posts: 40917

This table contains the full text for all our old WORDPRESS content in html form. The format is a bit odd as it represents a direct copy from wordpress content that includes a lot of wordpress specific comments that carry some meaning in terms of layout instructions etc.. The html in the content column can thus be rendered as is but will not look identical to the way it looks on our website as several post processing steps are not applied yet. The content should work though as a readable approximation for every post. For easy searching etc, a markdown copy of the content is available in the markdown column. If you want to query all posts (both wordpress and gdocs), use the posts_unified table or the posts_unified_with_content view.

Data license: CC-BY

This data as json

id	title	slug	type	status	content	archieml	archieml_update_statistics	published_at	updated_at	gdocSuccessorId	authors	excerpt	created_at_in_wordpress	updated_at_in_wordpress	featured_image	formattingOptions	markdown	wpApiSnapshot
40917	The economies that are home to the poorest billions of people need to grow if we want global poverty to decline substantially	poverty-growth-needed	post	publish	<!-- wp:html --> <div class="blog-info"> <p>Updated on 23 February. Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world’s largest problems.<br>This blog post draws on data and research discussed in our entries on <strong><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Economic Growth</a></strong> and <strong><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/poverty" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Poverty</a></strong>.</p> </div> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp-block-tombstone 53780 --> <!-- wp:owid/help --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>The World Bank has updated its poverty and inequality data</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The data in this article uses a previous release of the World Bank's poverty and inequality data in which incomes are expressed in 2011 international-$.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The World Bank has since updated its methods, and now measures incomes in 2017 international-$. As part of this change, the International Poverty Line used to measure extreme poverty has also been updated: from $1.90 (in 2011 prices) to $2.15 (in 2017 prices).</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This has had little effect on our overall understanding of poverty and inequality around the world. But because of the change of units, many of the figures mentioned in this article will differ from the latest World Bank figures.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:owid/prominent-link {"title":"","linkUrl":"https://ourworldindata.org/from-1-90-to-2-15-a-day-the-updated-international-poverty-line","className":"is-style-thin"} --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Read more about the World Bank's updated methodology</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- /wp:owid/prominent-link --> <!-- wp:owid/prominent-link {"title":"Explore the latest World Bank data on poverty and inequality","linkUrl":"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer","className":"is-style-thin"} --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- /wp:owid/prominent-link --> <!-- /wp:owid/help --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The huge majority of the world today is very poor. About 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day and around 61% live on less than $10 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data – which you can <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Share+in+poverty&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2430+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL">explore here</a>.{/ref} I believe, for reasons I’ll explain below, that if this should change it will require very substantial economic growth of the economies that are home to the poorest billions of people in the world.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The reason I wrote this text is that I believe some commentators on global poverty are not clear about the reality that very substantial growth is needed if people in poor countries should have a chance to leave poverty behind. I believe that if we do not express very clearly that economic growth is needed, we are damaging the prospects of the poorest people in the world to leave poverty behind.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>I am therefore asking that everyone who finds global poverty unacceptable should be very clear that the majority of people in the world live in poor economies and that massive economic growth is needed to increase their incomes to a decent level. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Higher incomes are not an end in themselves. But to say that income growth only has an instrumental role is not to say that it is of little importance. A person's income does not measure their well-being, it measures whether goods and services they value remain out of reach or not. Because many of these goods and services matter for their wellbeing, income matters too.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Any person’s income depends on two factors, the <em>average income</em> in the country they live in and the position that particular person has in that country’s <em>income distribution</em>. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Both aspects can change so that fewer people are poor:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>average income can <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=Western%20Europe~East%20Asia~South%20and%20South-East%20Asia~Middle%20East~Eastern%20Europe~Latin%20America~Sub-Sahara%20Africa~USA~GBR~AUS&region=World">increase</a> over time, that is called economic growth</li><li>and inequality can decline so that the poorest people get closer to the average income in that country.</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>For anyone who is concerned about poverty, it is important to consider by how much poverty can decline by either economic growth or lower inequality. Let’s look at each factor.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Reducing inequality within countries</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>One possibility to reduce poverty is to redistribute income within that country so that the income of the poor rises. There are a number of ways this can be done: one way is that the government taxes the incomes of richer people and pays it out to the poor.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The largest poverty reduction that is possible via a reduction in inequality would be achieved by a country that achieves perfect equality so that no one is poorer than anyone else. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To understand by how much the incomes of the poorest people can possibly increase via reduced inequality, it is therefore important to see data on average incomes across countries.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There are two ways of measuring average income in a country: </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>You can either start at the individual level and do a survey in which you ask people what their expenditure or income is – this is plotted on the vertical axis in the chart.  Households’ expenditure is not the same thing as their income – but they are closely related, this is especially true of poor people who do not have the chance to save much.{ref}To get a global view of poverty we need to combine data from both income and expenditure surveys since not all countries collect data on both.{/ref}</li><li>or you can start on the macro level and divide the size of the entire economy by the number of people in that country, and you end up with GDP per capita, plotted on the horizontal axis.</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The two income concepts differ: GDP per capita is typically higher – it is a more comprehensive measure of income and includes, for example, government expenditure and also the imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing.{ref}Measured across the whole economy income must always equal expenditure, since savings, by definition, equals investment expenditure. But this is not true if we look only at households – it is mostly households saving and mostly firms and government making expenditure on investment goods.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There is generally a gap between GDP per capita and the averages found in both income surveys and expenditure surveys. But the reasons for the gap are different depending on which we are comparing.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>GDP includes many items that are typically not measured in household income surveys, such as an imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing, the retained earnings of firms and taxes on production such as VAT. The gap is even larger when GDP is compared to surveys of household consumption – the latter concept excluding both investment expenditure and government expenditure on public services such as education and health.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Other aggregates beyond GDP are available in the national accounts that are more comparable to the concepts applied in household income and consumption surveys. However, important differences still remain even here. For example, in addition to imputed rents, imputations for the value of certain financial services, such as bank accounts, are included in aggregate household consumption measured in national accounts, with no equivalent for these items recorded in the survey data. In many countries, the consumption of nonprofit institutions serving households (NPISH) is included as part of household consumption within national accounts, but not within household surveys.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>On top of these conceptual differences are a range of mismeasurement problems that affect both sets of data. On this topic see Deaton (2005), and Pinkovskiy and Sala-i-Martin <a href="https://paperpile.com/c/sdaY5W/c3Eje/?noauthor=1">(2016)</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Deaton, Angus. 2005. “Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1–1. Available online <a href="https://scholar.princeton.edu/deaton/publications/measuring-poverty-growing-world-or-measuring-growth-poor-world">here</a>.<br>Pinkovskiy, Maxim, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2016. “Lights, Camera… Income! Illuminating the National Accounts-Household Surveys Debate.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 579–631. Available online <a href="https://www.nber.org/papers/w19831">here</a>.{/ref} Angus Deaton (2005) gives a helpful overview of these differences.{ref}Deaton, Angus. 2005. “Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1–19.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Because they differ and because both are relevant data points for understanding a country’s average income, I’m showing both income measures so that you can study how much it matters to use one or the other.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>All measures in this chart are given in international-$, which means that it is adjusted for the price differences between countries. This adjustment is done in a way such that one international-dollar is equivalent to the purchasing power of one US-$ <em>in the US</em>. The $13.13 average income of people in Peru, for example, means that the average Peruvian can purchase goods and services that would cost $13.13 in the US. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Many poorer people rely on subsistence farming and do not have a monetary income. To take this into account and make a fair comparison of their living standards, the statisticians that produce these figures estimate the monetary value of their home production and add it to their income/expenditure. That is true of both measures shown in the chart.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>As you can see, the majority of people in the world live in countries that are very poor. Even perfect equality in those countries would mean that billions of people around the world would live on extremely low incomes: $15 a day, $10 a day, even less than $5 a day.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>When the average of people’s income in a country is that low, then the only way the majority of people can possibly leave poverty behind is when that country’s economy grows so that average incomes increase.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-daily-expenditure-per-capita-vs-gdp-per-capita-2011-ppp" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Reducing global inequality</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Another possibility to reduce global poverty is to redistribute between countries. Money can be transferred from rich people in the rich countries to poorer people in poor countries.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>I am personally very much in favor of that: </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>I donate 10% of my income to efforts that support people in poorer countries and have been doing this for many years (I donate via <a href="https://www.givewell.org/">here</a> and <a href="https://app.effectivealtruism.org/">here</a>). </li><li>More directly, I have given to poor people via <a href="https://www.givedirectly.org/">GiveDirectly</a> and believe that this a very good way to spend your money. </li><li>I am also in favor of increased spending on aid (if you are skeptical, <a href="https://twitter.com/s8mb/status/1331190082049601536">here</a> is a good thread by an aid skeptic about why it is good to spend on aid).</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>But I have two problems with the idea that we should reduce global poverty by global redistribution:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>I think it is extremely optimistic to believe that large-scale global redistribution would be supported by those who live on more than the global average income.{ref}Again, where the global average income is depends on your definition of income:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>If you rely on the household surveys, then the average income in the world is around int.-$16 per day (<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL">same source</a> as above). </li><li>If you find GDP per capita more relevant, then you find that it is <a href="https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD">int.-$17,000</a> (but keep in mind that you then cannot compare it with people’s household income).</li><li>If you are relying on the World Inequality Lab estimate for the global average income you find that it is <a href="https://wid.world/world/#anninc_p0p100_z/WO/last/us/k/p/yearly/a/false/5651.916/30000/curve/false/country">int.-$23,445</a> (again this cannot be compared with estimates from the other sources).{/ref} You would need to convince (or force) the richest hundreds of million people in the world to give up large shares of their income and I think only few people would be willing to do that. One concrete data point that makes me skeptical: most rich countries in the world <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_development_aid_country_donors">are not willing to achieve</a> the UN goal of spending even only 0.7% of their GDP on aid. </li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If it is hard to find political support for the goal of spending 0.7% of people’s incomes on aid, I very much do not believe that the majority of people who live on more than the average income would agree to give up much larger shares of their income.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There are only two ways to increase the incomes of the poor: lower global inequality or economic growth for the poorest billions of the world. If someone is not in favor of economic growth for the poorer billions in the world, they are left with the option to reduce global inequality. I am in favor of reducing global inequality, but I find it extremely wrong to suggest that the only acceptable way to end global poverty is to reduce global inequality. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>It is wrong to make the chance of poor people leaving poverty behind conditional on an extremely optimistic scenario of the future of inequality.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Economic growth</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Economic growth in today’s rich countries over the last two hundred years is the reason that people in those countries are much less poor than people in the same places in the past or people in poor countries today.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The chart on the top compares estimates of the income distribution in Madagascar (in green) and the UK (in blue) in 2018. The income differences between people in these two countries are extremely large. The current average income in Madagascar today is $1.60 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data – which you can <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~MDG">explore here</a>.{/ref} This means that even the richer half of Madagascar’s population live on incomes between only $2 to $5 per day, much less than even poor people in the UK.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The chart at the bottom shows that back in 1800 the incomes in the UK were similarly low as Madagascar today. Since then the UK economy grew <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/englands-economy-over-the-long-run-gdp-vs-population?time=1800..latest">80-fold</a> and the income distribution moved to the right so that the majority of British people left the poverty of the past behind. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Average incomes in Madagascar did not grow – GDP per capita is <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=~MDG&region=World">not higher</a> than three generations ago – and poverty therefore remains <a href="https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Madagascar1.pdf">extremely severe</a> in Madagascar. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This needs to change if poor countries are to leave poverty behind. People in Madagascar only have a chance to leave poverty behind if their average incomes grow the way they did in the UK.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Economic growth is not enough to get people out of poverty. If the inequality of incomes increases, the poorest can be left behind. Fighting inequality matters too. But <em>without</em> economic growth, there is <em>no chance at all</em> to leave poverty behind. To make it possible that poverty can decline in Madagascar the average income must increase, without economic growth there is no chance that the people in Madagascar – and other poor countries – can possibly leave poverty behind.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":40918,"sizeSlug":"large","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-667x550.png" alt="" class="wp-image-40918"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The income differences between rich and poor countries today are vast, as we have just seen. The country where a person lives explains <em>two-thirds</em> of the variation of income differences between all people in the world – this is what inequality researcher Branko Milanovic <a href="https://voxeu.org/article/income-inequality-and-citizenship">documents</a>. Where a person lives is more important for how poor or rich they will be than everything else put together.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Understanding how much the size of the economy matters for our own income is important for our own self-understanding and for our judgement of why it is that some people are poor and others are not. A person’s knowledge, their skills, and how hard they work all matter for whether they are poor or not – but all these personal factors together matter much less than the factor that is entirely outside a person’s control: whether the place they happen to be born into has a large, productive economy or not. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Both the history of economic growth and the differences across the global income distribution today make this very clear: people are not poor because of who they are, poor people are poor because of the economy they happen to live in. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This is true over time: The fact that a particular person in the Middle Ages was poor was not his or her failure, it was due to the fact that <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap">almost all were very poor</a>. They happened to be born at a time when the economy was not very productive and living standards were much lower than today.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>And it is true for places across the world today: The poorest billions of people live in very poor economies and as a consequence are very poor.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Conclusion</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Lowering inequality is an important goal, and it can help to reduce poverty, but it can not be the only way in which the world fights global poverty. The poorest people live in places where average incomes are very low, as we have seen in the chart above. I am in favor of lower inequality, but I also believe that anyone who is concerned about global poverty should be in favor of strong economic growth in the economies that are home to the poorest billions in the world. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>For me personally, my income is not a major limiting factor on my freedom or well-being, and I am not concerned here with whether rich countries today should make it their goal to grow their economies. But I am concerned about the very low incomes of the majority of the world and believe that those economies that they are part of need to grow very substantially if there should be a chance that the poorest billions can leave poverty behind in the decades to come.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>One important reason why the people in some places are poor is because they were <a href="https://voxeu.org/article/economic-impact-colonialism">exploited by colonial powers</a> that did not allow those economies to grow and instead impoverished them. The injustice of an extremely unequal world needs to end. While some places in the world have left the worst poverty <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap">behind</a>, the huge majority of the world still lives in countries where the average income is extremely low. To increase average incomes <em>is</em> economic growth. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>That is why I think that everyone who is also concerned about global poverty should be clear and say without any hesitation that they are in favor of economic growth for the poorest billions in the world.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:separator --> <hr class="wp-block-separator"/> <!-- /wp:separator --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Follow up post:</strong> In a follow up post I made the statements above more concrete and looked at the depth of global poverty today to get a quantitative sense of just how much the global income distribution would need to change to reduce global poverty substantially: <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/poverty-minimum-growth-needed">How much economic growth is necessary to reduce global poverty substantially?</a></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph -->	{ "id": "wp-40917", "slug": "poverty-growth-needed", "content": { "toc": [], "body": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Updated on 23 February. Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world\u2019s largest problems.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "This blog post draws on data and research discussed in our entries on ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth", "children": [ { "text": "Economic Growth", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " and ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/poverty", "children": [ { "text": "Poverty", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "The World Bank has updated its poverty and inequality data", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The data in this article uses a previous release of the World Bank's poverty and inequality data in which incomes are expressed in 2011 international-$.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The World Bank has since updated its methods, and now measures incomes in 2017 international-$. As part of this change, the International Poverty Line used to measure extreme poverty has also been updated: from $1.90 (in 2011 prices) to $2.15 (in 2017 prices).", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This has had little effect on our overall understanding of poverty and inequality around the world. But because of the change of units, many of the figures mentioned in this article will differ from the latest World Bank figures.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/from-1-90-to-2-15-a-day-the-updated-international-poverty-line", "type": "prominent-link", "title": "", "description": "Read more about the World Bank's updated methodology", "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer", "type": "prominent-link", "title": "Explore the latest World Bank data on poverty and inequality", "description": "", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The huge majority of the world today is very poor. About 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day and around 61% live on less than $10 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data \u2013 which you can ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Share+in+poverty&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2430+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL", "children": [ { "text": "explore here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} I believe, for reasons I\u2019ll explain below, that if this should change it will require very substantial economic growth of the economies that are home to the poorest billions of people in the world.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The reason I wrote this text is that I believe some commentators on global poverty are not clear about the reality that very substantial growth is needed if people in poor countries should have a chance to leave poverty behind. I believe that if we do not express very clearly that economic growth is needed, we are damaging the prospects of the poorest people in the world to leave poverty behind.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "I am therefore asking that everyone who finds global poverty unacceptable should be very clear that the majority of people in the world live in poor economies and that massive economic growth is needed to increase their incomes to a decent level.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Higher incomes are not an end in themselves. But to say that income growth only has an instrumental role is not to say that it is of little importance. A person's income does not measure their well-being, it measures whether goods and services they value remain out of reach or not. Because many of these goods and services matter for their wellbeing, income matters too.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Any person\u2019s income depends on two factors, the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "average income", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " in the country they live in and the position that particular person has in that country\u2019s ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "income distribution", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ".\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Both aspects can change so that fewer people are poor:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "average income can ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=Western%20Europe~East%20Asia~South%20and%20South-East%20Asia~Middle%20East~Eastern%20Europe~Latin%20America~Sub-Sahara%20Africa~USA~GBR~AUS&region=World", "children": [ { "text": "increase", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " over time, that is called economic growth", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "and inequality can decline so that the poorest people get closer to the average income in that country.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "For anyone who is concerned about poverty, it is important to consider by how much poverty can decline by either economic growth or lower inequality. Let\u2019s look at each factor.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Reducing inequality within countries", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "One possibility to reduce poverty is to redistribute income within that country so that the income of the poor rises. There are a number of ways this can be done: one way is that the government taxes the incomes of richer people and pays it out to the poor.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The largest poverty reduction that is possible via a reduction in inequality would be achieved by a country that achieves perfect equality so that no one is poorer than anyone else.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "To understand by how much the incomes of the poorest people can possibly increase via reduced inequality, it is therefore important to see data on average incomes across countries.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There are two ways of measuring average income in a country:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "You can either start at the individual level and do a survey in which you ask people what their expenditure or income is \u2013 this is plotted on the vertical axis in the chart.\u00a0 Households\u2019 expenditure is not the same thing as their income \u2013 but they are closely related, this is especially true of poor people who do not have the chance to save much.{ref}To get a global view of poverty we need to combine data from both income and expenditure surveys since not all countries collect data on both.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "or you can start on the macro level and divide the size of the entire economy by the number of people in that country, and you end up with GDP per capita, plotted on the horizontal axis.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The two income concepts differ: GDP per capita is typically higher \u2013 it is a more comprehensive measure of income and includes, for example, government expenditure and also the imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing.{ref}Measured across the whole economy income must always equal expenditure, since savings, by definition, equals investment expenditure. But this is not true if we look only at households \u2013 it is mostly households saving and mostly firms and government making expenditure on investment goods.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There is generally a gap between GDP per capita and the averages found in both income surveys and expenditure surveys. But the reasons for the gap are different depending on which we are comparing.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "GDP includes many items that are typically not measured in household income surveys, such as an imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing, the retained earnings of firms and taxes on production such as VAT. The gap is even larger when GDP is compared to surveys of household consumption \u2013 the latter concept excluding both investment expenditure and government expenditure on public services such as education and health.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Other aggregates beyond GDP are available in the national accounts that are more comparable to the concepts applied in household income and consumption surveys. However, important differences still remain even here. For example, in addition to imputed rents, imputations for the value of certain financial services, such as bank accounts, are included in aggregate household consumption measured in national accounts, with no equivalent for these items recorded in the survey data. In many countries, the consumption of nonprofit institutions serving households (NPISH) is included as part of household consumption within national accounts, but not within household surveys.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "On top of these conceptual differences are a range of mismeasurement problems that affect both sets of data. On this topic see Deaton (2005), and Pinkovskiy and Sala-i-Martin ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://paperpile.com/c/sdaY5W/c3Eje/?noauthor=1", "children": [ { "text": "(2016)", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Deaton, Angus. 2005. \u201cMeasuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).\u201d The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1\u20131. Available online ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://scholar.princeton.edu/deaton/publications/measuring-poverty-growing-world-or-measuring-growth-poor-world", "children": [ { "text": "here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "Pinkovskiy, Maxim, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2016. \u201cLights, Camera\u2026 Income! Illuminating the National Accounts-Household Surveys Debate.\u201d The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 579\u2013631. Available online ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nber.org/papers/w19831", "children": [ { "text": "here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} Angus Deaton (2005) gives a helpful overview of these differences.{ref}Deaton, Angus. 2005. \u201cMeasuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).\u201d The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1\u201319.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Because they differ and because both are relevant data points for understanding a country\u2019s average income, I\u2019m showing both income measures so that you can study how much it matters to use one or the other.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "All measures in this chart are given in international-$, which means that it is adjusted for the price differences between countries. This adjustment is done in a way such that one international-dollar is equivalent to the purchasing power of one US-$ ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "in the US", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ". The $13.13 average income of people in Peru, for example, means that the average Peruvian can purchase goods and services that would cost $13.13 in the US.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Many poorer people rely on subsistence farming and do not have a monetary income. To take this into account and make a fair comparison of their living standards, the statisticians that produce these figures estimate the monetary value of their home production and add it to their income/expenditure. That is true of both measures shown in the chart.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "As you can see, the majority of people in the world live in countries that are very poor. Even perfect equality in those countries would mean that billions of people around the world would live on extremely low incomes: $15 a day, $10 a day, even less than $5 a day.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "When the average of people\u2019s income in a country is that low, then the only way the majority of people can possibly leave poverty behind is when that country\u2019s economy grows so that average incomes increase.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-daily-expenditure-per-capita-vs-gdp-per-capita-2011-ppp", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Reducing global inequality", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Another possibility to reduce global poverty is to redistribute between countries. Money can be transferred from rich people in the rich countries to poorer people in poor countries.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "I am personally very much in favor of that:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "I donate 10% of my income to efforts that support people in poorer countries and have been doing this for many years (I donate via ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.givewell.org/", "children": [ { "text": "here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " and ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://app.effectivealtruism.org/", "children": [ { "text": "here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ").\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "More directly, I have given to poor people via ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.givedirectly.org/", "children": [ { "text": "GiveDirectly", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " and believe that this a very good way to spend your money.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "I am also in favor of increased spending on aid (if you are skeptical, ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://twitter.com/s8mb/status/1331190082049601536", "children": [ { "text": "here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " is a good thread by an aid skeptic about why it is good to spend on aid).", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "But I have two problems with the idea that we should reduce global poverty by global redistribution:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "I think it is extremely optimistic to believe that large-scale global redistribution would be supported by those who live on more than the global average income.{ref}Again, where the global average income is depends on your definition of income:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If you rely on the household surveys, then the average income in the world is around int.-$16 per day (", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL", "children": [ { "text": "same source", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " as above).\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If you find GDP per capita more relevant, then you find that it is ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD", "children": [ { "text": "int.-$17,000", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " (but keep in mind that you then cannot compare it with people\u2019s household income).", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If you are relying on the World Inequality Lab estimate for the global average income you find that it is ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://wid.world/world/#anninc_p0p100_z/WO/last/us/k/p/yearly/a/false/5651.916/30000/curve/false/country", "children": [ { "text": "int.-$23,445", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " (again this cannot be compared with estimates from the other sources).{/ref} You would need to convince (or force) the richest hundreds of million people in the world to give up large shares of their income and I think only few people would be willing to do that. One concrete data point that makes me skeptical: most rich countries in the world ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_development_aid_country_donors", "children": [ { "text": "are not willing to achieve", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " the UN goal of spending even only 0.7% of their GDP on aid.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If it is hard to find political support for the goal of spending 0.7% of people\u2019s incomes on aid, I very much do not believe that the majority of people who live on more than the average income would agree to give up much larger shares of their income.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There are only two ways to increase the incomes of the poor: lower global inequality or economic growth for the poorest billions of the world. If someone is not in favor of economic growth for the poorer billions in the world, they are left with the option to reduce global inequality. I am in favor of reducing global inequality, but I find it extremely wrong to suggest that the only acceptable way to end global poverty is to reduce global inequality.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "It is wrong to make the chance of poor people leaving poverty behind conditional on an extremely optimistic scenario of the future of inequality.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Economic growth", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Economic growth in today\u2019s rich countries over the last two hundred years is the reason that people in those countries are much less poor than people in the same places in the past or people in poor countries today.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The chart on the top compares estimates of the income distribution in Madagascar (in green) and the UK (in blue) in 2018. The income differences between people in these two countries are extremely large. The current average income in Madagascar today is $1.60 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data \u2013 which you can ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~MDG", "children": [ { "text": "explore here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} This means that even the richer half of Madagascar\u2019s population live on incomes between only $2 to $5 per day, much less than even poor people in the UK.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The chart at the bottom shows that back in 1800 the incomes in the UK were similarly low as Madagascar today. Since then the UK economy grew ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/englands-economy-over-the-long-run-gdp-vs-population?time=1800..latest", "children": [ { "text": "80-fold", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " and the income distribution moved to the right so that the majority of British people left the poverty of the past behind.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Average incomes in Madagascar did not grow \u2013 GDP per capita is ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=~MDG&region=World", "children": [ { "text": "not higher", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " than three generations ago \u2013 and poverty therefore remains ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Madagascar1.pdf", "children": [ { "text": "extremely severe", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " in Madagascar.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This needs to change if poor countries are to leave poverty behind. People in Madagascar only have a chance to leave poverty behind if their average incomes grow the way they did in the UK.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Economic growth is not enough to get people out of poverty. If the inequality of incomes increases, the poorest can be left behind. Fighting inequality matters too. But ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "without", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " economic growth, there is ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "no chance at all", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " to leave poverty behind. To make it possible that poverty can decline in Madagascar the average income must increase, without economic growth there is no chance that the people in Madagascar \u2013 and other poor countries \u2013 can possibly leave poverty behind.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The income differences between rich and poor countries today are vast, as we have just seen. The country where a person lives explains ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "two-thirds", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " of the variation of income differences between all people in the world \u2013 this is what inequality researcher Branko Milanovic ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://voxeu.org/article/income-inequality-and-citizenship", "children": [ { "text": "documents", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". Where a person lives is more important for how poor or rich they will be than everything else put together.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Understanding how much the size of the economy matters for our own income is important for our own self-understanding and for our judgement of why it is that some people are poor and others are not. A person\u2019s knowledge, their skills, and how hard they work all matter for whether they are poor or not \u2013 but all these personal factors together matter much less than the factor that is entirely outside a person\u2019s control: whether the place they happen to be born into has a large, productive economy or not.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Both the history of economic growth and the differences across the global income distribution today make this very clear: people are not poor because of who they are, poor people are poor because of the economy they happen to live in.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This is true over time: The fact that a particular person in the Middle Ages was poor was not his or her failure, it was due to the fact that ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap", "children": [ { "text": "almost all were very poor", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". They happened to be born at a time when the economy was not very productive and living standards were much lower than today.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "And it is true for places across the world today: The poorest billions of people live in very poor economies and as a consequence are very poor.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Conclusion", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Lowering inequality is an important goal, and it can help to reduce poverty, but it can not be the only way in which the world fights global poverty. The poorest people live in places where average incomes are very low, as we have seen in the chart above. I am in favor of lower inequality, but I also believe that anyone who is concerned about global poverty should be in favor of strong economic growth in the economies that are home to the poorest billions in the world.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "For me personally, my income is not a major limiting factor on my freedom or well-being, and I am not concerned here with whether rich countries today should make it their goal to grow their economies. But I am concerned about the very low incomes of the majority of the world and believe that those economies that they are part of need to grow very substantially if there should be a chance that the poorest billions can leave poverty behind in the decades to come.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "One important reason why the people in some places are poor is because they were ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://voxeu.org/article/economic-impact-colonialism", "children": [ { "text": "exploited by colonial powers", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " that did not allow those economies to grow and instead impoverished them. The injustice of an extremely unequal world needs to end.\u00a0While some places in the world have left the worst poverty ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap", "children": [ { "text": "behind", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", the huge majority of the world still lives in countries where the average income is extremely low. To increase average incomes ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "is", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " economic growth. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "That is why I think that everyone who is also concerned about global poverty should be clear and say without any hesitation that they are in favor of economic growth for the poorest billions in the world.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Follow up post:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " In a follow up post I made the statements above more concrete and looked at the depth of global poverty today to get a quantitative sense of just how much the global income distribution would need to change to reduce global poverty substantially: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/poverty-minimum-growth-needed", "children": [ { "text": "How much economic growth is necessary to reduce global poverty substantially?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "article", "title": "The economies that are home to the poorest billions of people need to grow if we want global poverty to decline substantially", "authors": [ "Max Roser" ], "excerpt": "The majority of the world today is poor: 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day. If we are to alleviate global poverty, we need economic growth.", "dateline": "February 22, 2021", "subtitle": "The majority of the world today is poor: 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day. If we are to alleviate global poverty, we need economic growth.", "sidebar-toc": false, "featured-image": "Screen-Shot-2021-02-23-at-11.48.16.png" }, "createdAt": "2021-02-22T20:31:54.000Z", "published": false, "updatedAt": "2022-10-17T13:59:00.000Z", "revisionId": null, "publishedAt": "2021-02-22T20:31:54.000Z", "relatedCharts": [], "publicationContext": "listed" }	{ "errors": [ { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag owid/help" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unhandled html tag found", "details": "Encountered the unhandled tag hr" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag separator" } ], "numBlocks": 62, "numErrors": 8, "wpTagCounts": { "html": 2, "list": 4, "image": 1, "heading": 5, "owid/help": 1, "paragraph": 51, "separator": 1, "owid/prominent-link": 2 }, "htmlTagCounts": { "p": 52, "h3": 4, "h4": 1, "hr": 1, "ul": 4, "div": 1, "figure": 1, "iframe": 1 } }	2021-02-22 20:31:54	2024-02-16 14:22:51	1tCgkmXQk8cjdqzgQVs1-Tkj4zKdQ1526xR9nn7TuiMA	[ "Max Roser" ]	The majority of the world today is poor: 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day. If we are to alleviate global poverty, we need economic growth.	2021-02-22 20:31:54	2022-10-17 13:59:00	https://ourworldindata.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2021-02-23-at-11.48.16.png	{}	Updated on 23 February. Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world’s largest problems. This blog post draws on data and research discussed in our entries on [Economic Growth](https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth) and [Poverty](https://ourworldindata.org/poverty). ### The World Bank has updated its poverty and inequality data The data in this article uses a previous release of the World Bank's poverty and inequality data in which incomes are expressed in 2011 international-$. The World Bank has since updated its methods, and now measures incomes in 2017 international-$. As part of this change, the International Poverty Line used to measure extreme poverty has also been updated: from $1.90 (in 2011 prices) to $2.15 (in 2017 prices). This has had little effect on our overall understanding of poverty and inequality around the world. But because of the change of units, many of the figures mentioned in this article will differ from the latest World Bank figures. ### Read more about the World Bank's updated methodology https://ourworldindata.org/from-1-90-to-2-15-a-day-the-updated-international-poverty-line ### Explore the latest World Bank data on poverty and inequality https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer The huge majority of the world today is very poor. About 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day and around 61% live on less than $10 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data – which you can [explore here](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Share+in+poverty&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2430+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL).{/ref} I believe, for reasons I’ll explain below, that if this should change it will require very substantial economic growth of the economies that are home to the poorest billions of people in the world. The reason I wrote this text is that I believe some commentators on global poverty are not clear about the reality that very substantial growth is needed if people in poor countries should have a chance to leave poverty behind. I believe that if we do not express very clearly that economic growth is needed, we are damaging the prospects of the poorest people in the world to leave poverty behind. I am therefore asking that everyone who finds global poverty unacceptable should be very clear that the majority of people in the world live in poor economies and that massive economic growth is needed to increase their incomes to a decent level. Higher incomes are not an end in themselves. But to say that income growth only has an instrumental role is not to say that it is of little importance. A person's income does not measure their well-being, it measures whether goods and services they value remain out of reach or not. Because many of these goods and services matter for their wellbeing, income matters too. Any person’s income depends on two factors, the _average income_ in the country they live in and the position that particular person has in that country’s _income distribution_. Both aspects can change so that fewer people are poor: * average income can [increase](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=Western%20Europe~East%20Asia~South%20and%20South-East%20Asia~Middle%20East~Eastern%20Europe~Latin%20America~Sub-Sahara%20Africa~USA~GBR~AUS&region=World) over time, that is called economic growth * and inequality can decline so that the poorest people get closer to the average income in that country. For anyone who is concerned about poverty, it is important to consider by how much poverty can decline by either economic growth or lower inequality. Let’s look at each factor. ## Reducing inequality within countries One possibility to reduce poverty is to redistribute income within that country so that the income of the poor rises. There are a number of ways this can be done: one way is that the government taxes the incomes of richer people and pays it out to the poor. The largest poverty reduction that is possible via a reduction in inequality would be achieved by a country that achieves perfect equality so that no one is poorer than anyone else. To understand by how much the incomes of the poorest people can possibly increase via reduced inequality, it is therefore important to see data on average incomes across countries. There are two ways of measuring average income in a country: * You can either start at the individual level and do a survey in which you ask people what their expenditure or income is – this is plotted on the vertical axis in the chart. Households’ expenditure is not the same thing as their income – but they are closely related, this is especially true of poor people who do not have the chance to save much.{ref}To get a global view of poverty we need to combine data from both income and expenditure surveys since not all countries collect data on both.{/ref} * or you can start on the macro level and divide the size of the entire economy by the number of people in that country, and you end up with GDP per capita, plotted on the horizontal axis. The two income concepts differ: GDP per capita is typically higher – it is a more comprehensive measure of income and includes, for example, government expenditure and also the imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing.{ref}Measured across the whole economy income must always equal expenditure, since savings, by definition, equals investment expenditure. But this is not true if we look only at households – it is mostly households saving and mostly firms and government making expenditure on investment goods. There is generally a gap between GDP per capita and the averages found in both income surveys and expenditure surveys. But the reasons for the gap are different depending on which we are comparing. GDP includes many items that are typically not measured in household income surveys, such as an imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing, the retained earnings of firms and taxes on production such as VAT. The gap is even larger when GDP is compared to surveys of household consumption – the latter concept excluding both investment expenditure and government expenditure on public services such as education and health. Other aggregates beyond GDP are available in the national accounts that are more comparable to the concepts applied in household income and consumption surveys. However, important differences still remain even here. For example, in addition to imputed rents, imputations for the value of certain financial services, such as bank accounts, are included in aggregate household consumption measured in national accounts, with no equivalent for these items recorded in the survey data. In many countries, the consumption of nonprofit institutions serving households (NPISH) is included as part of household consumption within national accounts, but not within household surveys. On top of these conceptual differences are a range of mismeasurement problems that affect both sets of data. On this topic see Deaton (2005), and Pinkovskiy and Sala-i-Martin [(2016)](https://paperpile.com/c/sdaY5W/c3Eje/?noauthor=1). Deaton, Angus. 2005. “Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1–1. Available online [here](https://scholar.princeton.edu/deaton/publications/measuring-poverty-growing-world-or-measuring-growth-poor-world). Pinkovskiy, Maxim, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2016. “Lights, Camera… Income! Illuminating the National Accounts-Household Surveys Debate.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 579–631. Available online [here](https://www.nber.org/papers/w19831).{/ref} Angus Deaton (2005) gives a helpful overview of these differences.{ref}Deaton, Angus. 2005. “Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1–19.{/ref} Because they differ and because both are relevant data points for understanding a country’s average income, I’m showing both income measures so that you can study how much it matters to use one or the other. All measures in this chart are given in international-$, which means that it is adjusted for the price differences between countries. This adjustment is done in a way such that one international-dollar is equivalent to the purchasing power of one US-$ _in the US_. The $13.13 average income of people in Peru, for example, means that the average Peruvian can purchase goods and services that would cost $13.13 in the US. Many poorer people rely on subsistence farming and do not have a monetary income. To take this into account and make a fair comparison of their living standards, the statisticians that produce these figures estimate the monetary value of their home production and add it to their income/expenditure. That is true of both measures shown in the chart. As you can see, the majority of people in the world live in countries that are very poor. Even perfect equality in those countries would mean that billions of people around the world would live on extremely low incomes: $15 a day, $10 a day, even less than $5 a day. When the average of people’s income in a country is that low, then the only way the majority of people can possibly leave poverty behind is when that country’s economy grows so that average incomes increase. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-daily-expenditure-per-capita-vs-gdp-per-capita-2011-ppp"/> ## Reducing global inequality Another possibility to reduce global poverty is to redistribute between countries. Money can be transferred from rich people in the rich countries to poorer people in poor countries. I am personally very much in favor of that: * I donate 10% of my income to efforts that support people in poorer countries and have been doing this for many years (I donate via [here](https://www.givewell.org/) and [here](https://app.effectivealtruism.org/)). * More directly, I have given to poor people via [GiveDirectly](https://www.givedirectly.org/) and believe that this a very good way to spend your money. * I am also in favor of increased spending on aid (if you are skeptical, [here](https://twitter.com/s8mb/status/1331190082049601536) is a good thread by an aid skeptic about why it is good to spend on aid). But I have two problems with the idea that we should reduce global poverty by global redistribution: I think it is extremely optimistic to believe that large-scale global redistribution would be supported by those who live on more than the global average income.{ref}Again, where the global average income is depends on your definition of income: * If you rely on the household surveys, then the average income in the world is around int.-$16 per day ([same source](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL) as above). * If you find GDP per capita more relevant, then you find that it is [int.-$17,000](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD) (but keep in mind that you then cannot compare it with people’s household income). * If you are relying on the World Inequality Lab estimate for the global average income you find that it is [int.-$23,445](https://wid.world/world/#anninc_p0p100_z/WO/last/us/k/p/yearly/a/false/5651.916/30000/curve/false/country) (again this cannot be compared with estimates from the other sources).{/ref} You would need to convince (or force) the richest hundreds of million people in the world to give up large shares of their income and I think only few people would be willing to do that. One concrete data point that makes me skeptical: most rich countries in the world [are not willing to achieve](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_development_aid_country_donors) the UN goal of spending even only 0.7% of their GDP on aid. If it is hard to find political support for the goal of spending 0.7% of people’s incomes on aid, I very much do not believe that the majority of people who live on more than the average income would agree to give up much larger shares of their income. There are only two ways to increase the incomes of the poor: lower global inequality or economic growth for the poorest billions of the world. If someone is not in favor of economic growth for the poorer billions in the world, they are left with the option to reduce global inequality. I am in favor of reducing global inequality, but I find it extremely wrong to suggest that the only acceptable way to end global poverty is to reduce global inequality. It is wrong to make the chance of poor people leaving poverty behind conditional on an extremely optimistic scenario of the future of inequality. ## Economic growth Economic growth in today’s rich countries over the last two hundred years is the reason that people in those countries are much less poor than people in the same places in the past or people in poor countries today. The chart on the top compares estimates of the income distribution in Madagascar (in green) and the UK (in blue) in 2018. The income differences between people in these two countries are extremely large. The current average income in Madagascar today is $1.60 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data – which you can [explore here](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~MDG).{/ref} This means that even the richer half of Madagascar’s population live on incomes between only $2 to $5 per day, much less than even poor people in the UK. The chart at the bottom shows that back in 1800 the incomes in the UK were similarly low as Madagascar today. Since then the UK economy grew [80-fold](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/englands-economy-over-the-long-run-gdp-vs-population?time=1800..latest) and the income distribution moved to the right so that the majority of British people left the poverty of the past behind. Average incomes in Madagascar did not grow – GDP per capita is [not higher](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=~MDG&region=World) than three generations ago – and poverty therefore remains [extremely severe](https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Madagascar1.pdf) in Madagascar. This needs to change if poor countries are to leave poverty behind. People in Madagascar only have a chance to leave poverty behind if their average incomes grow the way they did in the UK. Economic growth is not enough to get people out of poverty. If the inequality of incomes increases, the poorest can be left behind. Fighting inequality matters too. But _without_ economic growth, there is _no chance at all_ to leave poverty behind. To make it possible that poverty can decline in Madagascar the average income must increase, without economic growth there is no chance that the people in Madagascar – and other poor countries – can possibly leave poverty behind. <Image filename="Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018.png" alt=""/> The income differences between rich and poor countries today are vast, as we have just seen. The country where a person lives explains _two-thirds_ of the variation of income differences between all people in the world – this is what inequality researcher Branko Milanovic [documents](https://voxeu.org/article/income-inequality-and-citizenship). Where a person lives is more important for how poor or rich they will be than everything else put together. Understanding how much the size of the economy matters for our own income is important for our own self-understanding and for our judgement of why it is that some people are poor and others are not. A person’s knowledge, their skills, and how hard they work all matter for whether they are poor or not – but all these personal factors together matter much less than the factor that is entirely outside a person’s control: whether the place they happen to be born into has a large, productive economy or not. Both the history of economic growth and the differences across the global income distribution today make this very clear: people are not poor because of who they are, poor people are poor because of the economy they happen to live in. This is true over time: The fact that a particular person in the Middle Ages was poor was not his or her failure, it was due to the fact that [almost all were very poor](https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap). They happened to be born at a time when the economy was not very productive and living standards were much lower than today. And it is true for places across the world today: The poorest billions of people live in very poor economies and as a consequence are very poor. ## Conclusion Lowering inequality is an important goal, and it can help to reduce poverty, but it can not be the only way in which the world fights global poverty. The poorest people live in places where average incomes are very low, as we have seen in the chart above. I am in favor of lower inequality, but I also believe that anyone who is concerned about global poverty should be in favor of strong economic growth in the economies that are home to the poorest billions in the world. For me personally, my income is not a major limiting factor on my freedom or well-being, and I am not concerned here with whether rich countries today should make it their goal to grow their economies. But I am concerned about the very low incomes of the majority of the world and believe that those economies that they are part of need to grow very substantially if there should be a chance that the poorest billions can leave poverty behind in the decades to come. One important reason why the people in some places are poor is because they were [exploited by colonial powers](https://voxeu.org/article/economic-impact-colonialism) that did not allow those economies to grow and instead impoverished them. The injustice of an extremely unequal world needs to end. While some places in the world have left the worst poverty [behind](https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap), the huge majority of the world still lives in countries where the average income is extremely low. To increase average incomes _is_ economic growth. That is why I think that everyone who is also concerned about global poverty should be clear and say without any hesitation that they are in favor of economic growth for the poorest billions in the world. Follow up post: In a follow up post I made the statements above more concrete and looked at the depth of global poverty today to get a quantitative sense of just how much the global income distribution would need to change to reduce global poverty substantially: [How much economic growth is necessary to reduce global poverty substantially?](https://ourworldindata.org/poverty-minimum-growth-needed)	{ "id": 40917, "date": "2021-02-22T20:31:54", "guid": { "rendered": "https://owid.cloud/?p=40917" }, "link": "https://owid.cloud/poverty-growth-needed", "meta": { "owid_publication_context_meta_field": { "latest": true, "homepage": true, "immediate_newsletter": true } }, "slug": "poverty-growth-needed", "tags": [], "type": "post", "title": { "rendered": "The economies that are home to the poorest billions of people need to grow if we want global poverty to decline substantially" }, "_links": { "self": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/40917" } ], "about": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/types/post" } ], "author": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/users/2", "embeddable": true } ], "curies": [ { "href": "https://api.w.org/{rel}", "name": "wp", "templated": true } ], "replies": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/comments?post=40917", "embeddable": true } ], "wp:term": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/categories?post=40917", "taxonomy": "category", "embeddable": true }, { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/tags?post=40917", "taxonomy": "post_tag", "embeddable": true } ], "collection": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts" } ], "wp:attachment": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/media?parent=40917" } ], "version-history": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/40917/revisions", "count": 30 } ], "wp:featuredmedia": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/media/40939", "embeddable": true } ], "predecessor-version": [ { "id": 53865, "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/40917/revisions/53865" } ] }, "author": 2, "format": "standard", "status": "publish", "sticky": false, "content": { "rendered": "\n<div class=\"blog-info\">\n<p>Updated on 23 February. Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world\u2019s largest problems.<br>This blog post draws on data and research discussed in our entries on <strong><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Economic Growth</a></strong> and <strong><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/poverty\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Poverty</a></strong>.</p>\n\n</div>\n\n\n\t<block type=\"help\">\n\t\t<content>\n\n<h4>The World Bank has updated its poverty and inequality data</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The data in this article uses a previous release of the World Bank’s poverty and inequality data in which incomes are expressed in 2011 international-$.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The World Bank has since updated its methods, and now measures incomes in 2017 international-$. As part of this change, the International Poverty Line used to measure extreme poverty has also been updated: from $1.90 (in 2011 prices) to $2.15 (in 2017 prices).</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This has had little effect on our overall understanding of poverty and inequality around the world. But because of the change of units, many of the figures mentioned in this article will differ from the latest World Bank figures.</p>\n\n\n <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/from-1-90-to-2-15-a-day-the-updated-international-poverty-line</link-url>\n <title></title>\n <content>\n\n<p>Read more about the World Bank’s updated methodology</p>\n\n</content>\n <figure></figure>\n </block>\n\n <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer</link-url>\n <title>Explore the latest World Bank data on poverty and inequality</title>\n <content>\n\n<p></p>\n\n</content>\n <figure></figure>\n </block>\n</content>\n\t</block>\n\n\n<p>The huge majority of the world today is very poor. About 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day and around 61% live on less than $10 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data \u2013 which you can <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Share+in+poverty&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2430+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL\">explore here</a>.{/ref} I believe, for reasons I\u2019ll explain below, that if this should change it will require very substantial economic growth of the economies that are home to the poorest billions of people in the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The reason I wrote this text is that I believe some commentators on global poverty are not clear about the reality that very substantial growth is needed if people in poor countries should have a chance to leave poverty behind. I believe that if we do not express very clearly that economic growth is needed, we are damaging the prospects of the poorest people in the world to leave poverty behind.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>I am therefore asking that everyone who finds global poverty unacceptable should be very clear that the majority of people in the world live in poor economies and that massive economic growth is needed to increase their incomes to a decent level. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Higher incomes are not an end in themselves. But to say that income growth only has an instrumental role is not to say that it is of little importance. A person’s income does not measure their well-being, it measures whether goods and services they value remain out of reach or not. Because many of these goods and services matter for their wellbeing, income matters too.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Any person\u2019s income depends on two factors, the <em>average income</em> in the country they live in and the position that particular person has in that country\u2019s <em>income distribution</em>. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Both aspects can change so that fewer people are poor:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>average income can <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=Western%20Europe~East%20Asia~South%20and%20South-East%20Asia~Middle%20East~Eastern%20Europe~Latin%20America~Sub-Sahara%20Africa~USA~GBR~AUS&region=World\">increase</a> over time, that is called economic growth</li><li>and inequality can decline so that the poorest people get closer to the average income in that country.</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For anyone who is concerned about poverty, it is important to consider by how much poverty can decline by either economic growth or lower inequality. Let\u2019s look at each factor.</p>\n\n\n\n<h3>Reducing inequality within countries</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>One possibility to reduce poverty is to redistribute income within that country so that the income of the poor rises. There are a number of ways this can be done: one way is that the government taxes the incomes of richer people and pays it out to the poor.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The largest poverty reduction that is possible via a reduction in inequality would be achieved by a country that achieves perfect equality so that no one is poorer than anyone else. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>To understand by how much the incomes of the poorest people can possibly increase via reduced inequality, it is therefore important to see data on average incomes across countries.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are two ways of measuring average income in a country: </p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>You can either start at the individual level and do a survey in which you ask people what their expenditure or income is \u2013 this is plotted on the vertical axis in the chart.  Households\u2019 expenditure is not the same thing as their income \u2013 but they are closely related, this is especially true of poor people who do not have the chance to save much.{ref}To get a global view of poverty we need to combine data from both income and expenditure surveys since not all countries collect data on both.{/ref}</li><li>or you can start on the macro level and divide the size of the entire economy by the number of people in that country, and you end up with GDP per capita, plotted on the horizontal axis.</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The two income concepts differ: GDP per capita is typically higher \u2013 it is a more comprehensive measure of income and includes, for example, government expenditure and also the imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing.{ref}Measured across the whole economy income must always equal expenditure, since savings, by definition, equals investment expenditure. But this is not true if we look only at households \u2013 it is mostly households saving and mostly firms and government making expenditure on investment goods.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is generally a gap between GDP per capita and the averages found in both income surveys and expenditure surveys. But the reasons for the gap are different depending on which we are comparing.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>GDP includes many items that are typically not measured in household income surveys, such as an imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing, the retained earnings of firms and taxes on production such as VAT. The gap is even larger when GDP is compared to surveys of household consumption \u2013 the latter concept excluding both investment expenditure and government expenditure on public services such as education and health.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Other aggregates beyond GDP are available in the national accounts that are more comparable to the concepts applied in household income and consumption surveys. However, important differences still remain even here. For example, in addition to imputed rents, imputations for the value of certain financial services, such as bank accounts, are included in aggregate household consumption measured in national accounts, with no equivalent for these items recorded in the survey data. In many countries, the consumption of nonprofit institutions serving households (NPISH) is included as part of household consumption within national accounts, but not within household surveys.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>On top of these conceptual differences are a range of mismeasurement problems that affect both sets of data. On this topic see Deaton (2005), and Pinkovskiy and Sala-i-Martin <a href=\"https://paperpile.com/c/sdaY5W/c3Eje/?noauthor=1\">(2016)</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Deaton, Angus. 2005. \u201cMeasuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).\u201d The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1\u20131. Available online <a href=\"https://scholar.princeton.edu/deaton/publications/measuring-poverty-growing-world-or-measuring-growth-poor-world\">here</a>.<br>Pinkovskiy, Maxim, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2016. \u201cLights, Camera\u2026 Income! Illuminating the National Accounts-Household Surveys Debate.\u201d The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 579\u2013631. Available online <a href=\"https://www.nber.org/papers/w19831\">here</a>.{/ref} Angus Deaton (2005) gives a helpful overview of these differences.{ref}Deaton, Angus. 2005. \u201cMeasuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).\u201d The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1\u201319.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because they differ and because both are relevant data points for understanding a country\u2019s average income, I\u2019m showing both income measures so that you can study how much it matters to use one or the other.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>All measures in this chart are given in international-$, which means that it is adjusted for the price differences between countries. This adjustment is done in a way such that one international-dollar is equivalent to the purchasing power of one US-$ <em>in the US</em>. The $13.13 average income of people in Peru, for example, means that the average Peruvian can purchase goods and services that would cost $13.13 in the US.\u00a0</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Many poorer people rely on subsistence farming and do not have a monetary income. To take this into account and make a fair comparison of their living standards, the statisticians that produce these figures estimate the monetary value of their home production and add it to their income/expenditure. That is true of both measures shown in the chart.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>As you can see, the majority of people in the world live in countries that are very poor. Even perfect equality in those countries would mean that billions of people around the world would live on extremely low incomes: $15 a day, $10 a day, even less than $5 a day.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>When the average of people\u2019s income in a country is that low, then the only way the majority of people can possibly leave poverty behind is when that country\u2019s economy grows so that average incomes increase.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-daily-expenditure-per-capita-vs-gdp-per-capita-2011-ppp\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h3>Reducing global inequality</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Another possibility to reduce global poverty is to redistribute between countries. Money can be transferred from rich people in the rich countries to poorer people in poor countries.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>I am personally very much in favor of that: </p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>I donate 10% of my income to efforts that support people in poorer countries and have been doing this for many years (I donate via <a href=\"https://www.givewell.org/\">here</a> and <a href=\"https://app.effectivealtruism.org/\">here</a>). </li><li>More directly, I have given to poor people via <a href=\"https://www.givedirectly.org/\">GiveDirectly</a> and believe that this a very good way to spend your money. </li><li>I am also in favor of increased spending on aid (if you are skeptical, <a href=\"https://twitter.com/s8mb/status/1331190082049601536\">here</a> is a good thread by an aid skeptic about why it is good to spend on aid).</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>But I have two problems with the idea that we should reduce global poverty by global redistribution:</p>\n\n\n\n<p>I think it is extremely optimistic to believe that large-scale global redistribution would be supported by those who live on more than the global average income.{ref}Again, where the global average income is depends on your definition of income:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>If you rely on the household surveys, then the average income in the world is around int.-$16 per day (<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL\">same source</a> as above).\u00a0</li><li>If you find GDP per capita more relevant, then you find that it is <a href=\"https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD\">int.-$17,000</a> (but keep in mind that you then cannot compare it with people\u2019s household income).</li><li>If you are relying on the World Inequality Lab estimate for the global average income you find that it is <a href=\"https://wid.world/world/#anninc_p0p100_z/WO/last/us/k/p/yearly/a/false/5651.916/30000/curve/false/country\">int.-$23,445</a> (again this cannot be compared with estimates from the other sources).{/ref} You would need to convince (or force) the richest hundreds of million people in the world to give up large shares of their income and I think only few people would be willing to do that. One concrete data point that makes me skeptical: most rich countries in the world <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_development_aid_country_donors\">are not willing to achieve</a> the UN goal of spending even only 0.7% of their GDP on aid.\u00a0</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If it is hard to find political support for the goal of spending 0.7% of people\u2019s incomes on aid, I very much do not believe that the majority of people who live on more than the average income would agree to give up much larger shares of their income.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are only two ways to increase the incomes of the poor: lower global inequality or economic growth for the poorest billions of the world. If someone is not in favor of economic growth for the poorer billions in the world, they are left with the option to reduce global inequality. I am in favor of reducing global inequality, but I find it extremely wrong to suggest that the only acceptable way to end global poverty is to reduce global inequality. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is wrong to make the chance of poor people leaving poverty behind conditional on an extremely optimistic scenario of the future of inequality.</p>\n\n\n\n<h3>Economic growth</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Economic growth in today\u2019s rich countries over the last two hundred years is the reason that people in those countries are much less poor than people in the same places in the past or people in poor countries today.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart on the top compares estimates of the income distribution in Madagascar (in green) and the UK (in blue) in 2018. The income differences between people in these two countries are extremely large. The current average income in Madagascar today is $1.60 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data \u2013 which you can <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~MDG\">explore here</a>.{/ref} This means that even the richer half of Madagascar\u2019s population live on incomes between only $2 to $5 per day, much less than even poor people in the UK.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart at the bottom shows that back in 1800 the incomes in the UK were similarly low as Madagascar today. Since then the UK economy grew <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/englands-economy-over-the-long-run-gdp-vs-population?time=1800..latest\">80-fold</a> and the income distribution moved to the right so that the majority of British people left the poverty of the past behind. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Average incomes in Madagascar did not grow \u2013 GDP per capita is <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=~MDG&region=World\">not higher</a> than three generations ago \u2013 and poverty therefore remains <a href=\"https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Madagascar1.pdf\">extremely severe</a> in Madagascar. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>This needs to change if poor countries are to leave poverty behind. People in Madagascar only have a chance to leave poverty behind if their average incomes grow the way they did in the UK.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Economic growth is not enough to get people out of poverty. If the inequality of incomes increases, the poorest can be left behind. Fighting inequality matters too. But <em>without</em> economic growth, there is <em>no chance at all</em> to leave poverty behind. To make it possible that poverty can decline in Madagascar the average income must increase, without economic growth there is no chance that the people in Madagascar \u2013 and other poor countries \u2013 can possibly leave poverty behind.</p>\n\n\n\n<p></p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"667\" height=\"550\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-667x550.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-40918\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-667x550.png 667w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-400x330.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-150x124.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-768x633.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-1536x1266.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-2048x1688.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 667px) 100vw, 667px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The income differences between rich and poor countries today are vast, as we have just seen. The country where a person lives explains <em>two-thirds</em> of the variation of income differences between all people in the world \u2013 this is what inequality researcher Branko Milanovic <a href=\"https://voxeu.org/article/income-inequality-and-citizenship\">documents</a>. Where a person lives is more important for how poor or rich they will be than everything else put together.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Understanding how much the size of the economy matters for our own income is important for our own self-understanding and for our judgement of why it is that some people are poor and others are not. A person\u2019s knowledge, their skills, and how hard they work all matter for whether they are poor or not \u2013 but all these personal factors together matter much less than the factor that is entirely outside a person\u2019s control: whether the place they happen to be born into has a large, productive economy or not. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Both the history of economic growth and the differences across the global income distribution today make this very clear: people are not poor because of who they are, poor people are poor because of the economy they happen to live in. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is true over time: The fact that a particular person in the Middle Ages was poor was not his or her failure, it was due to the fact that <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap\">almost all were very poor</a>. They happened to be born at a time when the economy was not very productive and living standards were much lower than today.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>And it is true for places across the world today: The poorest billions of people live in very poor economies and as a consequence are very poor.</p>\n\n\n\n<h3>Conclusion</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Lowering inequality is an important goal, and it can help to reduce poverty, but it can not be the only way in which the world fights global poverty. The poorest people live in places where average incomes are very low, as we have seen in the chart above. I am in favor of lower inequality, but I also believe that anyone who is concerned about global poverty should be in favor of strong economic growth in the economies that are home to the poorest billions in the world. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>For me personally, my income is not a major limiting factor on my freedom or well-being, and I am not concerned here with whether rich countries today should make it their goal to grow their economies. But I am concerned about the very low incomes of the majority of the world and believe that those economies that they are part of need to grow very substantially if there should be a chance that the poorest billions can leave poverty behind in the decades to come.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>One important reason why the people in some places are poor is because they were <a href=\"https://voxeu.org/article/economic-impact-colonialism\">exploited by colonial powers</a> that did not allow those economies to grow and instead impoverished them. The injustice of an extremely unequal world needs to end. While some places in the world have left the worst poverty <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap\">behind</a>, the huge majority of the world still lives in countries where the average income is extremely low. To increase average incomes <em>is</em> economic growth. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>That is why I think that everyone who is also concerned about global poverty should be clear and say without any hesitation that they are in favor of economic growth for the poorest billions in the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Follow up post:</strong> In a follow up post I made the statements above more concrete and looked at the depth of global poverty today to get a quantitative sense of just how much the global income distribution would need to change to reduce global poverty substantially: <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/poverty-minimum-growth-needed\">How much economic growth is necessary to reduce global poverty substantially?</a></p>\n", "protected": false }, "excerpt": { "rendered": "The majority of the world today is poor: 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day. If we are to alleviate global poverty, we need economic growth.", "protected": false }, "date_gmt": "2021-02-22T20:31:54", "modified": "2022-10-17T14:59:00", "template": "", "categories": [ 189, 1 ], "ping_status": "closed", "authors_name": [ "Max Roser" ], "modified_gmt": "2022-10-17T13:59:00", "comment_status": "closed", "featured_media": 40939, "featured_media_paths": { "thumbnail": "/app/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2021-02-23-at-11.48.16-150x80.png", "medium_large": "/app/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2021-02-23-at-11.48.16-768x410.png" } }

title

slug

type

status

content

archieml

archieml_update_statistics

published_at

updated_at

gdocSuccessorId

authors

excerpt

created_at_in_wordpress

updated_at_in_wordpress

featured_image

formattingOptions

markdown

wpApiSnapshot

40917

The economies that are home to the poorest billions of people need to grow if we want global poverty to decline substantially

poverty-growth-needed

post

publish

<div class="blog-info"> Updated on 23 February. Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world’s largest problems. This blog post draws on data and research discussed in our entries on <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Economic Growth</a> and <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/poverty" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Poverty</a>. </div>     <h4>The World Bank has updated its poverty and inequality data</h4>   The data in this article uses a previous release of the World Bank's poverty and inequality data in which incomes are expressed in 2011 international-$.   The World Bank has since updated its methods, and now measures incomes in 2017 international-$. As part of this change, the International Poverty Line used to measure extreme poverty has also been updated: from $1.90 (in 2011 prices) to $2.15 (in 2017 prices).   This has had little effect on our overall understanding of poverty and inequality around the world. But because of the change of units, many of the figures mentioned in this article will differ from the latest World Bank figures.    Read more about the World Bank's updated methodology         The huge majority of the world today is very poor. About 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day and around 61% live on less than $10 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data – which you can <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Share+in+poverty&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2430+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL">explore here</a>.{/ref} I believe, for reasons I’ll explain below, that if this should change it will require very substantial economic growth of the economies that are home to the poorest billions of people in the world.   The reason I wrote this text is that I believe some commentators on global poverty are not clear about the reality that very substantial growth is needed if people in poor countries should have a chance to leave poverty behind. I believe that if we do not express very clearly that economic growth is needed, we are damaging the prospects of the poorest people in the world to leave poverty behind.   I am therefore asking that everyone who finds global poverty unacceptable should be very clear that the majority of people in the world live in poor economies and that massive economic growth is needed to increase their incomes to a decent level.    Higher incomes are not an end in themselves. But to say that income growth only has an instrumental role is not to say that it is of little importance. A person's income does not measure their well-being, it measures whether goods and services they value remain out of reach or not. Because many of these goods and services matter for their wellbeing, income matters too.   Any person’s income depends on two factors, the average income in the country they live in and the position that particular person has in that country’s income distribution.    Both aspects can change so that fewer people are poor:   <ul><li>average income can <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=Western%20Europe~East%20Asia~South%20and%20South-East%20Asia~Middle%20East~Eastern%20Europe~Latin%20America~Sub-Sahara%20Africa~USA~GBR~AUS&region=World">increase</a> over time, that is called economic growth</li><li>and inequality can decline so that the poorest people get closer to the average income in that country.</li></ul>   For anyone who is concerned about poverty, it is important to consider by how much poverty can decline by either economic growth or lower inequality. Let’s look at each factor.   <h3>Reducing inequality within countries</h3>   One possibility to reduce poverty is to redistribute income within that country so that the income of the poor rises. There are a number of ways this can be done: one way is that the government taxes the incomes of richer people and pays it out to the poor.   The largest poverty reduction that is possible via a reduction in inequality would be achieved by a country that achieves perfect equality so that no one is poorer than anyone else.    To understand by how much the incomes of the poorest people can possibly increase via reduced inequality, it is therefore important to see data on average incomes across countries.   There are two ways of measuring average income in a country:    <ul><li>You can either start at the individual level and do a survey in which you ask people what their expenditure or income is – this is plotted on the vertical axis in the chart.  Households’ expenditure is not the same thing as their income – but they are closely related, this is especially true of poor people who do not have the chance to save much.{ref}To get a global view of poverty we need to combine data from both income and expenditure surveys since not all countries collect data on both.{/ref}</li><li>or you can start on the macro level and divide the size of the entire economy by the number of people in that country, and you end up with GDP per capita, plotted on the horizontal axis.</li></ul>   The two income concepts differ: GDP per capita is typically higher – it is a more comprehensive measure of income and includes, for example, government expenditure and also the imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing.{ref}Measured across the whole economy income must always equal expenditure, since savings, by definition, equals investment expenditure. But this is not true if we look only at households – it is mostly households saving and mostly firms and government making expenditure on investment goods.   There is generally a gap between GDP per capita and the averages found in both income surveys and expenditure surveys. But the reasons for the gap are different depending on which we are comparing.   GDP includes many items that are typically not measured in household income surveys, such as an imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing, the retained earnings of firms and taxes on production such as VAT. The gap is even larger when GDP is compared to surveys of household consumption – the latter concept excluding both investment expenditure and government expenditure on public services such as education and health.   Other aggregates beyond GDP are available in the national accounts that are more comparable to the concepts applied in household income and consumption surveys. However, important differences still remain even here. For example, in addition to imputed rents, imputations for the value of certain financial services, such as bank accounts, are included in aggregate household consumption measured in national accounts, with no equivalent for these items recorded in the survey data. In many countries, the consumption of nonprofit institutions serving households (NPISH) is included as part of household consumption within national accounts, but not within household surveys.   On top of these conceptual differences are a range of mismeasurement problems that affect both sets of data. On this topic see Deaton (2005), and Pinkovskiy and Sala-i-Martin <a href="https://paperpile.com/c/sdaY5W/c3Eje/?noauthor=1">(2016)</a>.   Deaton, Angus. 2005. “Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1–1. Available online <a href="https://scholar.princeton.edu/deaton/publications/measuring-poverty-growing-world-or-measuring-growth-poor-world">here</a>. Pinkovskiy, Maxim, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2016. “Lights, Camera… Income! Illuminating the National Accounts-Household Surveys Debate.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 579–631. Available online <a href="https://www.nber.org/papers/w19831">here</a>.{/ref} Angus Deaton (2005) gives a helpful overview of these differences.{ref}Deaton, Angus. 2005. “Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1–19.{/ref}   Because they differ and because both are relevant data points for understanding a country’s average income, I’m showing both income measures so that you can study how much it matters to use one or the other.   All measures in this chart are given in international-$, which means that it is adjusted for the price differences between countries. This adjustment is done in a way such that one international-dollar is equivalent to the purchasing power of one US-$ in the US. The $13.13 average income of people in Peru, for example, means that the average Peruvian can purchase goods and services that would cost $13.13 in the US.   Many poorer people rely on subsistence farming and do not have a monetary income. To take this into account and make a fair comparison of their living standards, the statisticians that produce these figures estimate the monetary value of their home production and add it to their income/expenditure. That is true of both measures shown in the chart.   As you can see, the majority of people in the world live in countries that are very poor. Even perfect equality in those countries would mean that billions of people around the world would live on extremely low incomes: $15 a day, $10 a day, even less than $5 a day.   When the average of people’s income in a country is that low, then the only way the majority of people can possibly leave poverty behind is when that country’s economy grows so that average incomes increase.   <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-daily-expenditure-per-capita-vs-gdp-per-capita-2011-ppp" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe>   <h3>Reducing global inequality</h3>   Another possibility to reduce global poverty is to redistribute between countries. Money can be transferred from rich people in the rich countries to poorer people in poor countries.   I am personally very much in favor of that:    <ul><li>I donate 10% of my income to efforts that support people in poorer countries and have been doing this for many years (I donate via <a href="https://www.givewell.org/">here</a> and <a href="https://app.effectivealtruism.org/">here</a>). </li><li>More directly, I have given to poor people via <a href="https://www.givedirectly.org/">GiveDirectly</a> and believe that this a very good way to spend your money. </li><li>I am also in favor of increased spending on aid (if you are skeptical, <a href="https://twitter.com/s8mb/status/1331190082049601536">here</a> is a good thread by an aid skeptic about why it is good to spend on aid).</li></ul>   But I have two problems with the idea that we should reduce global poverty by global redistribution:   I think it is extremely optimistic to believe that large-scale global redistribution would be supported by those who live on more than the global average income.{ref}Again, where the global average income is depends on your definition of income:   <ul><li>If you rely on the household surveys, then the average income in the world is around int.-$16 per day (<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL">same source</a> as above). </li><li>If you find GDP per capita more relevant, then you find that it is <a href="https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD">int.-$17,000</a> (but keep in mind that you then cannot compare it with people’s household income).</li><li>If you are relying on the World Inequality Lab estimate for the global average income you find that it is <a href="https://wid.world/world/#anninc_p0p100_z/WO/last/us/k/p/yearly/a/false/5651.916/30000/curve/false/country">int.-$23,445</a> (again this cannot be compared with estimates from the other sources).{/ref} You would need to convince (or force) the richest hundreds of million people in the world to give up large shares of their income and I think only few people would be willing to do that. One concrete data point that makes me skeptical: most rich countries in the world <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_development_aid_country_donors">are not willing to achieve</a> the UN goal of spending even only 0.7% of their GDP on aid. </li></ul>   If it is hard to find political support for the goal of spending 0.7% of people’s incomes on aid, I very much do not believe that the majority of people who live on more than the average income would agree to give up much larger shares of their income.   There are only two ways to increase the incomes of the poor: lower global inequality or economic growth for the poorest billions of the world. If someone is not in favor of economic growth for the poorer billions in the world, they are left with the option to reduce global inequality. I am in favor of reducing global inequality, but I find it extremely wrong to suggest that the only acceptable way to end global poverty is to reduce global inequality.    It is wrong to make the chance of poor people leaving poverty behind conditional on an extremely optimistic scenario of the future of inequality.   <h3>Economic growth</h3>   Economic growth in today’s rich countries over the last two hundred years is the reason that people in those countries are much less poor than people in the same places in the past or people in poor countries today.   The chart on the top compares estimates of the income distribution in Madagascar (in green) and the UK (in blue) in 2018. The income differences between people in these two countries are extremely large. The current average income in Madagascar today is $1.60 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data – which you can <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~MDG">explore here</a>.{/ref} This means that even the richer half of Madagascar’s population live on incomes between only $2 to $5 per day, much less than even poor people in the UK.   The chart at the bottom shows that back in 1800 the incomes in the UK were similarly low as Madagascar today. Since then the UK economy grew <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/englands-economy-over-the-long-run-gdp-vs-population?time=1800..latest">80-fold</a> and the income distribution moved to the right so that the majority of British people left the poverty of the past behind.    Average incomes in Madagascar did not grow – GDP per capita is <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=~MDG&region=World">not higher</a> than three generations ago – and poverty therefore remains <a href="https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Madagascar1.pdf">extremely severe</a> in Madagascar.    This needs to change if poor countries are to leave poverty behind. People in Madagascar only have a chance to leave poverty behind if their average incomes grow the way they did in the UK.   Economic growth is not enough to get people out of poverty. If the inequality of incomes increases, the poorest can be left behind. Fighting inequality matters too. But without economic growth, there is no chance at all to leave poverty behind. To make it possible that poverty can decline in Madagascar the average income must increase, without economic growth there is no chance that the people in Madagascar – and other poor countries – can possibly leave poverty behind.     <figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-667x550.png" alt="" class="wp-image-40918"/></figure>   The income differences between rich and poor countries today are vast, as we have just seen. The country where a person lives explains two-thirds of the variation of income differences between all people in the world – this is what inequality researcher Branko Milanovic <a href="https://voxeu.org/article/income-inequality-and-citizenship">documents</a>. Where a person lives is more important for how poor or rich they will be than everything else put together.   Understanding how much the size of the economy matters for our own income is important for our own self-understanding and for our judgement of why it is that some people are poor and others are not. A person’s knowledge, their skills, and how hard they work all matter for whether they are poor or not – but all these personal factors together matter much less than the factor that is entirely outside a person’s control: whether the place they happen to be born into has a large, productive economy or not.    Both the history of economic growth and the differences across the global income distribution today make this very clear: people are not poor because of who they are, poor people are poor because of the economy they happen to live in.    This is true over time: The fact that a particular person in the Middle Ages was poor was not his or her failure, it was due to the fact that <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap">almost all were very poor</a>. They happened to be born at a time when the economy was not very productive and living standards were much lower than today.   And it is true for places across the world today: The poorest billions of people live in very poor economies and as a consequence are very poor.   <h3>Conclusion</h3>   Lowering inequality is an important goal, and it can help to reduce poverty, but it can not be the only way in which the world fights global poverty. The poorest people live in places where average incomes are very low, as we have seen in the chart above. I am in favor of lower inequality, but I also believe that anyone who is concerned about global poverty should be in favor of strong economic growth in the economies that are home to the poorest billions in the world.    For me personally, my income is not a major limiting factor on my freedom or well-being, and I am not concerned here with whether rich countries today should make it their goal to grow their economies. But I am concerned about the very low incomes of the majority of the world and believe that those economies that they are part of need to grow very substantially if there should be a chance that the poorest billions can leave poverty behind in the decades to come.   One important reason why the people in some places are poor is because they were <a href="https://voxeu.org/article/economic-impact-colonialism">exploited by colonial powers</a> that did not allow those economies to grow and instead impoverished them. The injustice of an extremely unequal world needs to end. While some places in the world have left the worst poverty <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap">behind</a>, the huge majority of the world still lives in countries where the average income is extremely low. To increase average incomes is economic growth.   That is why I think that everyone who is also concerned about global poverty should be clear and say without any hesitation that they are in favor of economic growth for the poorest billions in the world.   <hr class="wp-block-separator"/>   Follow up post: In a follow up post I made the statements above more concrete and looked at the depth of global poverty today to get a quantitative sense of just how much the global income distribution would need to change to reduce global poverty substantially: <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/poverty-minimum-growth-needed">How much economic growth is necessary to reduce global poverty substantially?</a>

{
    "id": "wp-40917",
    "slug": "poverty-growth-needed",
    "content": {
        "toc": [],
        "body": [
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Updated on 23 February. Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world\u2019s largest problems.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "spanType": "span-newline"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "This blog post draws on data and research discussed in our entries on ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Economic Growth",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-bold"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " and ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/poverty",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Poverty",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-bold"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ".",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "text": [
                    {
                        "text": "The World Bank has updated its poverty and inequality data",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "type": "heading",
                "level": 3,
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The data in this article uses a previous release of the World Bank's poverty and inequality data in which incomes are expressed in 2011 international-$.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The World Bank has since updated its methods, and now measures incomes in 2017 international-$. As part of this change, the International Poverty Line used to measure extreme poverty has also been updated: from $1.90 (in 2011 prices) to $2.15 (in 2017 prices).",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "This has had little effect on our overall understanding of poverty and inequality around the world. But because of the change of units, many of the figures mentioned in this article will differ from the latest World Bank figures.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/from-1-90-to-2-15-a-day-the-updated-international-poverty-line",
                "type": "prominent-link",
                "title": "",
                "description": "Read more about the World Bank's updated methodology",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer",
                "type": "prominent-link",
                "title": "Explore the latest World Bank data on poverty and inequality",
                "description": "",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The huge majority of the world today is very poor. About 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day and around 61% live on less than $10 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data \u2013 which you can ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Share+in+poverty&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2430+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "explore here",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ".{/ref} I believe, for reasons I\u2019ll explain below, that if this should change it will require very substantial economic growth of the economies that are home to the poorest billions of people in the world.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The reason I wrote this text is that I believe some commentators on global poverty are not clear about the reality that very substantial growth is needed if people in poor countries should have a chance to leave poverty behind. I believe that if we do not express very clearly that economic growth is needed, we are damaging the prospects of the poorest people in the world to leave poverty behind.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "I am therefore asking that everyone who finds global poverty unacceptable should be very clear that the majority of people in the world live in poor economies and that massive economic growth is needed to increase their incomes to a decent level.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Higher incomes are not an end in themselves. But to say that income growth only has an instrumental role is not to say that it is of little importance. A person's income does not measure their well-being, it measures whether goods and services they value remain out of reach or not. Because many of these goods and services matter for their wellbeing, income matters too.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Any person\u2019s income depends on two factors, the ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "average income",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " in the country they live in and the position that particular person has in that country\u2019s ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "income distribution",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ".\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Both aspects can change so that fewer people are poor:",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "list",
                "items": [
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "average income can ",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=Western%20Europe~East%20Asia~South%20and%20South-East%20Asia~Middle%20East~Eastern%20Europe~Latin%20America~Sub-Sahara%20Africa~USA~GBR~AUS&region=World",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "increase",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": " over time, that is called economic growth",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "and inequality can decline so that the poorest people get closer to the average income in that country.",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "For anyone who is concerned about poverty, it is important to consider by how much poverty can decline by either economic growth or lower inequality. Let\u2019s look at each factor.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "text": [
                    {
                        "text": "Reducing inequality within countries",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "type": "heading",
                "level": 2,
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "One possibility to reduce poverty is to redistribute income within that country so that the income of the poor rises. There are a number of ways this can be done: one way is that the government taxes the incomes of richer people and pays it out to the poor.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The largest poverty reduction that is possible via a reduction in inequality would be achieved by a country that achieves perfect equality so that no one is poorer than anyone else.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "To understand by how much the incomes of the poorest people can possibly increase via reduced inequality, it is therefore important to see data on average incomes across countries.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "There are two ways of measuring average income in a country:\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "list",
                "items": [
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "You can either start at the individual level and do a survey in which you ask people what their expenditure or income is \u2013 this is plotted on the vertical axis in the chart.\u00a0 Households\u2019 expenditure is not the same thing as their income \u2013 but they are closely related, this is especially true of poor people who do not have the chance to save much.{ref}To get a global view of poverty we need to combine data from both income and expenditure surveys since not all countries collect data on both.{/ref}",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "or you can start on the macro level and divide the size of the entire economy by the number of people in that country, and you end up with GDP per capita, plotted on the horizontal axis.",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The two income concepts differ: GDP per capita is typically higher \u2013 it is a more comprehensive measure of income and includes, for example, government expenditure and also the imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing.{ref}Measured across the whole economy income must always equal expenditure, since savings, by definition, equals investment expenditure. But this is not true if we look only at households \u2013 it is mostly households saving and mostly firms and government making expenditure on investment goods.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "There is generally a gap between GDP per capita and the averages found in both income surveys and expenditure surveys. But the reasons for the gap are different depending on which we are comparing.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "GDP includes many items that are typically not measured in household income surveys, such as an imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing, the retained earnings of firms and taxes on production such as VAT. The gap is even larger when GDP is compared to surveys of household consumption \u2013 the latter concept excluding both investment expenditure and government expenditure on public services such as education and health.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Other aggregates beyond GDP are available in the national accounts that are more comparable to the concepts applied in household income and consumption surveys. However, important differences still remain even here. For example, in addition to imputed rents, imputations for the value of certain financial services, such as bank accounts, are included in aggregate household consumption measured in national accounts, with no equivalent for these items recorded in the survey data. In many countries, the consumption of nonprofit institutions serving households (NPISH) is included as part of household consumption within national accounts, but not within household surveys.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "On top of these conceptual differences are a range of mismeasurement problems that affect both sets of data. On this topic see Deaton (2005), and Pinkovskiy and Sala-i-Martin ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://paperpile.com/c/sdaY5W/c3Eje/?noauthor=1",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "(2016)",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ".",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Deaton, Angus. 2005. \u201cMeasuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).\u201d The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1\u20131. Available online ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://scholar.princeton.edu/deaton/publications/measuring-poverty-growing-world-or-measuring-growth-poor-world",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "here",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ".",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "spanType": "span-newline"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "Pinkovskiy, Maxim, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2016. \u201cLights, Camera\u2026 Income! Illuminating the National Accounts-Household Surveys Debate.\u201d The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 579\u2013631. Available online ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://www.nber.org/papers/w19831",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "here",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ".{/ref} Angus Deaton (2005) gives a helpful overview of these differences.{ref}Deaton, Angus. 2005. \u201cMeasuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).\u201d The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1\u201319.{/ref}",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Because they differ and because both are relevant data points for understanding a country\u2019s average income, I\u2019m showing both income measures so that you can study how much it matters to use one or the other.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "All measures in this chart are given in international-$, which means that it is adjusted for the price differences between countries. This adjustment is done in a way such that one international-dollar is equivalent to the purchasing power of one US-$ ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "in the US",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ". The $13.13 average income of people in Peru, for example, means that the average Peruvian can purchase goods and services that would cost $13.13 in the US.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Many poorer people rely on subsistence farming and do not have a monetary income. To take this into account and make a fair comparison of their living standards, the statisticians that produce these figures estimate the monetary value of their home production and add it to their income/expenditure. That is true of both measures shown in the chart.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "As you can see, the majority of people in the world live in countries that are very poor. Even perfect equality in those countries would mean that billions of people around the world would live on extremely low incomes: $15 a day, $10 a day, even less than $5 a day.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "When the average of people\u2019s income in a country is that low, then the only way the majority of people can possibly leave poverty behind is when that country\u2019s economy grows so that average incomes increase.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-daily-expenditure-per-capita-vs-gdp-per-capita-2011-ppp",
                "type": "chart",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "text": [
                    {
                        "text": "Reducing global inequality",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "type": "heading",
                "level": 2,
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Another possibility to reduce global poverty is to redistribute between countries. Money can be transferred from rich people in the rich countries to poorer people in poor countries.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "I am personally very much in favor of that:\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "list",
                "items": [
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "I donate 10% of my income to efforts that support people in poorer countries and have been doing this for many years (I donate via ",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://www.givewell.org/",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "here",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": " and ",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://app.effectivealtruism.org/",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "here",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": ").\u00a0",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "More directly, I have given to poor people via ",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://www.givedirectly.org/",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "GiveDirectly",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": " and believe that this a very good way to spend your money.\u00a0",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "I am also in favor of increased spending on aid (if you are skeptical, ",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://twitter.com/s8mb/status/1331190082049601536",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "here",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": " is a good thread by an aid skeptic about why it is good to spend on aid).",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "But I have two problems with the idea that we should reduce global poverty by global redistribution:",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "I think it is extremely optimistic to believe that large-scale global redistribution would be supported by those who live on more than the global average income.{ref}Again, where the global average income is depends on your definition of income:",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "list",
                "items": [
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "If you rely on the household surveys, then the average income in the world is around int.-$16 per day (",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "same source",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": " as above).\u00a0",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "If you find GDP per capita more relevant, then you find that it is ",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "int.-$17,000",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": " (but keep in mind that you then cannot compare it with people\u2019s household income).",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "If you are relying on the World Inequality Lab estimate for the global average income you find that it is ",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://wid.world/world/#anninc_p0p100_z/WO/last/us/k/p/yearly/a/false/5651.916/30000/curve/false/country",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "int.-$23,445",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": " (again this cannot be compared with estimates from the other sources).{/ref} You would need to convince (or force) the richest hundreds of million people in the world to give up large shares of their income and I think only few people would be willing to do that. One concrete data point that makes me skeptical: most rich countries in the world ",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_development_aid_country_donors",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "are not willing to achieve",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": " the UN goal of spending even only 0.7% of their GDP on aid.\u00a0",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "If it is hard to find political support for the goal of spending 0.7% of people\u2019s incomes on aid, I very much do not believe that the majority of people who live on more than the average income would agree to give up much larger shares of their income.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "There are only two ways to increase the incomes of the poor: lower global inequality or economic growth for the poorest billions of the world. If someone is not in favor of economic growth for the poorer billions in the world, they are left with the option to reduce global inequality. I am in favor of reducing global inequality, but I find it extremely wrong to suggest that the only acceptable way to end global poverty is to reduce global inequality.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "It is wrong to make the chance of poor people leaving poverty behind conditional on an extremely optimistic scenario of the future of inequality.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "text": [
                    {
                        "text": "Economic growth",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "type": "heading",
                "level": 2,
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Economic growth in today\u2019s rich countries over the last two hundred years is the reason that people in those countries are much less poor than people in the same places in the past or people in poor countries today.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The chart on the top compares estimates of the income distribution in Madagascar (in green) and the UK (in blue) in 2018. The income differences between people in these two countries are extremely large. The current average income in Madagascar today is $1.60 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data \u2013 which you can ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~MDG",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "explore here",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ".{/ref} This means that even the richer half of Madagascar\u2019s population live on incomes between only $2 to $5 per day, much less than even poor people in the UK.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The chart at the bottom shows that back in 1800 the incomes in the UK were similarly low as Madagascar today. Since then the UK economy grew ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/englands-economy-over-the-long-run-gdp-vs-population?time=1800..latest",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "80-fold",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " and the income distribution moved to the right so that the majority of British people left the poverty of the past behind.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Average incomes in Madagascar did not grow \u2013 GDP per capita is ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=~MDG&region=World",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "not higher",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " than three generations ago \u2013 and poverty therefore remains ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Madagascar1.pdf",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "extremely severe",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " in Madagascar.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "This needs to change if poor countries are to leave poverty behind. People in Madagascar only have a chance to leave poverty behind if their average incomes grow the way they did in the UK.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Economic growth is not enough to get people out of poverty. If the inequality of incomes increases, the poorest can be left behind. Fighting inequality matters too. But ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "without",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " economic growth, there is ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "no chance at all",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " to leave poverty behind. To make it possible that poverty can decline in Madagascar the average income must increase, without economic growth there is no chance that the people in Madagascar \u2013 and other poor countries \u2013 can possibly leave poverty behind.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "alt": "",
                "size": "wide",
                "type": "image",
                "filename": "Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018.png",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The income differences between rich and poor countries today are vast, as we have just seen. The country where a person lives explains ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "two-thirds",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " of the variation of income differences between all people in the world \u2013 this is what inequality researcher Branko Milanovic ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://voxeu.org/article/income-inequality-and-citizenship",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "documents",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ". Where a person lives is more important for how poor or rich they will be than everything else put together.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Understanding how much the size of the economy matters for our own income is important for our own self-understanding and for our judgement of why it is that some people are poor and others are not. A person\u2019s knowledge, their skills, and how hard they work all matter for whether they are poor or not \u2013 but all these personal factors together matter much less than the factor that is entirely outside a person\u2019s control: whether the place they happen to be born into has a large, productive economy or not.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Both the history of economic growth and the differences across the global income distribution today make this very clear: people are not poor because of who they are, poor people are poor because of the economy they happen to live in.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "This is true over time: The fact that a particular person in the Middle Ages was poor was not his or her failure, it was due to the fact that ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "almost all were very poor",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ". They happened to be born at a time when the economy was not very productive and living standards were much lower than today.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "And it is true for places across the world today: The poorest billions of people live in very poor economies and as a consequence are very poor.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "text": [
                    {
                        "text": "Conclusion",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "type": "heading",
                "level": 2,
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Lowering inequality is an important goal, and it can help to reduce poverty, but it can not be the only way in which the world fights global poverty. The poorest people live in places where average incomes are very low, as we have seen in the chart above. I am in favor of lower inequality, but I also believe that anyone who is concerned about global poverty should be in favor of strong economic growth in the economies that are home to the poorest billions in the world.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "For me personally, my income is not a major limiting factor on my freedom or well-being, and I am not concerned here with whether rich countries today should make it their goal to grow their economies. But I am concerned about the very low incomes of the majority of the world and believe that those economies that they are part of need to grow very substantially if there should be a chance that the poorest billions can leave poverty behind in the decades to come.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "One important reason why the people in some places are poor is because they were ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://voxeu.org/article/economic-impact-colonialism",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "exploited by colonial powers",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " that did not allow those economies to grow and instead impoverished them. The injustice of an extremely unequal world needs to end.\u00a0While some places in the world have left the worst poverty ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "behind",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ", the huge majority of the world still lives in countries where the average income is extremely low. To increase average incomes ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "is",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " economic growth. ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "That is why I think that everyone who is also concerned about global poverty should be clear and say without any hesitation that they are in favor of economic growth for the poorest billions in the world.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "Follow up post:",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-bold"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " In a follow up post I made the statements above more concrete and looked at the depth of global poverty today to get a quantitative sense of just how much the global income distribution would need to change to reduce global poverty substantially: ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/poverty-minimum-growth-needed",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "How much economic growth is necessary to reduce global poverty substantially?",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            }
        ],
        "type": "article",
        "title": "The economies that are home to the poorest billions of people need to grow if we want global poverty to decline substantially",
        "authors": [
            "Max Roser"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The majority of the world today is poor: 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day. If we are to alleviate global poverty, we need economic growth.",
        "dateline": "February 22, 2021",
        "subtitle": "The majority of the world today is poor: 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day. If we are to alleviate global poverty, we need economic growth.",
        "sidebar-toc": false,
        "featured-image": "Screen-Shot-2021-02-23-at-11.48.16.png"
    },
    "createdAt": "2021-02-22T20:31:54.000Z",
    "published": false,
    "updatedAt": "2022-10-17T13:59:00.000Z",
    "revisionId": null,
    "publishedAt": "2021-02-22T20:31:54.000Z",
    "relatedCharts": [],
    "publicationContext": "listed"
}

{
    "errors": [
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag owid/help"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image"
        },
        {
            "name": "unhandled html tag found",
            "details": "Encountered the unhandled tag hr"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag separator"
        }
    ],
    "numBlocks": 62,
    "numErrors": 8,
    "wpTagCounts": {
        "html": 2,
        "list": 4,
        "image": 1,
        "heading": 5,
        "owid/help": 1,
        "paragraph": 51,
        "separator": 1,
        "owid/prominent-link": 2
    },
    "htmlTagCounts": {
        "p": 52,
        "h3": 4,
        "h4": 1,
        "hr": 1,
        "ul": 4,
        "div": 1,
        "figure": 1,
        "iframe": 1
    }
}

2021-02-22 20:31:54

2024-02-16 14:22:51

1tCgkmXQk8cjdqzgQVs1-Tkj4zKdQ1526xR9nn7TuiMA

[
    "Max Roser"
]

The majority of the world today is poor: 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day. If we are to alleviate global poverty, we need economic growth.

2021-02-22 20:31:54

2022-10-17 13:59:00

https://ourworldindata.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2021-02-23-at-11.48.16.png

{}

Updated on 23 February. Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world’s largest problems. This blog post draws on data and research discussed in our entries on **[Economic Growth](https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth)** and **[Poverty](https://ourworldindata.org/poverty)**. ### The World Bank has updated its poverty and inequality data The data in this article uses a previous release of the World Bank's poverty and inequality data in which incomes are expressed in 2011 international-$. The World Bank has since updated its methods, and now measures incomes in 2017 international-$. As part of this change, the International Poverty Line used to measure extreme poverty has also been updated: from $1.90 (in 2011 prices) to $2.15 (in 2017 prices). This has had little effect on our overall understanding of poverty and inequality around the world. But because of the change of units, many of the figures mentioned in this article will differ from the latest World Bank figures. ### Read more about the World Bank's updated methodology https://ourworldindata.org/from-1-90-to-2-15-a-day-the-updated-international-poverty-line ### Explore the latest World Bank data on poverty and inequality https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer The huge majority of the world today is very poor. About 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day and around 61% live on less than $10 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data – which you can [explore here](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Share+in+poverty&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2430+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL).{/ref} I believe, for reasons I’ll explain below, that if this should change it will require very substantial economic growth of the economies that are home to the poorest billions of people in the world. The reason I wrote this text is that I believe some commentators on global poverty are not clear about the reality that very substantial growth is needed if people in poor countries should have a chance to leave poverty behind. I believe that if we do not express very clearly that economic growth is needed, we are damaging the prospects of the poorest people in the world to leave poverty behind. I am therefore asking that everyone who finds global poverty unacceptable should be very clear that the majority of people in the world live in poor economies and that massive economic growth is needed to increase their incomes to a decent level. Higher incomes are not an end in themselves. But to say that income growth only has an instrumental role is not to say that it is of little importance. A person's income does not measure their well-being, it measures whether goods and services they value remain out of reach or not. Because many of these goods and services matter for their wellbeing, income matters too. Any person’s income depends on two factors, the _average income_ in the country they live in and the position that particular person has in that country’s _income distribution_. Both aspects can change so that fewer people are poor: * average income can [increase](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=Western%20Europe~East%20Asia~South%20and%20South-East%20Asia~Middle%20East~Eastern%20Europe~Latin%20America~Sub-Sahara%20Africa~USA~GBR~AUS&region=World) over time, that is called economic growth * and inequality can decline so that the poorest people get closer to the average income in that country. For anyone who is concerned about poverty, it is important to consider by how much poverty can decline by either economic growth or lower inequality. Let’s look at each factor. ## Reducing inequality within countries One possibility to reduce poverty is to redistribute income within that country so that the income of the poor rises. There are a number of ways this can be done: one way is that the government taxes the incomes of richer people and pays it out to the poor. The largest poverty reduction that is possible via a reduction in inequality would be achieved by a country that achieves perfect equality so that no one is poorer than anyone else. To understand by how much the incomes of the poorest people can possibly increase via reduced inequality, it is therefore important to see data on average incomes across countries. There are two ways of measuring average income in a country: * You can either start at the individual level and do a survey in which you ask people what their expenditure or income is – this is plotted on the vertical axis in the chart. Households’ expenditure is not the same thing as their income – but they are closely related, this is especially true of poor people who do not have the chance to save much.{ref}To get a global view of poverty we need to combine data from both income and expenditure surveys since not all countries collect data on both.{/ref} * or you can start on the macro level and divide the size of the entire economy by the number of people in that country, and you end up with GDP per capita, plotted on the horizontal axis. The two income concepts differ: GDP per capita is typically higher – it is a more comprehensive measure of income and includes, for example, government expenditure and also the imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing.{ref}Measured across the whole economy income must always equal expenditure, since savings, by definition, equals investment expenditure. But this is not true if we look only at households – it is mostly households saving and mostly firms and government making expenditure on investment goods. There is generally a gap between GDP per capita and the averages found in both income surveys and expenditure surveys. But the reasons for the gap are different depending on which we are comparing. GDP includes many items that are typically not measured in household income surveys, such as an imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing, the retained earnings of firms and taxes on production such as VAT. The gap is even larger when GDP is compared to surveys of household consumption – the latter concept excluding both investment expenditure and government expenditure on public services such as education and health. Other aggregates beyond GDP are available in the national accounts that are more comparable to the concepts applied in household income and consumption surveys. However, important differences still remain even here. For example, in addition to imputed rents, imputations for the value of certain financial services, such as bank accounts, are included in aggregate household consumption measured in national accounts, with no equivalent for these items recorded in the survey data. In many countries, the consumption of nonprofit institutions serving households (NPISH) is included as part of household consumption within national accounts, but not within household surveys. On top of these conceptual differences are a range of mismeasurement problems that affect both sets of data. On this topic see Deaton (2005), and Pinkovskiy and Sala-i-Martin [(2016)](https://paperpile.com/c/sdaY5W/c3Eje/?noauthor=1). Deaton, Angus. 2005. “Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1–1. Available online [here](https://scholar.princeton.edu/deaton/publications/measuring-poverty-growing-world-or-measuring-growth-poor-world). Pinkovskiy, Maxim, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2016. “Lights, Camera… Income! Illuminating the National Accounts-Household Surveys Debate.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 579–631. Available online [here](https://www.nber.org/papers/w19831).{/ref} Angus Deaton (2005) gives a helpful overview of these differences.{ref}Deaton, Angus. 2005. “Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1–19.{/ref} Because they differ and because both are relevant data points for understanding a country’s average income, I’m showing both income measures so that you can study how much it matters to use one or the other. All measures in this chart are given in international-$, which means that it is adjusted for the price differences between countries. This adjustment is done in a way such that one international-dollar is equivalent to the purchasing power of one US-$ _in the US_. The $13.13 average income of people in Peru, for example, means that the average Peruvian can purchase goods and services that would cost $13.13 in the US. Many poorer people rely on subsistence farming and do not have a monetary income. To take this into account and make a fair comparison of their living standards, the statisticians that produce these figures estimate the monetary value of their home production and add it to their income/expenditure. That is true of both measures shown in the chart. As you can see, the majority of people in the world live in countries that are very poor. Even perfect equality in those countries would mean that billions of people around the world would live on extremely low incomes: $15 a day, $10 a day, even less than $5 a day. When the average of people’s income in a country is that low, then the only way the majority of people can possibly leave poverty behind is when that country’s economy grows so that average incomes increase. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-daily-expenditure-per-capita-vs-gdp-per-capita-2011-ppp"/> ## Reducing global inequality Another possibility to reduce global poverty is to redistribute between countries. Money can be transferred from rich people in the rich countries to poorer people in poor countries. I am personally very much in favor of that: * I donate 10% of my income to efforts that support people in poorer countries and have been doing this for many years (I donate via [here](https://www.givewell.org/) and [here](https://app.effectivealtruism.org/)). * More directly, I have given to poor people via [GiveDirectly](https://www.givedirectly.org/) and believe that this a very good way to spend your money. * I am also in favor of increased spending on aid (if you are skeptical, [here](https://twitter.com/s8mb/status/1331190082049601536) is a good thread by an aid skeptic about why it is good to spend on aid). But I have two problems with the idea that we should reduce global poverty by global redistribution: I think it is extremely optimistic to believe that large-scale global redistribution would be supported by those who live on more than the global average income.{ref}Again, where the global average income is depends on your definition of income: * If you rely on the household surveys, then the average income in the world is around int.-$16 per day ([same source](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~OWID_WRL) as above). * If you find GDP per capita more relevant, then you find that it is [int.-$17,000](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD) (but keep in mind that you then cannot compare it with people’s household income). * If you are relying on the World Inequality Lab estimate for the global average income you find that it is [int.-$23,445](https://wid.world/world/#anninc_p0p100_z/WO/last/us/k/p/yearly/a/false/5651.916/30000/curve/false/country) (again this cannot be compared with estimates from the other sources).{/ref} You would need to convince (or force) the richest hundreds of million people in the world to give up large shares of their income and I think only few people would be willing to do that. One concrete data point that makes me skeptical: most rich countries in the world [are not willing to achieve](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_development_aid_country_donors) the UN goal of spending even only 0.7% of their GDP on aid. If it is hard to find political support for the goal of spending 0.7% of people’s incomes on aid, I very much do not believe that the majority of people who live on more than the average income would agree to give up much larger shares of their income. There are only two ways to increase the incomes of the poor: lower global inequality or economic growth for the poorest billions of the world. If someone is not in favor of economic growth for the poorer billions in the world, they are left with the option to reduce global inequality. I am in favor of reducing global inequality, but I find it extremely wrong to suggest that the only acceptable way to end global poverty is to reduce global inequality. It is wrong to make the chance of poor people leaving poverty behind conditional on an extremely optimistic scenario of the future of inequality. ## Economic growth Economic growth in today’s rich countries over the last two hundred years is the reason that people in those countries are much less poor than people in the same places in the past or people in poor countries today. The chart on the top compares estimates of the income distribution in Madagascar (in green) and the UK (in blue) in 2018. The income differences between people in these two countries are extremely large. The current average income in Madagascar today is $1.60 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data – which you can [explore here](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&facet=none&Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&International-%24=2011+prices&Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&country=~MDG).{/ref} This means that even the richer half of Madagascar’s population live on incomes between only $2 to $5 per day, much less than even poor people in the UK. The chart at the bottom shows that back in 1800 the incomes in the UK were similarly low as Madagascar today. Since then the UK economy grew [80-fold](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/englands-economy-over-the-long-run-gdp-vs-population?time=1800..latest) and the income distribution moved to the right so that the majority of British people left the poverty of the past behind. Average incomes in Madagascar did not grow – GDP per capita is [not higher](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&yScale=linear&stackMode=absolute&country=~MDG&region=World) than three generations ago – and poverty therefore remains [extremely severe](https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Madagascar1.pdf) in Madagascar. This needs to change if poor countries are to leave poverty behind. People in Madagascar only have a chance to leave poverty behind if their average incomes grow the way they did in the UK. Economic growth is not enough to get people out of poverty. If the inequality of incomes increases, the poorest can be left behind. Fighting inequality matters too. But _without_ economic growth, there is _no chance at all_ to leave poverty behind. To make it possible that poverty can decline in Madagascar the average income must increase, without economic growth there is no chance that the people in Madagascar – and other poor countries – can possibly leave poverty behind. <Image filename="Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018.png" alt=""/> The income differences between rich and poor countries today are vast, as we have just seen. The country where a person lives explains _two-thirds_ of the variation of income differences between all people in the world – this is what inequality researcher Branko Milanovic [documents](https://voxeu.org/article/income-inequality-and-citizenship). Where a person lives is more important for how poor or rich they will be than everything else put together. Understanding how much the size of the economy matters for our own income is important for our own self-understanding and for our judgement of why it is that some people are poor and others are not. A person’s knowledge, their skills, and how hard they work all matter for whether they are poor or not – but all these personal factors together matter much less than the factor that is entirely outside a person’s control: whether the place they happen to be born into has a large, productive economy or not. Both the history of economic growth and the differences across the global income distribution today make this very clear: people are not poor because of who they are, poor people are poor because of the economy they happen to live in. This is true over time: The fact that a particular person in the Middle Ages was poor was not his or her failure, it was due to the fact that [almost all were very poor](https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap). They happened to be born at a time when the economy was not very productive and living standards were much lower than today. And it is true for places across the world today: The poorest billions of people live in very poor economies and as a consequence are very poor. ## Conclusion Lowering inequality is an important goal, and it can help to reduce poverty, but it can not be the only way in which the world fights global poverty. The poorest people live in places where average incomes are very low, as we have seen in the chart above. I am in favor of lower inequality, but I also believe that anyone who is concerned about global poverty should be in favor of strong economic growth in the economies that are home to the poorest billions in the world. For me personally, my income is not a major limiting factor on my freedom or well-being, and I am not concerned here with whether rich countries today should make it their goal to grow their economies. But I am concerned about the very low incomes of the majority of the world and believe that those economies that they are part of need to grow very substantially if there should be a chance that the poorest billions can leave poverty behind in the decades to come. One important reason why the people in some places are poor is because they were [exploited by colonial powers](https://voxeu.org/article/economic-impact-colonialism) that did not allow those economies to grow and instead impoverished them. The injustice of an extremely unequal world needs to end. While some places in the world have left the worst poverty [behind](https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap), the huge majority of the world still lives in countries where the average income is extremely low. To increase average incomes _is_ economic growth. That is why I think that everyone who is also concerned about global poverty should be clear and say without any hesitation that they are in favor of economic growth for the poorest billions in the world. **Follow up post:** In a follow up post I made the statements above more concrete and looked at the depth of global poverty today to get a quantitative sense of just how much the global income distribution would need to change to reduce global poverty substantially: [How much economic growth is necessary to reduce global poverty substantially?](https://ourworldindata.org/poverty-minimum-growth-needed)

{
    "id": 40917,
    "date": "2021-02-22T20:31:54",
    "guid": {
        "rendered": "https://owid.cloud/?p=40917"
    },
    "link": "https://owid.cloud/poverty-growth-needed",
    "meta": {
        "owid_publication_context_meta_field": {
            "latest": true,
            "homepage": true,
            "immediate_newsletter": true
        }
    },
    "slug": "poverty-growth-needed",
    "tags": [],
    "type": "post",
    "title": {
        "rendered": "The economies that are home to the poorest billions of people need to grow if we want global poverty to decline substantially"
    },
    "_links": {
        "self": [
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/40917"
            }
        ],
        "about": [
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/types/post"
            }
        ],
        "author": [
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/users/2",
                "embeddable": true
            }
        ],
        "curies": [
            {
                "href": "https://api.w.org/{rel}",
                "name": "wp",
                "templated": true
            }
        ],
        "replies": [
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/comments?post=40917",
                "embeddable": true
            }
        ],
        "wp:term": [
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/categories?post=40917",
                "taxonomy": "category",
                "embeddable": true
            },
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/tags?post=40917",
                "taxonomy": "post_tag",
                "embeddable": true
            }
        ],
        "collection": [
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts"
            }
        ],
        "wp:attachment": [
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/media?parent=40917"
            }
        ],
        "version-history": [
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/40917/revisions",
                "count": 30
            }
        ],
        "wp:featuredmedia": [
            {
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/media/40939",
                "embeddable": true
            }
        ],
        "predecessor-version": [
            {
                "id": 53865,
                "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/40917/revisions/53865"
            }
        ]
    },
    "author": 2,
    "format": "standard",
    "status": "publish",
    "sticky": false,
    "content": {
        "rendered": "\n<div class=\"blog-info\">\n<p>Updated on 23 February. Our World in Data presents the data and research to make progress against the world\u2019s largest problems.<br>This blog post draws on data and research discussed in our entries on <strong><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Economic Growth</a></strong> and <strong><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/poverty\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Poverty</a></strong>.</p>\n\n</div>\n\n\n\t<block type=\"help\">\n\t\t<content>\n\n<h4>The World Bank has updated its poverty and inequality data</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The data in this article uses a previous release of the World Bank&#8217;s poverty and inequality data in which incomes are expressed in 2011 international-$.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The World Bank has since updated its methods, and now measures incomes in 2017 international-$. As part of this change, the International Poverty Line used to measure extreme poverty has also been updated: from $1.90 (in 2011 prices) to $2.15 (in 2017 prices).</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This has had little effect on our overall understanding of poverty and inequality around the world. But because of the change of units, many of the figures mentioned in this article will differ from the latest World Bank figures.</p>\n\n\n    <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n        <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/from-1-90-to-2-15-a-day-the-updated-international-poverty-line</link-url>\n        <title></title>\n        <content>\n\n<p>Read more about the World Bank&#8217;s updated methodology</p>\n\n</content>\n        <figure></figure>\n    </block>\n\n    <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n        <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer</link-url>\n        <title>Explore the latest World Bank data on poverty and inequality</title>\n        <content>\n\n<p></p>\n\n</content>\n        <figure></figure>\n    </block>\n</content>\n\t</block>\n\n\n<p>The huge majority of the world today is very poor. About 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day and around 61% live on less than $10 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data \u2013 which you can <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&amp;facet=none&amp;Metric=Share+in+poverty&amp;International-%24=2011+prices&amp;Poverty+line=%2430+per+day&amp;Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&amp;country=~OWID_WRL\">explore here</a>.{/ref} I believe, for reasons I\u2019ll explain below, that if this should change it will require very substantial economic growth of the economies that are home to the poorest billions of people in the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The reason I wrote this text is that I believe some commentators on global poverty are not clear about the reality that very substantial growth is needed if people in poor countries should have a chance to leave poverty behind. I believe that if we do not express very clearly that economic growth is needed, we are damaging the prospects of the poorest people in the world to leave poverty behind.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>I am therefore asking that everyone who finds global poverty unacceptable should be very clear that the majority of people in the world live in poor economies and that massive economic growth is needed to increase their incomes to a decent level.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Higher incomes are not an end in themselves. But to say that income growth only has an instrumental role is not to say that it is of little importance. A person&#8217;s income does not measure their well-being, it measures whether goods and services they value remain out of reach or not. Because many of these goods and services matter for their wellbeing, income matters too.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Any person\u2019s income depends on two factors, the <em>average income</em> in the country they live in and the position that particular person has in that country\u2019s <em>income distribution</em>.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Both aspects can change so that fewer people are poor:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>average income can <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&amp;yScale=linear&amp;stackMode=absolute&amp;country=Western%20Europe~East%20Asia~South%20and%20South-East%20Asia~Middle%20East~Eastern%20Europe~Latin%20America~Sub-Sahara%20Africa~USA~GBR~AUS&amp;region=World\">increase</a> over time, that is called economic growth</li><li>and inequality can decline so that the poorest people get closer to the average income in that country.</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For anyone who is concerned about poverty, it is important to consider by how much poverty can decline by either economic growth or lower inequality. Let\u2019s look at each factor.</p>\n\n\n\n<h3>Reducing inequality within countries</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>One possibility to reduce poverty is to redistribute income within that country so that the income of the poor rises. There are a number of ways this can be done: one way is that the government taxes the incomes of richer people and pays it out to the poor.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The largest poverty reduction that is possible via a reduction in inequality would be achieved by a country that achieves perfect equality so that no one is poorer than anyone else.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>To understand by how much the incomes of the poorest people can possibly increase via reduced inequality, it is therefore important to see data on average incomes across countries.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are two ways of measuring average income in a country:&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>You can either start at the individual level and do a survey in which you ask people what their expenditure or income is \u2013 this is plotted on the vertical axis in the chart.&nbsp; Households\u2019 expenditure is not the same thing as their income \u2013 but they are closely related, this is especially true of poor people who do not have the chance to save much.{ref}To get a global view of poverty we need to combine data from both income and expenditure surveys since not all countries collect data on both.{/ref}</li><li>or you can start on the macro level and divide the size of the entire economy by the number of people in that country, and you end up with GDP per capita, plotted on the horizontal axis.</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The two income concepts differ: GDP per capita is typically higher \u2013 it is a more comprehensive measure of income and includes, for example, government expenditure and also the imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing.{ref}Measured across the whole economy income must always equal expenditure, since savings, by definition, equals investment expenditure. But this is not true if we look only at households \u2013 it is mostly households saving and mostly firms and government making expenditure on investment goods.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is generally a gap between GDP per capita and the averages found in both income surveys and expenditure surveys. But the reasons for the gap are different depending on which we are comparing.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>GDP includes many items that are typically not measured in household income surveys, such as an imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing, the retained earnings of firms and taxes on production such as VAT. The gap is even larger when GDP is compared to surveys of household consumption \u2013 the latter concept excluding both investment expenditure and government expenditure on public services such as education and health.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Other aggregates beyond GDP are available in the national accounts that are more comparable to the concepts applied in household income and consumption surveys. However, important differences still remain even here. For example, in addition to imputed rents, imputations for the value of certain financial services, such as bank accounts, are included in aggregate household consumption measured in national accounts, with no equivalent for these items recorded in the survey data. In many countries, the consumption of nonprofit institutions serving households (NPISH) is included as part of household consumption within national accounts, but not within household surveys.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>On top of these conceptual differences are a range of mismeasurement problems that affect both sets of data. On this topic see Deaton (2005), and Pinkovskiy and Sala-i-Martin <a href=\"https://paperpile.com/c/sdaY5W/c3Eje/?noauthor=1\">(2016)</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Deaton, Angus. 2005. \u201cMeasuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).\u201d The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1\u20131. Available online <a href=\"https://scholar.princeton.edu/deaton/publications/measuring-poverty-growing-world-or-measuring-growth-poor-world\">here</a>.<br>Pinkovskiy, Maxim, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2016. \u201cLights, Camera\u2026 Income! Illuminating the National Accounts-Household Surveys Debate.\u201d The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 579\u2013631. Available online <a href=\"https://www.nber.org/papers/w19831\">here</a>.{/ref} Angus Deaton (2005) gives a helpful overview of these differences.{ref}Deaton, Angus. 2005. \u201cMeasuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World).\u201d The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 1\u201319.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because they differ and because both are relevant data points for understanding a country\u2019s average income, I\u2019m showing both income measures so that you can study how much it matters to use one or the other.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>All measures in this chart are given in international-$, which means that it is adjusted for the price differences between countries. This adjustment is done in a way such that one international-dollar is equivalent to the purchasing power of one US-$ <em>in the US</em>. The $13.13 average income of people in Peru, for example, means that the average Peruvian can purchase goods and services that would cost $13.13 in the US.\u00a0</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Many poorer people rely on subsistence farming and do not have a monetary income. To take this into account and make a fair comparison of their living standards, the statisticians that produce these figures estimate the monetary value of their home production and add it to their income/expenditure. That is true of both measures shown in the chart.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>As you can see, the majority of people in the world live in countries that are very poor. Even perfect equality in those countries would mean that billions of people around the world would live on extremely low incomes: $15 a day, $10 a day, even less than $5 a day.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>When the average of people\u2019s income in a country is that low, then the only way the majority of people can possibly leave poverty behind is when that country\u2019s economy grows so that average incomes increase.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-daily-expenditure-per-capita-vs-gdp-per-capita-2011-ppp\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h3>Reducing global inequality</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Another possibility to reduce global poverty is to redistribute between countries. Money can be transferred from rich people in the rich countries to poorer people in poor countries.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>I am personally very much in favor of that:&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>I donate 10% of my income to efforts that support people in poorer countries and have been doing this for many years (I donate via <a href=\"https://www.givewell.org/\">here</a> and <a href=\"https://app.effectivealtruism.org/\">here</a>).&nbsp;</li><li>More directly, I have given to poor people via <a href=\"https://www.givedirectly.org/\">GiveDirectly</a> and believe that this a very good way to spend your money.&nbsp;</li><li>I am also in favor of increased spending on aid (if you are skeptical, <a href=\"https://twitter.com/s8mb/status/1331190082049601536\">here</a> is a good thread by an aid skeptic about why it is good to spend on aid).</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>But I have two problems with the idea that we should reduce global poverty by global redistribution:</p>\n\n\n\n<p>I think it is extremely optimistic to believe that large-scale global redistribution would be supported by those who live on more than the global average income.{ref}Again, where the global average income is depends on your definition of income:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>If you rely on the household surveys, then the average income in the world is around int.-$16 per day (<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&amp;facet=none&amp;Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&amp;International-%24=2011+prices&amp;Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&amp;Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&amp;country=~OWID_WRL\">same source</a> as above).\u00a0</li><li>If you find GDP per capita more relevant, then you find that it is <a href=\"https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD\">int.-$17,000</a> (but keep in mind that you then cannot compare it with people\u2019s household income).</li><li>If you are relying on the World Inequality Lab estimate for the global average income you find that it is <a href=\"https://wid.world/world/#anninc_p0p100_z/WO/last/us/k/p/yearly/a/false/5651.916/30000/curve/false/country\">int.-$23,445</a> (again this cannot be compared with estimates from the other sources).{/ref} You would need to convince (or force) the richest hundreds of million people in the world to give up large shares of their income and I think only few people would be willing to do that. One concrete data point that makes me skeptical: most rich countries in the world <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_development_aid_country_donors\">are not willing to achieve</a> the UN goal of spending even only 0.7% of their GDP on aid.\u00a0</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If it is hard to find political support for the goal of spending 0.7% of people\u2019s incomes on aid, I very much do not believe that the majority of people who live on more than the average income would agree to give up much larger shares of their income.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are only two ways to increase the incomes of the poor: lower global inequality or economic growth for the poorest billions of the world. If someone is not in favor of economic growth for the poorer billions in the world, they are left with the option to reduce global inequality. I am in favor of reducing global inequality, but I find it extremely wrong to suggest that the only acceptable way to end global poverty is to reduce global inequality.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is wrong to make the chance of poor people leaving poverty behind conditional on an extremely optimistic scenario of the future of inequality.</p>\n\n\n\n<h3>Economic growth</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Economic growth in today\u2019s rich countries over the last two hundred years is the reason that people in those countries are much less poor than people in the same places in the past or people in poor countries today.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart on the top compares estimates of the income distribution in Madagascar (in green) and the UK (in blue) in 2018. The income differences between people in these two countries are extremely large. The current average income in Madagascar today is $1.60 per day.{ref}According to World Bank Poverty and Inequality data \u2013 which you can <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/poverty-explorer-2011-vs-2017-ppp?tab=chart&amp;facet=none&amp;Metric=Mean+income+or+expenditure&amp;International-%24=2011+prices&amp;Poverty+line=%2410+per+day&amp;Household+survey+data+type=Show+data+from+both+income+and+expenditure+surveys&amp;country=~MDG\">explore here</a>.{/ref} This means that even the richer half of Madagascar\u2019s population live on incomes between only $2 to $5 per day, much less than even poor people in the UK.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart at the bottom shows that back in 1800 the incomes in the UK were similarly low as Madagascar today. Since then the UK economy grew <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/englands-economy-over-the-long-run-gdp-vs-population?time=1800..latest\">80-fold</a> and the income distribution moved to the right so that the majority of British people left the poverty of the past behind.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Average incomes in Madagascar did not grow \u2013 GDP per capita is <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020?tab=chart&amp;yScale=linear&amp;stackMode=absolute&amp;country=~MDG&amp;region=World\">not higher</a> than three generations ago \u2013 and poverty therefore remains <a href=\"https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Madagascar1.pdf\">extremely severe</a> in Madagascar.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This needs to change if poor countries are to leave poverty behind. People in Madagascar only have a chance to leave poverty behind if their average incomes grow the way they did in the UK.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Economic growth is not enough to get people out of poverty. If the inequality of incomes increases, the poorest can be left behind. Fighting inequality matters too. But <em>without</em> economic growth, there is <em>no chance at all</em> to leave poverty behind. To make it possible that poverty can decline in Madagascar the average income must increase, without economic growth there is no chance that the people in Madagascar \u2013 and other poor countries \u2013 can possibly leave poverty behind.</p>\n\n\n\n<p></p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"667\" height=\"550\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-667x550.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-40918\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-667x550.png 667w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-400x330.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-150x124.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-768x633.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-1536x1266.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2021/02/Incomes-poor-and-rich-country-1800-and-2018-2048x1688.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 667px) 100vw, 667px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The income differences between rich and poor countries today are vast, as we have just seen. The country where a person lives explains <em>two-thirds</em> of the variation of income differences between all people in the world \u2013 this is what inequality researcher Branko Milanovic <a href=\"https://voxeu.org/article/income-inequality-and-citizenship\">documents</a>. Where a person lives is more important for how poor or rich they will be than everything else put together.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Understanding how much the size of the economy matters for our own income is important for our own self-understanding and for our judgement of why it is that some people are poor and others are not. A person\u2019s knowledge, their skills, and how hard they work all matter for whether they are poor or not \u2013 but all these personal factors together matter much less than the factor that is entirely outside a person\u2019s control: whether the place they happen to be born into has a large, productive economy or not.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Both the history of economic growth and the differences across the global income distribution today make this very clear: people are not poor because of who they are, poor people are poor because of the economy they happen to live in.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is true over time: The fact that a particular person in the Middle Ages was poor was not his or her failure, it was due to the fact that <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap\">almost all were very poor</a>. They happened to be born at a time when the economy was not very productive and living standards were much lower than today.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>And it is true for places across the world today: The poorest billions of people live in very poor economies and as a consequence are very poor.</p>\n\n\n\n<h3>Conclusion</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Lowering inequality is an important goal, and it can help to reduce poverty, but it can not be the only way in which the world fights global poverty. The poorest people live in places where average incomes are very low, as we have seen in the chart above. I am in favor of lower inequality, but I also believe that anyone who is concerned about global poverty should be in favor of strong economic growth in the economies that are home to the poorest billions in the world.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>For me personally, my income is not a major limiting factor on my freedom or well-being, and I am not concerned here with whether rich countries today should make it their goal to grow their economies. But I am concerned about the very low incomes of the majority of the world and believe that those economies that they are part of need to grow very substantially if there should be a chance that the poorest billions can leave poverty behind in the decades to come.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>One important reason why the people in some places are poor is because they were <a href=\"https://voxeu.org/article/economic-impact-colonialism\">exploited by colonial powers</a> that did not allow those economies to grow and instead impoverished them. The injustice of an extremely unequal world needs to end.&nbsp;While some places in the world have left the worst poverty <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/breaking-the-malthusian-trap\">behind</a>, the huge majority of the world still lives in countries where the average income is extremely low. To increase average incomes <em>is</em> economic growth. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>That is why I think that everyone who is also concerned about global poverty should be clear and say without any hesitation that they are in favor of economic growth for the poorest billions in the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Follow up post:</strong> In a follow up post I made the statements above more concrete and looked at the depth of global poverty today to get a quantitative sense of just how much the global income distribution would need to change to reduce global poverty substantially: <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/poverty-minimum-growth-needed\">How much economic growth is necessary to reduce global poverty substantially?</a></p>\n",
        "protected": false
    },
    "excerpt": {
        "rendered": "The majority of the world today is poor: 85% of the world live on less than $30 per day. If we are to alleviate global poverty, we need economic growth.",
        "protected": false
    },
    "date_gmt": "2021-02-22T20:31:54",
    "modified": "2022-10-17T14:59:00",
    "template": "",
    "categories": [
        189,
        1
    ],
    "ping_status": "closed",
    "authors_name": [
        "Max Roser"
    ],
    "modified_gmt": "2022-10-17T13:59:00",
    "comment_status": "closed",
    "featured_media": 40939,
    "featured_media_paths": {
        "thumbnail": "/app/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2021-02-23-at-11.48.16-150x80.png",
        "medium_large": "/app/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2021-02-23-at-11.48.16-768x410.png"
    }
}

Links from other tables

0 rows from post_id in post_tags
25 rows from sourceId in posts_links
0 rows from wordpressId in posts_unified
27 rows from postId in post_links
3 rows from postId in post_charts
0 rows from postId in post_broken_chart_links