posts: 29768
Data license: CC-BY
This data as json
id | title | slug | type | status | content | archieml | archieml_update_statistics | published_at | updated_at | gdocSuccessorId | authors | excerpt | created_at_in_wordpress | updated_at_in_wordpress | featured_image | formattingOptions | markdown | wpApiSnapshot |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29768 | Social connections and health | untitled-reusable-block-185 | wp_block | publish | <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Dr. Vivek Murthy, former <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgeon_General_of_the_United_States" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Surgeon General</a> of the United States, recently <a href="https://www.vivekmurthy.com/single-post/2017/10/10/Work-and-the-Loneliness-Epidemic-Harvard-Business-Review" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wrote</a>: “Loneliness and weak social connections are associated with a reduction in lifespan similar to that caused by smoking 15 cigarettes a day”.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This ‘15 cigarettes a day’ figure has been reproduced and reported in the news many times, under headlines such as “Loneliness is as lethal as smoking 15 cigarettes per day”.{ref}There are dozens of articles reporting the ‘15 cigarettes a day’ figure. See for example <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.webmd.com/balance/news/20180504/loneliness-rivals-obesity-smoking-as-health-risk" target="_blank">this in WebMD</a>, and <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5181559/Loneliness-bad-health-smoking-15-day.html" target="_blank">this in The Daily Mail</a>. From what I gather, all the articles that cite this figure trace back to Dr. Vivek Murthy and a meta-analysis by Holt-Lunstad et al. (2015), which I discuss in more detail below in this post. When I reviewed this meta-analysis I did find the claim that loneliness is a risk factor comparable to smoking; but I could not find the calculations that lead to the 15 cigarettes benchmark. It’s still unclear to me what the unit of loneliness is and what this translates into in terms of years of lives lost. However, given that 15 cigarettes per day is <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/consumption-per-smoker-per-day-bounds" target="_blank">about average consumption among smokers</a>, it’s possible that the benchmark comes from comparing excess mortality of smoking for the average smoker, vs. excess mortality of loneliness for average levels of loneliness.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>It is indeed quite a shocking comparison since around <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/smoking-and-secondhand-deaths" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">7 million deaths</a> globally are attributed to smoking every year, and back-of-the-envelope calculations published in medical journals say <a href="https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/320/7226/53.1.full.pdf?casa_token=Fcl9ywjt31gAAAAA:9FnQFmC50vZclWEndIVf8Vf4uwlEsKIiQeeQtFXm11_06jJwLcgZn1MS4LPyFsFVnrcCsSSHXnv5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">one cigarette reduces your lifespan by 11 minutes</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Here we dig deeper to try to understand what the data and research tell us about the link between social relations and health. In a nutshell, my reading of the evidence is as follows:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list {"ordered":true} --> <ol><li>There is a huge amount of evidence showing individuals who report feelings of loneliness are more likely to have health problems later in their life.</li><li>There is credible theory and explanation of biological mechanisms, whereby isolation can set off unconscious surveillance for social threat, producing cognitive biases, reducing sleep and affecting hormones.</li><li>It's very likely there is a causal link, but there is no credible experimental evidence that would allow us to have a precise estimate of the magnitude of the causal effect that loneliness has on key metrics of health, such as life expectancy.</li><li>The fact that we struggle to pin down the magnitude of the effect of loneliness on health doesn't mean we should dismiss the available evidence. But it does show that more research is needed.</li></ol> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Observational studies: A first look at the data</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":5} --> <h5>Measuring loneliness</h5> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Psychologists and social neuroscientists often refer to loneliness as <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-07755-000" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>painful</em> isolation</a>. The emphasis on painful is there to make a clear distinction between solitude – the state of being alone – and subjective loneliness, which is the distressing feeling that comes from unmet expectations of the types of interpersonal relationships we wish to have.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Researchers use several kinds of data to measure solitude and loneliness. The most common source of data are surveys where people are asked about different aspects of their lives, including whether they live alone, how much time they spend with other people in a given window of time (e.g. ‘last week’) or specific context (e.g. ‘at social events, clubs or places of worship’); and whether they experience feelings of loneliness (e.g. ‘I have no-one with whom I can discuss important matters with’). Researchers sometimes study these survey responses separately, but often they also aggregate them in a composite index.{ref}The most popular composite index is the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UCLA_Loneliness_Scale" target="_blank">UCLA Loneliness Scale</a>, which was first proposed in 1978, and is based on a 20-item scale designed to measure subjective feelings of loneliness. You can read more about it <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://fetzer.org/sites/default/files/images/stories/pdf/selfmeasures/Self_Measures_for_Loneliness_and_Interpersonal_Problems_UCLA_LONELINESS.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Surveys <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0898264312460275" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">confirm</a> that people respond differently to questions about subjective loneliness and physical social isolation, which suggests people do understand these as two distinct issues.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In the chart here I've put together estimates on self-reported feelings of loneliness from various sources. The fact that we see such high levels of loneliness, with substantial divergence across countries, explains why this is an important and active research area. Indeed, there are literally hundreds of papers that have used survey data to explore the link between loneliness, solitude, and health. Below is an overview of what these studies find.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <figure><iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/self-reported-loneliness-older-adults"></iframe></figure> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":5} --> <h5>The link between loneliness and physical health</h5> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Most papers studying the link between loneliness and health find that both objective solitude (e.g. living alone) and subjective loneliness (e.g. frequent self-reported feelings of loneliness) are correlated with higher morbidity (i.e. illness) and higher mortality (i.e. likelihood of death).</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The relationship between health and loneliness can of course go both ways: lonely people may see their health deteriorate with time; but it may also be the case that people who suffer from poor health end up feeling more lonely later down the line.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Because of this two-way relationship it’s important to go beyond cross-sectional correlations and focus on longitudinal studies – these are studies where researchers track the same individuals over time to see if loneliness predicts illness or mortality in the future, after controlling for baseline behaviors and health status.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The evidence from longitudinal studies shows that people who experience loneliness during a period of their life tend to be more likely to have worse health later down the line. In the Netherlands, for example, <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-pdf/146/6/510/455063/146-6-510.pdf" target="_blank">researchers found</a> that self-reported loneliness among adults aged 55-85 predicted mortality several months later, and this was true after controlling for age, sex, chronic diseases, alcohol use, smoking, self-assessed health condition, and functional limitations.{ref}Penninx, B. W., Van Tilburg, T., Kriegsman, D. M., Deeg, D. J., Boeke, A. J. P., & van Eijk, J. T. M. (1997). Effects of social support and personal coping resources on mortality in older age: The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. American journal of epidemiology, 146(6), 510-519.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Most studies focus either on subjective loneliness, or on objective isolation. But some studies try to compare both. In a recent meta-analysis covering 70 longitudinal studies, the authors <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1745691614568352" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">write</a>:<em> “We found no differences between measures of objective and subjective social isolation. Results remain consistent across gender, length of follow-up, and world region.”</em> And in the concluding section they highlight that, in their interpretation of the evidence, <em>“the risk associated with social isolation and loneliness is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality”</em>; which include smoking and obesity.{ref}Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on psychological science, 10(2), 227-237.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":5} --> <h5>The link between mental health and subjective well-being</h5> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In another much-cited review of the evidence, Louise Hawkley and John Cacioppo, two leading experts on this topic, <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874845/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">concluded</a> that <em>“perhaps the most striking finding in this literature is the breadth of emotional and cognitive processes and outcomes that seem susceptible to the influence of loneliness”.</em>{ref}Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of behavioral medicine, 40(2), 218-227. {/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Researchers have found that loneliness correlates with subsequent increases in symptoms related to <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/dementia-death-rates" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">dementia</a>, <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health#depression" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">depression</a>, and many other issues related to <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">mental health</a>; and this holds after controlling for demographic variables, objective social isolation, stress, and baseline levels of cognitive function.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There is also research that suggests a link between loneliness and lower <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-life-satisfaction" target="_blank">happiness</a>, and we discuss this in more detail <a href="http://www.ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-friends">here</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Mechanisms</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Experiments with social animals, like rats, <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/106/52/22393.full.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">show</a> that induced isolation can lead to a higher risk of death from cancer. Humans and rats are of course very different; but experts, such as Hawkley and Cacioppo, argue that these experiments are important because they tell us something meaningful about a shared biological mechanism. In a review of the evidence, Susan Pinker writes: “If our big brains evolved to interact, loneliness would be an early warning system—a built-in alarm that sent a biological signal to members who had somehow become separated from the group”.{ref}Pinker, S. (2015). The village effect: How face-to-face contact can make us healthier and happier. Vintage Canada.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Indeed, there’s evidence of social regulation of gene expression in humans: <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/108/7/3080.full.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">studies suggest</a> perceived loneliness can switch on/off genes that regulate our immune systems, and it is this what then affects the health of humans, or other animals that evolved with similar defence mechanisms.{ref}Cole, S. W., Hawkley, L. C., Arevalo, J. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). Transcript origin analysis identifies antigen-presenting cells as primary targets of socially regulated gene expression in leukocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 3080-3085.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Causality and implications</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The bulk of evidence from observational studies and biological mechanisms, described above, implies that loneliness most likely matters for our health and well being. But do we really know how much it matters relative to other important risk factors?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The key point here is that estimates are likely biased to some extent.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The findings from longitudinal studies that track individuals over time are insightful, but they cannot rule out that the relationship might be partly driven by other factors that we cannot observe. Even the studies linking loneliness and genetics can be subject to this <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://mru.org/dictionary-economics/omitted-variable-economics" target="_blank">omitted-variable bias</a>, because a genetic predisposition to loneliness may drive both loneliness and health outcomes.{ref}Two concrete papers that show this is a real concern are:<br>- Abdellaoui, A., Sanchez-Roige, S., Sealock, J., Treur, J. L., Dennis, J., Fontanillas, P., … & Baselmans, B. (2018). Phenome-wide investigation of health outcomes associated with genetic predisposition to loneliness. bioRxiv, 468835.<br>-Abdellaoui, A., Chen, H. Y., Willemsen, G., Ehli, E. A., Davies, G. E., Verweij, K. J., … & Cacioppo, J. T. (2019). Associations between loneliness and personality are mostly driven by a genetic association with neuroticism. Journal of personality, 87(2), 386-397.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>I could not find credible experimental evidence that would allow us to have a precise estimate of the magnitude of the causal effect.{ref}If you know of relevant studies that do provide such estimates, please let me know at [email protected].{/ref} But the fact that we struggle to pin down the magnitude of the effect doesn't mean we should dismiss the available evidence. On the contrary – it would be great if we had evidence from randomized control trials that test positive interventions to reduce loneliness, to understand better if the ‘15 cigarettes per day’ comparison from the Surgeon General of the US is roughly correct, at least for the average person.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Having a better understanding of the magnitude of the effect is important, not only because loneliness is common, but also because it’s complex and unequally experienced by people around the world.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>As the chart above shows, there are large differences in self-reported loneliness across countries. We should understand how important these differences are for the distribution of health and well-being.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> | { "id": "wp-29768", "slug": "untitled-reusable-block-185", "content": { "toc": [], "body": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Dr. Vivek Murthy, former ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgeon_General_of_the_United_States", "children": [ { "text": "Surgeon General", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " of the United States, recently ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.vivekmurthy.com/single-post/2017/10/10/Work-and-the-Loneliness-Epidemic-Harvard-Business-Review", "children": [ { "text": "wrote", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ": \u201cLoneliness and weak social connections are associated with a reduction in lifespan similar to that caused by smoking 15 cigarettes a day\u201d.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This \u201815 cigarettes a day\u2019 figure has been reproduced and reported in the news many times, under headlines such as \u201cLoneliness is as lethal as smoking 15 cigarettes per day\u201d.{ref}There are dozens of articles reporting the \u201815 cigarettes a day\u2019 figure. See for example ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.webmd.com/balance/news/20180504/loneliness-rivals-obesity-smoking-as-health-risk", "children": [ { "text": "this in WebMD", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", and ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5181559/Loneliness-bad-health-smoking-15-day.html", "children": [ { "text": "this in The Daily Mail", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". From what I gather, all the articles that cite this figure trace back to Dr. Vivek Murthy and a meta-analysis by Holt-Lunstad et al. (2015), which I discuss in more detail below in this post. When I reviewed this meta-analysis I did find the claim that loneliness is a risk factor comparable to smoking; but I could not find the calculations that lead to the 15 cigarettes benchmark. It\u2019s still unclear to me what the unit of loneliness is and what this translates into in terms of years of lives lost. However, given that 15 cigarettes per day is ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/consumption-per-smoker-per-day-bounds", "children": [ { "text": "about average consumption among smokers", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", it\u2019s possible that the benchmark comes from comparing excess mortality of smoking for the average smoker, vs. excess mortality of loneliness for average levels of loneliness.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "It is indeed quite a shocking comparison since around ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/smoking-and-secondhand-deaths", "children": [ { "text": "7 million deaths", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " globally are attributed to smoking every year, and back-of-the-envelope calculations published in medical journals say ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/320/7226/53.1.full.pdf?casa_token=Fcl9ywjt31gAAAAA:9FnQFmC50vZclWEndIVf8Vf4uwlEsKIiQeeQtFXm11_06jJwLcgZn1MS4LPyFsFVnrcCsSSHXnv5", "children": [ { "text": "one cigarette reduces your lifespan by 11 minutes", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Here we dig deeper to try to understand what the data and research tell us about the link between social relations and health. In a nutshell, my reading of the evidence is as follows:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "numbered-list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There is a huge amount of evidence showing individuals who report feelings of loneliness are more likely to have health problems later in their life.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There is credible theory and explanation of biological mechanisms, whereby isolation can set off unconscious surveillance for social threat, producing cognitive biases, reducing sleep and affecting hormones.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "It's very likely there is a causal link, but there is no credible experimental evidence that would allow us to have a precise estimate of the magnitude of the causal effect that loneliness has on key metrics of health, such as life expectancy.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The fact that we struggle to pin down the magnitude of the effect of loneliness on health doesn't mean we should dismiss the available evidence. But it does show that more research is needed.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Observational studies: A first look at the data", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Measuring loneliness", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Psychologists and social neuroscientists often refer to loneliness as ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-07755-000", "children": [ { "children": [ { "text": "painful", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " isolation", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". The emphasis on painful is there to make a clear distinction between solitude \u2013 the state of being alone \u2013 and subjective loneliness, which is the distressing feeling that comes from unmet expectations of the types of interpersonal relationships we wish to have.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Researchers use several kinds of data to measure solitude and loneliness. The most common source of data are surveys where people are asked about different aspects of their lives, including whether they live alone, how much time they spend with other people in a given window of time (e.g. \u2018last week\u2019) or specific context (e.g. \u2018at social events, clubs or places of worship\u2019); and whether they experience feelings of loneliness (e.g. \u2018I have no-one with whom I can discuss important matters with\u2019). Researchers sometimes study these survey responses separately, but often they also aggregate them in a composite index.{ref}The most popular composite index is the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UCLA_Loneliness_Scale", "children": [ { "text": "UCLA Loneliness Scale", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", which was first proposed in 1978, and is based on a 20-item scale designed to measure subjective feelings of loneliness. You can read more about it ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://fetzer.org/sites/default/files/images/stories/pdf/selfmeasures/Self_Measures_for_Loneliness_and_Interpersonal_Problems_UCLA_LONELINESS.pdf", "children": [ { "text": "here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Surveys ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0898264312460275", "children": [ { "text": "confirm", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " that people respond differently to questions about subjective loneliness and physical social isolation, which suggests people do understand these as two distinct issues.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In the chart here I've put together estimates on self-reported feelings of loneliness from various sources. The fact that we see such high levels of loneliness, with substantial divergence across countries, explains why this is an important and active research area. Indeed, there are literally hundreds of papers that have used survey data to explore the link between loneliness, solitude, and health. Below is an overview of what these studies find.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/self-reported-loneliness-older-adults", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "The link between loneliness and physical health", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Most papers studying the link between loneliness and health find that both objective solitude (e.g. living alone) and subjective loneliness (e.g. frequent self-reported feelings of loneliness) are correlated with higher morbidity (i.e. illness) and higher mortality (i.e. likelihood of death).", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The relationship between health and loneliness can of course go both ways: lonely people may see their health deteriorate with time; but it may also be the case that people who suffer from poor health end up feeling more lonely later down the line.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Because of this two-way relationship it\u2019s important to go beyond cross-sectional correlations and focus on longitudinal studies \u2013 these are studies where researchers track the same individuals over time to see if loneliness predicts illness or mortality in the future, after controlling for baseline behaviors and health status.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The evidence from longitudinal studies shows that people who experience loneliness during a period of their life tend to be more likely to have worse health later down the line. In the Netherlands, for example, ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-pdf/146/6/510/455063/146-6-510.pdf", "children": [ { "text": "researchers found", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " that self-reported loneliness among adults aged 55-85 predicted mortality several months later, and this was true after controlling for age, sex, chronic diseases, alcohol use, smoking, self-assessed health condition, and functional limitations.{ref}Penninx, B. W., Van Tilburg, T., Kriegsman, D. M., Deeg, D. J., Boeke, A. J. P., & van Eijk, J. T. M. (1997). Effects of social support and personal coping resources on mortality in older age: The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. American journal of epidemiology, 146(6), 510-519.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Most studies focus either on subjective loneliness, or on objective isolation. But some studies try to compare both. In a recent meta-analysis covering 70 longitudinal studies, the authors ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1745691614568352", "children": [ { "text": "write", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ":", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": " \u201cWe found no differences between measures of objective and subjective social isolation. Results remain consistent across gender, length of follow-up, and world region.\u201d", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " And in the concluding section they highlight that, in their interpretation of the evidence, ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "\u201cthe risk associated with social isolation and loneliness is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality\u201d", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "; which include smoking and obesity.{ref}Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on psychological science, 10(2), 227-237.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "The link between mental health and subjective well-being", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In another much-cited review of the evidence, Louise Hawkley and John Cacioppo, two leading experts on this topic, ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874845/", "children": [ { "text": "concluded", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " that ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "\u201cperhaps the most striking finding in this literature is the breadth of emotional and cognitive processes and outcomes that seem susceptible to the influence of loneliness\u201d.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "{ref}Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of behavioral medicine, 40(2), 218-227. {/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Researchers have found that loneliness correlates with subsequent increases in symptoms related to ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/dementia-death-rates", "children": [ { "text": "dementia", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health#depression", "children": [ { "text": "depression", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", and many other issues related to ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health", "children": [ { "text": "mental health", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "; and this holds after controlling for demographic variables, objective social isolation, stress, and baseline levels of cognitive function.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There is also research that suggests a link between loneliness and lower ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-life-satisfaction", "children": [ { "text": "happiness", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", and we discuss this in more detail ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-friends", "children": [ { "text": "here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Mechanisms", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Experiments with social animals, like rats, ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/106/52/22393.full.pdf", "children": [ { "text": "show", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " that induced isolation can lead to a higher risk of death from cancer. Humans and rats are of course very different; but experts, such as Hawkley and Cacioppo, argue that these experiments are important because they tell us something meaningful about a shared biological mechanism. In a review of the evidence, Susan Pinker writes: \u201cIf our big brains evolved to interact, loneliness would be an early warning system\u2014a built-in alarm that sent a biological signal to members who had somehow become separated from the group\u201d.{ref}Pinker, S. (2015). The village effect: How face-to-face contact can make us healthier and happier. Vintage Canada.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Indeed, there\u2019s evidence of social regulation of gene expression in humans: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/108/7/3080.full.pdf", "children": [ { "text": "studies suggest", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " perceived loneliness can switch on/off genes that regulate our immune systems, and it is this what then affects the health of humans, or other animals that evolved with similar defence mechanisms.{ref}Cole, S. W., Hawkley, L. C., Arevalo, J. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). Transcript origin analysis identifies antigen-presenting cells as primary targets of socially regulated gene expression in leukocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 3080-3085.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Causality and implications", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The bulk of evidence from observational studies and biological mechanisms, described above, implies that loneliness most likely matters for our health and well being. But do we really know how much it matters relative to other important risk factors?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The key point here is that estimates are likely biased to some extent.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The findings from longitudinal studies that track individuals over time are insightful, but they cannot rule out that the relationship might be partly driven by other factors that we cannot observe. Even the studies linking loneliness and genetics can be subject to this ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://mru.org/dictionary-economics/omitted-variable-economics", "children": [ { "text": "omitted-variable bias", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", because a genetic predisposition to loneliness may drive both loneliness and health outcomes.{ref}Two concrete papers that show this is a real concern are:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "- Abdellaoui, A., Sanchez-Roige, S., Sealock, J., Treur, J. L., Dennis, J., Fontanillas, P., \u2026 & Baselmans, B. (2018). Phenome-wide investigation of health outcomes associated with genetic predisposition to loneliness. bioRxiv, 468835.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "-Abdellaoui, A., Chen, H. Y., Willemsen, G., Ehli, E. A., Davies, G. E., Verweij, K. J., \u2026 & Cacioppo, J. T. (2019). Associations between loneliness and personality are mostly driven by a genetic association with neuroticism. Journal of personality, 87(2), 386-397.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "I could not find credible experimental evidence that would allow us to have a precise estimate of the magnitude of the causal effect.{ref}If you know of relevant studies that do provide such estimates, please let me know at [email protected].{/ref} But the fact that we struggle to pin down the magnitude of the effect doesn't mean we should dismiss the available evidence. On the contrary \u2013 it would be great if we had evidence from randomized control trials that test positive interventions to reduce loneliness, to understand better if the \u201815 cigarettes per day\u2019 comparison from the Surgeon General of the US is roughly correct, at least for the average person.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Having a better understanding of the magnitude of the effect is important, not only because loneliness is common, but also because it\u2019s complex and unequally experienced by people around the world.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "As the chart above shows, there are large differences in self-reported loneliness across countries. We should understand how important these differences are for the distribution of health and well-being.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "article", "title": "Social connections and health", "authors": [ null ], "dateline": "January 30, 2020", "sidebar-toc": false, "featured-image": "" }, "createdAt": "2020-01-30T17:20:11.000Z", "published": false, "updatedAt": "2022-02-14T10:09:28.000Z", "revisionId": null, "publishedAt": "2020-01-30T17:19:57.000Z", "relatedCharts": [], "publicationContext": "listed" } |
{ "errors": [ { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" } ], "numBlocks": 32, "numErrors": 1, "wpTagCounts": { "html": 1, "list": 1, "heading": 6, "paragraph": 24 }, "htmlTagCounts": { "p": 24, "h4": 3, "h5": 3, "ol": 1, "figure": 1, "iframe": 1 } } |
2020-01-30 17:19:57 | 2024-02-16 14:22:59 | [ null ] |
2020-01-30 17:20:11 | 2022-02-14 10:09:28 | {} |
Dr. Vivek Murthy, former [Surgeon General](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgeon_General_of_the_United_States) of the United States, recently [wrote](https://www.vivekmurthy.com/single-post/2017/10/10/Work-and-the-Loneliness-Epidemic-Harvard-Business-Review): “Loneliness and weak social connections are associated with a reduction in lifespan similar to that caused by smoking 15 cigarettes a day”. This ‘15 cigarettes a day’ figure has been reproduced and reported in the news many times, under headlines such as “Loneliness is as lethal as smoking 15 cigarettes per day”.{ref}There are dozens of articles reporting the ‘15 cigarettes a day’ figure. See for example [this in WebMD](https://www.webmd.com/balance/news/20180504/loneliness-rivals-obesity-smoking-as-health-risk), and [this in The Daily Mail](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5181559/Loneliness-bad-health-smoking-15-day.html). From what I gather, all the articles that cite this figure trace back to Dr. Vivek Murthy and a meta-analysis by Holt-Lunstad et al. (2015), which I discuss in more detail below in this post. When I reviewed this meta-analysis I did find the claim that loneliness is a risk factor comparable to smoking; but I could not find the calculations that lead to the 15 cigarettes benchmark. It’s still unclear to me what the unit of loneliness is and what this translates into in terms of years of lives lost. However, given that 15 cigarettes per day is [about average consumption among smokers](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/consumption-per-smoker-per-day-bounds), it’s possible that the benchmark comes from comparing excess mortality of smoking for the average smoker, vs. excess mortality of loneliness for average levels of loneliness.{/ref} It is indeed quite a shocking comparison since around [7 million deaths](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/smoking-and-secondhand-deaths) globally are attributed to smoking every year, and back-of-the-envelope calculations published in medical journals say [one cigarette reduces your lifespan by 11 minutes](https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/320/7226/53.1.full.pdf?casa_token=Fcl9ywjt31gAAAAA:9FnQFmC50vZclWEndIVf8Vf4uwlEsKIiQeeQtFXm11_06jJwLcgZn1MS4LPyFsFVnrcCsSSHXnv5). Here we dig deeper to try to understand what the data and research tell us about the link between social relations and health. In a nutshell, my reading of the evidence is as follows: 0. There is a huge amount of evidence showing individuals who report feelings of loneliness are more likely to have health problems later in their life. 1. There is credible theory and explanation of biological mechanisms, whereby isolation can set off unconscious surveillance for social threat, producing cognitive biases, reducing sleep and affecting hormones. 2. It's very likely there is a causal link, but there is no credible experimental evidence that would allow us to have a precise estimate of the magnitude of the causal effect that loneliness has on key metrics of health, such as life expectancy. 3. The fact that we struggle to pin down the magnitude of the effect of loneliness on health doesn't mean we should dismiss the available evidence. But it does show that more research is needed. ## Observational studies: A first look at the data ### Measuring loneliness Psychologists and social neuroscientists often refer to loneliness as [_painful_ isolation](https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-07755-000). The emphasis on painful is there to make a clear distinction between solitude – the state of being alone – and subjective loneliness, which is the distressing feeling that comes from unmet expectations of the types of interpersonal relationships we wish to have. Researchers use several kinds of data to measure solitude and loneliness. The most common source of data are surveys where people are asked about different aspects of their lives, including whether they live alone, how much time they spend with other people in a given window of time (e.g. ‘last week’) or specific context (e.g. ‘at social events, clubs or places of worship’); and whether they experience feelings of loneliness (e.g. ‘I have no-one with whom I can discuss important matters with’). Researchers sometimes study these survey responses separately, but often they also aggregate them in a composite index.{ref}The most popular composite index is the [UCLA Loneliness Scale](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UCLA_Loneliness_Scale), which was first proposed in 1978, and is based on a 20-item scale designed to measure subjective feelings of loneliness. You can read more about it [here](https://fetzer.org/sites/default/files/images/stories/pdf/selfmeasures/Self_Measures_for_Loneliness_and_Interpersonal_Problems_UCLA_LONELINESS.pdf).{/ref} Surveys [confirm](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0898264312460275) that people respond differently to questions about subjective loneliness and physical social isolation, which suggests people do understand these as two distinct issues. In the chart here I've put together estimates on self-reported feelings of loneliness from various sources. The fact that we see such high levels of loneliness, with substantial divergence across countries, explains why this is an important and active research area. Indeed, there are literally hundreds of papers that have used survey data to explore the link between loneliness, solitude, and health. Below is an overview of what these studies find. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/self-reported-loneliness-older-adults"/> ### The link between loneliness and physical health Most papers studying the link between loneliness and health find that both objective solitude (e.g. living alone) and subjective loneliness (e.g. frequent self-reported feelings of loneliness) are correlated with higher morbidity (i.e. illness) and higher mortality (i.e. likelihood of death). The relationship between health and loneliness can of course go both ways: lonely people may see their health deteriorate with time; but it may also be the case that people who suffer from poor health end up feeling more lonely later down the line. Because of this two-way relationship it’s important to go beyond cross-sectional correlations and focus on longitudinal studies – these are studies where researchers track the same individuals over time to see if loneliness predicts illness or mortality in the future, after controlling for baseline behaviors and health status. The evidence from longitudinal studies shows that people who experience loneliness during a period of their life tend to be more likely to have worse health later down the line. In the Netherlands, for example, [researchers found](https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-pdf/146/6/510/455063/146-6-510.pdf) that self-reported loneliness among adults aged 55-85 predicted mortality several months later, and this was true after controlling for age, sex, chronic diseases, alcohol use, smoking, self-assessed health condition, and functional limitations.{ref}Penninx, B. W., Van Tilburg, T., Kriegsman, D. M., Deeg, D. J., Boeke, A. J. P., & van Eijk, J. T. M. (1997). Effects of social support and personal coping resources on mortality in older age: The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. American journal of epidemiology, 146(6), 510-519.{/ref} Most studies focus either on subjective loneliness, or on objective isolation. But some studies try to compare both. In a recent meta-analysis covering 70 longitudinal studies, the authors [write](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1745691614568352):_ “We found no differences between measures of objective and subjective social isolation. Results remain consistent across gender, length of follow-up, and world region.”_ And in the concluding section they highlight that, in their interpretation of the evidence, _“the risk associated with social isolation and loneliness is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality”_; which include smoking and obesity.{ref}Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on psychological science, 10(2), 227-237.{/ref} ### The link between mental health and subjective well-being In another much-cited review of the evidence, Louise Hawkley and John Cacioppo, two leading experts on this topic, [concluded](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874845/) that _“perhaps the most striking finding in this literature is the breadth of emotional and cognitive processes and outcomes that seem susceptible to the influence of loneliness”._{ref}Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of behavioral medicine, 40(2), 218-227. {/ref} Researchers have found that loneliness correlates with subsequent increases in symptoms related to [dementia](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/dementia-death-rates), [depression](https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health#depression), and many other issues related to [mental health](https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health); and this holds after controlling for demographic variables, objective social isolation, stress, and baseline levels of cognitive function. There is also research that suggests a link between loneliness and lower [happiness](https://ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-life-satisfaction), and we discuss this in more detail [here](http://www.ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-friends). ## Mechanisms Experiments with social animals, like rats, [show](https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/106/52/22393.full.pdf) that induced isolation can lead to a higher risk of death from cancer. Humans and rats are of course very different; but experts, such as Hawkley and Cacioppo, argue that these experiments are important because they tell us something meaningful about a shared biological mechanism. In a review of the evidence, Susan Pinker writes: “If our big brains evolved to interact, loneliness would be an early warning system—a built-in alarm that sent a biological signal to members who had somehow become separated from the group”.{ref}Pinker, S. (2015). The village effect: How face-to-face contact can make us healthier and happier. Vintage Canada.{/ref} Indeed, there’s evidence of social regulation of gene expression in humans: [studies suggest](https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/108/7/3080.full.pdf) perceived loneliness can switch on/off genes that regulate our immune systems, and it is this what then affects the health of humans, or other animals that evolved with similar defence mechanisms.{ref}Cole, S. W., Hawkley, L. C., Arevalo, J. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). Transcript origin analysis identifies antigen-presenting cells as primary targets of socially regulated gene expression in leukocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 3080-3085.{/ref} ## Causality and implications The bulk of evidence from observational studies and biological mechanisms, described above, implies that loneliness most likely matters for our health and well being. But do we really know how much it matters relative to other important risk factors? The key point here is that estimates are likely biased to some extent. The findings from longitudinal studies that track individuals over time are insightful, but they cannot rule out that the relationship might be partly driven by other factors that we cannot observe. Even the studies linking loneliness and genetics can be subject to this [omitted-variable bias](https://mru.org/dictionary-economics/omitted-variable-economics), because a genetic predisposition to loneliness may drive both loneliness and health outcomes.{ref}Two concrete papers that show this is a real concern are: - Abdellaoui, A., Sanchez-Roige, S., Sealock, J., Treur, J. L., Dennis, J., Fontanillas, P., … & Baselmans, B. (2018). Phenome-wide investigation of health outcomes associated with genetic predisposition to loneliness. bioRxiv, 468835. -Abdellaoui, A., Chen, H. Y., Willemsen, G., Ehli, E. A., Davies, G. E., Verweij, K. J., … & Cacioppo, J. T. (2019). Associations between loneliness and personality are mostly driven by a genetic association with neuroticism. Journal of personality, 87(2), 386-397.{/ref} I could not find credible experimental evidence that would allow us to have a precise estimate of the magnitude of the causal effect.{ref}If you know of relevant studies that do provide such estimates, please let me know at [email protected].{/ref} But the fact that we struggle to pin down the magnitude of the effect doesn't mean we should dismiss the available evidence. On the contrary – it would be great if we had evidence from randomized control trials that test positive interventions to reduce loneliness, to understand better if the ‘15 cigarettes per day’ comparison from the Surgeon General of the US is roughly correct, at least for the average person. Having a better understanding of the magnitude of the effect is important, not only because loneliness is common, but also because it’s complex and unequally experienced by people around the world. As the chart above shows, there are large differences in self-reported loneliness across countries. We should understand how important these differences are for the distribution of health and well-being. | { "data": { "wpBlock": { "content": "\n<p>Dr. Vivek Murthy, former <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgeon_General_of_the_United_States\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Surgeon General</a> of the United States, recently <a href=\"https://www.vivekmurthy.com/single-post/2017/10/10/Work-and-the-Loneliness-Epidemic-Harvard-Business-Review\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">wrote</a>: \u201cLoneliness and weak social connections are associated with a reduction in lifespan similar to that caused by smoking 15 cigarettes a day\u201d.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This \u201815 cigarettes a day\u2019 figure has been reproduced and reported in the news many times, under headlines such as \u201cLoneliness is as lethal as smoking 15 cigarettes per day\u201d.{ref}There are dozens of articles reporting the \u201815 cigarettes a day\u2019 figure. See for example <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://www.webmd.com/balance/news/20180504/loneliness-rivals-obesity-smoking-as-health-risk\" target=\"_blank\">this in WebMD</a>, and <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5181559/Loneliness-bad-health-smoking-15-day.html\" target=\"_blank\">this in The Daily Mail</a>. From what I gather, all the articles that cite this figure trace back to Dr. Vivek Murthy and a meta-analysis by Holt-Lunstad et al. (2015), which I discuss in more detail below in this post. When I reviewed this meta-analysis I did find the claim that loneliness is a risk factor comparable to smoking; but I could not find the calculations that lead to the 15 cigarettes benchmark. It\u2019s still unclear to me what the unit of loneliness is and what this translates into in terms of years of lives lost. However, given that 15 cigarettes per day is <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/consumption-per-smoker-per-day-bounds\" target=\"_blank\">about average consumption among smokers</a>, it\u2019s possible that the benchmark comes from comparing excess mortality of smoking for the average smoker, vs. excess mortality of loneliness for average levels of loneliness.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is indeed quite a shocking comparison since around <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/smoking-and-secondhand-deaths\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">7 million deaths</a> globally are attributed to smoking every year, and back-of-the-envelope calculations published in medical journals say <a href=\"https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/320/7226/53.1.full.pdf?casa_token=Fcl9ywjt31gAAAAA:9FnQFmC50vZclWEndIVf8Vf4uwlEsKIiQeeQtFXm11_06jJwLcgZn1MS4LPyFsFVnrcCsSSHXnv5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">one cigarette reduces your lifespan by 11 minutes</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here we dig deeper to try to understand what the data and research tell us about the link between social relations and health. In a nutshell, my reading of the evidence is as follows:</p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>There is a huge amount of evidence showing individuals who report feelings of loneliness are more likely to have health problems later in their life.</li><li>There is credible theory and explanation of biological mechanisms, whereby isolation can set off unconscious surveillance for social threat, producing cognitive biases, reducing sleep and affecting hormones.</li><li>It’s very likely there is a causal link, but there is no credible experimental evidence that would allow us to have a precise estimate of the magnitude of the causal effect that loneliness has on key metrics of health, such as life expectancy.</li><li>The fact that we struggle to pin down the magnitude of the effect of loneliness on health doesn’t mean we should dismiss the available evidence. But it does show that more research is needed.</li></ol>\n\n\n\n<h4>Observational studies: A first look at the data</h4>\n\n\n\n<h5>Measuring loneliness</h5>\n\n\n\n<p>Psychologists and social neuroscientists often refer to loneliness as <a href=\"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-07755-000\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>painful</em> isolation</a>. The emphasis on painful is there to make a clear distinction between solitude \u2013 the state of being alone \u2013 and subjective loneliness, which is the distressing feeling that comes from unmet expectations of the types of interpersonal relationships we wish to have.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Researchers use several kinds of data to measure solitude and loneliness. The most common source of data are surveys where people are asked about different aspects of their lives, including whether they live alone, how much time they spend with other people in a given window of time (e.g. \u2018last week\u2019) or specific context (e.g. \u2018at social events, clubs or places of worship\u2019); and whether they experience feelings of loneliness (e.g. \u2018I have no-one with whom I can discuss important matters with\u2019). Researchers sometimes study these survey responses separately, but often they also aggregate them in a composite index.{ref}The most popular composite index is the <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UCLA_Loneliness_Scale\" target=\"_blank\">UCLA Loneliness Scale</a>, which was first proposed in 1978, and is based on a 20-item scale designed to measure subjective feelings of loneliness. You can read more about it <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://fetzer.org/sites/default/files/images/stories/pdf/selfmeasures/Self_Measures_for_Loneliness_and_Interpersonal_Problems_UCLA_LONELINESS.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Surveys <a href=\"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0898264312460275\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">confirm</a> that people respond differently to questions about subjective loneliness and physical social isolation, which suggests people do understand these as two distinct issues.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the chart here I’ve put together estimates on self-reported feelings of loneliness from various sources. The fact that we see such high levels of loneliness, with substantial divergence across countries, explains why this is an important and active research area. Indeed, there are literally hundreds of papers that have used survey data to explore the link between loneliness, solitude, and health. Below is an overview of what these studies find.</p>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/self-reported-loneliness-older-adults\"></iframe></figure>\n\n\n\n<h5>The link between loneliness and physical health</h5>\n\n\n\n<p>Most papers studying the link between loneliness and health find that both objective solitude (e.g. living alone) and subjective loneliness (e.g. frequent self-reported feelings of loneliness) are correlated with higher morbidity (i.e. illness) and higher mortality (i.e. likelihood of death).</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The relationship between health and loneliness can of course go both ways: lonely people may see their health deteriorate with time; but it may also be the case that people who suffer from poor health end up feeling more lonely later down the line.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because of this two-way relationship it\u2019s important to go beyond cross-sectional correlations and focus on longitudinal studies \u2013 these are studies where researchers track the same individuals over time to see if loneliness predicts illness or mortality in the future, after controlling for baseline behaviors and health status.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The evidence from longitudinal studies shows that people who experience loneliness during a period of their life tend to be more likely to have worse health later down the line. In the Netherlands, for example, <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-pdf/146/6/510/455063/146-6-510.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">researchers found</a> that self-reported loneliness among adults aged 55-85 predicted mortality several months later, and this was true after controlling for age, sex, chronic diseases, alcohol use, smoking, self-assessed health condition, and functional limitations.{ref}Penninx, B. W., Van Tilburg, T., Kriegsman, D. M., Deeg, D. J., Boeke, A. J. P., & van Eijk, J. T. M. (1997). Effects of social support and personal coping resources on mortality in older age: The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. American journal of epidemiology, 146(6), 510-519.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Most studies focus either on subjective loneliness, or on objective isolation. But some studies try to compare both. In a recent meta-analysis covering 70 longitudinal studies, the authors <a href=\"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1745691614568352\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">write</a>:<em> \u201cWe found no differences between measures of objective and subjective social isolation. Results remain consistent across gender, length of follow-up, and world region.\u201d</em> And in the concluding section they highlight that, in their interpretation of the evidence, <em>\u201cthe risk associated with social isolation and loneliness is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality\u201d</em>; which include smoking and obesity.{ref}Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on psychological science, 10(2), 227-237.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<h5>The link between mental health and subjective well-being</h5>\n\n\n\n<p>In another much-cited review of the evidence, Louise Hawkley and John Cacioppo, two leading experts on this topic, <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874845/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">concluded</a> that <em>\u201cperhaps the most striking finding in this literature is the breadth of emotional and cognitive processes and outcomes that seem susceptible to the influence of loneliness\u201d.</em>{ref}Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of behavioral medicine, 40(2), 218-227. {/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Researchers have found that loneliness correlates with subsequent increases in symptoms related to <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/dementia-death-rates\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">dementia</a>, <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health#depression\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">depression</a>, and many other issues related to <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">mental health</a>; and this holds after controlling for demographic variables, objective social isolation, stress, and baseline levels of cognitive function.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is also research that suggests a link between loneliness and lower <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-life-satisfaction\" target=\"_blank\">happiness</a>, and we discuss this in more detail <a href=\"http://www.ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-friends\">here</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Mechanisms</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Experiments with social animals, like rats, <a href=\"https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/106/52/22393.full.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">show</a> that induced isolation can lead to a higher risk of death from cancer. Humans and rats are of course very different; but experts, such as Hawkley and Cacioppo, argue that these experiments are important because they tell us something meaningful about a shared biological mechanism. In a review of the evidence, Susan Pinker writes: \u201cIf our big brains evolved to interact, loneliness would be an early warning system\u2014a built-in alarm that sent a biological signal to members who had somehow become separated from the group\u201d.{ref}Pinker, S. (2015). The village effect: How face-to-face contact can make us healthier and happier. Vintage Canada.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Indeed, there\u2019s evidence of social regulation of gene expression in humans: <a href=\"https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/108/7/3080.full.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">studies suggest</a> perceived loneliness can switch on/off genes that regulate our immune systems, and it is this what then affects the health of humans, or other animals that evolved with similar defence mechanisms.{ref}Cole, S. W., Hawkley, L. C., Arevalo, J. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). Transcript origin analysis identifies antigen-presenting cells as primary targets of socially regulated gene expression in leukocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 3080-3085.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Causality and implications</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The bulk of evidence from observational studies and biological mechanisms, described above, implies that loneliness most likely matters for our health and well being. But do we really know how much it matters relative to other important risk factors?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The key point here is that estimates are likely biased to some extent.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The findings from longitudinal studies that track individuals over time are insightful, but they cannot rule out that the relationship might be partly driven by other factors that we cannot observe. Even the studies linking loneliness and genetics can be subject to this <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https://mru.org/dictionary-economics/omitted-variable-economics\" target=\"_blank\">omitted-variable bias</a>, because a genetic predisposition to loneliness may drive both loneliness and health outcomes.{ref}Two concrete papers that show this is a real concern are:<br>– Abdellaoui, A., Sanchez-Roige, S., Sealock, J., Treur, J. L., Dennis, J., Fontanillas, P., \u2026 & Baselmans, B. (2018). Phenome-wide investigation of health outcomes associated with genetic predisposition to loneliness. bioRxiv, 468835.<br>-Abdellaoui, A., Chen, H. Y., Willemsen, G., Ehli, E. A., Davies, G. E., Verweij, K. J., \u2026 & Cacioppo, J. T. (2019). Associations between loneliness and personality are mostly driven by a genetic association with neuroticism. Journal of personality, 87(2), 386-397.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>I could not find credible experimental evidence that would allow us to have a precise estimate of the magnitude of the causal effect.{ref}If you know of relevant studies that do provide such estimates, please let me know at [email protected].{/ref} But the fact that we struggle to pin down the magnitude of the effect doesn’t mean we should dismiss the available evidence. On the contrary \u2013 it would be great if we had evidence from randomized control trials that test positive interventions to reduce loneliness, to understand better if the \u201815 cigarettes per day\u2019 comparison from the Surgeon General of the US is roughly correct, at least for the average person.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Having a better understanding of the magnitude of the effect is important, not only because loneliness is common, but also because it\u2019s complex and unequally experienced by people around the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>As the chart above shows, there are large differences in self-reported loneliness across countries. We should understand how important these differences are for the distribution of health and well-being.</p>\n" } }, "extensions": { "debug": [ { "type": "DEBUG_LOGS_INACTIVE", "message": "GraphQL Debug logging is not active. To see debug logs, GRAPHQL_DEBUG must be enabled." } ] } } |