posts: 41923
Data license: CC-BY
This data as json
id | title | slug | type | status | content | archieml | archieml_update_statistics | published_at | updated_at | gdocSuccessorId | authors | excerpt | created_at_in_wordpress | updated_at_in_wordpress | featured_image | formattingOptions | markdown | wpApiSnapshot |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
41923 | Where are mammals most threatened? | untitled-reusable-block-262 | wp_block | publish | <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>One-quarter of mammal species <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-threatened-species">are threatened</a> with extinction. Indonesia is home to nearly 200 of these species. In contrast, Sweden has only one, and Finland only two at risk.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If we’re to protect and conserve the world’s mammals from extinction we first need to know where they’re most threatened.<br><br>In our <strong>related post</strong> we saw how the diversity of mammal species varies across the world, and where the biodiversity hotspots are. But does this also reflect where mammals are most under threat?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Where are <strong>endemic</strong> mammal species at risk of extinction?</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In the map we see the number of endemic mammal species which are threatened with extinction in the wild.{ref}Species are defined as ‘threatened’ if they’re classified as Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable on the <a href="https://www.iucnredlist.org/">IUCN Red List</a>.{/ref} It looks very similar to the <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/endemic-mammal-species-by-country">map of endemic species</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Indonesia has the most endemic mammals threatened with extinction: 132 species. This means 45% – nearly half – are under threat.{ref}The map presents threatened species in <em>absolute</em> numbers. Some may argue that they should instead be presented in relative terms i.e. the percentage of species which are threatened. After all, reporting absolute numbers tends to make countries with a larger number of endemic species look worse: countries with more endemics tend to have more threatened endemics. We should be aware of this. But here I think absolute numbers provide the more useful metric: if we want to protect and prevent the world’s mammals from going extinct, we need to know where the largest number are threatened and why. To do this, we need absolute numbers.{/ref} Madagascar is second on the list, with 129 (61%) species threatened. Australia – despite having the second largest number of endemic mammals – has much fewer at risk: with 54 endemics (1-in-5) at risk of extinction.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Mexico, Brazil and India also have more than 25 threatened endemic species.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/threatened-endemic-mammal-species" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Where are <strong>total</strong> mammal species at risk of extinction?</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>It makes sense to be most concerned about endemic species, or those with a very small geographical range. Once they are lost from these specific areas, they are lost forever. But of course that doesn’t mean we should ignore non-endemic species. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In this map you can explore the total number (endemic and non-endemic) of mammal species threatened in each country. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The broad picture is very similar to that of endemic species. The countries with the greatest total number of threatened mammals are (in order): Indonesia, Madagascar, India, Mexico, and Brazil. Again, Europe has relatively low numbers of threatened mammal species; Sweden has only one, and Finland only two. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Almost all countries have one or more mammal species at risk.{ref}There are not many countries where no mammals are threatened with extinction. The IUCN Red List reports some, most are very small or island states: Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Aland Islands, Macao, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Jersey, San Marino, French Polynesia, Pitcairn, Tokelau, United States Minor Outlying Islands, and Wallis and Futuna.{/ref} But, there are large differences in the number and level of threat across the world. If our aim is to protect as many mammals as possible, it’s essential that we know where the largest numbers are threatened.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>What’s consistent regardless of whether it’s endemic or non-endemic species, is that the conservation story is very much focused on the tropics. They are the richest in biodiversity, but also where the threats are most severe. As we looked at in a related article, the main pressures on mammals – particularly larger ones – is poaching animals for meat and body parts, and the expansion of agriculture. These environmental pressures are most strongly felt in the tropics: it’s where 95% of deforestation occurs, and is home for the most lucrative animals for illegal wildlife trade. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Understanding where and why this is happening is crucial to save these species, before it’s too late.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/threatened-mammal-species" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> | { "id": "wp-41923", "slug": "untitled-reusable-block-262", "content": { "toc": [], "body": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "One-quarter of mammal species ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-threatened-species", "children": [ { "text": "are threatened", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " with extinction. Indonesia is home to nearly 200 of these species. In contrast, Sweden has only one, and Finland only two at risk.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If we\u2019re to protect and conserve the world\u2019s mammals from extinction we first need to know where they\u2019re most threatened.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "In our ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "related post", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " we saw how the diversity of mammal species varies across the world, and where the biodiversity hotspots are. But does this also reflect where mammals are most under threat?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Where are ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "endemic", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " mammal species at risk of extinction?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In the map we see the number of endemic mammal species which are threatened with extinction in the wild.{ref}Species are defined as \u2018threatened\u2019 if they\u2019re classified as Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable on the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.iucnredlist.org/", "children": [ { "text": "IUCN Red List", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} It looks very similar to the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/endemic-mammal-species-by-country", "children": [ { "text": "map of endemic species", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Indonesia has the most endemic mammals threatened with extinction: 132 species. This means 45% \u2013 nearly half \u2013 are under threat.{ref}The map presents threatened species in ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "absolute", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " numbers. Some may argue that they should instead be presented in relative terms i.e. the percentage of species which are threatened. After all, reporting absolute numbers tends to make countries with a larger number of endemic species look worse: countries with more endemics tend to have more threatened endemics. We should be aware of this. But here I think absolute numbers provide the more useful metric: if we want to protect and prevent the world\u2019s mammals from going extinct, we need to know where the largest number are threatened and why. To do this, we need absolute numbers.{/ref} Madagascar is second on the list, with 129 (61%) species threatened. Australia \u2013 despite having the second largest number of endemic mammals \u2013 has much fewer at risk: with 54 endemics (1-in-5) at risk of extinction.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Mexico, Brazil and India also have more than 25 threatened endemic species.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/threatened-endemic-mammal-species", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Where are ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "total", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " mammal species at risk of extinction?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "It makes sense to be most concerned about endemic species, or those with a very small geographical range. Once they are lost from these specific areas, they are lost forever. But of\u00a0 course that doesn\u2019t mean we should ignore non-endemic species.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In this map you can explore the total number (endemic and non-endemic) of mammal species threatened in each country.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The broad picture is very similar to that of endemic species. The countries with the greatest total number of threatened mammals are (in order): Indonesia, Madagascar, India, Mexico, and Brazil. Again, Europe has relatively low numbers of threatened mammal species; Sweden has only one, and Finland only two.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Almost all countries have one or more mammal species at risk.{ref}There are not many countries where no mammals are threatened with extinction. The IUCN Red List reports some, most are very small or island states: Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Aland Islands, Macao, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Jersey, San Marino, French Polynesia, Pitcairn, Tokelau, United States Minor Outlying Islands, and Wallis and Futuna.{/ref} But, there are large differences in the number and level of threat across the world. If our aim is to protect as many mammals as possible, it\u2019s essential that we know where the largest numbers are threatened.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "What\u2019s consistent regardless of whether it\u2019s endemic or non-endemic species, is that the conservation story is very much focused on the tropics. They are the richest in biodiversity, but also where the threats are most severe. As we looked at in a related article, the main pressures on mammals \u2013 particularly larger ones \u2013 is poaching animals for meat and body parts, and the expansion of agriculture. These environmental pressures are most strongly felt in the tropics: it\u2019s where 95% of deforestation occurs, and is home for the most lucrative animals for illegal wildlife trade.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Understanding where and why this is happening is crucial to save these species, before it\u2019s too late.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/threatened-mammal-species", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "article", "title": "Where are mammals most threatened?", "authors": [ null ], "dateline": "March 23, 2021", "sidebar-toc": false, "featured-image": "" }, "createdAt": "2021-03-23T21:34:07.000Z", "published": false, "updatedAt": "2022-12-14T11:59:01.000Z", "revisionId": null, "publishedAt": "2021-03-23T21:25:24.000Z", "relatedCharts": [], "publicationContext": "listed" } |
{ "errors": [], "numBlocks": 6, "numErrors": 0, "wpTagCounts": { "html": 2, "column": 4, "columns": 2, "heading": 2, "paragraph": 11 }, "htmlTagCounts": { "p": 11, "h4": 2, "div": 6, "iframe": 2 } } |
2021-03-23 21:25:24 | 2024-02-16 14:23:01 | [ null ] |
2021-03-23 21:34:07 | 2022-12-14 11:59:01 | {} |
One-quarter of mammal species [are threatened](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-threatened-species) with extinction. Indonesia is home to nearly 200 of these species. In contrast, Sweden has only one, and Finland only two at risk. If we’re to protect and conserve the world’s mammals from extinction we first need to know where they’re most threatened. In our **related post** we saw how the diversity of mammal species varies across the world, and where the biodiversity hotspots are. But does this also reflect where mammals are most under threat? ## Where are **endemic** mammal species at risk of extinction? In the map we see the number of endemic mammal species which are threatened with extinction in the wild.{ref}Species are defined as ‘threatened’ if they’re classified as Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable on the [IUCN Red List](https://www.iucnredlist.org/).{/ref} It looks very similar to the [map of endemic species](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/endemic-mammal-species-by-country). Indonesia has the most endemic mammals threatened with extinction: 132 species. This means 45% – nearly half – are under threat.{ref}The map presents threatened species in _absolute_ numbers. Some may argue that they should instead be presented in relative terms i.e. the percentage of species which are threatened. After all, reporting absolute numbers tends to make countries with a larger number of endemic species look worse: countries with more endemics tend to have more threatened endemics. We should be aware of this. But here I think absolute numbers provide the more useful metric: if we want to protect and prevent the world’s mammals from going extinct, we need to know where the largest number are threatened and why. To do this, we need absolute numbers.{/ref} Madagascar is second on the list, with 129 (61%) species threatened. Australia – despite having the second largest number of endemic mammals – has much fewer at risk: with 54 endemics (1-in-5) at risk of extinction. Mexico, Brazil and India also have more than 25 threatened endemic species. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/threatened-endemic-mammal-species"/> ## Where are **total** mammal species at risk of extinction? It makes sense to be most concerned about endemic species, or those with a very small geographical range. Once they are lost from these specific areas, they are lost forever. But of course that doesn’t mean we should ignore non-endemic species. In this map you can explore the total number (endemic and non-endemic) of mammal species threatened in each country. The broad picture is very similar to that of endemic species. The countries with the greatest total number of threatened mammals are (in order): Indonesia, Madagascar, India, Mexico, and Brazil. Again, Europe has relatively low numbers of threatened mammal species; Sweden has only one, and Finland only two. Almost all countries have one or more mammal species at risk.{ref}There are not many countries where no mammals are threatened with extinction. The IUCN Red List reports some, most are very small or island states: Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Aland Islands, Macao, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Jersey, San Marino, French Polynesia, Pitcairn, Tokelau, United States Minor Outlying Islands, and Wallis and Futuna.{/ref} But, there are large differences in the number and level of threat across the world. If our aim is to protect as many mammals as possible, it’s essential that we know where the largest numbers are threatened. What’s consistent regardless of whether it’s endemic or non-endemic species, is that the conservation story is very much focused on the tropics. They are the richest in biodiversity, but also where the threats are most severe. As we looked at in a related article, the main pressures on mammals – particularly larger ones – is poaching animals for meat and body parts, and the expansion of agriculture. These environmental pressures are most strongly felt in the tropics: it’s where 95% of deforestation occurs, and is home for the most lucrative animals for illegal wildlife trade. Understanding where and why this is happening is crucial to save these species, before it’s too late. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/threatened-mammal-species"/> | { "data": { "wpBlock": { "content": "\n<p>One-quarter of mammal species <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-threatened-species\">are threatened</a> with extinction. Indonesia is home to nearly 200 of these species. In contrast, Sweden has only one, and Finland only two at risk.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>If we\u2019re to protect and conserve the world\u2019s mammals from extinction we first need to know where they\u2019re most threatened.<br><br>In our <strong>related post</strong> we saw how the diversity of mammal species varies across the world, and where the biodiversity hotspots are. But does this also reflect where mammals are most under threat?</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Where are <strong>endemic</strong> mammal species at risk of extinction?</h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>In the map we see the number of endemic mammal species which are threatened with extinction in the wild.{ref}Species are defined as \u2018threatened\u2019 if they\u2019re classified as Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable on the <a href=\"https://www.iucnredlist.org/\">IUCN Red List</a>.{/ref} It looks very similar to the <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/endemic-mammal-species-by-country\">map of endemic species</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Indonesia has the most endemic mammals threatened with extinction: 132 species. This means 45% \u2013 nearly half \u2013 are under threat.{ref}The map presents threatened species in <em>absolute</em> numbers. Some may argue that they should instead be presented in relative terms i.e. the percentage of species which are threatened. After all, reporting absolute numbers tends to make countries with a larger number of endemic species look worse: countries with more endemics tend to have more threatened endemics. We should be aware of this. But here I think absolute numbers provide the more useful metric: if we want to protect and prevent the world\u2019s mammals from going extinct, we need to know where the largest number are threatened and why. To do this, we need absolute numbers.{/ref} Madagascar is second on the list, with 129 (61%) species threatened. Australia \u2013 despite having the second largest number of endemic mammals \u2013 has much fewer at risk: with 54 endemics (1-in-5) at risk of extinction.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mexico, Brazil and India also have more than 25 threatened endemic species.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/threatened-endemic-mammal-species\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h4>Where are <strong>total</strong> mammal species at risk of extinction?</h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>It makes sense to be most concerned about endemic species, or those with a very small geographical range. Once they are lost from these specific areas, they are lost forever. But of course that doesn\u2019t mean we should ignore non-endemic species. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this map you can explore the total number (endemic and non-endemic) of mammal species threatened in each country. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>The broad picture is very similar to that of endemic species. The countries with the greatest total number of threatened mammals are (in order): Indonesia, Madagascar, India, Mexico, and Brazil. Again, Europe has relatively low numbers of threatened mammal species; Sweden has only one, and Finland only two. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Almost all countries have one or more mammal species at risk.{ref}There are not many countries where no mammals are threatened with extinction. The IUCN Red List reports some, most are very small or island states: Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Aland Islands, Macao, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Jersey, San Marino, French Polynesia, Pitcairn, Tokelau, United States Minor Outlying Islands, and Wallis and Futuna.{/ref} But, there are large differences in the number and level of threat across the world. If our aim is to protect as many mammals as possible, it\u2019s essential that we know where the largest numbers are threatened.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>What\u2019s consistent regardless of whether it\u2019s endemic or non-endemic species, is that the conservation story is very much focused on the tropics. They are the richest in biodiversity, but also where the threats are most severe. As we looked at in a related article, the main pressures on mammals \u2013 particularly larger ones \u2013 is poaching animals for meat and body parts, and the expansion of agriculture. These environmental pressures are most strongly felt in the tropics: it\u2019s where 95% of deforestation occurs, and is home for the most lucrative animals for illegal wildlife trade. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Understanding where and why this is happening is crucial to save these species, before it\u2019s too late.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/threatened-mammal-species\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n</div>\n</div>\n" } }, "extensions": { "debug": [ { "type": "DEBUG_LOGS_INACTIVE", "message": "GraphQL Debug logging is not active. To see debug logs, GRAPHQL_DEBUG must be enabled." } ] } } |