posts: 26451
Data license: CC-BY
This data as json
id | title | slug | type | status | content | archieml | archieml_update_statistics | published_at | updated_at | gdocSuccessorId | authors | excerpt | created_at_in_wordpress | updated_at_in_wordpress | featured_image | formattingOptions | markdown | wpApiSnapshot |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26451 | How long before we run out of fossil fuels? | untitled-reusable-block-80 | wp_block | publish | <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) are finite — consume them for long enough and global resources will eventually run out. Concerns surrounding this risk have persisted for decades. Arguably the most well-known example of this was Hubbert's Peak Theory — also known as the Hubbert curve.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._King_Hubbert" target="_blank">M. King Hubbert</a>, in 1956, published his hypothesis that for any given region, a fossil fuel production curve would follow a bell-shaped curve, with production first increasing following discovery of new resources and improved extraction methods, peaking, then ultimately declining as resources became depleted.{ref}Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels, M.K. Hubbert, Presented before the Spring Meeting of the Southern District, American Petroleum Institute, Plaza Hotel, San Antonio, Texas, March 7–8–9, 1956. Available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190610010030/http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf" target="_blank">online</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>His prediction that the United States would peak in oil production in 1970 actually came true (although it peaked 17 percent higher than he projected, and its pathway since has not followed the bell-shaped curve he predicted). This is shown in the chart with Hubbert's hypothesized peak shown alongside actual US production data reported by the Energy Information Administration (EIA); both are measured in barrels produced per year.{ref}This curve was derived based on actual production figures reported by the US Energy Information Administration [available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mcrfpus1&f=a" target="_blank">online</a>] and Hubbert peak analysis in: Cavallo, A. J. (2004). Hubbert’s petroleum production model: an evaluation and implications for world oil production forecasts. <em>Natural Resources Research</em>, <em>13</em>(4), 211-221. Available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11053-004-0129-2" target="_blank">online</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <figure><iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/hubberts-peak-vs-actual-oil-production-in-the-united-states" width="300" height="150"></iframe></figure> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Many have attempted to apply Hubbert's theory at not only a regional, but also a global level to answer the question: When will we run out of fossil fuels?{ref}Hubbert’s Petroleum Production Model: An Evaluation and Implications for World Oil Production Forecasts, Alfred J. Cavallo, Natural Resources Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2004. Available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11053-004-0129-2" target="_blank">online</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> Most attempts have, however, been proven wrong. During the 1979 oil crisis, Hubbert himself incorrectly predicted the world would reach 'peak oil' around the year 2000; and in the decades since, this prediction has been followed by a succession of premature forecasts by analysts.{ref}Kerr (1998). The Next Oil Crisis Looms Large--and Perhaps Close. Science,<br> 21 Aug 1998: Vol. 281, Issue 5380, pp. 1128-1131. Available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/281/5380/1128" target="_blank">online</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> Meanwhile, actual global oil production and consumption <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy-share-inc-biomass?country=OWID_WRL-1">continues to rise</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The difficulty in attempting to construct these curves is that our discovery of reserves and technological potential to extract these reserves economically evolves with time. If we look at trends in proven fuel reserves, we see that our reported <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/oil-proved-reserves">oil reserves</a> have not decreased but <em>increased</em> by more than 50 percent, and <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/natural-gas-proved-reserves">natural gas</a> by more than 55 percent, since 1995. This fact, combined with changes in rates of consumption means that predicting 'peak fossil fuel' is highly uncertain.{ref}Helm, D. (2011). Peak oil and energy policy—a critique. <em>Oxford Review of Economic Policy</em>, <em>27</em>(1), 68-91. Available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://www.dieterhelm.co.uk/assets/secure/documents/Peak-Oil-Published-version.pdf" target="_blank">online</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To give a static indicative estimate of how long we could feasibly consume fossil fuels for, we have plotted the Reserves-to-Production (R/P) ratio for coal, oil and gas based on 2015 figures. The R/P ratio essentially divides the quantity of known fuel reserves by the current rate of production to estimate how long we could continue if this level of production remained constant. Based on BP's Statistical Review of World Energy 2016, we'd have about 115 years of coal production, and roughly 50 years of both oil and natural gas remaining.{ref}BP (2016). Statistical Review of World Energy 2016. Available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/downloads.html" target="_blank">online</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Again, these figures are only useful as a static measure; they will continue to vary with time as our capacity to economically source and extract fossil fuels changes, and our levels of consumption rise or fall.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <figure><iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/years-of-fossil-fuel-reserves-left" width="300" height="150"></iframe></figure> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>However, whilst depleting reserves could become a pressing issue 50-100 years from now, there is another important limit to fossil fuel production: climate change. Carbon dioxide emissions remain trapped in the atmosphere for long periods of time, building up an atmospheric stock that leads temperatures to rise. To keep average global temperature increase below two degrees celsius (as has been agreed in the UN Paris Agreement), we can thus calculate the cumulative amount of carbon dioxide we can emit while maintaining a probability of remaining below this target temperature. This is what we define as a 'carbon budget'. In the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, the budget for having a 50 percent chance of keeping average warming below two degrees celsius was estimated to be approximately 275 billion tonnes of carbon (as shown in the chart).{ref}Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers, WG1 Contribution to IPCC AR5. Available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/" target="_blank">online</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> Note that with each year that passes, the remaining carbon budget continues to decline—by the end of 2017, this figure will have further decreased from the IPCC's estimates.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Here's the crucial factor: if the world burned all of its currently known reserves (without the use of carbon capture and storage technology), we would emit a total of nearly 750 billion tonnes of carbon. This means that we have to leave around two-thirds of known reserves in the ground if we want to meet our global climate targets. However, it is important to keep in mind that this in itself is a simplification of the global 'carbon budget'. As discussed in detail <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://www.cicero.uio.no/no/posts/klima/how-much-carbon-dioxide-can-we-emit" target="_blank">by CICERO's Glen Peters</a>, there is actually a variety of possible carbon budgets, and their size depends on a number of factors such as: the probability of staying below our two-degree warming target, the rates of decarbonization, and the contribution of non-CO<sub>2 </sub>greenhouse gases. For example, if we wanted to increase the probability of keeping warming below two degrees celsius to 80 percent, we would need stricter carbon limits, and would have to leave 75-80 percent of fossil fuels untouched.{ref}This is explained in a nice visual by Glen Peters and the CICERO group. Note that in this source, the budget has been converted to carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) equivalents rather than carbon resulting in different absolute figures. However, the relative percentages and principles of the budget remain similar. Available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://www.cicero.uio.no/en/carbonbudget-for-dummies" target="_blank">online</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The quantity of fossil fuels which we would have to abandon is often referred to as 'unburnable carbon'. According to a widely-quoted study by Carbon Tracker, there is significant potential for this unburnable carbon to result in major economic losses.{ref}Carbon Tracker (2013). Unburnable Carbon 2013: wasted capital and stranded assets. Available <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://www.carbontracker.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Unburnable-Carbon-2-Web-Version.pdf" target="_blank">online</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> If capital investment in carbon-emitting infrastructure continues at recent rates, it estimates that up to 6.74 trillion US$ (nearly twice the <a href="http://data.worldbank.org/indicator" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">GDP of Germany</a> in 2016) would be wasted over the next decade in the development of reserves that will eventually be unburnable. The study defines this as 'stranded assets'.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <figure><iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-carbon-budget-for-a-2c-world" width="300" height="150"></iframe></figure> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>So whilst many worry about the possibility of fossil fuels running out, it is instead expected that we will have to leave between 65 to 80 percent of current known reserves untouched if we are to stand a chance of keeping average global temperature rise below our two-degrees global target.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> | { "id": "wp-26451", "slug": "untitled-reusable-block-80", "content": { "toc": [], "body": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) are finite \u2014 consume them for long enough and global resources will eventually run out. Concerns surrounding this risk have persisted for decades. Arguably the most well-known example of this was Hubbert's Peak Theory \u2014 also known as the Hubbert curve.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._King_Hubbert", "children": [ { "text": "M. King Hubbert", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", in 1956, published his hypothesis that for any given region, a fossil fuel production curve would follow a bell-shaped curve, with production first increasing following discovery of new resources and improved extraction methods, peaking, then ultimately declining as resources became depleted.{ref}Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels, M.K. Hubbert, Presented before the Spring Meeting of the Southern District, American Petroleum Institute, Plaza Hotel, San Antonio, Texas, March 7\u20138\u20139, 1956. Available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190610010030/http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "His prediction that the United States would peak in oil production in 1970 actually came true (although it peaked 17 percent higher than he projected, and its pathway since has not followed the bell-shaped curve he predicted). This is shown in the chart with Hubbert's hypothesized peak shown alongside actual US production data reported by the Energy Information Administration (EIA); both are measured in barrels produced per year.{ref}This curve was derived based on actual production figures reported by the US Energy Information Administration [available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mcrfpus1&f=a", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "] and Hubbert peak analysis in: Cavallo, A. J. (2004). Hubbert\u2019s petroleum production model: an evaluation and implications for world oil production forecasts.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Natural Resources Research", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "13", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(4), 211-221. Available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11053-004-0129-2", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/hubberts-peak-vs-actual-oil-production-in-the-united-states", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Many have attempted to apply Hubbert's theory at not only a regional, but also a global level to answer the question: When will we\u00a0run out of fossil fuels?{ref}Hubbert\u2019s Petroleum Production Model: An Evaluation and Implications for World Oil Production Forecasts, Alfred J. Cavallo, Natural Resources Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2004. Available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11053-004-0129-2", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " Most attempts have, however, been proven wrong. During the 1979 oil crisis, Hubbert himself incorrectly predicted the world would reach 'peak oil' around the year 2000; and in the decades since, this prediction has been followed by a succession of premature forecasts by analysts.{ref}Kerr (1998). The Next Oil Crisis Looms Large--and Perhaps Close. Science,", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "\u00a021 Aug 1998: Vol. 281, Issue 5380, pp. 1128-1131. Available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://science.sciencemag.org/content/281/5380/1128", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " Meanwhile, actual global oil production and consumption ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy-share-inc-biomass?country=OWID_WRL-1", "children": [ { "text": "continues to rise", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The difficulty in attempting to construct these curves is that our discovery of reserves and technological potential to extract these reserves economically evolves with time. If we look at trends in proven fuel\u00a0reserves, we see that our reported ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/oil-proved-reserves", "children": [ { "text": "oil reserves", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " have not decreased but\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "increased", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " by more than 50 percent, and ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/natural-gas-proved-reserves", "children": [ { "text": "natural gas", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " by more than 55 percent, since 1995. This fact, combined with changes in rates of consumption means that predicting 'peak fossil fuel' is highly uncertain.{ref}Helm, D. (2011). Peak oil and energy policy\u2014a critique.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "27", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1), 68-91. Available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.dieterhelm.co.uk/assets/secure/documents/Peak-Oil-Published-version.pdf", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "To give a static indicative estimate of how long we could feasibly consume fossil fuels for, we have plotted the Reserves-to-Production (R/P) ratio for coal, oil and gas based on 2015 figures. The R/P ratio essentially divides the quantity of known fuel reserves by the current rate of production to estimate how long we could continue if this level of production remained constant. Based on BP's Statistical Review of World Energy 2016, we'd have about 115 years of coal production, and roughly 50 years of both oil and natural gas remaining.{ref}BP (2016). Statistical Review of World Energy 2016. Available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/downloads.html", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Again, these figures are only useful as a static measure; they will continue to vary with time as our capacity to economically source and extract fossil fuels changes, and our levels of consumption rise or fall.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/years-of-fossil-fuel-reserves-left", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "However, whilst depleting reserves could become a pressing issue 50-100 years from now, there is another important limit to fossil fuel production: climate change. Carbon dioxide emissions remain trapped in the atmosphere for long periods of time, building up an atmospheric stock that leads temperatures to rise. To keep average global temperature increase below two degrees celsius (as has been agreed in the UN Paris Agreement), we can thus calculate the cumulative amount of carbon dioxide we can emit while maintaining a probability of remaining below this target temperature. This is what we define as a 'carbon budget'. In the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, the budget for having a 50 percent chance of keeping average warming below two degrees celsius was estimated to be approximately 275 billion tonnes of carbon (as shown in the chart).{ref}Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers, WG1 Contribution to IPCC AR5. Available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " Note that with each year that passes, the remaining carbon budget continues to decline\u2014by the end of 2017, this figure will have further decreased from the IPCC's estimates.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Here's the crucial factor: if the world burned all of its currently known reserves (without the use of carbon capture and storage technology), we would emit a total of nearly 750 billion tonnes of carbon. This means that we have to leave around two-thirds of known reserves in the ground if we want to meet our global climate targets. However, it is important to keep in mind that this in itself is a simplification of the global 'carbon budget'. As discussed in detail\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.cicero.uio.no/no/posts/klima/how-much-carbon-dioxide-can-we-emit", "children": [ { "text": "by CICERO's Glen Peters", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", there is actually a variety of possible carbon budgets, and their size depends on a number of factors such as: the probability of staying below our two-degree warming target, the rates of decarbonization, and the contribution of non-CO", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "2\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-subscript" }, { "text": "greenhouse gases. For example, if we wanted to increase the probability of keeping warming below two degrees celsius to 80 percent, we would need stricter carbon limits, and would have to leave 75-80 percent of fossil fuels untouched.{ref}This is explained in a nice visual by Glen Peters and the CICERO group. Note that in this source, the budget has been converted to\u00a0carbon dioxide (CO", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "2", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-subscript" }, { "text": ") equivalents rather than carbon resulting in different absolute figures. However, the relative percentages and principles of the budget remain similar. Available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.cicero.uio.no/en/carbonbudget-for-dummies", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The quantity of fossil fuels which we would have to abandon is often referred to as 'unburnable carbon'. According to a widely-quoted study by Carbon Tracker, there is significant potential for this unburnable carbon to result in major economic losses.{ref}Carbon Tracker (2013). Unburnable Carbon 2013: wasted capital and stranded assets. Available ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.carbontracker.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Unburnable-Carbon-2-Web-Version.pdf", "children": [ { "text": "online", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " If capital investment in carbon-emitting infrastructure continues at recent rates, it estimates that up to 6.74 trillion US$ (nearly twice the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://data.worldbank.org/indicator", "children": [ { "text": "GDP of Germany", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " in 2016) would be wasted over the next decade in the development of reserves that will eventually be unburnable. The study defines this as 'stranded assets'.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-carbon-budget-for-a-2c-world", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "So whilst many worry about the possibility of fossil fuels running out, it is instead expected that we will have to leave between 65 to 80 percent of current known reserves untouched if we are to stand a chance of keeping average global temperature rise below our two-degrees global target.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "article", "title": "How long before we run out of fossil fuels?", "authors": [ null ], "dateline": "October 30, 2019", "sidebar-toc": false, "featured-image": "" }, "createdAt": "2019-10-30T15:43:03.000Z", "published": false, "updatedAt": "2020-04-30T14:00:13.000Z", "revisionId": null, "publishedAt": "2019-10-30T15:42:54.000Z", "relatedCharts": [], "publicationContext": "listed" } |
{ "errors": [], "numBlocks": 18, "numErrors": 0, "wpTagCounts": { "html": 3, "paragraph": 15 }, "htmlTagCounts": { "p": 15, "figure": 3, "iframe": 3 } } |
2019-10-30 15:42:54 | 2024-02-16 14:22:57 | [ null ] |
2019-10-30 15:43:03 | 2020-04-30 14:00:13 | {} |
Fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) are finite — consume them for long enough and global resources will eventually run out. Concerns surrounding this risk have persisted for decades. Arguably the most well-known example of this was Hubbert's Peak Theory — also known as the Hubbert curve. [M. King Hubbert](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._King_Hubbert), in 1956, published his hypothesis that for any given region, a fossil fuel production curve would follow a bell-shaped curve, with production first increasing following discovery of new resources and improved extraction methods, peaking, then ultimately declining as resources became depleted.{ref}Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels, M.K. Hubbert, Presented before the Spring Meeting of the Southern District, American Petroleum Institute, Plaza Hotel, San Antonio, Texas, March 7–8–9, 1956. Available [online](https://web.archive.org/web/20190610010030/http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf).{/ref} His prediction that the United States would peak in oil production in 1970 actually came true (although it peaked 17 percent higher than he projected, and its pathway since has not followed the bell-shaped curve he predicted). This is shown in the chart with Hubbert's hypothesized peak shown alongside actual US production data reported by the Energy Information Administration (EIA); both are measured in barrels produced per year.{ref}This curve was derived based on actual production figures reported by the US Energy Information Administration [available [online](https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mcrfpus1&f=a)] and Hubbert peak analysis in: Cavallo, A. J. (2004). Hubbert’s petroleum production model: an evaluation and implications for world oil production forecasts. _Natural Resources Research_, _13_(4), 211-221. Available [online](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11053-004-0129-2).{/ref} <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/hubberts-peak-vs-actual-oil-production-in-the-united-states"/> Many have attempted to apply Hubbert's theory at not only a regional, but also a global level to answer the question: When will we run out of fossil fuels?{ref}Hubbert’s Petroleum Production Model: An Evaluation and Implications for World Oil Production Forecasts, Alfred J. Cavallo, Natural Resources Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2004. Available [online](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11053-004-0129-2).{/ref} Most attempts have, however, been proven wrong. During the 1979 oil crisis, Hubbert himself incorrectly predicted the world would reach 'peak oil' around the year 2000; and in the decades since, this prediction has been followed by a succession of premature forecasts by analysts.{ref}Kerr (1998). The Next Oil Crisis Looms Large--and Perhaps Close. Science, 21 Aug 1998: Vol. 281, Issue 5380, pp. 1128-1131. Available [online](http://science.sciencemag.org/content/281/5380/1128).{/ref} Meanwhile, actual global oil production and consumption [continues to rise](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy-share-inc-biomass?country=OWID_WRL-1). The difficulty in attempting to construct these curves is that our discovery of reserves and technological potential to extract these reserves economically evolves with time. If we look at trends in proven fuel reserves, we see that our reported [oil reserves](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/oil-proved-reserves) have not decreased but _increased_ by more than 50 percent, and [natural gas](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/natural-gas-proved-reserves) by more than 55 percent, since 1995. This fact, combined with changes in rates of consumption means that predicting 'peak fossil fuel' is highly uncertain.{ref}Helm, D. (2011). Peak oil and energy policy—a critique. _Oxford Review of Economic Policy_, _27_(1), 68-91. Available [online](http://www.dieterhelm.co.uk/assets/secure/documents/Peak-Oil-Published-version.pdf).{/ref} To give a static indicative estimate of how long we could feasibly consume fossil fuels for, we have plotted the Reserves-to-Production (R/P) ratio for coal, oil and gas based on 2015 figures. The R/P ratio essentially divides the quantity of known fuel reserves by the current rate of production to estimate how long we could continue if this level of production remained constant. Based on BP's Statistical Review of World Energy 2016, we'd have about 115 years of coal production, and roughly 50 years of both oil and natural gas remaining.{ref}BP (2016). Statistical Review of World Energy 2016. Available [online](https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/downloads.html).{/ref} Again, these figures are only useful as a static measure; they will continue to vary with time as our capacity to economically source and extract fossil fuels changes, and our levels of consumption rise or fall. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/years-of-fossil-fuel-reserves-left"/> However, whilst depleting reserves could become a pressing issue 50-100 years from now, there is another important limit to fossil fuel production: climate change. Carbon dioxide emissions remain trapped in the atmosphere for long periods of time, building up an atmospheric stock that leads temperatures to rise. To keep average global temperature increase below two degrees celsius (as has been agreed in the UN Paris Agreement), we can thus calculate the cumulative amount of carbon dioxide we can emit while maintaining a probability of remaining below this target temperature. This is what we define as a 'carbon budget'. In the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, the budget for having a 50 percent chance of keeping average warming below two degrees celsius was estimated to be approximately 275 billion tonnes of carbon (as shown in the chart).{ref}Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers, WG1 Contribution to IPCC AR5. Available [online](https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/).{/ref} Note that with each year that passes, the remaining carbon budget continues to decline—by the end of 2017, this figure will have further decreased from the IPCC's estimates. Here's the crucial factor: if the world burned all of its currently known reserves (without the use of carbon capture and storage technology), we would emit a total of nearly 750 billion tonnes of carbon. This means that we have to leave around two-thirds of known reserves in the ground if we want to meet our global climate targets. However, it is important to keep in mind that this in itself is a simplification of the global 'carbon budget'. As discussed in detail [by CICERO's Glen Peters](http://www.cicero.uio.no/no/posts/klima/how-much-carbon-dioxide-can-we-emit), there is actually a variety of possible carbon budgets, and their size depends on a number of factors such as: the probability of staying below our two-degree warming target, the rates of decarbonization, and the contribution of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. For example, if we wanted to increase the probability of keeping warming below two degrees celsius to 80 percent, we would need stricter carbon limits, and would have to leave 75-80 percent of fossil fuels untouched.{ref}This is explained in a nice visual by Glen Peters and the CICERO group. Note that in this source, the budget has been converted to carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents rather than carbon resulting in different absolute figures. However, the relative percentages and principles of the budget remain similar. Available [online](http://www.cicero.uio.no/en/carbonbudget-for-dummies).{/ref} The quantity of fossil fuels which we would have to abandon is often referred to as 'unburnable carbon'. According to a widely-quoted study by Carbon Tracker, there is significant potential for this unburnable carbon to result in major economic losses.{ref}Carbon Tracker (2013). Unburnable Carbon 2013: wasted capital and stranded assets. Available [online](http://www.carbontracker.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Unburnable-Carbon-2-Web-Version.pdf).{/ref} If capital investment in carbon-emitting infrastructure continues at recent rates, it estimates that up to 6.74 trillion US$ (nearly twice the [GDP of Germany](http://data.worldbank.org/indicator) in 2016) would be wasted over the next decade in the development of reserves that will eventually be unburnable. The study defines this as 'stranded assets'. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-carbon-budget-for-a-2c-world"/> So whilst many worry about the possibility of fossil fuels running out, it is instead expected that we will have to leave between 65 to 80 percent of current known reserves untouched if we are to stand a chance of keeping average global temperature rise below our two-degrees global target. | { "data": { "wpBlock": { "content": "\n<p>Fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) are finite \u2014 consume them for long enough and global resources will eventually run out. Concerns surrounding this risk have persisted for decades. Arguably the most well-known example of this was Hubbert’s Peak Theory \u2014 also known as the Hubbert curve.</p>\n\n\n\n<p><a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._King_Hubbert\" target=\"_blank\">M. King Hubbert</a>, in 1956, published his hypothesis that for any given region, a fossil fuel production curve would follow a bell-shaped curve, with production first increasing following discovery of new resources and improved extraction methods, peaking, then ultimately declining as resources became depleted.{ref}Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels, M.K. Hubbert, Presented before the Spring Meeting of the Southern District, American Petroleum Institute, Plaza Hotel, San Antonio, Texas, March 7\u20138\u20139, 1956. Available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://web.archive.org/web/20190610010030/http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>His prediction that the United States would peak in oil production in 1970 actually came true (although it peaked 17 percent higher than he projected, and its pathway since has not followed the bell-shaped curve he predicted). This is shown in the chart with Hubbert’s hypothesized peak shown alongside actual US production data reported by the Energy Information Administration (EIA); both are measured in barrels produced per year.{ref}This curve was derived based on actual production figures reported by the US Energy Information Administration [available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mcrfpus1&f=a\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>] and Hubbert peak analysis in: Cavallo, A. J. (2004). Hubbert\u2019s petroleum production model: an evaluation and implications for world oil production forecasts.\u00a0<em>Natural Resources Research</em>,\u00a0<em>13</em>(4), 211-221. Available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11053-004-0129-2\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/hubberts-peak-vs-actual-oil-production-in-the-united-states\" width=\"300\" height=\"150\"></iframe></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Many have attempted to apply Hubbert’s theory at not only a regional, but also a global level to answer the question: When will we\u00a0run out of fossil fuels?{ref}Hubbert\u2019s Petroleum Production Model: An Evaluation and Implications for World Oil Production Forecasts, Alfred J. Cavallo, Natural Resources Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2004. Available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11053-004-0129-2\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> Most attempts have, however, been proven wrong. During the 1979 oil crisis, Hubbert himself incorrectly predicted the world would reach ‘peak oil’ around the year 2000; and in the decades since, this prediction has been followed by a succession of premature forecasts by analysts.{ref}Kerr (1998). The Next Oil Crisis Looms Large–and Perhaps Close. Science,<br>\u00a021 Aug 1998: Vol. 281, Issue 5380, pp. 1128-1131. Available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/281/5380/1128\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> Meanwhile, actual global oil production and consumption <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy-share-inc-biomass?country=OWID_WRL-1\">continues to rise</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The difficulty in attempting to construct these curves is that our discovery of reserves and technological potential to extract these reserves economically evolves with time. If we look at trends in proven fuel\u00a0reserves, we see that our reported <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/oil-proved-reserves\">oil reserves</a> have not decreased but\u00a0<em>increased</em> by more than 50 percent, and <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/natural-gas-proved-reserves\">natural gas</a> by more than 55 percent, since 1995. This fact, combined with changes in rates of consumption means that predicting ‘peak fossil fuel’ is highly uncertain.{ref}Helm, D. (2011). Peak oil and energy policy\u2014a critique.\u00a0<em>Oxford Review of Economic Policy</em>,\u00a0<em>27</em>(1), 68-91. Available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http://www.dieterhelm.co.uk/assets/secure/documents/Peak-Oil-Published-version.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>To give a static indicative estimate of how long we could feasibly consume fossil fuels for, we have plotted the Reserves-to-Production (R/P) ratio for coal, oil and gas based on 2015 figures. The R/P ratio essentially divides the quantity of known fuel reserves by the current rate of production to estimate how long we could continue if this level of production remained constant. Based on BP’s Statistical Review of World Energy 2016, we’d have about 115 years of coal production, and roughly 50 years of both oil and natural gas remaining.{ref}BP (2016). Statistical Review of World Energy 2016. Available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/downloads.html\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Again, these figures are only useful as a static measure; they will continue to vary with time as our capacity to economically source and extract fossil fuels changes, and our levels of consumption rise or fall.</p>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/years-of-fossil-fuel-reserves-left\" width=\"300\" height=\"150\"></iframe></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>However, whilst depleting reserves could become a pressing issue 50-100 years from now, there is another important limit to fossil fuel production: climate change. Carbon dioxide emissions remain trapped in the atmosphere for long periods of time, building up an atmospheric stock that leads temperatures to rise. To keep average global temperature increase below two degrees celsius (as has been agreed in the UN Paris Agreement), we can thus calculate the cumulative amount of carbon dioxide we can emit while maintaining a probability of remaining below this target temperature. This is what we define as a ‘carbon budget’. In the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, the budget for having a 50 percent chance of keeping average warming below two degrees celsius was estimated to be approximately 275 billion tonnes of carbon (as shown in the chart).{ref}Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers, WG1 Contribution to IPCC AR5. Available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> Note that with each year that passes, the remaining carbon budget continues to decline\u2014by the end of 2017, this figure will have further decreased from the IPCC’s estimates.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here’s the crucial factor: if the world burned all of its currently known reserves (without the use of carbon capture and storage technology), we would emit a total of nearly 750 billion tonnes of carbon. This means that we have to leave around two-thirds of known reserves in the ground if we want to meet our global climate targets. However, it is important to keep in mind that this in itself is a simplification of the global ‘carbon budget’. As discussed in detail\u00a0<a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"http://www.cicero.uio.no/no/posts/klima/how-much-carbon-dioxide-can-we-emit\" target=\"_blank\">by CICERO’s Glen Peters</a>, there is actually a variety of possible carbon budgets, and their size depends on a number of factors such as: the probability of staying below our two-degree warming target, the rates of decarbonization, and the contribution of non-CO<sub>2\u00a0</sub>greenhouse gases. For example, if we wanted to increase the probability of keeping warming below two degrees celsius to 80 percent, we would need stricter carbon limits, and would have to leave 75-80 percent of fossil fuels untouched.{ref}This is explained in a nice visual by Glen Peters and the CICERO group. Note that in this source, the budget has been converted to\u00a0carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) equivalents rather than carbon resulting in different absolute figures. However, the relative percentages and principles of the budget remain similar. Available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http://www.cicero.uio.no/en/carbonbudget-for-dummies\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The quantity of fossil fuels which we would have to abandon is often referred to as ‘unburnable carbon’. According to a widely-quoted study by Carbon Tracker, there is significant potential for this unburnable carbon to result in major economic losses.{ref}Carbon Tracker (2013). Unburnable Carbon 2013: wasted capital and stranded assets. Available <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http://www.carbontracker.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Unburnable-Carbon-2-Web-Version.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">online</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> If capital investment in carbon-emitting infrastructure continues at recent rates, it estimates that up to 6.74 trillion US$ (nearly twice the <a href=\"http://data.worldbank.org/indicator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">GDP of Germany</a> in 2016) would be wasted over the next decade in the development of reserves that will eventually be unburnable. The study defines this as ‘stranded assets’.</p>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-carbon-budget-for-a-2c-world\" width=\"300\" height=\"150\"></iframe></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>So whilst many worry about the possibility of fossil fuels running out, it is instead expected that we will have to leave between 65 to 80 percent of current known reserves untouched if we are to stand a chance of keeping average global temperature rise below our two-degrees global target.</p>\n" } }, "extensions": { "debug": [ { "type": "DEBUG_LOGS_INACTIVE", "message": "GraphQL Debug logging is not active. To see debug logs, GRAPHQL_DEBUG must be enabled." } ] } } |