world is in this effort. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The brown part of the chart shows the history of the temperate forests. These forests as a whole have achieved the transition: deforestation was high in the past, then peaked in the first half of the 20th century, and from the 1990s onwards temperate forests have expanded in size. Temperate forests are growing back.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The challenge is now to achieve the same in tropical forests, which are shown in green. We are making progress in this direction: the rate of deforestation in the tropics was highest in the 1980s. Since then, the rate of deforestation has declined by a factor of three. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If we can further decrease the demand for fuelwood and agricultural land it seems possible to bring deforestation in the tropics to an end. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If we achieve the global forest transition in our lifetimes it would be a major success for the protection of the world’s biodiversity. Additionally it would bring greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation to an end, and expanding, rather than shrinking, forests would instead suck more carbon out of the atmosphere.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":50165,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Long-term-forests.png" alt="" class="wp-image-50165"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>We can become the first generation that achieves a world in which forests expand</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>How can we bring deforestation to an end? There is no single answer, but, as we have seen, a few big changes can bring this big goal into reach. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>More productive agriculture that allows more production on a smaller land area, a shift away from meat, effective conservation policies, and a shift to modern energy sources: by bringing all of these factors together we could get there. Not only would we save existing forests from being cut down, we might also free up space for forests to grow back. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In our lifetime we have the unprecedented opportunity to bring our long history of deforestation to an end. For the first time in millennia we could achieve a world in which forests expand.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:separator --> <hr class="wp-block-separator"/> <!-- /wp:separator --> <!-- wp:spacer --> <div style="height:100px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div> <!-- /wp:spacer --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong><em>Continue reading on Our World in Data:</em></strong></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Humanity’s relation to other mammals on our planet is in many ways similar to the history told here. Wild mammal populations have declined over the last thousands of years, but we can turn things around and achieve a future in which they flourish.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:owid/prominent-link {"title":"","linkUrl":"https://ourworldindata.org/wild-mammal-decline","className":"is-style-thin"} /--> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Acknowledgements:</strong> I would like to thank my colleague Hannah Ritchie for her helpful comments on this essay.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> | { "id": "wp-50161", "slug": "global-forest-transition", "content": { "toc": [], "body": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world\u2019s largest problems.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "This article draws on data and research discussed in our entry on ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation", "children": [ { "text": "Forests and Deforestation", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "For thousands of years humans have destroyed forests. At the end of the last great ice age, an estimated 57% of the world\u2019s habitable land was forested.{ref}57% of the world\u2019s habitable land was forested and habitable land accounts for 71% of the world\u2019s land surface. This means (0.57*0.71=0.4047) that 40% of the total land surface was forested.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "For more information on the data see see Hannah Ritchie\u2019s Our World in Data article ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/world-lost-one-third-forests", "children": [ { "text": "The world has lost one-third of its forest, but an end of deforestation is possible", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} Since then, people in all regions of the world have burned and cut down forests. The chart shows this. The forested land area declined from 6 to 4 billion hectares. That means our ancestors ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/world-lost-one-third-forests", "children": [ { "text": "destroyed one-third of the former forests", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " \u2013 a forest area twice the size of the US was lost.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There are two big reasons why humans have destroyed forests and continue to do so \u2013 the need for land and the need for wood:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "We need wood for many purposes: as construction material for houses or ships, to turn it into paper, and \u2013 most importantly \u2013 as a source of energy. Burning wood is a major source of energy where there are trees but no modern energy sources available. Still today about half of extracted wood globally is used to produce energy, mostly for cooking and heating ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/energy-poverty-air-pollution", "children": [ { "text": "in poor households", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " that lack alternatives.{ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Today about ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "half", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " of all wood extracted from forests globally is used to produce energy, mostly for cooking and heating.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " See: FAO (2017) \u2013", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.fao.org/3/i6934e/i6934e.pdf", "children": [ { "text": " The Charcoal Transition", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". In", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.fao.org/sustainable-forest-management/toolbox/modules/wood-energy/basic-knowledge/en/?type=111", "children": [ { "text": " FAO \u2013 Wood Energy - Basic Knowledge", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " the authors write \u201cThe annual removal of wood worldwide was estimated at about 3.7 billion m3, of which 1.87 billion m3 was used as fuel.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "children": [ { "text": "On the African continent the reliance on wood as fuel is the single most important driver of forest degradation.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " See: FAO and UNEP. 2020. The State of the World\u2019s Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en", "children": [ { "text": " https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " The same report also reports that an estimated 880 million people worldwide are collecting fuelwood or producing charcoal with it.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "children": [ { "text": "In addition to the destruction of the natural environment, the reliance on fuelwood also contributes between 2 and 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " According to the 2017 FAO publication", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.fao.org/3/i6934e/i6934e.pdf", "children": [ { "text": " The Charcoal Transition", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " the use of firewood and charcoal contributes between 1-2.4 gigatons of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases annually, which is 2-7% of global anthropogenic emissions.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "By far, the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/what-are-drivers-deforestation", "children": [ { "text": "most important driver", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " of the destruction of forests is agriculture. Humanity cuts down forests primarily to make space for fields to grow crops and pastures to raise livestock. We also cut down forests to make space for settlements or mining, but these are small in comparison to farming.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The land use for farming did not only come at the expense of the world\u2019s forests, but also led to the huge decline of the world\u2019s other wild spaces, the shrub- and grasslands. The chart shows this too.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In many countries forests continue to be destroyed. The series of charts shows this. In all of these countries the forest cover today is lower than three decades ago.{ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/forest-area-as-share-of-land-area?tab=chart&time=1990..latest&facet=entity&uniformYAxis=0&country=BRA~IDN~COD~MYS~MDG~COL~ECU~PNG~ZMB~LAO~KHM", "children": [ { "text": "Here is the interactive version of this chart", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " in which you can download the data, compare these countries with other countries, and in which you find information on the data sources.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "deforestation.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Most of the forests that are destroyed today are in the tropics, some of the most biodiverse regions on our planet. Why is this happening?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The following chart shows what is driving the ongoing destruction of the world\u2019s largest tropical forest: the Amazon. The expansion of agricultural land to raise cattle is the most important driver, by far.{ref}The land use of different beef production systems varies. A big reason why beef drives so much deforestation in Brazil in particular is that Brazil has very low-density cattle-ranching (very few cows per unit of land).\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "On this point see the following studies:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Feltran-Barbieri, R., & F\u00e9res, J. G. (2021) \u2013 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201854", "children": [ { "text": "Degraded pastures in Brazil: improving livestock production and forest restoration", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". Royal Society Open Science, 8(7), 201854.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The authors find that \u201cthe Brazilian cattle sector has performed far below its biophysical potential. The observed average productivity is 89 kg ha\u22121 yr\u22121. However, biocapacity exceeds 172 kg ha\u22121 yr\u22121. Despite significant regional heterogeneity in technology adoption and production specialization, extensive and inefficient production systems are unfortunately common in the country.\u201d", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Schmidinger, K., & Stehfest, E. (2012) \u2013 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-012-0434-7", "children": [ { "text": "Including CO2 implications of land occupation in LCAs\u2014method and example for livestock products", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(8), 962-972.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "One key finding of this study that is relevant here is that \u201cThe highest CO2 implications of land occupation are calculated for beef and lamb, with beef production in Brazil having a missed potential carbon sink more than twice as high as the other GHG emissions.\u201d", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Also see Cederberg, C., Persson, U. M., Neovius, K., Molander, S., & Clift, R. (2011) \u2013 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es103240z", "children": [ { "text": "Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "One reason that explains part of the poor performance of beef production in Brazil is that in other cattle agricultural systems \u2013 such as in Europe \u2013 there are more mixed-dairy herds than in Brazil. So that the environmental impacts per nutritional value of beef production are shared between beef and dairy in these systems. In Brazil, more cattle are exclusively used for beef which means a higher footprint per kilogram of beef.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Finally also see the text ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/carbon-opportunity-costs-food", "children": [ { "text": "on carbon opportunity costs", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " by my colleague Hannah Ritchie. The first chart there makes this point well.{/ref}\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "I wish this was more widely understood. Land use for agriculture is the main threat to the world's biodiversity.{ref}Williams, David R., Michael Clark, Graeme M. Buchanan, G. Francesco Ficetola, Carlo Rondinini, and David Tilman (2021) \u2013 \u2018Proactive Conservation to Prevent Habitat Losses to Agricultural Expansion\u2019. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Nature Sustainability", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " 4, no. 4 (April 2021): 314\u201322.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5", "children": [ { "text": " https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Also see ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/yields-habitat-loss", "children": [ { "text": "Hannah Ritchie\u2019s \u2018Our World in Data\u2019-essay on this research", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", with interactive visualizations of the data.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Most of the destruction of tropical forests is due to consumers in the region, but ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/exporting-deforestation", "children": [ { "text": "about 12% of the deforestation", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " in the tropics is driven by demand from high-income countries. Beef-eaters around the world are contributing to the destruction of the Amazon rainforest.{ref}Most beef produced by Brazil is consumed by people in Brazil. At the time of writing the latest data was for 2018 when about 80% was consumed domestically: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/global-food?tab=chart&facet=none&Food=Meat%2C+beef&Metric=Exports&Per+Capita=false&country=~BRA", "children": [ { "text": "Exports of beef", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " in 2018 were\u00a0 about 2.1 million tonnes; ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/global-food?tab=chart&facet=none&Food=Meat%2C+beef+and+buffalo&Metric=Production&Per+Capita=false&country=~BRA", "children": [ { "text": "production of beef", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " was about 10.2 million tonnes.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The data on ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/deforestation-co2-trade-by-product?country=~BRA", "children": [ { "text": "Annual CO\u2082 emissions from deforestation in Brazil by product", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " is also useful to see in this context.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This huge impact of meat consumption on deforestation is also visible in the first chart that showed the history over the last 10 millennia \u2013 31% of the world\u2019s habitable land is now grazing land for livestock. This is an extremely large part of the world; taken together it is ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/land-use", "children": [ { "text": "as large as", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "children": [ { "text": "all of the Americas", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", from Alaska in the North down to Tierra del Fuego in the South.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Meat consumption is such a large driver of deforestation because it is a very inefficient way to produce food. The land use of meat production is ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/food-footprints?facet=none&country=Bananas~Beef+%28beef+herd%29~Beef+%28dairy+herd%29~Cheese~Eggs~Lamb+%26+Mutton~Milk~Maize~Nuts~Pig+Meat~Peas~Potatoes~Poultry+Meat~Rice~Tomatoes~Wheat+%26+Rye~Tofu+%28soybeans%29~Prawns+%28farmed%29&Environmental+impact=Land+use&Metric=Per+1000+kilocalories&By+stage+of+supply+chain=false", "children": [ { "text": "much higher", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " than plant-based foods. Reducing meat consumption is therefore a way to increase the agricultural output per land area. A shift away from the land-intensive production of meat, especially beef, would be a major way to make progress and end deforestation. One possible way to get there is to make clear how large the environmental impact of meat production is. Another \u2013 complementing \u2013 way is to produce meat substitutes that people prefer over beef.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "The end of deforestation?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "After thousands of years of deforestation is there any hope that it could be different?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Yes.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In fact there are many countries that brought their history of deforestation to an end. Several even turned it around so that forests there are now expanding.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This reversal, from deforestation to reforestation, is called a ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Forest Transition", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ". The chart shows the data for some of the countries that have achieved this.{ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/forest-area-as-share-of-land-area?tab=chart&time=earliest..latest&facet=entity&uniformYAxis=0&country=England~FRA~Scotland~JPN~USA~CHN~IND~CRI~VNM", "children": [ { "text": "Here is the interactive version of this chart", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " in which you can download the data, compare these countries with other countries, and in which you find information on the data sources.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "As mentioned before, while it is the case that several countries have achieved this transition, it is also the case that consumers in these countries contribute to deforestation elsewhere.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "forest-transition-countries-small-multiple.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Crucial for these turnarounds was technological progress that reduced the demand for fuelwood and agricultural land.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The demand for wood as a source of energy ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/long-term-energy-transitions?country=~FRA", "children": [ { "text": "decreased", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " when modern energy sources became available \u2013 initially fossil fuels, and more recently renewables and nuclear power.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The need for more and more agricultural land decreased when existing farmland was used more efficiently \u2013 when an increase in food production was achieved by a ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "higher output per area of land", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "The increased productivity of the land thanks to modern agriculture allowed more and more countries to spare the forests that would otherwise be converted into agricultural land. Innovative modern crops, fertilizers, pesticides and irrigation make this increase of crop yields ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/crop-yields", "children": [ { "text": "possible", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "These two technological changes can be complemented by effective policies and regulations. Zero-deforestation policies restrict deforestation and programs like ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.fao.org/redd/overview/en/", "children": [ { "text": "REDD+", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " of the FAO compensate poorer countries and farmers to make forest protection economically more attractive than deforestation.{ref}For an evaluation of such policies (via an RCT) see Jayachandran, Seema, Joost de Laat, Eric F. Lambin, Charlotte Y. Stanton, Robin Audy, and Nancy E. Thomas (2017) \u2013 \u2018", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568", "children": [ { "text": "Cash for Carbon: A Randomized Trial of Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Deforestation\u2019", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". Science 357, no. 6348 (21 July 2017): 267\u201373.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568", "children": [ { "text": " https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Can we achieve a Global Forest Transition in our lifetime?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If we want to protect our planet\u2019s forests the world as a whole would need to achieve what many countries have achieved already, the turnaround from deforestation to reforestation \u2013\u00a0a global forest transition.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Countries around the world have made the end of deforestation their explicit goal: At COP26 in Glasgow, countries with about 85% of the world\u2019s forests pledged to end deforestation by 2030.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The last chart shows where the world is in this effort.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The brown part of the chart shows the history of the temperate forests. These forests as a whole have achieved the transition: deforestation was high in the past, then peaked in the first half of the 20th century, and from the 1990s onwards temperate forests have expanded in size. Temperate forests are growing back.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The challenge is now to achieve the same in tropical forests, which are shown in green. We are making progress in this direction: the rate of deforestation in the tropics was highest in the 1980s. Since then, the rate of deforestation has declined by a factor of three.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If we can further decrease the demand for fuelwood and agricultural land it seems possible to bring deforestation in the tropics to an end.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If we achieve the global forest transition in our lifetimes it would be a major success for the protection of the world\u2019s biodiversity. Additionally it would bring greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation to an end, and expanding, rather than shrinking, forests would instead suck more carbon out of the atmosphere.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Long-term-forests.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "We can become the first generation that achieves a world in which forests expand", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "How can we bring deforestation to an end? There is no single answer, but, as we have seen, a few big changes can bring this big goal into reach.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "More productive agriculture that allows more production on a smaller land area, a shift away from meat, effective conservation policies, and a shift to modern energy sources: by bringing all of these factors together we could get there. Not only would we save existing forests from being cut down, we might also free up space for forests to grow back.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In our lifetime we have the unprecedented opportunity to bring our long history of deforestation to an end. For the first time in millennia we could achieve a world in which forests expand.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Continue reading on Our World in Data:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Humanity\u2019s relation to other mammals on our planet is in many ways similar to the history told here. Wild mammal populations have declined over the last thousands of years, but we can turn things around and achieve a future in which they flourish.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/wild-mammal-decline", "type": "prominent-link", "title": "", "description": "", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Acknowledgements:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " I would like to thank my colleague Hannah Ritchie for her helpful comments on this essay.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "article", "title": "Humans destroyed forests for thousands of years \u2013 we can become the first generation that achieves a world in which forests expand", "authors": [ "Max Roser" ], "excerpt": "Why has humanity destroyed such vast forests? And how can we bring this to an end?", "dateline": "April 20, 2022", "subtitle": "Why has humanity destroyed such vast forests? And how can we bring this to an end?", "sidebar-toc": false, "featured-image": "FEATURED-IMAGE-Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age.png" }, "createdAt": "2022-03-17T11:09:59.000Z", "published": false, "updatedAt": "2022-07-18T10:33:55.000Z", "revisionId": null, "publishedAt": "2022-04-20T10:30:00.000Z", "relatedCharts": [], "publicationContext": "listed" } |
{ "errors": [ { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unhandled html tag found", "details": "Encountered the unhandled tag hr" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag separator" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag spacer" } ], "numBlocks": 53, "numErrors": 11, "wpTagCounts": { "html": 1, "list": 3, "image": 5, "column": 4, "spacer": 1, "columns": 2, "heading": 3, "paragraph": 40, "separator": 1, "owid/prominent-link": 1 }, "htmlTagCounts": { "p": 41, "h3": 1, "h4": 2, "hr": 1, "ul": 3, "div": 8, "figure": 5 } } |
2022-04-20 10:30:00 | 2024-02-16 14:22:53 | 1RKJpoVkdJT8iDdgC8emtovgWlXYfvvTwMh2lnlJPMzg | [ "Max Roser" ] |
Why has humanity destroyed such vast forests? And how can we bring this to an end? | 2022-03-17 11:09:59 | 2022-07-18 10:33:55 | https://ourworldindata.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/FEATURED-IMAGE-Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age.png | {} |
Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world’s largest problems. This article draws on data and research discussed in our entry on **[Forests and Deforestation](https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation)**. For thousands of years humans have destroyed forests. At the end of the last great ice age, an estimated 57% of the world’s habitable land was forested.{ref}57% of the world’s habitable land was forested and habitable land accounts for 71% of the world’s land surface. This means (0.57*0.71=0.4047) that 40% of the total land surface was forested. For more information on the data see see Hannah Ritchie’s Our World in Data article [The world has lost one-third of its forest, but an end of deforestation is possible](https://ourworldindata.org/world-lost-one-third-forests).{/ref} Since then, people in all regions of the world have burned and cut down forests. The chart shows this. The forested land area declined from 6 to 4 billion hectares. That means our ancestors [destroyed one-third of the former forests](https://ourworldindata.org/world-lost-one-third-forests) – a forest area twice the size of the US was lost. There are two big reasons why humans have destroyed forests and continue to do so – the need for land and the need for wood: * We need wood for many purposes: as construction material for houses or ships, to turn it into paper, and – most importantly – as a source of energy. Burning wood is a major source of energy where there are trees but no modern energy sources available. Still today about half of extracted wood globally is used to produce energy, mostly for cooking and heating [in poor households](https://ourworldindata.org/energy-poverty-air-pollution) that lack alternatives.{ref}**Today about _half_ of all wood extracted from forests globally is used to produce energy, mostly for cooking and heating.** See: FAO (2017) –[ The Charcoal Transition](http://www.fao.org/3/i6934e/i6934e.pdf). In[ FAO – Wood Energy - Basic Knowledge](http://www.fao.org/sustainable-forest-management/toolbox/modules/wood-energy/basic-knowledge/en/?type=111) the authors write “The annual removal of wood worldwide was estimated at about 3.7 billion m3, of which 1.87 billion m3 was used as fuel. **On the African continent the reliance on wood as fuel is the single most important driver of forest degradation.** See: FAO and UNEP. 2020. The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome.[ https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en](https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en) The same report also reports that an estimated 880 million people worldwide are collecting fuelwood or producing charcoal with it. **In addition to the destruction of the natural environment, the reliance on fuelwood also contributes between 2 and 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions.** According to the 2017 FAO publication[ The Charcoal Transition](http://www.fao.org/3/i6934e/i6934e.pdf) the use of firewood and charcoal contributes between 1-2.4 gigatons of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases annually, which is 2-7% of global anthropogenic emissions.{/ref} * By far, the [most important driver](https://ourworldindata.org/what-are-drivers-deforestation) of the destruction of forests is agriculture. Humanity cuts down forests primarily to make space for fields to grow crops and pastures to raise livestock. We also cut down forests to make space for settlements or mining, but these are small in comparison to farming. The land use for farming did not only come at the expense of the world’s forests, but also led to the huge decline of the world’s other wild spaces, the shrub- and grasslands. The chart shows this too. <Image filename="Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age.png" alt=""/> In many countries forests continue to be destroyed. The series of charts shows this. In all of these countries the forest cover today is lower than three decades ago.{ref}[Here is the interactive version of this chart](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/forest-area-as-share-of-land-area?tab=chart&time=1990..latest&facet=entity&uniformYAxis=0&country=BRA~IDN~COD~MYS~MDG~COL~ECU~PNG~ZMB~LAO~KHM) in which you can download the data, compare these countries with other countries, and in which you find information on the data sources.{/ref} <Image filename="deforestation.png" alt=""/> Most of the forests that are destroyed today are in the tropics, some of the most biodiverse regions on our planet. Why is this happening? The following chart shows what is driving the ongoing destruction of the world’s largest tropical forest: the Amazon. The expansion of agricultural land to raise cattle is the most important driver, by far.{ref}The land use of different beef production systems varies. A big reason why beef drives so much deforestation in Brazil in particular is that Brazil has very low-density cattle-ranching (very few cows per unit of land). On this point see the following studies: Feltran-Barbieri, R., & Féres, J. G. (2021) – [Degraded pastures in Brazil: improving livestock production and forest restoration](https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201854). Royal Society Open Science, 8(7), 201854. The authors find that “the Brazilian cattle sector has performed far below its biophysical potential. The observed average productivity is 89 kg ha−1 yr−1. However, biocapacity exceeds 172 kg ha−1 yr−1. Despite significant regional heterogeneity in technology adoption and production specialization, extensive and inefficient production systems are unfortunately common in the country.” Schmidinger, K., & Stehfest, E. (2012) – [Including CO2 implications of land occupation in LCAs—method and example for livestock products](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-012-0434-7). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(8), 962-972. One key finding of this study that is relevant here is that “The highest CO2 implications of land occupation are calculated for beef and lamb, with beef production in Brazil having a missed potential carbon sink more than twice as high as the other GHG emissions.” Also see Cederberg, C., Persson, U. M., Neovius, K., Molander, S., & Clift, R. (2011) – [Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es103240z). One reason that explains part of the poor performance of beef production in Brazil is that in other cattle agricultural systems – such as in Europe – there are more mixed-dairy herds than in Brazil. So that the environmental impacts per nutritional value of beef production are shared between beef and dairy in these systems. In Brazil, more cattle are exclusively used for beef which means a higher footprint per kilogram of beef. Finally also see the text [on carbon opportunity costs](https://ourworldindata.org/carbon-opportunity-costs-food) by my colleague Hannah Ritchie. The first chart there makes this point well.{/ref} I wish this was more widely understood. Land use for agriculture is the main threat to the world's biodiversity.{ref}Williams, David R., Michael Clark, Graeme M. Buchanan, G. Francesco Ficetola, Carlo Rondinini, and David Tilman (2021) – ‘Proactive Conservation to Prevent Habitat Losses to Agricultural Expansion’. _Nature Sustainability_ 4, no. 4 (April 2021): 314–22.[ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5). Also see [Hannah Ritchie’s ‘Our World in Data’-essay on this research](https://ourworldindata.org/yields-habitat-loss), with interactive visualizations of the data.{/ref} <Image filename="Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon.png" alt=""/> Most of the destruction of tropical forests is due to consumers in the region, but [about 12% of the deforestation](https://ourworldindata.org/exporting-deforestation) in the tropics is driven by demand from high-income countries. Beef-eaters around the world are contributing to the destruction of the Amazon rainforest.{ref}Most beef produced by Brazil is consumed by people in Brazil. At the time of writing the latest data was for 2018 when about 80% was consumed domestically: [Exports of beef](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/global-food?tab=chart&facet=none&Food=Meat%2C+beef&Metric=Exports&Per+Capita=false&country=~BRA) in 2018 were about 2.1 million tonnes; [production of beef](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/global-food?tab=chart&facet=none&Food=Meat%2C+beef+and+buffalo&Metric=Production&Per+Capita=false&country=~BRA) was about 10.2 million tonnes. The data on [Annual CO₂ emissions from deforestation in Brazil by product](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/deforestation-co2-trade-by-product?country=~BRA) is also useful to see in this context.{/ref} This huge impact of meat consumption on deforestation is also visible in the first chart that showed the history over the last 10 millennia – 31% of the world’s habitable land is now grazing land for livestock. This is an extremely large part of the world; taken together it is [as large as](https://ourworldindata.org/land-use)_all of the Americas_, from Alaska in the North down to Tierra del Fuego in the South. Meat consumption is such a large driver of deforestation because it is a very inefficient way to produce food. The land use of meat production is [much higher](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/food-footprints?facet=none&country=Bananas~Beef+%28beef+herd%29~Beef+%28dairy+herd%29~Cheese~Eggs~Lamb+%26+Mutton~Milk~Maize~Nuts~Pig+Meat~Peas~Potatoes~Poultry+Meat~Rice~Tomatoes~Wheat+%26+Rye~Tofu+%28soybeans%29~Prawns+%28farmed%29&Environmental+impact=Land+use&Metric=Per+1000+kilocalories&By+stage+of+supply+chain=false) than plant-based foods. Reducing meat consumption is therefore a way to increase the agricultural output per land area. A shift away from the land-intensive production of meat, especially beef, would be a major way to make progress and end deforestation. One possible way to get there is to make clear how large the environmental impact of meat production is. Another – complementing – way is to produce meat substitutes that people prefer over beef. ## The end of deforestation? After thousands of years of deforestation is there any hope that it could be different? Yes. In fact there are many countries that brought their history of deforestation to an end. Several even turned it around so that forests there are now expanding. This reversal, from deforestation to reforestation, is called a _Forest Transition_. The chart shows the data for some of the countries that have achieved this.{ref}[Here is the interactive version of this chart](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/forest-area-as-share-of-land-area?tab=chart&time=earliest..latest&facet=entity&uniformYAxis=0&country=England~FRA~Scotland~JPN~USA~CHN~IND~CRI~VNM) in which you can download the data, compare these countries with other countries, and in which you find information on the data sources.{/ref} As mentioned before, while it is the case that several countries have achieved this transition, it is also the case that consumers in these countries contribute to deforestation elsewhere. <Image filename="forest-transition-countries-small-multiple.png" alt=""/> Crucial for these turnarounds was technological progress that reduced the demand for fuelwood and agricultural land. * The demand for wood as a source of energy [decreased](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/long-term-energy-transitions?country=~FRA) when modern energy sources became available – initially fossil fuels, and more recently renewables and nuclear power. * The need for more and more agricultural land decreased when existing farmland was used more efficiently – when an increase in food production was achieved by a _higher output per area of land_. The increased productivity of the land thanks to modern agriculture allowed more and more countries to spare the forests that would otherwise be converted into agricultural land. Innovative modern crops, fertilizers, pesticides and irrigation make this increase of crop yields [possible](https://ourworldindata.org/crop-yields). These two technological changes can be complemented by effective policies and regulations. Zero-deforestation policies restrict deforestation and programs like [REDD+](http://www.fao.org/redd/overview/en/) of the FAO compensate poorer countries and farmers to make forest protection economically more attractive than deforestation.{ref}For an evaluation of such policies (via an RCT) see Jayachandran, Seema, Joost de Laat, Eric F. Lambin, Charlotte Y. Stanton, Robin Audy, and Nancy E. Thomas (2017) – ‘[Cash for Carbon: A Randomized Trial of Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Deforestation’](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568). Science 357, no. 6348 (21 July 2017): 267–73.[ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568){/ref} ### Can we achieve a Global Forest Transition in our lifetime? If we want to protect our planet’s forests the world as a whole would need to achieve what many countries have achieved already, the turnaround from deforestation to reforestation – a global forest transition. Countries around the world have made the end of deforestation their explicit goal: At COP26 in Glasgow, countries with about 85% of the world’s forests pledged to end deforestation by 2030. The last chart shows where the world is in this effort. The brown part of the chart shows the history of the temperate forests. These forests as a whole have achieved the transition: deforestation was high in the past, then peaked in the first half of the 20th century, and from the 1990s onwards temperate forests have expanded in size. Temperate forests are growing back. The challenge is now to achieve the same in tropical forests, which are shown in green. We are making progress in this direction: the rate of deforestation in the tropics was highest in the 1980s. Since then, the rate of deforestation has declined by a factor of three. If we can further decrease the demand for fuelwood and agricultural land it seems possible to bring deforestation in the tropics to an end. If we achieve the global forest transition in our lifetimes it would be a major success for the protection of the world’s biodiversity. Additionally it would bring greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation to an end, and expanding, rather than shrinking, forests would instead suck more carbon out of the atmosphere. <Image filename="Long-term-forests.png" alt=""/> ### We can become the first generation that achieves a world in which forests expand How can we bring deforestation to an end? There is no single answer, but, as we have seen, a few big changes can bring this big goal into reach. More productive agriculture that allows more production on a smaller land area, a shift away from meat, effective conservation policies, and a shift to modern energy sources: by bringing all of these factors together we could get there. Not only would we save existing forests from being cut down, we might also free up space for forests to grow back. In our lifetime we have the unprecedented opportunity to bring our long history of deforestation to an end. For the first time in millennia we could achieve a world in which forests expand. **_Continue reading on Our World in Data:_** Humanity’s relation to other mammals on our planet is in many ways similar to the history told here. Wild mammal populations have declined over the last thousands of years, but we can turn things around and achieve a future in which they flourish. ### https://ourworldindata.org/wild-mammal-decline **Acknowledgements:** I would like to thank my colleague Hannah Ritchie for her helpful comments on this essay. | { "id": 50161, "date": "2022-04-20T11:30:00", "guid": { "rendered": "https://owid.cloud/?p=50161" }, "link": "https://owid.cloud/global-forest-transition", "meta": { "owid_publication_context_meta_field": { "latest": true, "homepage": true, "immediate_newsletter": true } }, "slug": "global-forest-transition", "tags": [], "type": "post", "title": { "rendered": "Humans destroyed forests for thousands of years \u2013 we can become the first generation that achieves a world in which forests expand" }, "_links": { "self": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/50161" } ], "about": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/types/post" } ], "author": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/users/2", "embeddable": true } ], "curies": [ { "href": "https://api.w.org/{rel}", "name": "wp", "templated": true } ], "replies": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/comments?post=50161", "embeddable": true } ], "wp:term": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/categories?post=50161", "taxonomy": "category", "embeddable": true }, { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/tags?post=50161", "taxonomy": "post_tag", "embeddable": true } ], "collection": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts" } ], "wp:attachment": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/media?parent=50161" } ], "version-history": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/50161/revisions", "count": 11 } ], "wp:featuredmedia": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/media/50164", "embeddable": true } ], "predecessor-version": [ { "id": 52291, "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/50161/revisions/52291" } ] }, "author": 2, "format": "standard", "status": "publish", "sticky": false, "content": { "rendered": "\n<div class=\"blog-info\">\n<p>Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world\u2019s largest problems.<br>This article draws on data and research discussed in our entry on <strong><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Forests and Deforestation</a></strong>.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>For thousands of years humans have destroyed forests. At the end of the last great ice age, an estimated 57% of the world\u2019s habitable land was forested.{ref}57% of the world\u2019s habitable land was forested and habitable land accounts for 71% of the world\u2019s land surface. This means (0.57*0.71=0.4047) that 40% of the total land surface was forested.<br>For more information on the data see see Hannah Ritchie\u2019s Our World in Data article <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/world-lost-one-third-forests\">The world has lost one-third of its forest, but an end of deforestation is possible</a>.{/ref} Since then, people in all regions of the world have burned and cut down forests. The chart shows this. The forested land area declined from 6 to 4 billion hectares. That means our ancestors <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/world-lost-one-third-forests\">destroyed one-third of the former forests</a> \u2013 a forest area twice the size of the US was lost. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are two big reasons why humans have destroyed forests and continue to do so \u2013 the need for land and the need for wood:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>We need wood for many purposes: as construction material for houses or ships, to turn it into paper, and \u2013 most importantly \u2013 as a source of energy. Burning wood is a major source of energy where there are trees but no modern energy sources available. Still today about half of extracted wood globally is used to produce energy, mostly for cooking and heating <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/energy-poverty-air-pollution\">in poor households</a> that lack alternatives.{ref}<strong>Today about <em>half</em> of all wood extracted from forests globally is used to produce energy, mostly for cooking and heating.</strong> See: FAO (2017) \u2013<a href=\"http://www.fao.org/3/i6934e/i6934e.pdf\"> The Charcoal Transition</a>. In<a href=\"http://www.fao.org/sustainable-forest-management/toolbox/modules/wood-energy/basic-knowledge/en/?type=111\"> FAO \u2013 Wood Energy – Basic Knowledge</a> the authors write \u201cThe annual removal of wood worldwide was estimated at about 3.7 billion m3, of which 1.87 billion m3 was used as fuel.<br><br><strong>On the African continent the reliance on wood as fuel is the single most important driver of forest degradation.</strong> See: FAO and UNEP. 2020. The State of the World\u2019s Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome.<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en\"> https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en</a> The same report also reports that an estimated 880 million people worldwide are collecting fuelwood or producing charcoal with it.<br><br><strong>In addition to the destruction of the natural environment, the reliance on fuelwood also contributes between 2 and 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions.</strong> According to the 2017 FAO publication<a href=\"http://www.fao.org/3/i6934e/i6934e.pdf\"> The Charcoal Transition</a> the use of firewood and charcoal contributes between 1-2.4 gigatons of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases annually, which is 2-7% of global anthropogenic emissions.{/ref}</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>By far, the <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/what-are-drivers-deforestation\">most important driver</a> of the destruction of forests is agriculture. Humanity cuts down forests primarily to make space for fields to grow crops and pastures to raise livestock. We also cut down forests to make space for settlements or mining, but these are small in comparison to farming. </li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The land use for farming did not only come at the expense of the world\u2019s forests, but also led to the huge decline of the world\u2019s other wild spaces, the shrub- and grasslands. The chart shows this too.</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"3618\" height=\"2066\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-50169\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age.png 3618w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age-400x228.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age-800x457.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age-150x86.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age-768x439.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age-1536x877.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age-2048x1169.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 3618px) 100vw, 3618px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>In many countries forests continue to be destroyed. The series of charts shows this. In all of these countries the forest cover today is lower than three decades ago.{ref}<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/forest-area-as-share-of-land-area?tab=chart&time=1990..latest&facet=entity&uniformYAxis=0&country=BRA~IDN~COD~MYS~MDG~COL~ECU~PNG~ZMB~LAO~KHM\">Here is the interactive version of this chart</a> in which you can download the data, compare these countries with other countries, and in which you find information on the data sources.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"8095\" height=\"1176\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/deforestation.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-50170\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/deforestation.png 8095w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/deforestation-400x58.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/deforestation-800x116.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/deforestation-150x22.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/deforestation-768x112.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/deforestation-1536x223.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/deforestation-2048x298.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 8095px) 100vw, 8095px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Most of the forests that are destroyed today are in the tropics, some of the most biodiverse regions on our planet. Why is this happening?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The following chart shows what is driving the ongoing destruction of the world\u2019s largest tropical forest: the Amazon. The expansion of agricultural land to raise cattle is the most important driver, by far.{ref}The land use of different beef production systems varies. A big reason why beef drives so much deforestation in Brazil in particular is that Brazil has very low-density cattle-ranching (very few cows per unit of land). </p>\n\n\n\n<p>On this point see the following studies:</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Feltran-Barbieri, R., & F\u00e9res, J. G. (2021) \u2013 <a href=\"https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201854\">Degraded pastures in Brazil: improving livestock production and forest restoration</a>. Royal Society Open Science, 8(7), 201854.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The authors find that \u201cthe Brazilian cattle sector has performed far below its biophysical potential. The observed average productivity is 89 kg ha\u22121 yr\u22121. However, biocapacity exceeds 172 kg ha\u22121 yr\u22121. Despite significant regional heterogeneity in technology adoption and production specialization, extensive and inefficient production systems are unfortunately common in the country.\u201d</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Schmidinger, K., & Stehfest, E. (2012) \u2013 <a href=\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-012-0434-7\">Including CO2 implications of land occupation in LCAs\u2014method and example for livestock products</a>. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(8), 962-972.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>One key finding of this study that is relevant here is that \u201cThe highest CO2 implications of land occupation are calculated for beef and lamb, with beef production in Brazil having a missed potential carbon sink more than twice as high as the other GHG emissions.\u201d</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Also see Cederberg, C., Persson, U. M., Neovius, K., Molander, S., & Clift, R. (2011) \u2013 <a href=\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es103240z\">Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>One reason that explains part of the poor performance of beef production in Brazil is that in other cattle agricultural systems \u2013 such as in Europe \u2013 there are more mixed-dairy herds than in Brazil. So that the environmental impacts per nutritional value of beef production are shared between beef and dairy in these systems. In Brazil, more cattle are exclusively used for beef which means a higher footprint per kilogram of beef.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Finally also see the text <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/carbon-opportunity-costs-food\">on carbon opportunity costs</a> by my colleague Hannah Ritchie. The first chart there makes this point well.{/ref} </p>\n\n\n\n<p>I wish this was more widely understood. Land use for agriculture is the main threat to the world’s biodiversity.{ref}Williams, David R., Michael Clark, Graeme M. Buchanan, G. Francesco Ficetola, Carlo Rondinini, and David Tilman (2021) \u2013 \u2018Proactive Conservation to Prevent Habitat Losses to Agricultural Expansion\u2019. <em>Nature Sustainability</em> 4, no. 4 (April 2021): 314\u201322.<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5\"> https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00656-5</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Also see <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/yields-habitat-loss\">Hannah Ritchie\u2019s \u2018Our World in Data\u2019-essay on this research</a>, with interactive visualizations of the data.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"2763\" height=\"854\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/07/Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-52290\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/07/Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon.png 2763w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/07/Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon-400x124.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/07/Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon-800x247.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/07/Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon-150x46.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/07/Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon-768x237.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/07/Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon-1536x475.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/07/Drivers-of-forest-loss-in-the-Brazilean-Amazon-2048x633.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 2763px) 100vw, 2763px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Most of the destruction of tropical forests is due to consumers in the region, but <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/exporting-deforestation\">about 12% of the deforestation</a> in the tropics is driven by demand from high-income countries. Beef-eaters around the world are contributing to the destruction of the Amazon rainforest.{ref}Most beef produced by Brazil is consumed by people in Brazil. At the time of writing the latest data was for 2018 when about 80% was consumed domestically: <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/global-food?tab=chart&facet=none&Food=Meat%2C+beef&Metric=Exports&Per+Capita=false&country=~BRA\">Exports of beef</a> in 2018 were about 2.1 million tonnes; <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/global-food?tab=chart&facet=none&Food=Meat%2C+beef+and+buffalo&Metric=Production&Per+Capita=false&country=~BRA\">production of beef</a> was about 10.2 million tonnes.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The data on <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/deforestation-co2-trade-by-product?country=~BRA\">Annual CO\u2082 emissions from deforestation in Brazil by product</a> is also useful to see in this context.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This huge impact of meat consumption on deforestation is also visible in the first chart that showed the history over the last 10 millennia \u2013 31% of the world\u2019s habitable land is now grazing land for livestock. This is an extremely large part of the world; taken together it is <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/land-use\">as large as</a> <em>all of the Americas</em>, from Alaska in the North down to Tierra del Fuego in the South.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Meat consumption is such a large driver of deforestation because it is a very inefficient way to produce food. The land use of meat production is <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/food-footprints?facet=none&country=Bananas~Beef+%28beef+herd%29~Beef+%28dairy+herd%29~Cheese~Eggs~Lamb+%26+Mutton~Milk~Maize~Nuts~Pig+Meat~Peas~Potatoes~Poultry+Meat~Rice~Tomatoes~Wheat+%26+Rye~Tofu+%28soybeans%29~Prawns+%28farmed%29&Environmental+impact=Land+use&Metric=Per+1000+kilocalories&By+stage+of+supply+chain=false\">much higher</a> than plant-based foods. Reducing meat consumption is therefore a way to increase the agricultural output per land area. A shift away from the land-intensive production of meat, especially beef, would be a major way to make progress and end deforestation. One possible way to get there is to make clear how large the environmental impact of meat production is. Another \u2013 complementing \u2013 way is to produce meat substitutes that people prefer over beef.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\"></div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h3>The end of deforestation?</h3>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>After thousands of years of deforestation is there any hope that it could be different?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yes. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>In fact there are many countries that brought their history of deforestation to an end. Several even turned it around so that forests there are now expanding. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>This reversal, from deforestation to reforestation, is called a <em>Forest Transition</em>. The chart shows the data for some of the countries that have achieved this.{ref}<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/forest-area-as-share-of-land-area?tab=chart&time=earliest..latest&facet=entity&uniformYAxis=0&country=England~FRA~Scotland~JPN~USA~CHN~IND~CRI~VNM\">Here is the interactive version of this chart</a> in which you can download the data, compare these countries with other countries, and in which you find information on the data sources.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>As mentioned before, while it is the case that several countries have achieved this transition, it is also the case that consumers in these countries contribute to deforestation elsewhere.</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"8095\" height=\"1225\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/forest-transition-countries-small-multiple.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-50166\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/forest-transition-countries-small-multiple.png 8095w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/forest-transition-countries-small-multiple-400x61.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/forest-transition-countries-small-multiple-800x121.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/forest-transition-countries-small-multiple-150x23.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/forest-transition-countries-small-multiple-768x116.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/forest-transition-countries-small-multiple-1536x232.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/forest-transition-countries-small-multiple-2048x310.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 8095px) 100vw, 8095px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Crucial for these turnarounds was technological progress that reduced the demand for fuelwood and agricultural land.</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The demand for wood as a source of energy <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/long-term-energy-transitions?country=~FRA\">decreased</a> when modern energy sources became available \u2013 initially fossil fuels, and more recently renewables and nuclear power.</li><li>The need for more and more agricultural land decreased when existing farmland was used more efficiently \u2013 when an increase in food production was achieved by a <em>higher output per area of land</em>.<br>The increased productivity of the land thanks to modern agriculture allowed more and more countries to spare the forests that would otherwise be converted into agricultural land. Innovative modern crops, fertilizers, pesticides and irrigation make this increase of crop yields <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/crop-yields\">possible</a>. </li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>These two technological changes can be complemented by effective policies and regulations. Zero-deforestation policies restrict deforestation and programs like <a href=\"http://www.fao.org/redd/overview/en/\">REDD+</a> of the FAO compensate poorer countries and farmers to make forest protection economically more attractive than deforestation.{ref}For an evaluation of such policies (via an RCT) see Jayachandran, Seema, Joost de Laat, Eric F. Lambin, Charlotte Y. Stanton, Robin Audy, and Nancy E. Thomas (2017) \u2013 \u2018<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568\">Cash for Carbon: A Randomized Trial of Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Deforestation\u2019</a>. Science 357, no. 6348 (21 July 2017): 267\u201373.<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568\"> https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568</a>{/ref}</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\"></div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h4>Can we achieve a Global Forest Transition in our lifetime?</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>If we want to protect our planet\u2019s forests the world as a whole would need to achieve what many countries have achieved already, the turnaround from deforestation to reforestation \u2013 a global forest transition.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Countries around the world have made the end of deforestation their explicit goal: At COP26 in Glasgow, countries with about 85% of the world\u2019s forests pledged to end deforestation by 2030.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The last chart shows where the world is in this effort. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>The brown part of the chart shows the history of the temperate forests. These forests as a whole have achieved the transition: deforestation was high in the past, then peaked in the first half of the 20th century, and from the 1990s onwards temperate forests have expanded in size. Temperate forests are growing back.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The challenge is now to achieve the same in tropical forests, which are shown in green. We are making progress in this direction: the rate of deforestation in the tropics was highest in the 1980s. Since then, the rate of deforestation has declined by a factor of three. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>If we can further decrease the demand for fuelwood and agricultural land it seems possible to bring deforestation in the tropics to an end. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>If we achieve the global forest transition in our lifetimes it would be a major success for the protection of the world\u2019s biodiversity. Additionally it would bring greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation to an end, and expanding, rather than shrinking, forests would instead suck more carbon out of the atmosphere.</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"3083\" height=\"1703\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Long-term-forests.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-50165\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Long-term-forests.png 3083w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Long-term-forests-400x221.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Long-term-forests-800x442.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Long-term-forests-150x83.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Long-term-forests-768x424.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Long-term-forests-1536x848.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2022/03/Long-term-forests-2048x1131.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 3083px) 100vw, 3083px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<h4>We can become the first generation that achieves a world in which forests expand</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>How can we bring deforestation to an end? There is no single answer, but, as we have seen, a few big changes can bring this big goal into reach. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>More productive agriculture that allows more production on a smaller land area, a shift away from meat, effective conservation policies, and a shift to modern energy sources: by bringing all of these factors together we could get there. Not only would we save existing forests from being cut down, we might also free up space for forests to grow back. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>In our lifetime we have the unprecedented opportunity to bring our long history of deforestation to an end. For the first time in millennia we could achieve a world in which forests expand.</p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"/>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:100px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"></div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Continue reading on Our World in Data:</em></strong></p>\n\n\n\n<p>Humanity\u2019s relation to other mammals on our planet is in many ways similar to the history told here. Wild mammal populations have declined over the last thousands of years, but we can turn things around and achieve a future in which they flourish.</p>\n\n\n <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/wild-mammal-decline</link-url>\n <title></title>\n <content></content>\n <figure></figure>\n </block>\n\n\n<p><strong>Acknowledgements:</strong> I would like to thank my colleague Hannah Ritchie for her helpful comments on this essay.</p>\n", "protected": false }, "excerpt": { "rendered": "Why has humanity destroyed such vast forests? And how can we bring this to an end?", "protected": false }, "date_gmt": "2022-04-20T10:30:00", "modified": "2022-07-18T11:33:55", "template": "", "categories": [ 1 ], "ping_status": "closed", "authors_name": [ "Max Roser" ], "modified_gmt": "2022-07-18T10:33:55", "comment_status": "closed", "featured_media": 50164, "featured_media_paths": { "thumbnail": "/app/uploads/2022/03/FEATURED-IMAGE-Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age-150x89.png", "medium_large": "/app/uploads/2022/03/FEATURED-IMAGE-Global-forest-loss-since-ice-age-768x458.png" } } |