posts: 25312

This table contains the full text for all our old WORDPRESS content in html form. The format is a bit odd as it represents a direct copy from wordpress content that includes a lot of wordpress specific comments that carry some meaning in terms of layout instructions etc.. The html in the content column can thus be rendered as is but will not look identical to the way it looks on our website as several post processing steps are not applied yet. The content should work though as a readable approximation for every post. For easy searching etc, a markdown copy of the content is available in the markdown column. If you want to query all posts (both wordpress and gdocs), use the posts_unified table or the posts_unified_with_content view.

Data license: CC-BY

This data as json

id	title	slug	type	status	content	archieml	archieml_update_statistics	published_at	updated_at	gdocSuccessorId	authors	excerpt	created_at_in_wordpress	updated_at_in_wordpress	featured_image	formattingOptions	markdown	wpApiSnapshot
25312	Mortality in the past – around half died as children	untitled-reusable-block-56	wp_block	publish	<!-- wp:columns {"className":"is-style-sticky-right"} --> <div class="wp-block-columns is-style-sticky-right"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>A child dying is one of the most dreadful tragedies one can imagine. We all know that child deaths were more common in the past. But how common? How do we know? And what can we learn from our history?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Archeologists and historians have brought together data from many places and time periods across the world which lets us piece together a picture of our past.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Sweden is a country that has particularly good historical, demographic data. It was the first country to establish an office for population statistics: the Tabellverket, founded in 1749. Looking at the statistical records for the first three decades – the period from 1750 to 1780 – we find that 40% of children died before the age of 15.{ref}As explained in the following footnote, this data is available from the Human Mortality Database.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>During the same period about half of all children died in Bavaria (Germany), and in France the mortality rate was about 45%. At that time the average couple would have more than 5, 6, or even 7 children, which meant that most parents saw several of their children die.{ref}Regarding the number of children that people had, the metric that I would ideally need here is the average number of children per woman (or per couple). This is sometimes reported as average family size, but I was not able to find this data. But I could find data on the total marital fertility rate.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The sources for both the number of children and the rate of deaths for the three countries are the following:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Sweden:<br>A total marital fertility rate of 7.62 children per married woman is reported in Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) – Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750–1850. Extramarital children were rare in Sweden at the time. Anderson estimates it at 2%.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The under-15 mortality rate is taken from the Human Mortality Database and corresponds to the average of the annual observations between 1750 to 1780.<br><br>Bavaria, Germany:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This data is taken from John Knodel’s research: John Knodel (1970) – ‘Two and a Half Centuries of Demographic History in a Bavarian Village’. <em>Population Studies</em> 24, no. 3 (1 November 1970): 353–76.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>According to his study married women had on average 5.6 children and saw on average almost three (2.8) of their children die before they were 15 years old. Knodel also includes data for an earlier period, but cautions against relying on it, writing: “The figure shown for couples married between 1692 and 1749 is undoubtedly spuriously high, resulting from the frequent omission of infant and child deaths from the parish registers during the period.” Knodel suggests that even the data after 1750 (which is shown here) is likely an underestimate of the true mortality.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>France:<br><br>In France the average married woman had about 8 children in the period 1740 to 1769. This is the total marital fertility rate taken from Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) – Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750–1850. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Youth mortality rates for France are reported in Volk and Atkinson. For the period 1600-1700 the authors report an estimate of 40-50%. They also present an estimate for the period 1816-50 when the mortality rate was 44%.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":56585,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56585"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Was this unusual? Was the death rate in Europe particularly high at that specific time? </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>We can look at research for other places and time periods.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Based on skeletons found in the South of modern-day Peru, paleodemographers can estimate the mortality of children who were born two millennia ago. The records suggest a similar figure: almost half of children died before the end of puberty.{ref}This research is carried out in the area of Pueblo Viejo, Cahuachi, Estaqueria and Atarco in the Nasca valley. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The original paper is Drusini, A. G., Carrara, N., Orefici, G., & Bonati, M. R. (2001). Paleodemography of the Nasca valley: Reconstruction of the human ecology of the southern Peruvian coast. Homo, 52, 157–172.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":56586,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56586"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>A burial site on the Spanish island of Mallorca offers us a view on child mortality in Europe during the Iron Age. Based on the skeletons found in Mallorca researchers again found that about half of all children did not survive.{ref}This research is carried out in several sites on the S’Illot des Porros in Mallorca.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The original paper is Alesan, A., A. Malgosa, and C. Simó (1999) – <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199911)110:3%3C285::AID-AJPA3%3E3.0.CO;2-2">Looking into the Demography of an Iron Age Population in the Western Mediterranean. I. Mortality</a>. In <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology</em> 110, no. 3 (November 1999): 285–301. The life expectancy at birth was 23 years.{/ref} </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":56587,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none","className":"wp-block-full-content-width"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full wp-block-full-content-width"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56587"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>And the same is also true in very different regions and different periods. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":56588,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56588"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Researchers also collected data about hunter-gatherer societies. The 17 different societies include paleolithic and modern-day hunter-gatherers and the mortality rate was high in all of them. On average 49% of all children died.{ref}For details see the paper Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) – <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>When relying on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers one needs to be cautious of how representative these societies are of those in the past. This is because recent hunter-gatherers might have been in exchange with surrounding societies and “often currently live in marginalized territories”, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels, so that the mortality rates are higher or lower than in historical times.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample “only to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.”</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>All but one of these studied societies in Volk and Atkinson are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers finds a higher youth mortality rate: 56% did not survive to puberty.{/ref} At the end of this article you can find more detail about the available evidence for the mortality rates of children in hunter-gatherer societies.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":56589,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56589"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>The mortality of children over the long-run</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Let’s take all the historical estimates of child mortality and combine them with global data for recent decades to see what this tells us about humanity’s history.{ref}In the literature on global health and modern health statistics, the most commonly studied age-cutoff is the age of five and the share of children dying before they are five years old is referred to as ‘child mortality’. A low age-cut off makes sense because the mortality in early childhood is typically substantially higher than in late childhood. Nevertheless a focus on the first five years gives only a partial view on the mortality of children. Childhood of course doesn’t end at the age of five, and in this article I’m relying on a more common definition of childhood and am considering all deaths up to the end of puberty or up to the age of 15. Which cutoff is used varies between the different studies on which this account is based on.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>A higher cut-off also has the advantage that it makes it possible to connect with historical and archaeological research on the mortality of children. Especially in archeological records it is not possible to determine the precise age at which a child died, but it is possible to differentiate between a child and an adult. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The researchers Anthony Volk and Jeremy Atkinson, on whose research I am primarily relying here, have brought together most of the historical estimates I am reporting here. Their literature search focused on the  share of children who died before reaching “approximate sexual maturity at age 15”. See: Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) – Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015</a></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The mortality up to the end of puberty is less commonly reported in modern health statistics. But it is of course also estimated by health statisticians and at the end of this post you find the estimates from the IGME at: <a href="https://childmortality.org">https://childmortality.org</a></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>(Note that Volk and Atkinson refer to the mortality up to “approximate sexual maturity” as child mortality, while I am following the established language in global health statistics where child mortality is reserved for mortality up to the age of five.){/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>What is striking about the historical research is how similar child mortality rates were across a wide range of very different historical cultures: No matter where in the world a child was born, about half of them died.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:image {"id":56719,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none","className":"wp-block-full-content-width"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full wp-block-full-content-width"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56719"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4><em>Everyone</em> failed to make progress</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Tens of billions of children died.{ref}The demographers Toshiko Kaneda and Carl Haub <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/longtermism">estimate</a> the number of humans that were ever born to be about 100 billion. Applying a child mortality rate of 50% this would mean that about 50 billion children died throughout human history. This is of course a rough estimate, but it gives us some idea of just how many children died.{/ref} Billions of parents <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/parents-losing-their-child">mourned helplessly</a> when they saw their children dying.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Despite the relentless suffering no one was able to do much about it.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The chart speaks about societies that lived thousands of kilometers away from each other, separated by thousands of years of history, and yet they all suffered the same pain. Whether in Ancient Rome, in hunter-gatherer-societies, in the pre-Columbian Americas, in Medieval Japan or Medieval England, in the European Renaissance, or in Imperial China, every second child died.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>While some societies were better off than others, the differences were small. Generation after generation was born into societies that struggled against poverty, hunger, and disease and there is no indication that any society made any substantial and sustained progress against those problems. Substantial progress against child mortality is a recent achievement everywhere.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>It is not that people in the past didn’t try to make progress against early death and disease. They tried, of course.{ref}Despite the great pain caused by poor health and early death humanity discovered extremely few medical remedies and practices that were effective over the course of hundreds of generations.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>While the rate of discoveries was extremely slow, there were certainly some breakthroughs that were relevant in the context of the time. One such example is that from the bark of the Cinchona tree Quinine was extracted which was effective in treating malaria. For other drugs see Wikipedia’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drugs_by_year_of_discovery">List of drugs by year of discovery</a>, which includes some other remedies.{/ref}  Healers and doctors had a high status in societies. And people often took on great pain and costs in the hope of improving their children’s health.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The “most common procedure performed by surgeons for almost two thousand years” in Europe <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20090415024002/http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/techniques/bloodletting.aspx">was</a> bloodletting. The pain this practice caused makes clear just how desperate people were to achieve any health improvements. The fact that it not only offered no benefits, but that it was indeed harmful to the patients, makes clear just how unsuccessful humanity was for most of its history.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>All were suffering as they saw their children die, yet none of them were able to do anything about it.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The key insight for me is that progress is not natural. It is hard. Even against some of the largest problems – the unrelenting death of children – thousands of generations failed to make any progress.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Are these high historical mortality rates plausible?</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The historical studies of child mortality don’t provide a full picture of our ancestors' past. They are snapshots of some moments in the long history of our species. Could they mislead us to believe that mortality rates were higher than they actually were?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There is another piece of evidence to consider that suggests the mortality of children was in fact very high: birth rates were high, but population growth was close to zero.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If every couple has on average four children, the population size would double each generation. But while we know that couples had on average many more children than four, the population did <em>not</em> double with each generation.{ref}We discuss this in more detail<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#total-fertility-rate-around-the-world-over-the-last-two-centuries"> here</a> and also in the first footnote of this article. From 10,000 BCE to 1700 the world population grew by only<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#world-population-from-10-000-bc-to-today"> 0.04% annually</a>..{/ref} In fact population sizes barely changed at all.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>A high number of births without a rapid increase of the population can only be explained by one sad reality: a high share of children died before they could have children themselves.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If anything, the mortality rates shown in the chart above underestimate the true mortality of children. Volk and Atkinson, the two researchers who gathered most of these studies, caution that these historical mortality rates “should be viewed as conservative estimates that generally err toward underestimating actual historic rates”.{ref}Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.{/ref} A first reason is that death records were often not produced for children, especially if children died soon after birth. A second reason is that child burial remains, another important source, are often incomplete “due to the more rapid decay of children's smaller physical remains and the lower frequency of elaborate infant burials”.{ref}See also M.E. Lewis (2007) – The bioarchaeology of children. Cambridge University Press, NY.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>The mortality of children today</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The chart above also shows the dramatic progress that was recently achieved. Most children in the world still died at extremely high rates well into the 20th century. Even as recently as 1950 – a time that some readers might well remember – one in four children died globally. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>More recently, during our lifetimes, the world has achieved an entirely unprecedented improvement. In a brief episode of human history the global death rate of children declined from around 50% to 4%. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>After millennia of suffering and failure, the progress against child mortality is for me one of the greatest achievements of humanity.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This is not an improvement that is only achieved by a few countries. The rate has declined in every single country in the world.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The map shows the latest available data for mortality up to the age of 15. In several countries the rate has declined to about 0.3%, a mortality rate that is more than 100-times lower than in the past. This was achieved in just a few generations. Progress can be fast.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In the richest parts of the world child deaths have become very rare, but differences across countries are high. Somalia – on the Horn of Africa – is the country with the highest rate, 14% of newborns die as children.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The fact that several countries show that it is possible for 99.7% of children to survive shows us what the world can aspire to. Global health has improved, and <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better">it is on us</a> to make sure that this progress continues to bring the daily tragedy of child deaths to an end.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Our ancestors could have surely not imagined what is reality today. Let’s make it our goal to give children everywhere the chance to live a long and healthy life.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/youth-mortality-rate" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:owid/additional-information {"defaultOpen":true} --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Additional information</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns {"className":"is-style-sticky-right"} --> <div class="wp-block-columns is-style-sticky-right"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Infant mortality rates in the past</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Many of the studies brought together by Volk and Atkinson also report estimates of the <em>infant mortality rate,</em> which is defined as the share of newborns who died in their first year of life.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Across the entire historical sample the authors found that on average, 27% of newborns died in their first year of life. This means the two key estimates are both easy to remember: Around a quarter died in the first year of life. Around half died as children.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The global infant mortality rate today is below 3%. In<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infant-mortality"> our map for infant mortality</a> you can find the data for every country in the world.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Mortality at young ages in hunter gatherer societies</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The historical data discussed above goes back 2500 years. What about prehistory when our ancestors around the world lived as<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer"> </a>hunter-gatherers?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Good evidence here is much harder to come by. To study mortality at a young age in prehistoric societies the researchers need to mostly rely on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers. Here, one needs to be cautious of how much we can learn from the realities of modern societies for those of the past. Modern hunter-gatherers are to varying degrees in exchange with surrounding societies and “often currently live in marginalized territories”, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample “only to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.”</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Again, the researchers find very similar mortality rates across their sample of 20 different studies on hunter-gatherer societies from very different locations: The average infant mortality rate (younger than 1) was 26.8% and the average mortality before puberty, 48.8%. Almost exactly the same as the historical sample discussed above.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>All but one of these studied societies are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers investigates the famous<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Knoll"> Indian Knoll</a> archaeological site from around 2,500 BCE, located in today’s area of Kentucky.{ref}The Indian Knoll site was investigated by Francis Johnston and Charles Snow C.E. Snow. See F.E. Johnston, C.E. Snow (1961) –<a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fajpa.1330190304&btnG="> The reassessment of the age and sex of the Indian Knoll skeletal population: Demographic and methodological aspects</a>. In American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 19, pp. 237-244.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>And also Indian Knoll skeletons. The University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology, Vol. IV, No. 3, Part 11 University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (1948){/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>For this community the estimates suggest that mortality at a young age was even higher than the average for modern-day hunter-gatherers: 30% died in their first year of life, and 56% did not survive to puberty.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Neanderthals and primates – the mortality of our closest relatives</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Going beyond our own species (homo sapiens), researchers have also attempted to estimate the mortality rates at young ages for our closest relatives.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Studies that focussed on the Neanderthals, our very closest relatives who lived within Eurasia from circa 400,000 until 40,000 years ago, suggest that they suffered infant mortality rates similar to our species before modernization: it is estimated that around 28% died in the first year of life.{ref}The 28% infant mortality rate is reported in Volk and Atkinson based on Trinkaus (1995).</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Erik Trinkaus (1995) – Neanderthal mortality patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22 (1995), pp. 121-142. Online here <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707</a></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Chamberlain (2006) also reports very high mortality rates for subadult Neanderthals (Homo Neanderthalensis). See: Andrew T. Chamberlain (2006) – Demography in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology).{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Atkinson and Volk also compared human child mortality rates across species with other primates. Bringing together many different sources the authors find the mortality rates of young chimpanzees and gorillas to be similar to the mortality rates of humans of the past, while other primates differ: orangutans and bonobos appear to have somewhat lower mortality rates and baboons, macaques, colobus monkeys, vervet monkeys, lemurs and other primates suffer from higher mortality rates at young ages.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html /--></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- /wp:owid/additional-information -->	{ "id": "wp-25312", "slug": "untitled-reusable-block-56", "content": { "toc": [], "body": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "A child dying is one of the most dreadful tragedies one can imagine. We all know that child deaths were more common in the past. But how common? How do we know? And what can we learn from our history?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Archeologists and historians have brought together data from many places and time periods across the world which lets us piece together a picture of our past.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Sweden is a country that has particularly good historical, demographic data. It was the first country to establish an office for population statistics: the Tabellverket, founded in 1749. Looking at the statistical records for the first three decades \u2013 the period from 1750 to 1780 \u2013 we find that 40% of children died before the age of 15.{ref}As explained in the following footnote, this data is available from the Human Mortality Database.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "During the same period about half of all children died in Bavaria (Germany), and in France the mortality rate was about 45%. At that time the average couple would have more than 5, 6, or even 7 children, which meant that most parents saw several of their children die.{ref}Regarding the number of children that people had, the metric that I would ideally need here is the average number of children per woman (or per couple). This is sometimes reported as average family size, but I was not able to find this data. But I could find data on the total marital fertility rate.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The sources for both the number of children and the rate of deaths for the three countries are the following:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Sweden:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "A total marital fertility rate of 7.62 children per married woman is reported in Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) \u2013 Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750\u20131850. Extramarital children were rare in Sweden at the time. Anderson estimates it at 2%.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The under-15 mortality rate is taken from the Human Mortality Database and corresponds to the average of the annual observations between 1750 to 1780.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "Bavaria, Germany:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This data is taken from John Knodel\u2019s research: John Knodel (1970) \u2013 \u2018Two and a Half Centuries of Demographic History in a Bavarian Village\u2019. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Population Studies", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " 24, no. 3 (1 November 1970): 353\u201376.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "According to his study married women had on average 5.6 children and saw on average almost three (2.8) of their children die before they were 15 years old. Knodel also includes data for an earlier period, but cautions against relying on it, writing: \u201cThe figure shown for couples married between 1692 and 1749 is undoubtedly spuriously high, resulting from the frequent omission of infant and child deaths from the parish registers during the period.\u201d Knodel suggests that even the data after 1750 (which is shown here) is likely an underestimate of the true mortality.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "France:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "In France the average married woman had about 8 children in the period 1740 to 1769. This is the total marital fertility rate taken from Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) \u2013 Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750\u20131850.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Youth mortality rates for France are reported in Volk and Atkinson. For the period 1600-1700 the authors report an estimate of 40-50%. They also present an estimate for the period 1816-50 when the mortality rate was 44%.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Was this unusual? Was the death rate in Europe particularly high at that specific time?\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "We can look at research for other places and time periods.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Based on skeletons found in the South of modern-day Peru, paleodemographers can estimate the mortality of children who were born two millennia ago. The records suggest a similar figure: almost half of children died before\u00a0the end of puberty.{ref}This research is carried out in the area of Pueblo Viejo, Cahuachi, Estaqueria and Atarco in the Nasca valley.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015", "children": [ { "text": "Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The original paper is Drusini, A. G., Carrara, N., Orefici, G., & Bonati, M. R. (2001). Paleodemography of the Nasca valley: Reconstruction of the human ecology of the southern Peruvian coast. Homo, 52, 157\u2013172.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "A burial site on the Spanish island of Mallorca offers us a view on child mortality in Europe during the Iron Age. Based on the skeletons found in Mallorca researchers again found that about half of all children did not survive.{ref}This research is carried out in several sites on the S\u2019Illot des Porros in Mallorca.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015", "children": [ { "text": "Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The original paper is Alesan, A., A. Malgosa, and C. Sim\u00f3 (1999) \u2013 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199911)110:3%3C285::AID-AJPA3%3E3.0.CO;2-2", "children": [ { "text": "Looking into the Demography of an Iron Age Population in the Western Mediterranean. I. Mortality", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". In ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "American Journal of Physical Anthropology", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " 110, no. 3 (November 1999): 285\u2013301. The life expectancy at birth was 23 years.{/ref}\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "And the same is also true in very different regions and different periods.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Researchers also collected data about hunter-gatherer societies. The 17 different societies include paleolithic and modern-day hunter-gatherers and the mortality rate was high in all of them. On average 49% of all children died.{ref}For details see the paper Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) \u2013 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015", "children": [ { "text": "Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "When relying on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers one needs to be cautious of how representative these societies are of those in the past. This is because recent hunter-gatherers might have been in exchange with surrounding societies and \u201coften currently live in marginalized territories\u201d, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels, so that the mortality rates are higher or lower than in historical times.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample \u201conly to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.\u201d", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "All but one of these studied societies in Volk and Atkinson are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers finds a higher youth mortality rate: 56% did not survive to puberty.{/ref} At the end of this article you can find more detail about the available evidence for the mortality rates of children in hunter-gatherer societies.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "The mortality of children over the long-run", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Let\u2019s take all the historical estimates of child mortality and combine them with global data for recent decades to see what this tells us about humanity\u2019s history.{ref}In the literature on global health and modern health statistics, the most commonly studied age-cutoff is the age of five and the share of children dying before they are five years old is referred to as \u2018child mortality\u2019. A low age-cut off makes sense because the mortality in early childhood is typically substantially higher than in late childhood. Nevertheless a focus on the first five years gives only a partial view on the mortality of children. Childhood of course doesn\u2019t end at the age of five, and in this article I\u2019m relying on a more common definition of childhood and am considering all deaths up to the end of puberty or up to the age of 15. Which cutoff is used varies between the different studies on which this account is based on.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "A higher cut-off also has the advantage that it makes it possible to connect with historical and archaeological research on the mortality of children. Especially in archeological records it is not possible to determine the precise age at which a child died, but it is possible to differentiate between a child and an adult.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The researchers Anthony Volk and Jeremy Atkinson, on whose research I am primarily relying here, have brought together most of the historical estimates I am reporting here. Their literature search focused on the\u00a0 share of children who died before reaching \u201capproximate sexual maturity at age 15\u201d. See: Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) \u2013 Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The mortality up to the end of puberty is less commonly reported in modern health statistics. But it is of course also estimated by health statisticians and at the end of this post you find the estimates from the IGME at: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://childmortality.org", "children": [ { "text": "https://childmortality.org", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "(Note that Volk and Atkinson refer to the mortality up to \u201capproximate sexual maturity\u201d as child mortality, while I am following the established language in global health statistics where child mortality is reserved for mortality up to the age of five.){/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "What is striking about the historical research is how similar child mortality rates were across a wide range of very different historical cultures: No matter where in the world a child was born, about half of them died.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Everyone", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " failed to make progress", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Tens of billions of children died.{ref}The demographers Toshiko Kaneda and Carl Haub ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/longtermism", "children": [ { "text": "estimate", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " the number of humans that were ever born to be about 100 billion. Applying a child mortality rate of 50% this would mean that about 50 billion children died throughout human history. This is of course a rough estimate, but it gives us some idea of just how many children died.{/ref} Billions of parents ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/parents-losing-their-child", "children": [ { "text": "mourned helplessly", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " when they saw their children dying.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Despite the relentless suffering no one was able to do much about it.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The chart speaks about societies that lived thousands of kilometers away from each other, separated by thousands of years of history, and yet they all suffered the same pain. Whether in Ancient Rome, in hunter-gatherer-societies, in the pre-Columbian Americas, in Medieval Japan or Medieval England, in the European Renaissance, or in Imperial China, every second child died.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "While some societies were better off than others, the differences were small. Generation after generation was born into societies that struggled against poverty, hunger, and disease and there is no indication that any society made any substantial and sustained progress against those problems. Substantial progress against child mortality is a recent achievement everywhere.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "It is not that people in the past didn\u2019t try to make progress against early death and disease. They tried, of course.{ref}Despite the great pain caused by poor health and early death humanity discovered extremely few medical remedies and practices that were effective over the course of hundreds of generations.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "While the rate of discoveries was extremely slow, there were certainly some breakthroughs that were relevant in the context of the time. One such example is that from the bark of the Cinchona tree Quinine was extracted which was effective in treating malaria. For other drugs see Wikipedia\u2019s ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drugs_by_year_of_discovery", "children": [ { "text": "List of drugs by year of discovery", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ", which includes some other remedies.{/ref} \u00a0Healers and doctors had a high status in societies. And people often took on great pain and costs in the hope of improving their children\u2019s health.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The \u201cmost common procedure performed by surgeons for almost two thousand years\u201d in Europe ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20090415024002/http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/techniques/bloodletting.aspx", "children": [ { "text": "was", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " bloodletting. The pain this practice caused makes clear just how desperate people were to achieve any health improvements. The fact that it not only offered no benefits, but that it was indeed harmful to the patients, makes clear just how unsuccessful humanity was for most of its history.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "All were suffering as they saw their children die, yet none of them were able to do anything about it.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The key insight for me is that progress is not natural. It is hard. Even against some of the largest problems \u2013 the unrelenting death of children \u2013 thousands of generations failed to make any progress.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Are these high historical mortality rates plausible?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The historical studies of child mortality don\u2019t provide a full picture of our ancestors' past. They are snapshots of some moments in the long history of our species. Could they mislead us to believe that mortality rates were higher than they actually were?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There is another piece of evidence to consider that suggests the mortality of children was in fact very high: birth rates were high, but population growth was close to zero.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If every couple has on average four children, the population size would double each generation. But while we know that couples had on average many more children than four, the population did ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "not", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " double with each generation.{ref}We discuss this in more detail", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#total-fertility-rate-around-the-world-over-the-last-two-centuries", "children": [ { "text": " here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " and also in the first footnote of this article. From 10,000 BCE to 1700 the world population grew by only", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#world-population-from-10-000-bc-to-today", "children": [ { "text": " 0.04% annually", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "..{/ref} In fact population sizes barely changed at all.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "A high number of births without a rapid increase of the population can only be explained by one sad reality: a high share of children died before they could have children themselves.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If anything, the mortality rates shown in the chart above underestimate the true mortality of children. Volk and Atkinson, the two researchers who gathered most of these studies, caution that these historical mortality rates \u201cshould be viewed as conservative estimates that generally err toward underestimating actual historic rates\u201d.{ref}Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015", "children": [ { "text": "Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.{/ref} A first reason is that death records were often not produced for children, especially if children died soon after birth. A second reason is that child burial remains, another important source, are often incomplete \u201cdue to the more rapid decay of children's smaller physical remains and the lower frequency of elaborate infant burials\u201d.{ref}See also M.E. Lewis (2007) \u2013 The bioarchaeology of children. Cambridge University Press, NY.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "The mortality of children today", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The chart above also shows the dramatic progress that was recently achieved. Most children in the world still died at extremely high rates well into the 20th century. Even as recently as 1950 \u2013 a time that some readers might well remember \u2013 one in four children died globally.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "More recently, during our lifetimes, the world has achieved an entirely unprecedented improvement. In a brief episode of human history the global death rate of children declined from around 50% to 4%.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "After millennia of suffering and failure, the progress against child mortality is for me one of the greatest achievements of humanity.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This is not an improvement that is only achieved by a few countries. The rate has declined in every single country in the world.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The map shows the latest available data for mortality up to the age of 15. In several countries the rate has declined to about 0.3%, a mortality rate that is more than 100-times lower than in the past. This was achieved in just a few generations. Progress can be fast.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In the richest parts of the world child deaths have become very rare, but differences across countries are high. Somalia \u2013 on the Horn of Africa \u2013 is the country with the highest rate, 14% of newborns die as children.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The fact that several countries show that it is possible for 99.7% of children to survive shows us what the world can aspire to. Global health has improved, and ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better", "children": [ { "text": "it is on us", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " to make sure that this progress continues to bring the daily tragedy of child deaths to an end.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Our ancestors could have surely not imagined what is reality today. Let\u2019s make it our goal to give children everywhere the chance to live a long and healthy life.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/youth-mortality-rate", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "gray-section", "items": [ { "text": [ { "text": "Additional information", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "expandable-paragraph", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Infant mortality rates in the past", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Many of the studies brought together by Volk and Atkinson also report estimates of the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "infant mortality rate,", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " which is defined as the share of newborns who died in their first year of life.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Across the entire historical sample the authors found that on average, 27% of newborns died in their first year of life. This means the two key estimates are both easy to remember: Around a quarter died in the first year of life. Around half died as children.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The global infant mortality rate today is below 3%. In", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infant-mortality", "children": [ { "text": " our map for infant mortality", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " you can find the data for every country in the world.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Mortality at young ages in hunter gatherer societies", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The historical data discussed above goes back 2500 years. What about prehistory when our ancestors around the world lived as", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer", "children": [ { "text": " ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "hunter-gatherers?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Good evidence here is much harder to come by. To study mortality at a young age in prehistoric societies the researchers need to mostly rely on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers. Here, one needs to be cautious of how much we can learn from the realities of modern societies for those of the past. Modern hunter-gatherers are to varying degrees in exchange with surrounding societies and \u201coften currently live in marginalized territories\u201d, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample \u201conly to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.\u201d", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Again, the researchers find very similar mortality rates across their sample of 20 different studies on hunter-gatherer societies from very different locations: The average infant mortality rate (younger than 1) was 26.8% and the average mortality before puberty, 48.8%. Almost exactly the same as the historical sample discussed above.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "All but one of these studied societies are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers investigates the famous", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Knoll", "children": [ { "text": " Indian Knoll", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " archaeological site from around 2,500 BCE, located in today\u2019s area of Kentucky.{ref}The Indian Knoll site was investigated by Francis Johnston and Charles Snow C.E. Snow. See F.E. Johnston, C.E. Snow (1961) \u2013", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fajpa.1330190304&btnG=", "children": [ { "text": " The reassessment of the age and sex of the Indian Knoll skeletal population: Demographic and methodological aspects", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". In American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 19, pp. 237-244.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "And also Indian Knoll skeletons. The University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology, Vol. IV, No. 3, Part 11 University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (1948){/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "For this community the estimates suggest that mortality at a young age was even higher than the average for modern-day hunter-gatherers: 30% died in their first year of life, and 56% did not survive to puberty.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Neanderthals and primates \u2013 the mortality of our closest relatives", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Going beyond our own species (homo sapiens), researchers have also attempted to estimate the mortality rates at young ages for our closest relatives.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Studies that focussed on the Neanderthals, our very closest relatives who lived within Eurasia from circa 400,000 until 40,000 years ago, suggest that they suffered infant mortality rates similar to our species before modernization: it is estimated that around 28% died in the first year of life.{ref}The 28% infant mortality rate is reported in Volk and Atkinson based on Trinkaus (1995).", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Erik Trinkaus (1995) \u2013 Neanderthal mortality patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22 (1995), pp. 121-142. Online here ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Chamberlain (2006) also reports very high mortality rates for subadult Neanderthals (Homo Neanderthalensis). See: Andrew T. Chamberlain (2006) \u2013 Demography in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology).{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Atkinson and Volk also compared human child mortality rates across species with other primates. Bringing together many different sources the authors find the mortality rates of young chimpanzees and gorillas to be similar to the mortality rates of humans of the past, while other primates differ: orangutans and bonobos appear to have somewhat lower mortality rates and baboons, macaques, colobus monkeys, vervet monkeys, lemurs and other primates suffer from higher mortality rates at young ages.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "article", "title": "Mortality in the past \u2013 around half died as children", "authors": [ null ], "dateline": "October 7, 2019", "sidebar-toc": false, "featured-image": "" }, "createdAt": "2021-03-28T18:06:16.000Z", "published": false, "updatedAt": "2023-04-19T11:43:29.000Z", "revisionId": null, "publishedAt": "2019-10-07T10:22:03.000Z", "relatedCharts": [], "publicationContext": "listed" }	{ "errors": [ { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" } ], "numBlocks": 60, "numErrors": 6, "wpTagCounts": { "html": 2, "image": 6, "column": 6, "columns": 3, "heading": 7, "paragraph": 68, "owid/additional-information": 1 }, "htmlTagCounts": { "p": 68, "h3": 1, "h4": 6, "div": 9, "figure": 6, "iframe": 1 } }	2019-10-07 10:22:03	2024-02-16 14:22:56		[ null ]		2021-03-28 18:06:16	2023-04-19 11:43:29		{}	A child dying is one of the most dreadful tragedies one can imagine. We all know that child deaths were more common in the past. But how common? How do we know? And what can we learn from our history? Archeologists and historians have brought together data from many places and time periods across the world which lets us piece together a picture of our past. Sweden is a country that has particularly good historical, demographic data. It was the first country to establish an office for population statistics: the Tabellverket, founded in 1749. Looking at the statistical records for the first three decades – the period from 1750 to 1780 – we find that 40% of children died before the age of 15.{ref}As explained in the following footnote, this data is available from the Human Mortality Database.{/ref} During the same period about half of all children died in Bavaria (Germany), and in France the mortality rate was about 45%. At that time the average couple would have more than 5, 6, or even 7 children, which meant that most parents saw several of their children die.{ref}Regarding the number of children that people had, the metric that I would ideally need here is the average number of children per woman (or per couple). This is sometimes reported as average family size, but I was not able to find this data. But I could find data on the total marital fertility rate. The sources for both the number of children and the rate of deaths for the three countries are the following: Sweden: A total marital fertility rate of 7.62 children per married woman is reported in Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) – Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750–1850. Extramarital children were rare in Sweden at the time. Anderson estimates it at 2%. The under-15 mortality rate is taken from the Human Mortality Database and corresponds to the average of the annual observations between 1750 to 1780. Bavaria, Germany: This data is taken from John Knodel’s research: John Knodel (1970) – ‘Two and a Half Centuries of Demographic History in a Bavarian Village’. _Population Studies_ 24, no. 3 (1 November 1970): 353–76. According to his study married women had on average 5.6 children and saw on average almost three (2.8) of their children die before they were 15 years old. Knodel also includes data for an earlier period, but cautions against relying on it, writing: “The figure shown for couples married between 1692 and 1749 is undoubtedly spuriously high, resulting from the frequent omission of infant and child deaths from the parish registers during the period.” Knodel suggests that even the data after 1750 (which is shown here) is likely an underestimate of the true mortality. France: In France the average married woman had about 8 children in the period 1740 to 1769. This is the total marital fertility rate taken from Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) – Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750–1850. Youth mortality rates for France are reported in Volk and Atkinson. For the period 1600-1700 the authors report an estimate of 40-50%. They also present an estimate for the period 1816-50 when the mortality rate was 44%.{/ref} <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png" alt=""/> Was this unusual? Was the death rate in Europe particularly high at that specific time? We can look at research for other places and time periods. Based on skeletons found in the South of modern-day Peru, paleodemographers can estimate the mortality of children who were born two millennia ago. The records suggest a similar figure: almost half of children died before the end of puberty.{ref}This research is carried out in the area of Pueblo Viejo, Cahuachi, Estaqueria and Atarco in the Nasca valley. The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – [Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015). In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. The original paper is Drusini, A. G., Carrara, N., Orefici, G., & Bonati, M. R. (2001). Paleodemography of the Nasca valley: Reconstruction of the human ecology of the southern Peruvian coast. Homo, 52, 157–172.{/ref} <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png" alt=""/> A burial site on the Spanish island of Mallorca offers us a view on child mortality in Europe during the Iron Age. Based on the skeletons found in Mallorca researchers again found that about half of all children did not survive.{ref}This research is carried out in several sites on the S’Illot des Porros in Mallorca. The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – [Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015). In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. The original paper is Alesan, A., A. Malgosa, and C. Simó (1999) – [Looking into the Demography of an Iron Age Population in the Western Mediterranean. I. Mortality](https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199911)110:3%3C285::AID-AJPA3%3E3.0.CO;2-2). In _American Journal of Physical Anthropology_ 110, no. 3 (November 1999): 285–301. The life expectancy at birth was 23 years.{/ref} <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png" alt=""/> And the same is also true in very different regions and different periods. <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png" alt=""/> Researchers also collected data about hunter-gatherer societies. The 17 different societies include paleolithic and modern-day hunter-gatherers and the mortality rate was high in all of them. On average 49% of all children died.{ref}For details see the paper Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) – [Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015). In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. When relying on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers one needs to be cautious of how representative these societies are of those in the past. This is because recent hunter-gatherers might have been in exchange with surrounding societies and “often currently live in marginalized territories”, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels, so that the mortality rates are higher or lower than in historical times. To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample “only to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.” All but one of these studied societies in Volk and Atkinson are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers finds a higher youth mortality rate: 56% did not survive to puberty.{/ref} At the end of this article you can find more detail about the available evidence for the mortality rates of children in hunter-gatherer societies. <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png" alt=""/> ## The mortality of children over the long-run Let’s take all the historical estimates of child mortality and combine them with global data for recent decades to see what this tells us about humanity’s history.{ref}In the literature on global health and modern health statistics, the most commonly studied age-cutoff is the age of five and the share of children dying before they are five years old is referred to as ‘child mortality’. A low age-cut off makes sense because the mortality in early childhood is typically substantially higher than in late childhood. Nevertheless a focus on the first five years gives only a partial view on the mortality of children. Childhood of course doesn’t end at the age of five, and in this article I’m relying on a more common definition of childhood and am considering all deaths up to the end of puberty or up to the age of 15. Which cutoff is used varies between the different studies on which this account is based on. A higher cut-off also has the advantage that it makes it possible to connect with historical and archaeological research on the mortality of children. Especially in archeological records it is not possible to determine the precise age at which a child died, but it is possible to differentiate between a child and an adult. The researchers Anthony Volk and Jeremy Atkinson, on whose research I am primarily relying here, have brought together most of the historical estimates I am reporting here. Their literature search focused on the share of children who died before reaching “approximate sexual maturity at age 15”. See: Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) – Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015) The mortality up to the end of puberty is less commonly reported in modern health statistics. But it is of course also estimated by health statisticians and at the end of this post you find the estimates from the IGME at: [https://childmortality.org](https://childmortality.org) (Note that Volk and Atkinson refer to the mortality up to “approximate sexual maturity” as child mortality, while I am following the established language in global health statistics where child mortality is reserved for mortality up to the age of five.){/ref} What is striking about the historical research is how similar child mortality rates were across a wide range of very different historical cultures: No matter where in the world a child was born, about half of them died. <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png" alt=""/> ## _Everyone_ failed to make progress Tens of billions of children died.{ref}The demographers Toshiko Kaneda and Carl Haub [estimate](https://ourworldindata.org/longtermism) the number of humans that were ever born to be about 100 billion. Applying a child mortality rate of 50% this would mean that about 50 billion children died throughout human history. This is of course a rough estimate, but it gives us some idea of just how many children died.{/ref} Billions of parents [mourned helplessly](https://ourworldindata.org/parents-losing-their-child) when they saw their children dying. Despite the relentless suffering no one was able to do much about it. The chart speaks about societies that lived thousands of kilometers away from each other, separated by thousands of years of history, and yet they all suffered the same pain. Whether in Ancient Rome, in hunter-gatherer-societies, in the pre-Columbian Americas, in Medieval Japan or Medieval England, in the European Renaissance, or in Imperial China, every second child died. While some societies were better off than others, the differences were small. Generation after generation was born into societies that struggled against poverty, hunger, and disease and there is no indication that any society made any substantial and sustained progress against those problems. Substantial progress against child mortality is a recent achievement everywhere. It is not that people in the past didn’t try to make progress against early death and disease. They tried, of course.{ref}Despite the great pain caused by poor health and early death humanity discovered extremely few medical remedies and practices that were effective over the course of hundreds of generations. While the rate of discoveries was extremely slow, there were certainly some breakthroughs that were relevant in the context of the time. One such example is that from the bark of the Cinchona tree Quinine was extracted which was effective in treating malaria. For other drugs see Wikipedia’s [List of drugs by year of discovery](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drugs_by_year_of_discovery), which includes some other remedies.{/ref} Healers and doctors had a high status in societies. And people often took on great pain and costs in the hope of improving their children’s health. The “most common procedure performed by surgeons for almost two thousand years” in Europe [was](https://web.archive.org/web/20090415024002/http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/techniques/bloodletting.aspx) bloodletting. The pain this practice caused makes clear just how desperate people were to achieve any health improvements. The fact that it not only offered no benefits, but that it was indeed harmful to the patients, makes clear just how unsuccessful humanity was for most of its history. All were suffering as they saw their children die, yet none of them were able to do anything about it. The key insight for me is that progress is not natural. It is hard. Even against some of the largest problems – the unrelenting death of children – thousands of generations failed to make any progress. ## Are these high historical mortality rates plausible? The historical studies of child mortality don’t provide a full picture of our ancestors' past. They are snapshots of some moments in the long history of our species. Could they mislead us to believe that mortality rates were higher than they actually were? There is another piece of evidence to consider that suggests the mortality of children was in fact very high: birth rates were high, but population growth was close to zero. If every couple has on average four children, the population size would double each generation. But while we know that couples had on average many more children than four, the population did _not_ double with each generation.{ref}We discuss this in more detail[ here](https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#total-fertility-rate-around-the-world-over-the-last-two-centuries) and also in the first footnote of this article. From 10,000 BCE to 1700 the world population grew by only[ 0.04% annually](https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#world-population-from-10-000-bc-to-today)..{/ref} In fact population sizes barely changed at all. A high number of births without a rapid increase of the population can only be explained by one sad reality: a high share of children died before they could have children themselves. If anything, the mortality rates shown in the chart above underestimate the true mortality of children. Volk and Atkinson, the two researchers who gathered most of these studies, caution that these historical mortality rates “should be viewed as conservative estimates that generally err toward underestimating actual historic rates”.{ref}Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – [Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015). In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.{/ref} A first reason is that death records were often not produced for children, especially if children died soon after birth. A second reason is that child burial remains, another important source, are often incomplete “due to the more rapid decay of children's smaller physical remains and the lower frequency of elaborate infant burials”.{ref}See also M.E. Lewis (2007) – The bioarchaeology of children. Cambridge University Press, NY.{/ref} ## The mortality of children today The chart above also shows the dramatic progress that was recently achieved. Most children in the world still died at extremely high rates well into the 20th century. Even as recently as 1950 – a time that some readers might well remember – one in four children died globally. More recently, during our lifetimes, the world has achieved an entirely unprecedented improvement. In a brief episode of human history the global death rate of children declined from around 50% to 4%. After millennia of suffering and failure, the progress against child mortality is for me one of the greatest achievements of humanity. This is not an improvement that is only achieved by a few countries. The rate has declined in every single country in the world. The map shows the latest available data for mortality up to the age of 15. In several countries the rate has declined to about 0.3%, a mortality rate that is more than 100-times lower than in the past. This was achieved in just a few generations. Progress can be fast. In the richest parts of the world child deaths have become very rare, but differences across countries are high. Somalia – on the Horn of Africa – is the country with the highest rate, 14% of newborns die as children. The fact that several countries show that it is possible for 99.7% of children to survive shows us what the world can aspire to. Global health has improved, and [it is on us](https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better) to make sure that this progress continues to bring the daily tragedy of child deaths to an end. Our ancestors could have surely not imagined what is reality today. Let’s make it our goal to give children everywhere the chance to live a long and healthy life. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/youth-mortality-rate"/> ## Additional information Infant mortality rates in the past Many of the studies brought together by Volk and Atkinson also report estimates of the _infant mortality rate,_ which is defined as the share of newborns who died in their first year of life. Across the entire historical sample the authors found that on average, 27% of newborns died in their first year of life. This means the two key estimates are both easy to remember: Around a quarter died in the first year of life. Around half died as children. The global infant mortality rate today is below 3%. In[ our map for infant mortality](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infant-mortality) you can find the data for every country in the world. #### Mortality at young ages in hunter gatherer societies The historical data discussed above goes back 2500 years. What about prehistory when our ancestors around the world lived as[ ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer)hunter-gatherers? Good evidence here is much harder to come by. To study mortality at a young age in prehistoric societies the researchers need to mostly rely on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers. Here, one needs to be cautious of how much we can learn from the realities of modern societies for those of the past. Modern hunter-gatherers are to varying degrees in exchange with surrounding societies and “often currently live in marginalized territories”, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels. To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample “only to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.” Again, the researchers find very similar mortality rates across their sample of 20 different studies on hunter-gatherer societies from very different locations: The average infant mortality rate (younger than 1) was 26.8% and the average mortality before puberty, 48.8%. Almost exactly the same as the historical sample discussed above. All but one of these studied societies are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers investigates the famous[ Indian Knoll](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Knoll) archaeological site from around 2,500 BCE, located in today’s area of Kentucky.{ref}The Indian Knoll site was investigated by Francis Johnston and Charles Snow C.E. Snow. See F.E. Johnston, C.E. Snow (1961) –[ The reassessment of the age and sex of the Indian Knoll skeletal population: Demographic and methodological aspects](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fajpa.1330190304&btnG=). In American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 19, pp. 237-244. And also Indian Knoll skeletons. The University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology, Vol. IV, No. 3, Part 11 University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (1948){/ref} For this community the estimates suggest that mortality at a young age was even higher than the average for modern-day hunter-gatherers: 30% died in their first year of life, and 56% did not survive to puberty. #### Neanderthals and primates – the mortality of our closest relatives Going beyond our own species (homo sapiens), researchers have also attempted to estimate the mortality rates at young ages for our closest relatives. Studies that focussed on the Neanderthals, our very closest relatives who lived within Eurasia from circa 400,000 until 40,000 years ago, suggest that they suffered infant mortality rates similar to our species before modernization: it is estimated that around 28% died in the first year of life.{ref}The 28% infant mortality rate is reported in Volk and Atkinson based on Trinkaus (1995). Erik Trinkaus (1995) – Neanderthal mortality patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22 (1995), pp. 121-142. Online here [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707) Chamberlain (2006) also reports very high mortality rates for subadult Neanderthals (Homo Neanderthalensis). See: Andrew T. Chamberlain (2006) – Demography in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology).{/ref} Atkinson and Volk also compared human child mortality rates across species with other primates. Bringing together many different sources the authors find the mortality rates of young chimpanzees and gorillas to be similar to the mortality rates of humans of the past, while other primates differ: orangutans and bonobos appear to have somewhat lower mortality rates and baboons, macaques, colobus monkeys, vervet monkeys, lemurs and other primates suffer from higher mortality rates at young ages.	{ "data": { "wpBlock": { "content": "\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-style-sticky-right\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>A child dying is one of the most dreadful tragedies one can imagine. We all know that child deaths were more common in the past. But how common? How do we know? And what can we learn from our history?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Archeologists and historians have brought together data from many places and time periods across the world which lets us piece together a picture of our past.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sweden is a country that has particularly good historical, demographic data. It was the first country to establish an office for population statistics: the Tabellverket, founded in 1749. Looking at the statistical records for the first three decades \u2013 the period from 1750 to 1780 \u2013 we find that 40% of children died before the age of 15.{ref}As explained in the following footnote, this data is available from the Human Mortality Database.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>During the same period about half of all children died in Bavaria (Germany), and in France the mortality rate was about 45%. At that time the average couple would have more than 5, 6, or even 7 children, which meant that most parents saw several of their children die.{ref}Regarding the number of children that people had, the metric that I would ideally need here is the average number of children per woman (or per couple). This is sometimes reported as average family size, but I was not able to find this data. But I could find data on the total marital fertility rate.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The sources for both the number of children and the rate of deaths for the three countries are the following:</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sweden:<br>A total marital fertility rate of 7.62 children per married woman is reported in Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) \u2013 Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750\u20131850. Extramarital children were rare in Sweden at the time. Anderson estimates it at 2%.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The under-15 mortality rate is taken from the Human Mortality Database and corresponds to the average of the annual observations between 1750 to 1780.<br><br>Bavaria, Germany:</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This data is taken from John Knodel\u2019s research: John Knodel (1970) \u2013 \u2018Two and a Half Centuries of Demographic History in a Bavarian Village\u2019. <em>Population Studies</em> 24, no. 3 (1 November 1970): 353\u201376.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to his study married women had on average 5.6 children and saw on average almost three (2.8) of their children die before they were 15 years old. Knodel also includes data for an earlier period, but cautions against relying on it, writing: \u201cThe figure shown for couples married between 1692 and 1749 is undoubtedly spuriously high, resulting from the frequent omission of infant and child deaths from the parish registers during the period.\u201d Knodel suggests that even the data after 1750 (which is shown here) is likely an underestimate of the true mortality.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>France:<br><br>In France the average married woman had about 8 children in the period 1740 to 1769. This is the total marital fertility rate taken from Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) \u2013 Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750\u20131850. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Youth mortality rates for France are reported in Volk and Atkinson. For the period 1600-1700 the authors report an estimate of 40-50%. They also present an estimate for the period 1816-50 when the mortality rate was 44%.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"946\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56585\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-400x79.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-800x158.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-150x30.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-768x152.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-1536x304.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-2048x405.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Was this unusual? Was the death rate in Europe particularly high at that specific time? </p>\n\n\n\n<p>We can look at research for other places and time periods.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on skeletons found in the South of modern-day Peru, paleodemographers can estimate the mortality of children who were born two millennia ago. The records suggest a similar figure: almost half of children died before the end of puberty.{ref}This research is carried out in the area of Pueblo Viejo, Cahuachi, Estaqueria and Atarco in the Nasca valley. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The original paper is Drusini, A. G., Carrara, N., Orefici, G., & Bonati, M. R. (2001). Paleodemography of the Nasca valley: Reconstruction of the human ecology of the southern Peruvian coast. Homo, 52, 157\u2013172.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"298\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56586\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-400x25.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-800x50.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-150x9.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-768x48.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-1536x96.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-2048x128.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>A burial site on the Spanish island of Mallorca offers us a view on child mortality in Europe during the Iron Age. Based on the skeletons found in Mallorca researchers again found that about half of all children did not survive.{ref}This research is carried out in several sites on the S\u2019Illot des Porros in Mallorca.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The original paper is Alesan, A., A. Malgosa, and C. Sim\u00f3 (1999) \u2013 <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199911)110:3%3C285::AID-AJPA3%3E3.0.CO;2-2\">Looking into the Demography of an Iron Age Population in the Western Mediterranean. I. Mortality</a>. In <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology</em> 110, no. 3 (November 1999): 285\u2013301. The life expectancy at birth was 23 years.{/ref} </p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full wp-block-full-content-width\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"279\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56587\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-400x23.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-800x47.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-150x9.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-768x45.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-1536x90.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-2048x120.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>And the same is also true in very different regions and different periods. </p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"1378\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56588\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-400x115.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-800x231.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-150x43.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-768x221.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-1536x443.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-2048x591.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Researchers also collected data about hunter-gatherer societies. The 17 different societies include paleolithic and modern-day hunter-gatherers and the mortality rate was high in all of them. On average 49% of all children died.{ref}For details see the paper Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) \u2013 <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>When relying on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers one needs to be cautious of how representative these societies are of those in the past. This is because recent hunter-gatherers might have been in exchange with surrounding societies and \u201coften currently live in marginalized territories\u201d, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels, so that the mortality rates are higher or lower than in historical times.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample \u201conly to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.\u201d</p>\n\n\n\n<p>All but one of these studied societies in Volk and Atkinson are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers finds a higher youth mortality rate: 56% did not survive to puberty.{/ref} At the end of this article you can find more detail about the available evidence for the mortality rates of children in hunter-gatherer societies.</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"409\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56589\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-400x34.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-800x68.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-150x13.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-768x66.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-1536x131.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-2048x175.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<h4>The mortality of children over the long-run</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Let\u2019s take all the historical estimates of child mortality and combine them with global data for recent decades to see what this tells us about humanity\u2019s history.{ref}In the literature on global health and modern health statistics, the most commonly studied age-cutoff is the age of five and the share of children dying before they are five years old is referred to as \u2018child mortality\u2019. A low age-cut off makes sense because the mortality in early childhood is typically substantially higher than in late childhood. Nevertheless a focus on the first five years gives only a partial view on the mortality of children. Childhood of course doesn\u2019t end at the age of five, and in this article I\u2019m relying on a more common definition of childhood and am considering all deaths up to the end of puberty or up to the age of 15. Which cutoff is used varies between the different studies on which this account is based on.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>A higher cut-off also has the advantage that it makes it possible to connect with historical and archaeological research on the mortality of children. Especially in archeological records it is not possible to determine the precise age at which a child died, but it is possible to differentiate between a child and an adult. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>The researchers Anthony Volk and Jeremy Atkinson, on whose research I am primarily relying here, have brought together most of the historical estimates I am reporting here. Their literature search focused on the  share of children who died before reaching \u201capproximate sexual maturity at age 15\u201d. See: Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) \u2013 Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015</a></p>\n\n\n\n<p>The mortality up to the end of puberty is less commonly reported in modern health statistics. But it is of course also estimated by health statisticians and at the end of this post you find the estimates from the IGME at: <a href=\"https://childmortality.org\">https://childmortality.org</a></p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Note that Volk and Atkinson refer to the mortality up to \u201capproximate sexual maturity\u201d as child mortality, while I am following the established language in global health statistics where child mortality is reserved for mortality up to the age of five.){/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is striking about the historical research is how similar child mortality rates were across a wide range of very different historical cultures: No matter where in the world a child was born, about half of them died.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\"></div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full wp-block-full-content-width\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"3000\" height=\"2760\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56719\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png 3000w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-400x368.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-598x550.png 598w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-150x138.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-768x707.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-1536x1413.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-2048x1884.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 3000px) 100vw, 3000px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<h4><em>Everyone</em> failed to make progress</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tens of billions of children died.{ref}The demographers Toshiko Kaneda and Carl Haub <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/longtermism\">estimate</a> the number of humans that were ever born to be about 100 billion. Applying a child mortality rate of 50% this would mean that about 50 billion children died throughout human history. This is of course a rough estimate, but it gives us some idea of just how many children died.{/ref} Billions of parents <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/parents-losing-their-child\">mourned helplessly</a> when they saw their children dying.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite the relentless suffering no one was able to do much about it.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart speaks about societies that lived thousands of kilometers away from each other, separated by thousands of years of history, and yet they all suffered the same pain. Whether in Ancient Rome, in hunter-gatherer-societies, in the pre-Columbian Americas, in Medieval Japan or Medieval England, in the European Renaissance, or in Imperial China, every second child died.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>While some societies were better off than others, the differences were small. Generation after generation was born into societies that struggled against poverty, hunger, and disease and there is no indication that any society made any substantial and sustained progress against those problems. Substantial progress against child mortality is a recent achievement everywhere.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is not that people in the past didn\u2019t try to make progress against early death and disease. They tried, of course.{ref}Despite the great pain caused by poor health and early death humanity discovered extremely few medical remedies and practices that were effective over the course of hundreds of generations.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>While the rate of discoveries was extremely slow, there were certainly some breakthroughs that were relevant in the context of the time. One such example is that from the bark of the Cinchona tree Quinine was extracted which was effective in treating malaria. For other drugs see Wikipedia\u2019s <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drugs_by_year_of_discovery\">List of drugs by year of discovery</a>, which includes some other remedies.{/ref}  Healers and doctors had a high status in societies. And people often took on great pain and costs in the hope of improving their children\u2019s health.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The \u201cmost common procedure performed by surgeons for almost two thousand years\u201d in Europe <a href=\"https://web.archive.org/web/20090415024002/http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/techniques/bloodletting.aspx\">was</a> bloodletting. The pain this practice caused makes clear just how desperate people were to achieve any health improvements. The fact that it not only offered no benefits, but that it was indeed harmful to the patients, makes clear just how unsuccessful humanity was for most of its history.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>All were suffering as they saw their children die, yet none of them were able to do anything about it.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The key insight for me is that progress is not natural. It is hard. Even against some of the largest problems \u2013 the unrelenting death of children \u2013 thousands of generations failed to make any progress.</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Are these high historical mortality rates plausible?</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The historical studies of child mortality don\u2019t provide a full picture of our ancestors’ past. They are snapshots of some moments in the long history of our species. Could they mislead us to believe that mortality rates were higher than they actually were?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is another piece of evidence to consider that suggests the mortality of children was in fact very high: birth rates were high, but population growth was close to zero.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>If every couple has on average four children, the population size would double each generation. But while we know that couples had on average many more children than four, the population did <em>not</em> double with each generation.{ref}We discuss this in more detail<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#total-fertility-rate-around-the-world-over-the-last-two-centuries\"> here</a> and also in the first footnote of this article. From 10,000 BCE to 1700 the world population grew by only<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#world-population-from-10-000-bc-to-today\"> 0.04% annually</a>..{/ref} In fact population sizes barely changed at all.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>A high number of births without a rapid increase of the population can only be explained by one sad reality: a high share of children died before they could have children themselves.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>If anything, the mortality rates shown in the chart above underestimate the true mortality of children. Volk and Atkinson, the two researchers who gathered most of these studies, caution that these historical mortality rates \u201cshould be viewed as conservative estimates that generally err toward underestimating actual historic rates\u201d.{ref}Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.{/ref} A first reason is that death records were often not produced for children, especially if children died soon after birth. A second reason is that child burial remains, another important source, are often incomplete \u201cdue to the more rapid decay of children’s smaller physical remains and the lower frequency of elaborate infant burials\u201d.{ref}See also M.E. Lewis (2007) \u2013 The bioarchaeology of children. Cambridge University Press, NY.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>The mortality of children today</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart above also shows the dramatic progress that was recently achieved. Most children in the world still died at extremely high rates well into the 20th century. Even as recently as 1950 \u2013 a time that some readers might well remember \u2013 one in four children died globally. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>More recently, during our lifetimes, the world has achieved an entirely unprecedented improvement. In a brief episode of human history the global death rate of children declined from around 50% to 4%. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>After millennia of suffering and failure, the progress against child mortality is for me one of the greatest achievements of humanity.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is not an improvement that is only achieved by a few countries. The rate has declined in every single country in the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>The map shows the latest available data for mortality up to the age of 15. In several countries the rate has declined to about 0.3%, a mortality rate that is more than 100-times lower than in the past. This was achieved in just a few generations. Progress can be fast.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the richest parts of the world child deaths have become very rare, but differences across countries are high. Somalia \u2013 on the Horn of Africa \u2013 is the country with the highest rate, 14% of newborns die as children.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The fact that several countries show that it is possible for 99.7% of children to survive shows us what the world can aspire to. Global health has improved, and <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better\">it is on us</a> to make sure that this progress continues to bring the daily tragedy of child deaths to an end.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Our ancestors could have surely not imagined what is reality today. Let\u2019s make it our goal to give children everywhere the chance to live a long and healthy life.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/youth-mortality-rate\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n\n\t<block type=\"additional-information\" default-open=\"true\">\n\t\t<content>\n\n<h3>Additional information</h3>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-style-sticky-right\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>Infant mortality rates in the past</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Many of the studies brought together by Volk and Atkinson also report estimates of the <em>infant mortality rate,</em> which is defined as the share of newborns who died in their first year of life.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Across the entire historical sample the authors found that on average, 27% of newborns died in their first year of life. This means the two key estimates are both easy to remember: Around a quarter died in the first year of life. Around half died as children.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The global infant mortality rate today is below 3%. In<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infant-mortality\"> our map for infant mortality</a> you can find the data for every country in the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Mortality at young ages in hunter gatherer societies</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The historical data discussed above goes back 2500 years. What about prehistory when our ancestors around the world lived as<a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer\"> </a>hunter-gatherers?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Good evidence here is much harder to come by. To study mortality at a young age in prehistoric societies the researchers need to mostly rely on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers. Here, one needs to be cautious of how much we can learn from the realities of modern societies for those of the past. Modern hunter-gatherers are to varying degrees in exchange with surrounding societies and \u201coften currently live in marginalized territories\u201d, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample \u201conly to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.\u201d</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Again, the researchers find very similar mortality rates across their sample of 20 different studies on hunter-gatherer societies from very different locations: The average infant mortality rate (younger than 1) was 26.8% and the average mortality before puberty, 48.8%. Almost exactly the same as the historical sample discussed above.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>All but one of these studied societies are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers investigates the famous<a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Knoll\"> Indian Knoll</a> archaeological site from around 2,500 BCE, located in today\u2019s area of Kentucky.{ref}The Indian Knoll site was investigated by Francis Johnston and Charles Snow C.E. Snow. See F.E. Johnston, C.E. Snow (1961) \u2013<a href=\"https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fajpa.1330190304&btnG=\"> The reassessment of the age and sex of the Indian Knoll skeletal population: Demographic and methodological aspects</a>. In American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 19, pp. 237-244.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>And also Indian Knoll skeletons. The University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology, Vol. IV, No. 3, Part 11 University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (1948){/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>For this community the estimates suggest that mortality at a young age was even higher than the average for modern-day hunter-gatherers: 30% died in their first year of life, and 56% did not survive to puberty.</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Neanderthals and primates \u2013 the mortality of our closest relatives</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Going beyond our own species (homo sapiens), researchers have also attempted to estimate the mortality rates at young ages for our closest relatives.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Studies that focussed on the Neanderthals, our very closest relatives who lived within Eurasia from circa 400,000 until 40,000 years ago, suggest that they suffered infant mortality rates similar to our species before modernization: it is estimated that around 28% died in the first year of life.{ref}The 28% infant mortality rate is reported in Volk and Atkinson based on Trinkaus (1995).</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Erik Trinkaus (1995) \u2013 Neanderthal mortality patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22 (1995), pp. 121-142. Online here <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707</a></p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chamberlain (2006) also reports very high mortality rates for subadult Neanderthals (Homo Neanderthalensis). See: Andrew T. Chamberlain (2006) \u2013 Demography in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology).{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Atkinson and Volk also compared human child mortality rates across species with other primates. Bringing together many different sources the authors find the mortality rates of young chimpanzees and gorillas to be similar to the mortality rates of humans of the past, while other primates differ: orangutans and bonobos appear to have somewhat lower mortality rates and baboons, macaques, colobus monkeys, vervet monkeys, lemurs and other primates suffer from higher mortality rates at young ages.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\"></div>\n</div>\n\n</content>\n\t</block>" } }, "extensions": { "debug": [ { "type": "DEBUG_LOGS_INACTIVE", "message": "GraphQL Debug logging is not active. To see debug logs, GRAPHQL_DEBUG must be enabled." } ] } }

title

slug

type

status

content

archieml

archieml_update_statistics

published_at

updated_at

gdocSuccessorId

authors

excerpt

created_at_in_wordpress

updated_at_in_wordpress

featured_image

formattingOptions

markdown

wpApiSnapshot

25312

Mortality in the past – around half died as children

untitled-reusable-block-56

wp_block

publish

<div class="wp-block-columns is-style-sticky-right"> <div class="wp-block-column"> <p>A child dying is one of the most dreadful tragedies one can imagine. We all know that child deaths were more common in the past. But how common? How do we know? And what can we learn from our history?</p>   <p>Archeologists and historians have brought together data from many places and time periods across the world which lets us piece together a picture of our past.</p>   <p>Sweden is a country that has particularly good historical, demographic data. It was the first country to establish an office for population statistics: the Tabellverket, founded in 1749. Looking at the statistical records for the first three decades – the period from 1750 to 1780 – we find that 40% of children died before the age of 15.{ref}As explained in the following footnote, this data is available from the Human Mortality Database.{/ref}</p>   <p>During the same period about half of all children died in Bavaria (Germany), and in France the mortality rate was about 45%. At that time the average couple would have more than 5, 6, or even 7 children, which meant that most parents saw several of their children die.{ref}Regarding the number of children that people had, the metric that I would ideally need here is the average number of children per woman (or per couple). This is sometimes reported as average family size, but I was not able to find this data. But I could find data on the total marital fertility rate.</p>   <p>The sources for both the number of children and the rate of deaths for the three countries are the following:</p>   <p>Sweden:<br>A total marital fertility rate of 7.62 children per married woman is reported in Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) – Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750–1850. Extramarital children were rare in Sweden at the time. Anderson estimates it at 2%.</p>   <p>The under-15 mortality rate is taken from the Human Mortality Database and corresponds to the average of the annual observations between 1750 to 1780.<br><br>Bavaria, Germany:</p>   <p>This data is taken from John Knodel’s research: John Knodel (1970) – ‘Two and a Half Centuries of Demographic History in a Bavarian Village’. <em>Population Studies</em> 24, no. 3 (1 November 1970): 353–76.</p>   <p>According to his study married women had on average 5.6 children and saw on average almost three (2.8) of their children die before they were 15 years old. Knodel also includes data for an earlier period, but cautions against relying on it, writing: “The figure shown for couples married between 1692 and 1749 is undoubtedly spuriously high, resulting from the frequent omission of infant and child deaths from the parish registers during the period.” Knodel suggests that even the data after 1750 (which is shown here) is likely an underestimate of the true mortality.</p>   <p>France:<br><br>In France the average married woman had about 8 children in the period 1740 to 1769. This is the total marital fertility rate taken from Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) – Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750–1850. </p>   <p>Youth mortality rates for France are reported in Volk and Atkinson. For the period 1600-1700 the authors report an estimate of 40-50%. They also present an estimate for the period 1816-50 when the mortality rate was 44%.{/ref}</p>   <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56585"/></figure>   <p>Was this unusual? Was the death rate in Europe particularly high at that specific time? </p>   <p>We can look at research for other places and time periods.</p>   <p>Based on skeletons found in the South of modern-day Peru, paleodemographers can estimate the mortality of children who were born two millennia ago. The records suggest a similar figure: almost half of children died before the end of puberty.{ref}This research is carried out in the area of Pueblo Viejo, Cahuachi, Estaqueria and Atarco in the Nasca valley. </p>   <p>The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p>   <p>The original paper is Drusini, A. G., Carrara, N., Orefici, G., & Bonati, M. R. (2001). Paleodemography of the Nasca valley: Reconstruction of the human ecology of the southern Peruvian coast. Homo, 52, 157–172.{/ref}</p>   <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56586"/></figure>   <p>A burial site on the Spanish island of Mallorca offers us a view on child mortality in Europe during the Iron Age. Based on the skeletons found in Mallorca researchers again found that about half of all children did not survive.{ref}This research is carried out in several sites on the S’Illot des Porros in Mallorca.</p>   <p>The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p>   <p>The original paper is Alesan, A., A. Malgosa, and C. Simó (1999) – <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199911)110:3%3C285::AID-AJPA3%3E3.0.CO;2-2">Looking into the Demography of an Iron Age Population in the Western Mediterranean. I. Mortality</a>. In <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology</em> 110, no. 3 (November 1999): 285–301. The life expectancy at birth was 23 years.{/ref} </p>   <figure class="wp-block-image size-full wp-block-full-content-width"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56587"/></figure>   <p>And the same is also true in very different regions and different periods. </p>   <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56588"/></figure>   <p>Researchers also collected data about hunter-gatherer societies. The 17 different societies include paleolithic and modern-day hunter-gatherers and the mortality rate was high in all of them. On average 49% of all children died.{ref}For details see the paper Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) – <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p>   <p>When relying on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers one needs to be cautious of how representative these societies are of those in the past. This is because recent hunter-gatherers might have been in exchange with surrounding societies and “often currently live in marginalized territories”, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels, so that the mortality rates are higher or lower than in historical times.</p>   <p>To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample “only to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.”</p>   <p>All but one of these studied societies in Volk and Atkinson are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers finds a higher youth mortality rate: 56% did not survive to puberty.{/ref} At the end of this article you can find more detail about the available evidence for the mortality rates of children in hunter-gatherer societies.</p>   <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56589"/></figure>   <h4>The mortality of children over the long-run</h4>   <p>Let’s take all the historical estimates of child mortality and combine them with global data for recent decades to see what this tells us about humanity’s history.{ref}In the literature on global health and modern health statistics, the most commonly studied age-cutoff is the age of five and the share of children dying before they are five years old is referred to as ‘child mortality’. A low age-cut off makes sense because the mortality in early childhood is typically substantially higher than in late childhood. Nevertheless a focus on the first five years gives only a partial view on the mortality of children. Childhood of course doesn’t end at the age of five, and in this article I’m relying on a more common definition of childhood and am considering all deaths up to the end of puberty or up to the age of 15. Which cutoff is used varies between the different studies on which this account is based on.</p>   <p>A higher cut-off also has the advantage that it makes it possible to connect with historical and archaeological research on the mortality of children. Especially in archeological records it is not possible to determine the precise age at which a child died, but it is possible to differentiate between a child and an adult. </p>   <p>The researchers Anthony Volk and Jeremy Atkinson, on whose research I am primarily relying here, have brought together most of the historical estimates I am reporting here. Their literature search focused on the  share of children who died before reaching “approximate sexual maturity at age 15”. See: Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) – Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015</a></p>   <p>The mortality up to the end of puberty is less commonly reported in modern health statistics. But it is of course also estimated by health statisticians and at the end of this post you find the estimates from the IGME at: <a href="https://childmortality.org">https://childmortality.org</a></p>   <p>(Note that Volk and Atkinson refer to the mortality up to “approximate sexual maturity” as child mortality, while I am following the established language in global health statistics where child mortality is reserved for mortality up to the age of five.){/ref}</p>   <p>What is striking about the historical research is how similar child mortality rates were across a wide range of very different historical cultures: No matter where in the world a child was born, about half of them died.</p> </div>   <div class="wp-block-column"></div> </div>   <figure class="wp-block-image size-full wp-block-full-content-width"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png" alt="" class="wp-image-56719"/></figure>   <h4><em>Everyone</em> failed to make progress</h4>   <p>Tens of billions of children died.{ref}The demographers Toshiko Kaneda and Carl Haub <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/longtermism">estimate</a> the number of humans that were ever born to be about 100 billion. Applying a child mortality rate of 50% this would mean that about 50 billion children died throughout human history. This is of course a rough estimate, but it gives us some idea of just how many children died.{/ref} Billions of parents <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/parents-losing-their-child">mourned helplessly</a> when they saw their children dying.</p>   <p>Despite the relentless suffering no one was able to do much about it.</p>   <p>The chart speaks about societies that lived thousands of kilometers away from each other, separated by thousands of years of history, and yet they all suffered the same pain. Whether in Ancient Rome, in hunter-gatherer-societies, in the pre-Columbian Americas, in Medieval Japan or Medieval England, in the European Renaissance, or in Imperial China, every second child died.</p>   <p>While some societies were better off than others, the differences were small. Generation after generation was born into societies that struggled against poverty, hunger, and disease and there is no indication that any society made any substantial and sustained progress against those problems. Substantial progress against child mortality is a recent achievement everywhere.</p>   <p>It is not that people in the past didn’t try to make progress against early death and disease. They tried, of course.{ref}Despite the great pain caused by poor health and early death humanity discovered extremely few medical remedies and practices that were effective over the course of hundreds of generations.</p>   <p>While the rate of discoveries was extremely slow, there were certainly some breakthroughs that were relevant in the context of the time. One such example is that from the bark of the Cinchona tree Quinine was extracted which was effective in treating malaria. For other drugs see Wikipedia’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drugs_by_year_of_discovery">List of drugs by year of discovery</a>, which includes some other remedies.{/ref}  Healers and doctors had a high status in societies. And people often took on great pain and costs in the hope of improving their children’s health.</p>   <p>The “most common procedure performed by surgeons for almost two thousand years” in Europe <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20090415024002/http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/techniques/bloodletting.aspx">was</a> bloodletting. The pain this practice caused makes clear just how desperate people were to achieve any health improvements. The fact that it not only offered no benefits, but that it was indeed harmful to the patients, makes clear just how unsuccessful humanity was for most of its history.</p>   <p>All were suffering as they saw their children die, yet none of them were able to do anything about it.</p>   <p>The key insight for me is that progress is not natural. It is hard. Even against some of the largest problems – the unrelenting death of children – thousands of generations failed to make any progress.</p>   <h4>Are these high historical mortality rates plausible?</h4>   <p>The historical studies of child mortality don’t provide a full picture of our ancestors' past. They are snapshots of some moments in the long history of our species. Could they mislead us to believe that mortality rates were higher than they actually were?</p>   <p>There is another piece of evidence to consider that suggests the mortality of children was in fact very high: birth rates were high, but population growth was close to zero.</p>   <p>If every couple has on average four children, the population size would double each generation. But while we know that couples had on average many more children than four, the population did <em>not</em> double with each generation.{ref}We discuss this in more detail<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#total-fertility-rate-around-the-world-over-the-last-two-centuries"> here</a> and also in the first footnote of this article. From 10,000 BCE to 1700 the world population grew by only<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#world-population-from-10-000-bc-to-today"> 0.04% annually</a>..{/ref} In fact population sizes barely changed at all.</p>   <p>A high number of births without a rapid increase of the population can only be explained by one sad reality: a high share of children died before they could have children themselves.</p>   <p>If anything, the mortality rates shown in the chart above underestimate the true mortality of children. Volk and Atkinson, the two researchers who gathered most of these studies, caution that these historical mortality rates “should be viewed as conservative estimates that generally err toward underestimating actual historic rates”.{ref}Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.{/ref} A first reason is that death records were often not produced for children, especially if children died soon after birth. A second reason is that child burial remains, another important source, are often incomplete “due to the more rapid decay of children's smaller physical remains and the lower frequency of elaborate infant burials”.{ref}See also M.E. Lewis (2007) – The bioarchaeology of children. Cambridge University Press, NY.{/ref}</p>   <h4>The mortality of children today</h4>   <p>The chart above also shows the dramatic progress that was recently achieved. Most children in the world still died at extremely high rates well into the 20th century. Even as recently as 1950 – a time that some readers might well remember – one in four children died globally. </p>   <p>More recently, during our lifetimes, the world has achieved an entirely unprecedented improvement. In a brief episode of human history the global death rate of children declined from around 50% to 4%. </p>   <p>After millennia of suffering and failure, the progress against child mortality is for me one of the greatest achievements of humanity.</p>   <p>This is not an improvement that is only achieved by a few countries. The rate has declined in every single country in the world.</p>   <div class="wp-block-columns"> <div class="wp-block-column"> <p>The map shows the latest available data for mortality up to the age of 15. In several countries the rate has declined to about 0.3%, a mortality rate that is more than 100-times lower than in the past. This was achieved in just a few generations. Progress can be fast.</p>   <p>In the richest parts of the world child deaths have become very rare, but differences across countries are high. Somalia – on the Horn of Africa – is the country with the highest rate, 14% of newborns die as children.</p>   <p>The fact that several countries show that it is possible for 99.7% of children to survive shows us what the world can aspire to. Global health has improved, and <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better">it is on us</a> to make sure that this progress continues to bring the daily tragedy of child deaths to an end.</p>   <p>Our ancestors could have surely not imagined what is reality today. Let’s make it our goal to give children everywhere the chance to live a long and healthy life.</p> </div>   <div class="wp-block-column"> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/youth-mortality-rate" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> </div> </div>    <h3>Additional information</h3>   <div class="wp-block-columns is-style-sticky-right"> <div class="wp-block-column"> <p>Infant mortality rates in the past</p>   <p>Many of the studies brought together by Volk and Atkinson also report estimates of the <em>infant mortality rate,</em> which is defined as the share of newborns who died in their first year of life.</p>   <p>Across the entire historical sample the authors found that on average, 27% of newborns died in their first year of life. This means the two key estimates are both easy to remember: Around a quarter died in the first year of life. Around half died as children.</p>   <p>The global infant mortality rate today is below 3%. In<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infant-mortality"> our map for infant mortality</a> you can find the data for every country in the world.</p>   <h4>Mortality at young ages in hunter gatherer societies</h4>   <p>The historical data discussed above goes back 2500 years. What about prehistory when our ancestors around the world lived as<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer"> </a>hunter-gatherers?</p>   <p>Good evidence here is much harder to come by. To study mortality at a young age in prehistoric societies the researchers need to mostly rely on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers. Here, one needs to be cautious of how much we can learn from the realities of modern societies for those of the past. Modern hunter-gatherers are to varying degrees in exchange with surrounding societies and “often currently live in marginalized territories”, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels.</p>   <p>To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample “only to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.”</p>   <p>Again, the researchers find very similar mortality rates across their sample of 20 different studies on hunter-gatherer societies from very different locations: The average infant mortality rate (younger than 1) was 26.8% and the average mortality before puberty, 48.8%. Almost exactly the same as the historical sample discussed above.</p>   <p>All but one of these studied societies are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers investigates the famous<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Knoll"> Indian Knoll</a> archaeological site from around 2,500 BCE, located in today’s area of Kentucky.{ref}The Indian Knoll site was investigated by Francis Johnston and Charles Snow C.E. Snow. See F.E. Johnston, C.E. Snow (1961) –<a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fajpa.1330190304&btnG="> The reassessment of the age and sex of the Indian Knoll skeletal population: Demographic and methodological aspects</a>. In American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 19, pp. 237-244.</p>   <p>And also Indian Knoll skeletons. The University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology, Vol. IV, No. 3, Part 11 University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (1948){/ref}</p>   <p>For this community the estimates suggest that mortality at a young age was even higher than the average for modern-day hunter-gatherers: 30% died in their first year of life, and 56% did not survive to puberty.</p>   <h4>Neanderthals and primates – the mortality of our closest relatives</h4>   <p>Going beyond our own species (homo sapiens), researchers have also attempted to estimate the mortality rates at young ages for our closest relatives.</p>   <p>Studies that focussed on the Neanderthals, our very closest relatives who lived within Eurasia from circa 400,000 until 40,000 years ago, suggest that they suffered infant mortality rates similar to our species before modernization: it is estimated that around 28% died in the first year of life.{ref}The 28% infant mortality rate is reported in Volk and Atkinson based on Trinkaus (1995).</p>   <p>Erik Trinkaus (1995) – Neanderthal mortality patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22 (1995), pp. 121-142. Online here <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707</a></p>   <p>Chamberlain (2006) also reports very high mortality rates for subadult Neanderthals (Homo Neanderthalensis). See: Andrew T. Chamberlain (2006) – Demography in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology).{/ref}</p>   <p>Atkinson and Volk also compared human child mortality rates across species with other primates. Bringing together many different sources the authors find the mortality rates of young chimpanzees and gorillas to be similar to the mortality rates of humans of the past, while other primates differ: orangutans and bonobos appear to have somewhat lower mortality rates and baboons, macaques, colobus monkeys, vervet monkeys, lemurs and other primates suffer from higher mortality rates at young ages.</p> </div>   <div class="wp-block-column"></div> </div>

{
    "id": "wp-25312",
    "slug": "untitled-reusable-block-56",
    "content": {
        "toc": [],
        "body": [
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "A child dying is one of the most dreadful tragedies one can imagine. We all know that child deaths were more common in the past. But how common? How do we know? And what can we learn from our history?",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Archeologists and historians have brought together data from many places and time periods across the world which lets us piece together a picture of our past.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Sweden is a country that has particularly good historical, demographic data. It was the first country to establish an office for population statistics: the Tabellverket, founded in 1749. Looking at the statistical records for the first three decades \u2013 the period from 1750 to 1780 \u2013 we find that 40% of children died before the age of 15.{ref}As explained in the following footnote, this data is available from the Human Mortality Database.{/ref}",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "During the same period about half of all children died in Bavaria (Germany), and in France the mortality rate was about 45%. At that time the average couple would have more than 5, 6, or even 7 children, which meant that most parents saw several of their children die.{ref}Regarding the number of children that people had, the metric that I would ideally need here is the average number of children per woman (or per couple). This is sometimes reported as average family size, but I was not able to find this data. But I could find data on the total marital fertility rate.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The sources for both the number of children and the rate of deaths for the three countries are the following:",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Sweden:",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "spanType": "span-newline"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "A total marital fertility rate of 7.62 children per married woman is reported in Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) \u2013 Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750\u20131850. Extramarital children were rare in Sweden at the time. Anderson estimates it at 2%.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The under-15 mortality rate is taken from the Human Mortality Database and corresponds to the average of the annual observations between 1750 to 1780.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "spanType": "span-newline"
                    },
                    {
                        "spanType": "span-newline"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "Bavaria, Germany:",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "This data is taken from John Knodel\u2019s research: John Knodel (1970) \u2013 \u2018Two and a Half Centuries of Demographic History in a Bavarian Village\u2019. ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "Population Studies",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " 24, no. 3 (1 November 1970): 353\u201376.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "According to his study married women had on average 5.6 children and saw on average almost three (2.8) of their children die before they were 15 years old. Knodel also includes data for an earlier period, but cautions against relying on it, writing: \u201cThe figure shown for couples married between 1692 and 1749 is undoubtedly spuriously high, resulting from the frequent omission of infant and child deaths from the parish registers during the period.\u201d Knodel suggests that even the data after 1750 (which is shown here) is likely an underestimate of the true mortality.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "France:",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "spanType": "span-newline"
                    },
                    {
                        "spanType": "span-newline"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "In France the average married woman had about 8 children in the period 1740 to 1769. This is the total marital fertility rate taken from Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) \u2013 Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750\u20131850.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Youth mortality rates for France are reported in Volk and Atkinson. For the period 1600-1700 the authors report an estimate of 40-50%. They also present an estimate for the period 1816-50 when the mortality rate was 44%.{/ref}",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "alt": "",
                "size": "wide",
                "type": "image",
                "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Was this unusual? Was the death rate in Europe particularly high at that specific time?\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "We can look at research for other places and time periods.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Based on skeletons found in the South of modern-day Peru, paleodemographers can estimate the mortality of children who were born two millennia ago. The records suggest a similar figure: almost half of children died before\u00a0the end of puberty.{ref}This research is carried out in the area of Pueblo Viejo, Cahuachi, Estaqueria and Atarco in the Nasca valley.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ". In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The original paper is Drusini, A. G., Carrara, N., Orefici, G., & Bonati, M. R. (2001). Paleodemography of the Nasca valley: Reconstruction of the human ecology of the southern Peruvian coast. Homo, 52, 157\u2013172.{/ref}",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "alt": "",
                "size": "wide",
                "type": "image",
                "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "A burial site on the Spanish island of Mallorca offers us a view on child mortality in Europe during the Iron Age. Based on the skeletons found in Mallorca researchers again found that about half of all children did not survive.{ref}This research is carried out in several sites on the S\u2019Illot des Porros in Mallorca.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ". In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The original paper is Alesan, A., A. Malgosa, and C. Sim\u00f3 (1999) \u2013 ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199911)110:3%3C285::AID-AJPA3%3E3.0.CO;2-2",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "Looking into the Demography of an Iron Age Population in the Western Mediterranean. I. Mortality",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ". In ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " 110, no. 3 (November 1999): 285\u2013301. The life expectancy at birth was 23 years.{/ref}\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "alt": "",
                "size": "wide",
                "type": "image",
                "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "And the same is also true in very different regions and different periods.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "alt": "",
                "size": "wide",
                "type": "image",
                "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Researchers also collected data about hunter-gatherer societies. The 17 different societies include paleolithic and modern-day hunter-gatherers and the mortality rate was high in all of them. On average 49% of all children died.{ref}For details see the paper Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) \u2013 ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ". In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "When relying on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers one needs to be cautious of how representative these societies are of those in the past. This is because recent hunter-gatherers might have been in exchange with surrounding societies and \u201coften currently live in marginalized territories\u201d, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels, so that the mortality rates are higher or lower than in historical times.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample \u201conly to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.\u201d",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "All but one of these studied societies in Volk and Atkinson are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers finds a higher youth mortality rate: 56% did not survive to puberty.{/ref} At the end of this article you can find more detail about the available evidence for the mortality rates of children in hunter-gatherer societies.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "alt": "",
                "size": "wide",
                "type": "image",
                "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "text": [
                    {
                        "text": "The mortality of children over the long-run",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "type": "heading",
                "level": 2,
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Let\u2019s take all the historical estimates of child mortality and combine them with global data for recent decades to see what this tells us about humanity\u2019s history.{ref}In the literature on global health and modern health statistics, the most commonly studied age-cutoff is the age of five and the share of children dying before they are five years old is referred to as \u2018child mortality\u2019. A low age-cut off makes sense because the mortality in early childhood is typically substantially higher than in late childhood. Nevertheless a focus on the first five years gives only a partial view on the mortality of children. Childhood of course doesn\u2019t end at the age of five, and in this article I\u2019m relying on a more common definition of childhood and am considering all deaths up to the end of puberty or up to the age of 15. Which cutoff is used varies between the different studies on which this account is based on.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "A higher cut-off also has the advantage that it makes it possible to connect with historical and archaeological research on the mortality of children. Especially in archeological records it is not possible to determine the precise age at which a child died, but it is possible to differentiate between a child and an adult.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The researchers Anthony Volk and Jeremy Atkinson, on whose research I am primarily relying here, have brought together most of the historical estimates I am reporting here. Their literature search focused on the\u00a0 share of children who died before reaching \u201capproximate sexual maturity at age 15\u201d. See: Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) \u2013 Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The mortality up to the end of puberty is less commonly reported in modern health statistics. But it is of course also estimated by health statisticians and at the end of this post you find the estimates from the IGME at: ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://childmortality.org",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "https://childmortality.org",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "(Note that Volk and Atkinson refer to the mortality up to \u201capproximate sexual maturity\u201d as child mortality, while I am following the established language in global health statistics where child mortality is reserved for mortality up to the age of five.){/ref}",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "What is striking about the historical research is how similar child mortality rates were across a wide range of very different historical cultures: No matter where in the world a child was born, about half of them died.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "alt": "",
                "size": "wide",
                "type": "image",
                "filename": "Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png",
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "text": [
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "Everyone",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " failed to make progress",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "type": "heading",
                "level": 2,
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Tens of billions of children died.{ref}The demographers Toshiko Kaneda and Carl Haub ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/longtermism",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "estimate",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " the number of humans that were ever born to be about 100 billion. Applying a child mortality rate of 50% this would mean that about 50 billion children died throughout human history. This is of course a rough estimate, but it gives us some idea of just how many children died.{/ref} Billions of parents ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/parents-losing-their-child",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "mourned helplessly",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " when they saw their children dying.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "Despite the relentless suffering no one was able to do much about it.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The chart speaks about societies that lived thousands of kilometers away from each other, separated by thousands of years of history, and yet they all suffered the same pain. Whether in Ancient Rome, in hunter-gatherer-societies, in the pre-Columbian Americas, in Medieval Japan or Medieval England, in the European Renaissance, or in Imperial China, every second child died.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "While some societies were better off than others, the differences were small. Generation after generation was born into societies that struggled against poverty, hunger, and disease and there is no indication that any society made any substantial and sustained progress against those problems. Substantial progress against child mortality is a recent achievement everywhere.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "It is not that people in the past didn\u2019t try to make progress against early death and disease. They tried, of course.{ref}Despite the great pain caused by poor health and early death humanity discovered extremely few medical remedies and practices that were effective over the course of hundreds of generations.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "While the rate of discoveries was extremely slow, there were certainly some breakthroughs that were relevant in the context of the time. One such example is that from the bark of the Cinchona tree Quinine was extracted which was effective in treating malaria. For other drugs see Wikipedia\u2019s ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drugs_by_year_of_discovery",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "List of drugs by year of discovery",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ", which includes some other remedies.{/ref} \u00a0Healers and doctors had a high status in societies. And people often took on great pain and costs in the hope of improving their children\u2019s health.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The \u201cmost common procedure performed by surgeons for almost two thousand years\u201d in Europe ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20090415024002/http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/techniques/bloodletting.aspx",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "was",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " bloodletting. The pain this practice caused makes clear just how desperate people were to achieve any health improvements. The fact that it not only offered no benefits, but that it was indeed harmful to the patients, makes clear just how unsuccessful humanity was for most of its history.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "All were suffering as they saw their children die, yet none of them were able to do anything about it.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The key insight for me is that progress is not natural. It is hard. Even against some of the largest problems \u2013 the unrelenting death of children \u2013 thousands of generations failed to make any progress.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "text": [
                    {
                        "text": "Are these high historical mortality rates plausible?",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "type": "heading",
                "level": 2,
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The historical studies of child mortality don\u2019t provide a full picture of our ancestors' past. They are snapshots of some moments in the long history of our species. Could they mislead us to believe that mortality rates were higher than they actually were?",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "There is another piece of evidence to consider that suggests the mortality of children was in fact very high: birth rates were high, but population growth was close to zero.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "If every couple has on average four children, the population size would double each generation. But while we know that couples had on average many more children than four, the population did ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "not",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " double with each generation.{ref}We discuss this in more detail",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#total-fertility-rate-around-the-world-over-the-last-two-centuries",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": " here",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": " and also in the first footnote of this article. From 10,000 BCE to 1700 the world population grew by only",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#world-population-from-10-000-bc-to-today",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": " 0.04% annually",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": "..{/ref} In fact population sizes barely changed at all.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "A high number of births without a rapid increase of the population can only be explained by one sad reality: a high share of children died before they could have children themselves.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "If anything, the mortality rates shown in the chart above underestimate the true mortality of children. Volk and Atkinson, the two researchers who gathered most of these studies, caution that these historical mortality rates \u201cshould be viewed as conservative estimates that generally err toward underestimating actual historic rates\u201d.{ref}Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 ",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    },
                    {
                        "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015",
                        "children": [
                            {
                                "text": "Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "spanType": "span-link"
                    },
                    {
                        "text": ". In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.{/ref} A first reason is that death records were often not produced for children, especially if children died soon after birth. A second reason is that child burial remains, another important source, are often incomplete \u201cdue to the more rapid decay of children's smaller physical remains and the lower frequency of elaborate infant burials\u201d.{ref}See also M.E. Lewis (2007) \u2013 The bioarchaeology of children. Cambridge University Press, NY.{/ref}",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "text": [
                    {
                        "text": "The mortality of children today",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "type": "heading",
                "level": 2,
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "The chart above also shows the dramatic progress that was recently achieved. Most children in the world still died at extremely high rates well into the 20th century. Even as recently as 1950 \u2013 a time that some readers might well remember \u2013 one in four children died globally.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "More recently, during our lifetimes, the world has achieved an entirely unprecedented improvement. In a brief episode of human history the global death rate of children declined from around 50% to 4%.\u00a0",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "After millennia of suffering and failure, the progress against child mortality is for me one of the greatest achievements of humanity.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "text",
                "value": [
                    {
                        "text": "This is not an improvement that is only achieved by a few countries. The rate has declined in every single country in the world.",
                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "left": [
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "The map shows the latest available data for mortality up to the age of 15. In several countries the rate has declined to about 0.3%, a mortality rate that is more than 100-times lower than in the past. This was achieved in just a few generations. Progress can be fast.",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "In the richest parts of the world child deaths have become very rare, but differences across countries are high. Somalia \u2013 on the Horn of Africa \u2013 is the country with the highest rate, 14% of newborns die as children.",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "The fact that several countries show that it is possible for 99.7% of children to survive shows us what the world can aspire to. Global health has improved, and ",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            },
                            {
                                "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better",
                                "children": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "it is on us",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "spanType": "span-link"
                            },
                            {
                                "text": " to make sure that this progress continues to bring the daily tragedy of child deaths to an end.",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "value": [
                            {
                                "text": "Our ancestors could have surely not imagined what is reality today. Let\u2019s make it our goal to give children everywhere the chance to live a long and healthy life.",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    }
                ],
                "type": "sticky-right",
                "right": [
                    {
                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/youth-mortality-rate",
                        "type": "chart",
                        "parseErrors": []
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            },
            {
                "type": "gray-section",
                "items": [
                    {
                        "text": [
                            {
                                "text": "Additional information",
                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                            }
                        ],
                        "type": "heading",
                        "level": 2,
                        "parseErrors": []
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "expandable-paragraph",
                        "items": [
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Infant mortality rates in the past",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Many of the studies brought together by Volk and Atkinson also report estimates of the ",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "children": [
                                            {
                                                "text": "infant mortality rate,",
                                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                            }
                                        ],
                                        "spanType": "span-italic"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "text": " which is defined as the share of newborns who died in their first year of life.",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Across the entire historical sample the authors found that on average, 27% of newborns died in their first year of life. This means the two key estimates are both easy to remember: Around a quarter died in the first year of life. Around half died as children.",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "The global infant mortality rate today is below 3%. In",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infant-mortality",
                                        "children": [
                                            {
                                                "text": " our map for infant mortality",
                                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                            }
                                        ],
                                        "spanType": "span-link"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "text": " you can find the data for every country in the world.",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "text": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Mortality at young ages in hunter gatherer societies",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "type": "heading",
                                "level": 4,
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "The historical data discussed above goes back 2500 years. What about prehistory when our ancestors around the world lived as",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer",
                                        "children": [
                                            {
                                                "text": " ",
                                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                            }
                                        ],
                                        "spanType": "span-link"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "text": "hunter-gatherers?",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Good evidence here is much harder to come by. To study mortality at a young age in prehistoric societies the researchers need to mostly rely on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers. Here, one needs to be cautious of how much we can learn from the realities of modern societies for those of the past. Modern hunter-gatherers are to varying degrees in exchange with surrounding societies and \u201coften currently live in marginalized territories\u201d, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels.",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample \u201conly to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.\u201d",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Again, the researchers find very similar mortality rates across their sample of 20 different studies on hunter-gatherer societies from very different locations: The average infant mortality rate (younger than 1) was 26.8% and the average mortality before puberty, 48.8%. Almost exactly the same as the historical sample discussed above.",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "All but one of these studied societies are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers investigates the famous",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Knoll",
                                        "children": [
                                            {
                                                "text": " Indian Knoll",
                                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                            }
                                        ],
                                        "spanType": "span-link"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "text": " archaeological site from around 2,500 BCE, located in today\u2019s area of Kentucky.{ref}The Indian Knoll site was investigated by Francis Johnston and Charles Snow C.E. Snow. See F.E. Johnston, C.E. Snow (1961) \u2013",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "url": "https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fajpa.1330190304&btnG=",
                                        "children": [
                                            {
                                                "text": " The reassessment of the age and sex of the Indian Knoll skeletal population: Demographic and methodological aspects",
                                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                            }
                                        ],
                                        "spanType": "span-link"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "text": ". In American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 19, pp. 237-244.",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "And also Indian Knoll skeletons. The University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology, Vol. IV, No. 3, Part 11 University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (1948){/ref}",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "For this community the estimates suggest that mortality at a young age was even higher than the average for modern-day hunter-gatherers: 30% died in their first year of life, and 56% did not survive to puberty.",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "text": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Neanderthals and primates \u2013 the mortality of our closest relatives",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "type": "heading",
                                "level": 4,
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Going beyond our own species (homo sapiens), researchers have also attempted to estimate the mortality rates at young ages for our closest relatives.",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Studies that focussed on the Neanderthals, our very closest relatives who lived within Eurasia from circa 400,000 until 40,000 years ago, suggest that they suffered infant mortality rates similar to our species before modernization: it is estimated that around 28% died in the first year of life.{ref}The 28% infant mortality rate is reported in Volk and Atkinson based on Trinkaus (1995).",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Erik Trinkaus (1995) \u2013 Neanderthal mortality patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22 (1995), pp. 121-142. Online here ",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    },
                                    {
                                        "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707",
                                        "children": [
                                            {
                                                "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707",
                                                "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                            }
                                        ],
                                        "spanType": "span-link"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Chamberlain (2006) also reports very high mortality rates for subadult Neanderthals (Homo Neanderthalensis). See: Andrew T. Chamberlain (2006) \u2013 Demography in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology).{/ref}",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            },
                            {
                                "type": "text",
                                "value": [
                                    {
                                        "text": "Atkinson and Volk also compared human child mortality rates across species with other primates. Bringing together many different sources the authors find the mortality rates of young chimpanzees and gorillas to be similar to the mortality rates of humans of the past, while other primates differ: orangutans and bonobos appear to have somewhat lower mortality rates and baboons, macaques, colobus monkeys, vervet monkeys, lemurs and other primates suffer from higher mortality rates at young ages.",
                                        "spanType": "span-simple-text"
                                    }
                                ],
                                "parseErrors": []
                            }
                        ],
                        "parseErrors": []
                    }
                ],
                "parseErrors": []
            }
        ],
        "type": "article",
        "title": "Mortality in the past \u2013 around half died as children",
        "authors": [
            null
        ],
        "dateline": "October 7, 2019",
        "sidebar-toc": false,
        "featured-image": ""
    },
    "createdAt": "2021-03-28T18:06:16.000Z",
    "published": false,
    "updatedAt": "2023-04-19T11:43:29.000Z",
    "revisionId": null,
    "publishedAt": "2019-10-07T10:22:03.000Z",
    "relatedCharts": [],
    "publicationContext": "listed"
}

{
    "errors": [
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image"
        },
        {
            "name": "unexpected wp component tag",
            "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image"
        }
    ],
    "numBlocks": 60,
    "numErrors": 6,
    "wpTagCounts": {
        "html": 2,
        "image": 6,
        "column": 6,
        "columns": 3,
        "heading": 7,
        "paragraph": 68,
        "owid/additional-information": 1
    },
    "htmlTagCounts": {
        "p": 68,
        "h3": 1,
        "h4": 6,
        "div": 9,
        "figure": 6,
        "iframe": 1
    }
}

2019-10-07 10:22:03

2024-02-16 14:22:56

[
    null
]

2021-03-28 18:06:16

2023-04-19 11:43:29

{}

A child dying is one of the most dreadful tragedies one can imagine. We all know that child deaths were more common in the past. But how common? How do we know? And what can we learn from our history? Archeologists and historians have brought together data from many places and time periods across the world which lets us piece together a picture of our past. Sweden is a country that has particularly good historical, demographic data. It was the first country to establish an office for population statistics: the Tabellverket, founded in 1749. Looking at the statistical records for the first three decades – the period from 1750 to 1780 – we find that 40% of children died before the age of 15.{ref}As explained in the following footnote, this data is available from the Human Mortality Database.{/ref} During the same period about half of all children died in Bavaria (Germany), and in France the mortality rate was about 45%. At that time the average couple would have more than 5, 6, or even 7 children, which meant that most parents saw several of their children die.{ref}Regarding the number of children that people had, the metric that I would ideally need here is the average number of children per woman (or per couple). This is sometimes reported as average family size, but I was not able to find this data. But I could find data on the total marital fertility rate. The sources for both the number of children and the rate of deaths for the three countries are the following: Sweden: A total marital fertility rate of 7.62 children per married woman is reported in Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) – Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750–1850. Extramarital children were rare in Sweden at the time. Anderson estimates it at 2%. The under-15 mortality rate is taken from the Human Mortality Database and corresponds to the average of the annual observations between 1750 to 1780. Bavaria, Germany: This data is taken from John Knodel’s research: John Knodel (1970) – ‘Two and a Half Centuries of Demographic History in a Bavarian Village’. _Population Studies_ 24, no. 3 (1 November 1970): 353–76. According to his study married women had on average 5.6 children and saw on average almost three (2.8) of their children die before they were 15 years old. Knodel also includes data for an earlier period, but cautions against relying on it, writing: “The figure shown for couples married between 1692 and 1749 is undoubtedly spuriously high, resulting from the frequent omission of infant and child deaths from the parish registers during the period.” Knodel suggests that even the data after 1750 (which is shown here) is likely an underestimate of the true mortality. France: In France the average married woman had about 8 children in the period 1740 to 1769. This is the total marital fertility rate taken from Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) – Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750–1850. Youth mortality rates for France are reported in Volk and Atkinson. For the period 1600-1700 the authors report an estimate of 40-50%. They also present an estimate for the period 1816-50 when the mortality rate was 44%.{/ref} <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png" alt=""/> Was this unusual? Was the death rate in Europe particularly high at that specific time? We can look at research for other places and time periods. Based on skeletons found in the South of modern-day Peru, paleodemographers can estimate the mortality of children who were born two millennia ago. The records suggest a similar figure: almost half of children died before the end of puberty.{ref}This research is carried out in the area of Pueblo Viejo, Cahuachi, Estaqueria and Atarco in the Nasca valley. The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – [Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015). In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. The original paper is Drusini, A. G., Carrara, N., Orefici, G., & Bonati, M. R. (2001). Paleodemography of the Nasca valley: Reconstruction of the human ecology of the southern Peruvian coast. Homo, 52, 157–172.{/ref} <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png" alt=""/> A burial site on the Spanish island of Mallorca offers us a view on child mortality in Europe during the Iron Age. Based on the skeletons found in Mallorca researchers again found that about half of all children did not survive.{ref}This research is carried out in several sites on the S’Illot des Porros in Mallorca. The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – [Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015). In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. The original paper is Alesan, A., A. Malgosa, and C. Simó (1999) – [Looking into the Demography of an Iron Age Population in the Western Mediterranean. I. Mortality](https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199911)110:3%3C285::AID-AJPA3%3E3.0.CO;2-2). In _American Journal of Physical Anthropology_ 110, no. 3 (November 1999): 285–301. The life expectancy at birth was 23 years.{/ref} <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png" alt=""/> And the same is also true in very different regions and different periods. <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png" alt=""/> Researchers also collected data about hunter-gatherer societies. The 17 different societies include paleolithic and modern-day hunter-gatherers and the mortality rate was high in all of them. On average 49% of all children died.{ref}For details see the paper Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) – [Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015). In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. When relying on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers one needs to be cautious of how representative these societies are of those in the past. This is because recent hunter-gatherers might have been in exchange with surrounding societies and “often currently live in marginalized territories”, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels, so that the mortality rates are higher or lower than in historical times. To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample “only to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.” All but one of these studied societies in Volk and Atkinson are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers finds a higher youth mortality rate: 56% did not survive to puberty.{/ref} At the end of this article you can find more detail about the available evidence for the mortality rates of children in hunter-gatherer societies. <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png" alt=""/> ## The mortality of children over the long-run Let’s take all the historical estimates of child mortality and combine them with global data for recent decades to see what this tells us about humanity’s history.{ref}In the literature on global health and modern health statistics, the most commonly studied age-cutoff is the age of five and the share of children dying before they are five years old is referred to as ‘child mortality’. A low age-cut off makes sense because the mortality in early childhood is typically substantially higher than in late childhood. Nevertheless a focus on the first five years gives only a partial view on the mortality of children. Childhood of course doesn’t end at the age of five, and in this article I’m relying on a more common definition of childhood and am considering all deaths up to the end of puberty or up to the age of 15. Which cutoff is used varies between the different studies on which this account is based on. A higher cut-off also has the advantage that it makes it possible to connect with historical and archaeological research on the mortality of children. Especially in archeological records it is not possible to determine the precise age at which a child died, but it is possible to differentiate between a child and an adult. The researchers Anthony Volk and Jeremy Atkinson, on whose research I am primarily relying here, have brought together most of the historical estimates I am reporting here. Their literature search focused on the share of children who died before reaching “approximate sexual maturity at age 15”. See: Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) – Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015) The mortality up to the end of puberty is less commonly reported in modern health statistics. But it is of course also estimated by health statisticians and at the end of this post you find the estimates from the IGME at: [https://childmortality.org](https://childmortality.org) (Note that Volk and Atkinson refer to the mortality up to “approximate sexual maturity” as child mortality, while I am following the established language in global health statistics where child mortality is reserved for mortality up to the age of five.){/ref} What is striking about the historical research is how similar child mortality rates were across a wide range of very different historical cultures: No matter where in the world a child was born, about half of them died. <Image filename="Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png" alt=""/> ## _Everyone_ failed to make progress Tens of billions of children died.{ref}The demographers Toshiko Kaneda and Carl Haub [estimate](https://ourworldindata.org/longtermism) the number of humans that were ever born to be about 100 billion. Applying a child mortality rate of 50% this would mean that about 50 billion children died throughout human history. This is of course a rough estimate, but it gives us some idea of just how many children died.{/ref} Billions of parents [mourned helplessly](https://ourworldindata.org/parents-losing-their-child) when they saw their children dying. Despite the relentless suffering no one was able to do much about it. The chart speaks about societies that lived thousands of kilometers away from each other, separated by thousands of years of history, and yet they all suffered the same pain. Whether in Ancient Rome, in hunter-gatherer-societies, in the pre-Columbian Americas, in Medieval Japan or Medieval England, in the European Renaissance, or in Imperial China, every second child died. While some societies were better off than others, the differences were small. Generation after generation was born into societies that struggled against poverty, hunger, and disease and there is no indication that any society made any substantial and sustained progress against those problems. Substantial progress against child mortality is a recent achievement everywhere. It is not that people in the past didn’t try to make progress against early death and disease. They tried, of course.{ref}Despite the great pain caused by poor health and early death humanity discovered extremely few medical remedies and practices that were effective over the course of hundreds of generations. While the rate of discoveries was extremely slow, there were certainly some breakthroughs that were relevant in the context of the time. One such example is that from the bark of the Cinchona tree Quinine was extracted which was effective in treating malaria. For other drugs see Wikipedia’s [List of drugs by year of discovery](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drugs_by_year_of_discovery), which includes some other remedies.{/ref} Healers and doctors had a high status in societies. And people often took on great pain and costs in the hope of improving their children’s health. The “most common procedure performed by surgeons for almost two thousand years” in Europe [was](https://web.archive.org/web/20090415024002/http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/techniques/bloodletting.aspx) bloodletting. The pain this practice caused makes clear just how desperate people were to achieve any health improvements. The fact that it not only offered no benefits, but that it was indeed harmful to the patients, makes clear just how unsuccessful humanity was for most of its history. All were suffering as they saw their children die, yet none of them were able to do anything about it. The key insight for me is that progress is not natural. It is hard. Even against some of the largest problems – the unrelenting death of children – thousands of generations failed to make any progress. ## Are these high historical mortality rates plausible? The historical studies of child mortality don’t provide a full picture of our ancestors' past. They are snapshots of some moments in the long history of our species. Could they mislead us to believe that mortality rates were higher than they actually were? There is another piece of evidence to consider that suggests the mortality of children was in fact very high: birth rates were high, but population growth was close to zero. If every couple has on average four children, the population size would double each generation. But while we know that couples had on average many more children than four, the population did _not_ double with each generation.{ref}We discuss this in more detail[ here](https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#total-fertility-rate-around-the-world-over-the-last-two-centuries) and also in the first footnote of this article. From 10,000 BCE to 1700 the world population grew by only[ 0.04% annually](https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#world-population-from-10-000-bc-to-today)..{/ref} In fact population sizes barely changed at all. A high number of births without a rapid increase of the population can only be explained by one sad reality: a high share of children died before they could have children themselves. If anything, the mortality rates shown in the chart above underestimate the true mortality of children. Volk and Atkinson, the two researchers who gathered most of these studies, caution that these historical mortality rates “should be viewed as conservative estimates that generally err toward underestimating actual historic rates”.{ref}Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) – [Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015). In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.{/ref} A first reason is that death records were often not produced for children, especially if children died soon after birth. A second reason is that child burial remains, another important source, are often incomplete “due to the more rapid decay of children's smaller physical remains and the lower frequency of elaborate infant burials”.{ref}See also M.E. Lewis (2007) – The bioarchaeology of children. Cambridge University Press, NY.{/ref} ## The mortality of children today The chart above also shows the dramatic progress that was recently achieved. Most children in the world still died at extremely high rates well into the 20th century. Even as recently as 1950 – a time that some readers might well remember – one in four children died globally. More recently, during our lifetimes, the world has achieved an entirely unprecedented improvement. In a brief episode of human history the global death rate of children declined from around 50% to 4%. After millennia of suffering and failure, the progress against child mortality is for me one of the greatest achievements of humanity. This is not an improvement that is only achieved by a few countries. The rate has declined in every single country in the world. The map shows the latest available data for mortality up to the age of 15. In several countries the rate has declined to about 0.3%, a mortality rate that is more than 100-times lower than in the past. This was achieved in just a few generations. Progress can be fast. In the richest parts of the world child deaths have become very rare, but differences across countries are high. Somalia – on the Horn of Africa – is the country with the highest rate, 14% of newborns die as children. The fact that several countries show that it is possible for 99.7% of children to survive shows us what the world can aspire to. Global health has improved, and [it is on us](https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better) to make sure that this progress continues to bring the daily tragedy of child deaths to an end. Our ancestors could have surely not imagined what is reality today. Let’s make it our goal to give children everywhere the chance to live a long and healthy life. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/youth-mortality-rate"/> ## Additional information Infant mortality rates in the past Many of the studies brought together by Volk and Atkinson also report estimates of the _infant mortality rate,_ which is defined as the share of newborns who died in their first year of life. Across the entire historical sample the authors found that on average, 27% of newborns died in their first year of life. This means the two key estimates are both easy to remember: Around a quarter died in the first year of life. Around half died as children. The global infant mortality rate today is below 3%. In[ our map for infant mortality](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infant-mortality) you can find the data for every country in the world. #### Mortality at young ages in hunter gatherer societies The historical data discussed above goes back 2500 years. What about prehistory when our ancestors around the world lived as[ ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer)hunter-gatherers? Good evidence here is much harder to come by. To study mortality at a young age in prehistoric societies the researchers need to mostly rely on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers. Here, one needs to be cautious of how much we can learn from the realities of modern societies for those of the past. Modern hunter-gatherers are to varying degrees in exchange with surrounding societies and “often currently live in marginalized territories”, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels. To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample “only to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.” Again, the researchers find very similar mortality rates across their sample of 20 different studies on hunter-gatherer societies from very different locations: The average infant mortality rate (younger than 1) was 26.8% and the average mortality before puberty, 48.8%. Almost exactly the same as the historical sample discussed above. All but one of these studied societies are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers investigates the famous[ Indian Knoll](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Knoll) archaeological site from around 2,500 BCE, located in today’s area of Kentucky.{ref}The Indian Knoll site was investigated by Francis Johnston and Charles Snow C.E. Snow. See F.E. Johnston, C.E. Snow (1961) –[ The reassessment of the age and sex of the Indian Knoll skeletal population: Demographic and methodological aspects](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fajpa.1330190304&btnG=). In American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 19, pp. 237-244. And also Indian Knoll skeletons. The University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology, Vol. IV, No. 3, Part 11 University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (1948){/ref} For this community the estimates suggest that mortality at a young age was even higher than the average for modern-day hunter-gatherers: 30% died in their first year of life, and 56% did not survive to puberty. #### Neanderthals and primates – the mortality of our closest relatives Going beyond our own species (homo sapiens), researchers have also attempted to estimate the mortality rates at young ages for our closest relatives. Studies that focussed on the Neanderthals, our very closest relatives who lived within Eurasia from circa 400,000 until 40,000 years ago, suggest that they suffered infant mortality rates similar to our species before modernization: it is estimated that around 28% died in the first year of life.{ref}The 28% infant mortality rate is reported in Volk and Atkinson based on Trinkaus (1995). Erik Trinkaus (1995) – Neanderthal mortality patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22 (1995), pp. 121-142. Online here [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707) Chamberlain (2006) also reports very high mortality rates for subadult Neanderthals (Homo Neanderthalensis). See: Andrew T. Chamberlain (2006) – Demography in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology).{/ref} Atkinson and Volk also compared human child mortality rates across species with other primates. Bringing together many different sources the authors find the mortality rates of young chimpanzees and gorillas to be similar to the mortality rates of humans of the past, while other primates differ: orangutans and bonobos appear to have somewhat lower mortality rates and baboons, macaques, colobus monkeys, vervet monkeys, lemurs and other primates suffer from higher mortality rates at young ages.

{
    "data": {
        "wpBlock": {
            "content": "\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-style-sticky-right\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>A child dying is one of the most dreadful tragedies one can imagine. We all know that child deaths were more common in the past. But how common? How do we know? And what can we learn from our history?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Archeologists and historians have brought together data from many places and time periods across the world which lets us piece together a picture of our past.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sweden is a country that has particularly good historical, demographic data. It was the first country to establish an office for population statistics: the Tabellverket, founded in 1749. Looking at the statistical records for the first three decades \u2013 the period from 1750 to 1780 \u2013 we find that 40% of children died before the age of 15.{ref}As explained in the following footnote, this data is available from the Human Mortality Database.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>During the same period about half of all children died in Bavaria (Germany), and in France the mortality rate was about 45%. At that time the average couple would have more than 5, 6, or even 7 children, which meant that most parents saw several of their children die.{ref}Regarding the number of children that people had, the metric that I would ideally need here is the average number of children per woman (or per couple). This is sometimes reported as average family size, but I was not able to find this data. But I could find data on the total marital fertility rate.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The sources for both the number of children and the rate of deaths for the three countries are the following:</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sweden:<br>A total marital fertility rate of 7.62 children per married woman is reported in Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) \u2013 Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750\u20131850. Extramarital children were rare in Sweden at the time. Anderson estimates it at 2%.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The under-15 mortality rate is taken from the Human Mortality Database and corresponds to the average of the annual observations between 1750 to 1780.<br><br>Bavaria, Germany:</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This data is taken from John Knodel\u2019s research: John Knodel (1970) \u2013 \u2018Two and a Half Centuries of Demographic History in a Bavarian Village\u2019. <em>Population Studies</em> 24, no. 3 (1 November 1970): 353\u201376.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to his study married women had on average 5.6 children and saw on average almost three (2.8) of their children die before they were 15 years old. Knodel also includes data for an earlier period, but cautions against relying on it, writing: \u201cThe figure shown for couples married between 1692 and 1749 is undoubtedly spuriously high, resulting from the frequent omission of infant and child deaths from the parish registers during the period.\u201d Knodel suggests that even the data after 1750 (which is shown here) is likely an underestimate of the true mortality.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>France:<br><br>In France the average married woman had about 8 children in the period 1740 to 1769. This is the total marital fertility rate taken from Table II (page 40) in M. Anderson (Ed.) (1996) \u2013 Population Change in North-Western Europe, 1750\u20131850.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Youth mortality rates for France are reported in Volk and Atkinson. For the period 1600-1700 the authors report an estimate of 40-50%. They also present an estimate for the period 1816-50 when the mortality rate was 44%.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"946\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56585\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-400x79.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-800x158.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-150x30.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-768x152.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-1536x304.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-01-2048x405.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Was this unusual? Was the death rate in Europe particularly high at that specific time?&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>We can look at research for other places and time periods.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on skeletons found in the South of modern-day Peru, paleodemographers can estimate the mortality of children who were born two millennia ago. The records suggest a similar figure: almost half of children died before&nbsp;the end of puberty.{ref}This research is carried out in the area of Pueblo Viejo, Cahuachi, Estaqueria and Atarco in the Nasca valley.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The original paper is Drusini, A. G., Carrara, N., Orefici, G., &amp; Bonati, M. R. (2001). Paleodemography of the Nasca valley: Reconstruction of the human ecology of the southern Peruvian coast. Homo, 52, 157\u2013172.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"298\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56586\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-400x25.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-800x50.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-150x9.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-768x48.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-1536x96.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-02-2048x128.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>A burial site on the Spanish island of Mallorca offers us a view on child mortality in Europe during the Iron Age. Based on the skeletons found in Mallorca researchers again found that about half of all children did not survive.{ref}This research is carried out in several sites on the S\u2019Illot des Porros in Mallorca.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The mortality is quoted after Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The original paper is Alesan, A., A. Malgosa, and C. Sim\u00f3 (1999) \u2013 <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199911)110:3%3C285::AID-AJPA3%3E3.0.CO;2-2\">Looking into the Demography of an Iron Age Population in the Western Mediterranean. I. Mortality</a>. In <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology</em> 110, no. 3 (November 1999): 285\u2013301. The life expectancy at birth was 23 years.{/ref}&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full wp-block-full-content-width\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"279\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56587\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-400x23.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-800x47.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-150x9.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-768x45.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-1536x90.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-03-2048x120.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>And the same is also true in very different regions and different periods.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"1378\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56588\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-400x115.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-800x231.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-150x43.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-768x221.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-1536x443.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-04-2048x591.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Researchers also collected data about hunter-gatherer societies. The 17 different societies include paleolithic and modern-day hunter-gatherers and the mortality rate was high in all of them. On average 49% of all children died.{ref}For details see the paper Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) \u2013 <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>When relying on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers one needs to be cautious of how representative these societies are of those in the past. This is because recent hunter-gatherers might have been in exchange with surrounding societies and \u201coften currently live in marginalized territories\u201d, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels, so that the mortality rates are higher or lower than in historical times.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample \u201conly to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.\u201d</p>\n\n\n\n<p>All but one of these studied societies in Volk and Atkinson are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers finds a higher youth mortality rate: 56% did not survive to puberty.{/ref} At the end of this article you can find more detail about the available evidence for the mortality rates of children in hunter-gatherer societies.</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"4779\" height=\"409\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56589\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05.png 4779w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-400x34.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-800x68.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-150x13.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-768x66.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-1536x131.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-05-2048x175.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 4779px) 100vw, 4779px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<h4>The mortality of children over the long-run</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Let\u2019s take all the historical estimates of child mortality and combine them with global data for recent decades to see what this tells us about humanity\u2019s history.{ref}In the literature on global health and modern health statistics, the most commonly studied age-cutoff is the age of five and the share of children dying before they are five years old is referred to as \u2018child mortality\u2019. A low age-cut off makes sense because the mortality in early childhood is typically substantially higher than in late childhood. Nevertheless a focus on the first five years gives only a partial view on the mortality of children. Childhood of course doesn\u2019t end at the age of five, and in this article I\u2019m relying on a more common definition of childhood and am considering all deaths up to the end of puberty or up to the age of 15. Which cutoff is used varies between the different studies on which this account is based on.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>A higher cut-off also has the advantage that it makes it possible to connect with historical and archaeological research on the mortality of children. Especially in archeological records it is not possible to determine the precise age at which a child died, but it is possible to differentiate between a child and an adult.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The researchers Anthony Volk and Jeremy Atkinson, on whose research I am primarily relying here, have brought together most of the historical estimates I am reporting here. Their literature search focused on the&nbsp; share of children who died before reaching \u201capproximate sexual maturity at age 15\u201d. See: Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A.Atkinson (2013) \u2013 Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192. <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015</a></p>\n\n\n\n<p>The mortality up to the end of puberty is less commonly reported in modern health statistics. But it is of course also estimated by health statisticians and at the end of this post you find the estimates from the IGME at: <a href=\"https://childmortality.org\">https://childmortality.org</a></p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Note that Volk and Atkinson refer to the mortality up to \u201capproximate sexual maturity\u201d as child mortality, while I am following the established language in global health statistics where child mortality is reserved for mortality up to the age of five.){/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is striking about the historical research is how similar child mortality rates were across a wide range of very different historical cultures: No matter where in the world a child was born, about half of them died.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\"></div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full wp-block-full-content-width\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"3000\" height=\"2760\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56719\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2.png 3000w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-400x368.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-598x550.png 598w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-150x138.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-768x707.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-1536x1413.png 1536w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2023/04/Youth-mortality-rates-over-last-two-millennia-2-2048x1884.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 3000px) 100vw, 3000px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<h4><em>Everyone</em> failed to make progress</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Tens of billions of children died.{ref}The demographers Toshiko Kaneda and Carl Haub <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/longtermism\">estimate</a> the number of humans that were ever born to be about 100 billion. Applying a child mortality rate of 50% this would mean that about 50 billion children died throughout human history. This is of course a rough estimate, but it gives us some idea of just how many children died.{/ref} Billions of parents <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/parents-losing-their-child\">mourned helplessly</a> when they saw their children dying.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite the relentless suffering no one was able to do much about it.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart speaks about societies that lived thousands of kilometers away from each other, separated by thousands of years of history, and yet they all suffered the same pain. Whether in Ancient Rome, in hunter-gatherer-societies, in the pre-Columbian Americas, in Medieval Japan or Medieval England, in the European Renaissance, or in Imperial China, every second child died.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>While some societies were better off than others, the differences were small. Generation after generation was born into societies that struggled against poverty, hunger, and disease and there is no indication that any society made any substantial and sustained progress against those problems. Substantial progress against child mortality is a recent achievement everywhere.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is not that people in the past didn\u2019t try to make progress against early death and disease. They tried, of course.{ref}Despite the great pain caused by poor health and early death humanity discovered extremely few medical remedies and practices that were effective over the course of hundreds of generations.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>While the rate of discoveries was extremely slow, there were certainly some breakthroughs that were relevant in the context of the time. One such example is that from the bark of the Cinchona tree Quinine was extracted which was effective in treating malaria. For other drugs see Wikipedia\u2019s <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drugs_by_year_of_discovery\">List of drugs by year of discovery</a>, which includes some other remedies.{/ref} &nbsp;Healers and doctors had a high status in societies. And people often took on great pain and costs in the hope of improving their children\u2019s health.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The \u201cmost common procedure performed by surgeons for almost two thousand years\u201d in Europe <a href=\"https://web.archive.org/web/20090415024002/http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/techniques/bloodletting.aspx\">was</a> bloodletting. The pain this practice caused makes clear just how desperate people were to achieve any health improvements. The fact that it not only offered no benefits, but that it was indeed harmful to the patients, makes clear just how unsuccessful humanity was for most of its history.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>All were suffering as they saw their children die, yet none of them were able to do anything about it.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The key insight for me is that progress is not natural. It is hard. Even against some of the largest problems \u2013 the unrelenting death of children \u2013 thousands of generations failed to make any progress.</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Are these high historical mortality rates plausible?</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The historical studies of child mortality don\u2019t provide a full picture of our ancestors&#8217; past. They are snapshots of some moments in the long history of our species. Could they mislead us to believe that mortality rates were higher than they actually were?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is another piece of evidence to consider that suggests the mortality of children was in fact very high: birth rates were high, but population growth was close to zero.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>If every couple has on average four children, the population size would double each generation. But while we know that couples had on average many more children than four, the population did <em>not</em> double with each generation.{ref}We discuss this in more detail<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#total-fertility-rate-around-the-world-over-the-last-two-centuries\"> here</a> and also in the first footnote of this article. From 10,000 BCE to 1700 the world population grew by only<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#world-population-from-10-000-bc-to-today\"> 0.04% annually</a>..{/ref} In fact population sizes barely changed at all.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>A high number of births without a rapid increase of the population can only be explained by one sad reality: a high share of children died before they could have children themselves.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>If anything, the mortality rates shown in the chart above underestimate the true mortality of children. Volk and Atkinson, the two researchers who gathered most of these studies, caution that these historical mortality rates \u201cshould be viewed as conservative estimates that generally err toward underestimating actual historic rates\u201d.{ref}Anthony A.Volk Jeremy A. Atkinson (2013) \u2013 <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015\">Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation</a>. In Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2013, Pages 182-192.{/ref} A first reason is that death records were often not produced for children, especially if children died soon after birth. A second reason is that child burial remains, another important source, are often incomplete \u201cdue to the more rapid decay of children&#8217;s smaller physical remains and the lower frequency of elaborate infant burials\u201d.{ref}See also M.E. Lewis (2007) \u2013 The bioarchaeology of children. Cambridge University Press, NY.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>The mortality of children today</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart above also shows the dramatic progress that was recently achieved. Most children in the world still died at extremely high rates well into the 20th century. Even as recently as 1950 \u2013 a time that some readers might well remember \u2013 one in four children died globally.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>More recently, during our lifetimes, the world has achieved an entirely unprecedented improvement. In a brief episode of human history the global death rate of children declined from around 50% to 4%.&nbsp;</p>\n\n\n\n<p>After millennia of suffering and failure, the progress against child mortality is for me one of the greatest achievements of humanity.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is not an improvement that is only achieved by a few countries. The rate has declined in every single country in the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>The map shows the latest available data for mortality up to the age of 15. In several countries the rate has declined to about 0.3%, a mortality rate that is more than 100-times lower than in the past. This was achieved in just a few generations. Progress can be fast.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the richest parts of the world child deaths have become very rare, but differences across countries are high. Somalia \u2013 on the Horn of Africa \u2013 is the country with the highest rate, 14% of newborns die as children.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The fact that several countries show that it is possible for 99.7% of children to survive shows us what the world can aspire to. Global health has improved, and <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better\">it is on us</a> to make sure that this progress continues to bring the daily tragedy of child deaths to an end.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Our ancestors could have surely not imagined what is reality today. Let\u2019s make it our goal to give children everywhere the chance to live a long and healthy life.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/youth-mortality-rate\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n\n\t<block type=\"additional-information\" default-open=\"true\">\n\t\t<content>\n\n<h3>Additional information</h3>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-style-sticky-right\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>Infant mortality rates in the past</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Many of the studies brought together by Volk and Atkinson also report estimates of the <em>infant mortality rate,</em> which is defined as the share of newborns who died in their first year of life.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Across the entire historical sample the authors found that on average, 27% of newborns died in their first year of life. This means the two key estimates are both easy to remember: Around a quarter died in the first year of life. Around half died as children.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The global infant mortality rate today is below 3%. In<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/infant-mortality\"> our map for infant mortality</a> you can find the data for every country in the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Mortality at young ages in hunter gatherer societies</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The historical data discussed above goes back 2500 years. What about prehistory when our ancestors around the world lived as<a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer\"> </a>hunter-gatherers?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Good evidence here is much harder to come by. To study mortality at a young age in prehistoric societies the researchers need to mostly rely on evidence from modern hunter-gatherers. Here, one needs to be cautious of how much we can learn from the realities of modern societies for those of the past. Modern hunter-gatherers are to varying degrees in exchange with surrounding societies and \u201coften currently live in marginalized territories\u201d, as the authors say. Both of these could matter for mortality levels.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>To account for this, Volk and Atkinson have attempted to only include hunter-gatherers that are best representative for the living conditions in the past; they limited their sample \u201conly to those populations that had not been significantly influenced by contact with modern resources that could directly influence mortality rates, such as education, food, medicine, birth control, and/or sanitation.\u201d</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Again, the researchers find very similar mortality rates across their sample of 20 different studies on hunter-gatherer societies from very different locations: The average infant mortality rate (younger than 1) was 26.8% and the average mortality before puberty, 48.8%. Almost exactly the same as the historical sample discussed above.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>All but one of these studied societies are modern hunter-gatherers. The one study on mortality rates of paleolithic hunter-gatherers investigates the famous<a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Knoll\"> Indian Knoll</a> archaeological site from around 2,500 BCE, located in today\u2019s area of Kentucky.{ref}The Indian Knoll site was investigated by Francis Johnston and Charles Snow C.E. Snow. See F.E. Johnston, C.E. Snow (1961) \u2013<a href=\"https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0%2C5&amp;q=doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fajpa.1330190304&amp;btnG=\"> The reassessment of the age and sex of the Indian Knoll skeletal population: Demographic and methodological aspects</a>. In American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 19, pp. 237-244.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>And also Indian Knoll skeletons. The University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology, Vol. IV, No. 3, Part 11 University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (1948){/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>For this community the estimates suggest that mortality at a young age was even higher than the average for modern-day hunter-gatherers: 30% died in their first year of life, and 56% did not survive to puberty.</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Neanderthals and primates \u2013 the mortality of our closest relatives</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Going beyond our own species (homo sapiens), researchers have also attempted to estimate the mortality rates at young ages for our closest relatives.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Studies that focussed on the Neanderthals, our very closest relatives who lived within Eurasia from circa 400,000 until 40,000 years ago, suggest that they suffered infant mortality rates similar to our species before modernization: it is estimated that around 28% died in the first year of life.{ref}The 28% infant mortality rate is reported in Volk and Atkinson based on Trinkaus (1995).</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Erik Trinkaus (1995) \u2013 Neanderthal mortality patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22 (1995), pp. 121-142. Online here <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440395801707</a></p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chamberlain (2006) also reports very high mortality rates for subadult Neanderthals (Homo Neanderthalensis). See: Andrew T. Chamberlain (2006) \u2013 Demography in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology).{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Atkinson and Volk also compared human child mortality rates across species with other primates. Bringing together many different sources the authors find the mortality rates of young chimpanzees and gorillas to be similar to the mortality rates of humans of the past, while other primates differ: orangutans and bonobos appear to have somewhat lower mortality rates and baboons, macaques, colobus monkeys, vervet monkeys, lemurs and other primates suffer from higher mortality rates at young ages.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\"></div>\n</div>\n\n</content>\n\t</block>"
        }
    },
    "extensions": {
        "debug": [
            {
                "type": "DEBUG_LOGS_INACTIVE",
                "message": "GraphQL Debug logging is not active. To see debug logs, GRAPHQL_DEBUG must be enabled."
            }
        ]
    }
}

Links from other tables

0 rows from post_id in post_tags
22 rows from sourceId in posts_links
0 rows from wordpressId in posts_unified
25 rows from postId in post_links
2 rows from postId in post_charts
0 rows from postId in post_broken_chart_links