posts: 19690
Data license: CC-BY
This data as json
id | title | slug | type | status | content | archieml | archieml_update_statistics | published_at | updated_at | gdocSuccessorId | authors | excerpt | created_at_in_wordpress | updated_at_in_wordpress | featured_image | formattingOptions | markdown | wpApiSnapshot |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19690 | Plastic Pollution | plastic-pollution | page | publish | <!-- wp:html --> <div class="blog-info"> <p>This article was first published in September 2018. It was updated in April 2022 based on the most recent research.</p> </div> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe class="wp-block-full-content-width" src="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/plastic-pollution" style="width: 100%; min-height: 740px; max-height: 950px; height: 100vh; border: 0px none !important;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>→ <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/plastic-pollution">Open the Data Explorer</a> in a new tab.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:separator --> <hr class="wp-block-separator"/> <!-- /wp:separator --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This is our main data entry on plastics, with a particular focus on its pollution of the environment.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>We have also produced an <a href="http://ourworldindata.org/faq-on-plastics">FAQs on Plastics</a> page which attempts to answer additional common questions on the topic.</li><li>A slide-deck summary of global plastics is <a href="https://slides.ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution">available here</a>.</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The first synthetic plastic — <em>Bakelite</em> — was produced in 1907, marking the beginning of the global plastics industry. However, rapid growth in global plastic production was not realized until the 1950s. Over the next 70 years, annual production of plastics <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastics#global-plastic-production">increased nearly 230-fold</a> to 460 million tonnes in 2019.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:owid/summary --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-does-plastic-impact-wildlife-and-human-health">Plastic pollution is having a negative impact on our oceans and wildlife health</a></li><li><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#which-countries-produce-the-most-plastic-waste">High-income countries generate more plastic waste per person</a></li><li><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#which-countries-emit-the-most-plastic-into-the-oceans">But, most of the plastic that ends up in the ocean comes from rivers in low-to-middle income countries.</a></li><li><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#which-countries-produce-the-most-mismanaged-plastic-waste">This is because they tend to have more <em>mismanaged</em> plastic waste, whereas high-income countries have much more effective waste management.</a></li><li>This makes the improvement of waste management systems across the world critical to reducing plastic pollution.</li><li><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-much-of-ocean-plastics-come-from-land-and-marine-sources">Around 20% of all plastic waste in the oceans comes from marine sources. The other 80% comes from land.</a></li><li><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-much-of-ocean-plastics-come-from-land-and-marine-sources">In some regions, marine sources dominate: More than 80% in the <em>Great Pacific Garbage Patch</em> (GPGP) come from fishing nets, ropes and lines</a></li><li><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/faq-on-plastics#are-plastic-alternatives-better-for-the-environment">Plastic is a unique material with many benefits: it's cheap, versatile, lightweight, and resistant. This makes it a valuable material for many functions. It can also provide environmental benefits: it plays a critical role in maintaining food quality, safety and reducing food waste. The trade-offs between plastics and substitutes (or complete bans) are therefore complex and could create negative knock-on impacts on the environment.</a></li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- /wp:owid/summary --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>How much plastic enters the world's oceans?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To understand the magnitude of input of plastics to the natural environment and the world's oceans, we must understand various elements of the plastic production, distribution and waste management chain. This is crucial, not only in understanding the scale of the problem but in implementing the most effective interventions for reduction.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The data and visualizations which follow in this entry provide this overview step-by-step. This overview is summarized in the figure.{ref}The data used in this figure is based on the <em>Science</em> study: Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., … & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. <em>Science</em>, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768" target="_blank">http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Here we see that in 2010:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>global primary production of plastic was 270 million tonnes;</li><li>global plastic waste was 275 million tonnes – it did exceed annual primary production through wastage of plastic from previous years;</li><li>plastic waste generated in coastal regions is most at risk of entering the oceans; in 2010 coastal plastic waste – generated within 50 kilometres of the coastline – amounted to 99.5 million tonnes;</li><li>only plastic waste which is improperly managed (mismanaged) is at significant risk of leakage to the environment; in 2010 this amounted to 31.9 million tonnes;</li><li>of this, 8 million tonnes – 3% of global annual plastics waste – entered the ocean (through multiple outlets, including rivers);</li><li>Plastics in the oceans' surface waters is several orders of magnitude lower than annual ocean plastic inputs. This discrepancy is known as the 'missing plastic problem' and is discussed <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem">h</a><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#where-does-our-plastic-accumulate-in-the-ocean-and-what-does-that-mean-for-the-future">e</a><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem">re</a>. </li><li>The amount of plastic in surface waters is not very well known: estimates range from 10,000s to 100,000s tonnes.</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:image {"align":"center","id":24884,"linkDestination":"custom"} --> <div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><a href="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-800x491.png" alt="" class="wp-image-24884"/></a></figure></div> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>How much plastic does the world produce?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The chart shows the increase of global plastic production, measured in tonnes per year, from 1950 onwards.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In 1950 the world produced only 2 million tonnes per year. Since then, annual production has increased nearly 230-fold, reaching 460 million tonnes in 2019.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The short downturn in annual production in 2009 and 2010 was predominantly the result of the 2008 global financial crisis — a similar dent is seen across several metrics of resource production and consumption, <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-and-changing-energy-sources#global-total-energy-production-long-run-view-by-source" target="_blank">including energy</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-plastics-production"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Cumulative production</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>How much plastic has the world produced cumulatively? </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The chart shows that by 2019, the world had produced 9.5 billion tonnes of plastic — more than one tonne of plastic for every person alive today.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-global-plastics"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>How do we dispose of our plastic?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Plastic disposal methods</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>How has global plastic waste disposal method changed over time? In the chart we see the share of global plastic waste that is discarded, recycled or incinerated from 1980 through to 2015.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Prior to 1980, recycling and incineration of plastic was negligible; 100 percent was therefore discarded. From 1980 for incineration, and 1990 for recycling, rates increased on average by about 0.7 percent per year.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>3</em>(7), e1700782. Available at: <a href="http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> In 2015, an estimated 55 percent of global plastic waste was discarded, 25 percent was incinerated, and 20 percent recycled.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If we extrapolate historical trends through to 2050 — as can be seen in the <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-fate-to-2050">chart here</a> — by 2050, incineration rates would increase to 50 percent; recycling to 44 percent; and discarded waste would fall to 6 percent. However, note that this is based on the simplistic extrapolation of historic trends and does not represent concrete projections.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-fate"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Global plastic production to fate</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In the figure we summarize global plastic production to final fate over the period 1950 to 2015.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>3</em>(7), e1700782. Available at: <a href="http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> This is given in cumulative million tonnes.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>As shown:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>cumulative production of polymers, synthetic fibers and additives was 8300 million tonnes;</li><li>2500 million tonnes (30 percent) of primary plastics was still in use in 2015;</li><li>4600 million tonnes (55 percent) went straight to landfill or was discarded;</li><li>700 million tonnes (8 percent) was incinerated;</li><li>500 million tonnes (6 percent) was recycled (100 million tonnes of recycled plastic was still in use; 100 million tonnes was later incinerated; and 300 million tonnes was later discarded or sent to landfill).</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Of the 5800 million tonnes of primary plastic no longer in use, only 9 percent has been recycled since 1950.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"align":"center","id":20291,"linkDestination":"custom"} --> <div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><a href="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/plastic-fate.png"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/plastic-fate-605x550.png" alt="" class="wp-image-20291"/></a></figure></div> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>Which sectors produce the most plastic?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Plastic use by sector</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To which industries and product uses is primary plastic production allocated? In the chart we see plastic production allocation by sector for 2015.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Packaging was the dominant use of primary plastics, with 42 percent of plastics entering the use phase.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>3</em>(7), e1700782. Available at: <a href="http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> Building and construction was the second largest sector utilizing 19 percent of the total. Primary plastic production does not directly reflect plastic waste generation (as shown in the next section), since this is also influenced by the polymer type and <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">lifetime of the end product</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Primary plastic production by polymer type can be <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-production-polymer">found here</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-production-by-sector"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Plastic waste by sector</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This chart shows the use of primary plastics by sector; in the chart we show these same sectors in terms of plastic waste generation. Plastic waste generation is strongly influenced by primary plastic use, but also the <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic" target="_blank">product lifetime</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Packaging, for example, has a very short 'in-use' lifetime (typically around 6 months or less). This is in contrast to building and construction, where plastic use has a <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic" target="_blank">mean lifetime</a> of 35 years.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>3</em>(7), e1700782. Available at: <a href="http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> Packaging is therefore the dominant generator of plastic waste, responsible for almost half of the global total.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In 2015, primary plastics production was 407 million tonnes; around three-quarters (302 million tonnes) ended up as waste.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Plastic waste breakdown by polymer type can be <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-polymer">found here</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-by-sector"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>Plastic waste by country</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Which countries produce the most total plastic waste?</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In the chart we see the per capita rate of plastic waste generation, measured in kilograms per person per day. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Here we see differences of around an order of magnitude: daily per capita plastic waste across the highest countries – Kuwait, Guyana, Germany, Netherlands, Ireland, the United States – is more than ten times higher than across many countries such as India, Tanzania, Mozambique and Bangladesh.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>These figures represent total plastic waste generation and do not account for differences in waste management, recycling or incineration. They therefore do not represent quantities of plastic at risk of loss to the ocean or other waterways.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-per-capita"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Related chart:</strong></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:owid/prominent-link {"title":"","linkUrl":"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-generation-total","className":"is-style-thin"} /--></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Which countries produce the most mismanaged plastic waste?</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Plastic will only enter rivers and the ocean if it’s poorly managed. In rich countries, nearly all of its plastic waste is incinerated, recycled, or sent to well-managed landfills. It’s not left open to the surrounding environment. Low-to-middle income countries tend to have poorer waste management infrastructure. Waste can be dumped outside of landfills, and landfills that do exist are often open, leaking waste to the surrounding environment. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><em>Mismanaged</em> waste in low-to-middle income countries is therefore much higher.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Mismanaged waste is material which is at high risk of entering the ocean via wind or tidal transport, or carried to coastlines from inland waterways. Mismanaged waste is the sum of material which is either littered or inadequately disposed. Inadequately disposed and littered waste are different, and are defined in the sections below.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/admin/charts/4873/edit">Per capita mismanaged waste</a> in the Philippines is 100 times higher than in the UK. When we multiply by population (giving us <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/admin/charts/4880/edit">each country’s total</a>), India, China, the Philippines, Brazil, and Nigeria top the list. Each country’s share of global mismanaged waste is shown in the map.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-mismanaged-plastic-waste?country=Asia~Africa~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Related charts:</strong></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:owid/prominent-link {"title":"","linkUrl":"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-mismanaged","className":"is-style-thin"} /--> <!-- wp:owid/prominent-link {"title":"","linkUrl":"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mismanaged-plastic-waste-per-capita","className":"is-style-thin"} /--></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Probability that mismanaged plastic waste gets emitted to the ocean</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Not all mismanaged plastic waste has the same probability that it reaches river networks, and then the ocean. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The climate, terrain, land use, and distances within river basins affect the probability that mismanaged plastic waste is emitted to the ocean.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This interactive chart shows the probability that mismanaged waste is emitted to the ocean.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/probability-mismanaged-plastic-ocean?country=MYS~PHL~CHN~IND~LKA~BRA~NGA~TZA" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Which countries emit the most plastic into the oceans?</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The distribution of plastic inputs is reflected on the world map. There we see each country’s share of global plastic emissions.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The Philippines accounts for more than one-third (36%) of plastic inputs – unsurprising given the fact that it’s home to seven of the top ten rivers. This is because the Philippines consists of many small islands where the majority of the population lives near the coast.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean?country=Africa~Asia~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Related charts:</strong></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:owid/prominent-link {"title":"","linkUrl":"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean","className":"is-style-thin"} /--> <!-- wp:owid/prominent-link {"title":"","linkUrl":"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-ocean-plastic-waste","className":"is-style-thin"} --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- /wp:owid/prominent-link --></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Plastic emitted to the ocean by region</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This chart shows how global plastics emitted into the oceans breaks down by region.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean?tab=chart&country=Africa~Asia~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>How much of ocean plastics come from land and marine sources?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Plastic in our oceans can arise from both land-based or marine sources. Plastics pollution from marine sources refers to the pollution caused by fishing fleets that leave behind fishing nets, lines, ropes, and sometimes abandoned vessels.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There is often intense debate about the relative importance of marine and land sources for ocean pollution. What is the relative contribution of each?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>At the global level, best estimates suggest that approximately 80 percent of ocean plastics come from land-based sources, and the remaining 20 percent from marine sources.{ref}Li, W. C., Tse, H. F., & Fok, L. (2016). Plastic waste in the marine environment: A review of sources, occurrence and effects. <em>Science of the Total Environment</em>, <em>566</em>, 333-349. Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716310154">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716310154</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Of the 20 percent from marine sources, it's estimated that around half (10 percentage points) arises from fishing fleets (such as nets, lines and abandoned vessels). This is supported by figures from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) which suggests abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear contributes approximately 10 percent to total ocean plastics.{ref}UNEP & FAO (2009). Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 523; UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 185. Available at: <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0620e/i0620e00.htm">http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0620e/i0620e00.htm</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Other estimates allocate a slightly higher contribution of marine sources, at 28 percent of total ocean plastics.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Although uncertain, it's likely that marine sources contribute between 20% to 30% of ocean plastics, but the dominant source remains land-based input at 70% to 80%.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Whilst this is the relative contribution as an aggregate of global ocean plastics, the relative contribution of different sources will vary depending on geographical location and context. For example, our most recent estimates of the contribution of marine sources to the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP) is that abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear make up 75% of 86% of floating plastic mass (greater than 5 centimeters).{ref}Lebreton, L., Royer, SJ., Peytavin, A. <em>et al.</em> (2022). <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16529-0">Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre</a>. <em>Scientific Rep</em>orts <strong>12</strong>, 12666.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Previous studies (notably Lebreton et al. 2018) estimated that plastic lines, ropes, and fishing nets contributed just over half of the plastic mass in the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch'. More recent studies estimate that this share is higher – giving the 75% to 86% referenced here.<br><br>Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref} This research suggests that most of this fishing activity originates from five countries – Japan, South Korea, China, the United States and Taiwan.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>River inputs to the ocean</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To tackle plastic pollution we need to know what rivers these plastics are coming from. It also helps if we understand <em>why</em> these rivers emit so much.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Most of the world’s largest emitting rivers are in Asia, with some also in East Africa and the Caribbean. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In the chart we see the ten largest contributors.{ref}This data comes from Meijer, L. J., van Emmerik, T., van der Ent, R., Schmidt, C., & Lebreton, L. (2021). <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5803">More than 1000 rivers account for 80% of global riverine plastic emissions into the ocean</a>. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>7</em>(18), eaaz5803.{/ref} This is shown as each river’s share of the global total. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>You can explore the data on the top 50 rivers using the <em>+Add river</em> button on the chart.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Seven of the top ten rivers are in the Philippines. Two are in India, and one in Malaysia. The Pasig River in the Philippines alone accounts for 6.4% of global river plastics. This paints a very different picture to earlier studies where it was Asia’s largest rivers – the Yangtze, Xi, and Huangpu rivers in China, and Ganges in India – that were dominant.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>What are the characteristics of the largest emitting rivers?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>First, plastic pollution is dominant where the local waste management practices are poor. This means there is a large amount of mismanaged plastic waste that can enter rivers and the ocean in the first place. This makes clear that improving waste management is essential if we’re to tackle plastic pollution. Second, the largest emitters tend to have cities nearby: this means there are a lot of paved surfaces where both water and plastic can drain into river outlets. Cities such as Jakarta in Indonesia and Manila in the Philippines are drained by relatively small rivers but account for a large share of plastic emissions. Third, the river basins had high precipitation rates (meaning plastics washed into rivers, and the flow rate of rivers to the ocean was high). Fourth, distance matters: the largest emitting rivers had cities nearby and were also very close to the coast.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The authors of the study illustrate the importance of the additional climate, basin terrain, and proximity factors with a real-life example. The Ciliwung River basin in Java is 275 times smaller than the Rhine river basin in Europe and generates 75% less plastic waste. Yet it emits 100 times as much plastic to the ocean each year (200 to 300 tonnes versus only 3 to 5 tonnes). The Ciliwung River emits much more plastic to the ocean, despite being much smaller because the basin’s waste is generated very close to the river (meaning the plastic gets into the river network in the first place) and the river network is also much closer to the ocean. It also gets much more rainfall meaning the plastic waste is more easily transported than in the Rhine basin.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If you want to explore the plastic inputs from each of the world’s rivers, the Ocean Cleanup Project <a href="https://theoceancleanup.com/sources/">provides a beautiful interactive map</a> where you can see this in more detail.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastics-top-rivers?country=Pasig+%28Philippines%29~Tullahan+%28Philippines%29~Ganges+%28India%29~Ulhas+%28India%29~Klang+%28Malaysia%29~Meycauayan+%28Philippines%29~Pampanga+%28Philippines%29~Libmanan+%28Philippines%29~Rio+Grande+de+Mindanao+%28Philippines%29~Agno+%28Philippines%29" loading="lazy" style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>Which oceans have the most plastic waste?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Plastic enters the oceans from coastlines, rivers, tides, and marine sources. But once it is there, where does it go?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The distribution and accumulation of ocean plastics is strongly influenced by oceanic surface currents and wind patterns. Plastics are typically buoyant – meaning they float on the ocean surface –, allowing them to be transported by the prevalent wind and surface current routes. As a result, plastics tend to accumulate in <a href="https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/gyre.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">oceanic gyres</a>, with high concentrations of plastics at the centre of ocean basins, and much less around the perimeters. After entry to oceans from coastal regions, plastics tend to migrate towards the centre of ocean basins.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In the chart we see estimates of the mass of plastics in surface ocean waters by ocean basin. Eriksen et al. (2014) estimated that there was approximately 269,000 tonnes of plastic in surface waters across the world.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., … & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at: <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> Note that this at least an order of magnitude lower than estimated inputs of plastics to the ocean; the discrepancy here relates to a surprising, but long-standing question in the research literature on plastics: "<a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem">where is the missing plastic going?</a>".</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>As we see, basins in the Northern Hemisphere had the highest quantity of plastics. This would be expected since the majority of the world's population – and in particular, coastal populations – live within the Northern Hemisphere. However, authors were still surprised by the quantity of plastic accumulation in Southern oceans — while it was lower than in the Northern Hemisphere, it was still of the same order of magnitude. Considering the lack of coastal populations and plastic inputs in the Southern Hemisphere, this was an unexpected result. The authors suggest this means plastic pollution can be moved between oceanic gyres and basins much more readily than previously assumed.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/surface-plastic-mass-by-ocean"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Plastic particles in the world's surface ocean</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>It's estimated that there are more than 5 trillion plastic particles in the world's surface waters.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., … & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at: <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> We can see this breakdown of plastic particles by ocean basin <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/surface-plastic-particles-by-ocean">here</a>. The accumulation of a large <em>number</em> of particles tends to result from the breakdown of larger plastics — this results in an accumulation of plastic particles for a given mass.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The figure summarizes plastics in the ocean surface waters by basin. This is shown by particle size in terms of mass (left) and particle count (right). As shown, the majority of plastics by mass are large particles (macroplastics), whereas the majority in terms of particle count are microplastics (small particles).</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"align":"center","id":20224,"linkDestination":"custom"} --> <div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><a href="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Surface-ocean-plastic.png"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Surface-ocean-plastic-750x331.png" alt="" class="wp-image-20224"/></a></figure></div> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>The 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP)</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The most well-known example of large plastic accumulations in surface waters is the so-called 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP). As shown in the chart here, the largest accumulation of plastics within ocean basins is the North Pacific. This results from the combined impact of large coastal plastic inputs in the region, alongside intensive fishing activity in the Pacific ocean.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In a <em>Nature</em> study, Lebreton et al. (2018) attempted to quantify the characteristics of the GPGP.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> The vast majority of GPGP material is plastics — trawling samples indicate an estimated 99.9 percent of all floating debris. The authors estimate the GPGP spanned 1.6 million km<sup>2</sup>. This is just over three times the area of Spain, and slightly larger in area to Alaska (the USA's largest state).{ref}The reported <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_area#Countries_greater_than_1.5_million_km2">land area of Spain</a> is approximately 500,000 square kilometres, and Alaska is an <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_area">estimated 1.5 million</a> square kilometres.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The GPGP comprised 1.8 trillion pieces of plastic, with a mass of 79,000 tonnes (approximately 29 percent of the 269,000 tonnes in the world's surface oceans). Over recent decades, the authors report there has been an exponential increase in concentration of surface plastics in the GPGP.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Our most recent estimates of the contribution of marine sources to the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP) is that abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear make up 75% of 86% of floating plastic mass (greater than 5 centimeters).{ref}Lebreton, L., Royer, SJ., Peytavin, A. <em>et al.</em> (2022). <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16529-0">Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre</a>. <em>Scientific Rep</em>orts <strong>12</strong>, 12666.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Previous studies (notably Lebreton et al. 2018) estimated that plastic lines, ropes, and fishing nets contributed just over half of the plastic mass in the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch'. More recent studies estimate that this share is higher – giving the 75% to 86% referenced here.<br><br>Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref} This research suggests that most of this fishing activity originates from five countries – Japan, South Korea, China, the United States and Taiwan.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"align":"center","id":20267,"linkDestination":"custom"} --> <div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><a href="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch.png"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch-750x430.png" alt="" class="wp-image-20267"/></a></figure></div> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>Where does our plastic accumulate in the ocean and what does that mean for the future?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp-block-tombstone 24889 --> <!-- wp:columns --> <div class="wp-block-columns"><!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The world now produces more than <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-much-plastic-does-the-world-produce">380 million tonnes</a> of plastic every year, which could end up as pollutants, entering our natural environment and oceans.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Of course, not all of our plastic waste ends up in the ocean, most ends up in landfills: it’s estimated that the share of global plastic waste that enters the ocean is around 3%.{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., … & Law, K. L. (2015). <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768">Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean</a>. <em>Science</em>, 347(6223), 768-771.{/ref} In 2010 – the year for which we have the latest estimates – that was around 8 million tonnes.{ref}The estimates for this figure range from around 4 to 12 million tonnes, with 8 million as a midpoint. In the context of this discussion, the uncertainty in this value is less important: the difference between ocean plastic inputs and observed plastic in surface ocean waters are orders of magnitude – rather than multiples – apart.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Most of the plastic materials we produce are less dense than water and should therefore float at the ocean surface. But our best estimates of the amount of plastic afloat at sea are orders of magnitude lower than the amount of plastic that enters our oceans in a single year: as we show in the visualization, it’s far lower than 8 million tonnes and instead in the order of 10s to 100s of thousands of tonnes. One of the most widely-quoted estimates is 250,000 tonnes.{ref}Eriksen, M. et al. <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913">Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea</a>. <em>Plos One</em> 9, e111913 (2014).{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If we currently pollute our oceans with millions of tonnes of plastic each year, we must have released tens of millions of tonnes in recent decades. Why then do we find at least 100 times less plastics in our surface waters? </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This discrepancy is often referred to as the ‘missing plastic problem’.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at:<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w"> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref} It’s a conundrum we need to address if we want to understand where plastic waste could end up, and what its impacts might be for wildlife, ecosystems and health.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div> <!-- /wp:column --> <!-- wp:column --> <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":24884,"sizeSlug":"full"} --> <figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png" alt="" class="wp-image-24884"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --></div> <!-- /wp:column --></div> <!-- /wp:columns --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>The ‘missing plastic problem’</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There are several hypotheses to explain the ‘missing plastic problem’. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>One possibility is that it is due to imprecise measurement: we might either grossly overestimate the amount of plastic waste we release into the ocean, or underestimate the amount floating in the surface ocean. Whilst we know that tracking ocean plastic inputs and their distribution is notoriously difficult{ref}Cressey, D. (2016). <a href="https://www.nature.com/news/bottles-bags-ropes-and-toothbrushes-the-struggle-to-track-ocean-plastics-1.20432">Bottles, bags, ropes and toothbrushes: the struggle to track ocean plastics</a>. <em>Nature News</em>, <em>536</em>(7616), 263.{/ref} the levels of uncertainty in these measurements are much less than the several orders of magnitude that would be needed to explain the missing plastic problem.{ref}Lebreton, L., Egger, M., & Slat, B. (2019). <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49413-5">A global mass budget for positively buoyant macroplastic debris in the ocean</a>. <em>Scientific reports</em>, <em>9</em>(1), 1-10.{/ref} <br><br>Another popular hypothesis is that ultraviolet light (UV) and mechanical wave forces break large pieces of plastic into smaller ones.These smaller particles, referred to as microplastics, are much more easily incorporated into sediments or ingested by organisms. And this is where the missing plastic might end up.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>One proposed ‘sink’ for ocean plastics was deep-sea sediments; a study which sampled deep-sea sediments across several basins found that microplastic was up to four orders of magnitude more abundant (per unit volume) in deep-sea sediments from the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean than in plastic-polluted surface waters.{ref}Woodall, L. C., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., Paterson, G. L., Coppock, R., Sleight, V., … & Thompson, R. C. (2014). <a href="http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/4/140317">The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris</a>. <em>Royal Society Open Science</em>, 1(4), 140317.{/ref}<br><br>But, new research may suggest a third explanation: that plastics in the ocean break down slower than previously thought, and that much of the missing plastic is washed up or buried in our shorelines.{ref}Lebreton, L., Egger, M., & Slat, B. (2019). <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49413-5">A global mass budget for positively buoyant macroplastic debris in the ocean</a>. <em>Scientific reports</em>, <em>9</em>(1), 1-10.{/ref} </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Plastics persist for decades and accumulate on our shorelines</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To try to understand the conundrum of what happens to plastic waste when it enters the ocean, Lebreton, Egger and Slat (2019) created a global model of ocean plastics from 1950 to 2015. This model uses data on global plastic production, emissions into the ocean by plastic type and age, and transport and degradation rates to map not only the amount of plastic in different environments in the ocean, but also its age.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The authors aimed to quantify where plastic accumulates in the ocean across three environments: the shoreline (defined as dry land bordering the ocean), coastal areas (defined as waters with a depth less than 200 meters) and offshore (waters with a depth greater than 200 meters). They wanted to understand where plastic accumulates, and how old it is: a few years old, ten years or decades? </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In the visualization I summarized their results. This is shown for two categories of plastics: shown in blue are ‘macroplastics’ (larger plastic materials greater than 0.5 centimeters in diameter) and shown in red microplastics (smaller particles less than 0.5 centimeters). </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There are some key points we can take away from the visualization:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>The vast majority – 82 million tonnes of macroplastics and 40 million tonnes of microplastics – is washed up, buried or resurfaced along the world’s shorelines.</li><li>Much of the macroplastics in our shorelines is from the past 15 years, but still a significant amount is older suggesting it can persist for several decades without breaking down.</li><li>In coastal regions most macroplastics (79%) are recent – less than 5 years old.</li><li>In offshore environments, older microplastics have had longer to accumulate than in coastal regions. There macroplastics from several decades ago – even as far back as the 1950s and 1960s – persist. </li><li>Most microplastics (three-quarters) in offshore environments are from the 1990s and earlier, suggesting it can take several decades for plastics to break down.</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>What does this mean for our understanding of the ‘missing plastic’ problem?</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Firstly</strong>, is that the majority of ocean plastics are washed, buried and resurface along our shorelines. Whilst we try to tally ocean inputs with the amount floating in gyres at the centre of our oceans, most of it may be accumulating around the edges of the oceans. This would explain why we find much less in surface waters than we’d expect. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Secondly</strong>, accumulated plastics are much older than previously thought. Macroplastics appear to persist in the surface of the ocean for decades without breaking down. Offshore we find large plastic objects dating as far back as the 1950s and 1960s. This goes against previous hypotheses of the ‘missing plastic’ problem which suggested that UV light and wave action degrade and remove them from the surface in only a few years. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:image {"id":24886} --> <figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Where-does-plastic-accumulate-800x396.png" alt="" class="wp-image-24886"/></figure> <!-- /wp:image --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>How much plastic will remain in surface oceans in the coming decades?</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The study by Lebreton, Egger and Slat challenges the previous hypotheses that plastics in the surface ocean have a very short lifetime, quickly degrade into microplastics and sink to greater depths. Their results suggest that macroplastics can persist for decades; can be buried and resurfaced along shorelines; and end up in offshore regions years later. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If true, this matters a lot for how much plastic we would expect in our surface oceans in the decades which follow. The same study also modelled how the mass of plastics – both macro and micro – in the world’s surface waters might evolve under three scenarios:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list {"ordered":true} --> <ol><li>we stop emitting any plastics to our oceans by 2020;</li><li>‘emissions’ of plastic to the ocean continue to increase until 2020 then level off;</li><li>‘emissions’ continue to grow to 2050 in line with historic growth rates.{ref}Under growth scenarios, the authors assume annual growth rates continue in line with the average increase in global plastic production over the decade from 2005-2015.{/ref}</li></ol> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Their results are shown in the charts.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The scenarios of continued emissions growth are what we’d expect: if we continue to release more plastics to the ocean, we’ll have more in our surface waters. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>What’s more striking is that even if we stopped ocean plastic waste by 2020, macroplastics would persist in our surface waters for many more decades. This is because we have a large legacy of plastics buried and awash on our shorelines which would continue to resurface and be transported to offshore regions; and existing plastics can persist in the ocean environment for many decades.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The amount of microplastics in our surface ocean will increase under every scenario because the large plastics that we already have on our shorelines and surface waters will continue to breakdown. And, any additional plastics we add will contribute further. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This also matters for how we solve the problem of ocean pollution.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If we want to rapidly reduce the amount of both macro- and microplastics in our oceans, these results suggest two priorities:<br><br> <em>Number one</em> — we must stop plastic waste entering our waterways as soon as possible. Most of the plastic that ends up in our oceans does so because of <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#mismanaged-plastic-waste">poor waste management</a> practices – particularly in <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#what-determines-how-much-mismanaged-waste-we-produce">low-to-middle income countries</a>; this means that good waste management across the world is essential to achieving this.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>But this ambitious target alone will not be enough. We have many decades of legacy waste to contend with.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This makes a <em>second priority</em> necessary— we have to focus our efforts on recapturing and removing plastics already in our offshore waters and shorelines. This is the goal of Slat, Lebreton and Egger – the authors of this paper – with their <a href="https://theoceancleanup.com/">Ocean Cleanup</a> project.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/macroplastics-in-ocean"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/microplastics-in-ocean"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>How does plastic impact wildlife and human health?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There have been many documented incidences of the impact of plastic on ecosystems and wildlife. Peer-reviewed publications of plastic impacts date back to the 1980s. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>An analysis by Rochman et al. (2016){ref}This data is also presented in the review by Law (2017): Law, K. L. (2017). Plastics in the marine environment. <em>Annual review of marine science</em>, <em>9</em>, 205-229. Available at: <a href="https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409">https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409</a>.{/ref} reviews the findings of peer-reviewed documentation of the impacts of marine plastic debris on animal life; the results of this study are presented in <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://ourworldindata.org/ecological-impacts-of-marine-plastic-debris/" target="_blank">this table</a>.{ref}Rochman, C. M., Browne, M. A., Underwood, A. J., Van Franeker, J. A., Thompson, R. C., & Amaral‐Zettler, L. A. (2016). The ecological impacts of marine debris: unraveling the demonstrated evidence from what is perceived. <em>Ecology</em>, <em>97</em>(2), 302-312. Available at: <a href="https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/14-2070.1">https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/14-2070.1</a>.{/ref} </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Nonetheless, despite many documented cases, it's widely acknowledged that the full extent of impacts on ecosystems is not yet known.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There are three key pathways by which plastic debris can affect wildlife{ref}Law, K. L. (2017). Plastics in the marine environment. <em>Annual review of marine science</em>, <em>9</em>, 205-229. Available at: <a href="https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409">https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409</a>.{/ref}:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Entanglement</strong> – the entrapping, encircling or constricting of marine animals by plastic debris. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Entanglement cases have been reported for at least 344 species to date, including all marine turtle species, more than two-thirds of seal species, one-third of whale species, and one-quarter of seabirds.{ref}Kühn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em> (pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham. Available at: <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4</a>.{/ref} Entanglement by 89 species of fish and 92 species of invertebrates has also been recorded.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Entanglements most commonly involve plastic rope and netting{ref}Gall, S. C., & Thompson, R. C. (2015). The impact of debris on marine life. <em>Marine pollution bulletin</em>, <em>92</em>(1-2), 170-179. Available at: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190719200908/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X14008571">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X14008571</a>.{/ref} and abandoned fishing gear.{ref}Kühn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em> (pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham. Available at: <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4</a>.{/ref} However, entanglement by other plastics such as packaging have also been recorded.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Ingestion</strong>: </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Ingestion of plastic can occur unintentionally, intentionally, or indirectly through the ingestion of prey species containing plastic. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>It has been documented for at least 233 marine species, including all marine turtle species, more than one-third of seal species, 59% of whale species, and 59% of seabirds.{ref}Kühn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em> (pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham. Available at: <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4</a>.{/ref} Ingestion by 92 species of fish and 6 species of invertebrates has also been recorded.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The size of the ingested material is ultimately limited by the size of the organism. Very small particles such as plastic fibres can be taken up by small organisms such as filter-feeding oysters or mussels; larger materials such as plastic films, cigarette packets, and food packaging have been found in large fish species; and in extreme cases, documented cases of sperm whales have shown ingestion of very large materials including 9m of rope, 4.5m of hose, two flowerpots, and large amounts of plastic sheeting.{ref}de Stephanis R, Gimenez J, Carpinelli E, Gutierrez-Exposito C, Canadas A. 2013. As main meal for sperm whales: plastics debris. <em>Marine Pollution Bulletin</em> 69:206–14.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Ingestion of plastics can have multiple impacts on organism health. Large volumes of plastic can greatly reduce stomach capacity, leading to poor appetite and false sense of satiation.{ref}Day RH, Wehle DHS, Coleman FC. 1985. Ingestion of plastic pollutants by marine birds. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Fate and Impact of Marine Debris, 27–29 November 1984, Honolulu, Hawaii, ed. RS Shomura, HO Yoshida, pp. 344–86. Tech. Memo. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFC-54. Washington, DC: Natl. Ocean. Atmos. Adm.{/ref} Plastic can also obstruct or perforate the gut, cause ulcerative lesions, or gastric rupture. This can ultimately lead to death.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In laboratory settings, biochemical responses to plastic ingestion have also been observed. These responses include oxidative stress, metabolic disruption, reduced enzyme activity, and cellular necrosis.{ref}Browne MA, Niven SJ, Galloway TS, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC. 2013. Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. <em>Current Biology</em> 23:2388–92.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Cedervall T, Hansson LA, Lard M, Frohm B, Linse S. 2012. Food chain transport of nanoparticles affects behaviour and fat metabolism in fish. <em>PLOS ONE</em> 7:e32254{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Oliveira M, Ribeiro A, Hylland K, Guilhermino L. 2013. Single and combined effects of microplastics and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Teleostei, Gobiidae). <em>Ecological Indicators</em> 34:641–47{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Rochman CM, Hoh E, Kurobe T, Teh SJ. 2013. Ingested plastic transfers hazardous chemicals to fish and induces hepatic stress. <em>Scientific Reports</em> 3:3263{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Interaction</strong> – interaction includes collisions, obstructions, abrasions or use as substrate.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There are multiple scenarios where this can have an impact on organisms.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Fishing gear, for example, has been shown to cause abrasion and damage to coral reef ecosystems upon collision. Ecosystem structures can also be impacted by plastics following interference of substrate with plastics (impacting on light penetration, organic matter availability and oxygen exchange).</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>What are the impacts of microplastics on health?</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Impact of microplastics on wildlife</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>As discussed in the section on 'Impacts on Wildlife' above, there are several ways in which plastics can interact or influence wildlife. In the case of microplastics (particles smaller than 4.75 millimeter in diameter), the key concern is ingestion.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Ingestion of microplastics have been shown to occur for many organisms. This can occur through several mechanisms, ranging from uptake by filter-feeders, swallowing from surrounding water, or consumption of organisms that have previously ingested microplastics.{ref}Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. <em>Nature Ecology & Evolution</em>, <em>1</em>(5), 0116. Available at: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There a number of potential effects of microplastics at different biological levels, which range from sub-cellular to ecosystems, but most research has focused on impacts in individual adult organisms.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Microplastic ingestion rarely causes mortality in any organisms. As such, 'lethal concentration' (LC) values which are often measured and reported for contaminants do not exist. There are a few exceptions: common <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goby">goby</a> exposure to polyethylene and pyrene; Asian green mussels exposed to polyvinylchloride (PVC); and <i>Daphnia magna</i> neonates exposed to polyethylene{ref}Oliveira, M., Ribeiro, A., Hylland, K. & Guilhermino, L. Single and combined effects of microplastics and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby <em>Pomatoschistus microps</em> (Teleostei, Gobiidae)<br>. <em>Ecological Indicators,</em> <strong>34</strong>, 641–647 (2013). Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X13002501">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X13002501</a>.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Rist, S. E. <em>et al</em>. Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel <em>Perna viridis</em><br>. <em>Marine Pollution Bulletin</em> <strong>111</strong>, 213–220 (2016). Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380</a>.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Ogonowski, M., Schür, C., Jarsén, Å. & Gorokhova, E. The effects of natural and anthropogenic microparticles on individual fitness in <em>Daphnia magna</em>.<br> <em>PLoS ONE</em> <strong>11</strong>, e0155063 (2016). Available at: <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p> In such studies, however, concentrations and exposure to microplastics far exceeded levels which would be encountered in the natural environment (even a highly contaminated one).</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There is increasing evidence that microplastic ingestion can affect the consumption of prey, leading to energy depletion, inhibited growth and fertility impacts. When organisms ingest microplastics, it can take up space in the gut and digestive system, leading to reductions in feeding signals. This feeling of fullness can reduce dietary intake. Evidence of impacts of reduced food consumption include:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>slower metabolic rate and survival in Asian green mussels{ref}Rist, S. E. <em>et al</em>. Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel <em>Perna viridis</em><br>. <em>Marine Pollution Bulletin</em> <strong>111</strong>, 213–220 (2016). Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380</a>.{/ref}</li><li>reduced reproducibility and survival in copepods{ref}Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C. & Galloway, T. The impact of polystyrene microplastics on feeding, function and fecundity in the marine copepod <em>Calanus helgolandicus</em>.<br> <em>Environment, Science & Technology,</em> <strong>49</strong>, 1130–1137 (2015). Available at: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563688">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563688</a>.{/ref}</li><li>reduced growth and development of <em>Daphnia</em>{ref}Ogonowski, M., Schür, C., Jarsén, Å. & Gorokhova, E. The effects of natural and anthropogenic microparticles on individual fitness in <br>Daphnia magna<em>. PLoS ONE, <strong>11</strong>, e0155063 (2016). Available at: <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063</a>.</em>{/ref}</li><li>reduced growth and development of langoustine{ref}Welden, N. A. C. & Cowie, P. R. Environment and gut morphology influence microplastic retention in langoustine, <em>Nephrops norvegicus</em>.<br> <em>Environmental Pollution,</em> <strong>214</strong>, 859–865 (2016). Available at: <a href="http://oro.open.ac.uk/47539/">http://oro.open.ac.uk/47539/</a>.{/ref}</li><li>reduced energy stores in shore crabs and lugworms{ref}Watts, A. J. R., Urbina, M. A., Corr, S., Lewis, C. & Galloway, T. S. Ingestion of plastic microfibers by the crab <em>Carcinus maenas</em> and its effect on food consumption and energy balance.<br> <em>Environment, Science & Technology,</em> <strong>49</strong>, 14597–14604 (2015). Available at: <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b04026">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b04026</a>.{/ref},{ref}Wright, S., Rowe, D., Thompson, R. C. & Galloway, T. S. Microplastic ingestion decreases energy reserves in marine worms<br>. <em>Current Biology.</em> <strong>23</strong>, 1031–1033 (2013). Available at: <a href="https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43097705.pdf">https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43097705.pdf</a>.{/ref}</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Many organisms do not exhibit changes in feeding after microplastic ingestion. A number of organisms, including suspension-feeders (for example, oyster larvae, urchin larvae, European flat oysters, Pacific oysters) and detritivorous (for example, isopods, amphipods) invertebrates show no impact of microplastics.{ref}Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. <em>Nature Ecology & Evolution</em>, <em>1</em>(5), 0116. Available at: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116</a>.{/ref} Overall, however, it's likely that for some organisms, the presence of microplastic particles in the gut (where food should be) can have negative biological impacts.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Impact of microplastics on humans</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There is, currently, very little evidence of the impact that microplastics can have on humans.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>For human health, it is the smallest particles – micro- and nano-particles which are small enough to be ingested – that are of greatest concern. There are several ways by which plastic particles can be ingested: orally through water, consumption of marine products which contain microplastics, through the skin via cosmetics (identified as highly unlikely but possible), or inhalation of particles in the air.{ref}Revel, M., Châtel, A., & Mouneyrac, C. (2018). Micro (nano) plastics: A threat to human health?. <em>Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health</em>, <em>1</em>, 17-23. Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584417300235">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584417300235</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>It is possible for microplastics to be passed up to higher levels in the food chain. This can occur when a species consumes organisms of a lower level in the food chain which has microplastics in the gut or tissue.{ref}Galloway T.S. (2015) Micro- and Nano-plastics and Human Health. In: Bergmann M., Gutow L., Klages M. (eds) <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em>. Available at: <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13</a>.{/ref} The presence of microplastics at higher levels of the food chain (in fish) has been documented.{ref}Güven, O., Gökdağ, K., Jovanović, B., & Kıdeyş, A. E. (2017). Microplastic litter composition of the Turkish territorial waters of the Mediterranean Sea, and its occurrence in the gastrointestinal tract of fish. <em>Environmental Pollution</em>, <em>223</em>, 286-294. Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116323910">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116323910</a>.{/ref} {ref}Jabeen, K., Su, L., Li, J., Yang, D., Tong, C., Mu, J., & Shi, H. (2017). Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China. <em>Environmental Pollution</em>, <em>221</em>, 141-149. Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116311666">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116311666</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>One factor which possibly limits the dietary uptake for humans is that microplastics in fish tend to be present in the gut and digestive tract — parts of the fish not typically eaten.{ref}Galloway T.S. (2015) Micro- and Nano-plastics and Human Health. In: Bergmann M., Gutow L., Klages M. (eds) <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em>. Available at: <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13</a>.{/ref} The presence of microplastics in fish beyond the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. in tissue) remains to be studied in detail.{ref}Bouwmeester, H., Hollman, P. C., & Peters, R. J. (2015). Potential health impact of environmentally released micro-and nanoplastics in the human food production chain: experiences from nanotoxicology. <em>Environmental Science & Technology</em>, <em>49</em>(15), 8932-8947. Available at: <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01090">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01090</a>.{/ref} Micro- and nanoplastics in bivalves (mussels and oysters) cultured for human consumption have also been identified. However, neither human exposure nor potential risk have been identified or quantified.{ref}Van Cauwenberghe, L., & Janssen, C. R. (2014). Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption. <em>Environmental Pollution</em>, <em>193</em>, 65-70. Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114002425">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114002425</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Plastic fibres have also been detected in other food items; for example, honey, beer and table salt.{ref}Liebezeit, G., & Liebezeit, E. (2013). Non-pollen particulates in honey and sugar. <em>Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A</em>, <em>30</em>(12), 2136-2140. Available at: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2013.843025">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2013.843025</a>.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Liebezeit, G., & Liebezeit, E. (2014). Synthetic particles as contaminants in German beers. <em>Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A</em>, <em>31</em>(9), 1574-1578. Available at: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2014.945099">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2014.945099</a>.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Yang, D., Shi, H., Li, L., Li, J., Jabeen, K., & Kolandhasamy, P. (2015). Microplastic pollution in table salts from China. <em>Environmental Science & Technology</em>, <em>49</em>(22), 13622-13627. Available at: <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b03163">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b03163</a>.{/ref} But the authors suggested negligible health risks as a result of this exposure.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Levels of microplastic ingestion are currently unknown. Even less is known about how such particles interact in the body. It may be the case that microplastics simply pass straight through the gastrointestinal tract without impact or interaction.{ref}Wang, J., Tan, Z., Peng, J., Qiu, Q., & Li, M. (2016). The behaviors of microplastics in the marine environment. <em>Marine Environmental Research</em>, <em>113</em>, 7-17. Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113615300659">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113615300659</a>.{/ref} A study of North Sea fish, for example, revealed that 80 percent of fish with detected microplastics contained only one particle — this suggests that following ingestion, plastic does not persist for long periods of time.{ref}Foekema, E. M., De Gruijter, C., Mergia, M. T., van Franeker, J. A., Murk, A. J., & Koelmans, A. A. (2013). Plastic in north sea fish. <em>Environmental Science & Technology</em>, <em>47</em>(15), 8818-8824. Available at: <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es400931b">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es400931b</a>.{/ref} Concentrations in mussels, in contrast, can be significantly higher.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>What could cause concern about the impact of microplastics? </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Three possible toxic effects of plastic particle have been suggested: the plastic particles themselves, the release of persistent organic pollutant adsorbed to the plastics, and leaching of plastic additives.{ref}Iñiguez, M. E., Conesa, J. A., & Fullana, A. (2017). Microplastics in Spanish Table Salt. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>7 </em>(1), 8620. Available at: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09128-x">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09128-x</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>There has been no evidence of harmful effects to date – however, the precautionary principle would indicate that this is not evidence against taking exposure seriously. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Since microplastics are hydrophobic (insoluble), and are have a high surface area-to-volume ratio, they can sorb environmental contaminants.{ref}For example polychlorinated biphenyl; PCB.{/ref} If there was significant accumulation of environmental contaminants, there is the possibility that these concentrations could 'biomagnify' up the food chain to higher levels.{ref}Biomagnification (sometimes termed 'bioamplification' or 'biological magnification'), is the increasing concentration of a substance in the tissues of organisms at successively higher levels in a food chain. This occurs as organisms at higher trophic levels eat significant masses of contaminated organisms at lower levels; with increased consumption, these concentrations can increase.{/ref} Biomagnification of PCBs varies by organism and environmental conditions; multiple studies have shown no evidence of uptake by the organisms of PCBs despite ingestion{ref}Devriese, L. I., De Witte, B., Vethaak, A. D., Hostens, K., & Leslie, H. A. (2017). Bioaccumulation of PCBs from microplastics in Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus): An experimental study. <em>Chemosphere</em>, <em>186</em>, 10-16. Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724</a>.{/ref} whilst some mussels, for example, have shown capability to transfer some compounds into their digestive glands.{ref}Avio, C. G., Gorbi, S., Milan, M., Benedetti, M., Fattorini, D., d'Errico, G., … & Regoli, F. (2015). Pollutants bioavailability and toxicological risk from microplastics to marine mussels. <em>Environmental Pollution</em>, <em>198</em>, 211-222. Available at: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To date, there has been no clear evidence of the accumulation of persistent organic pollutants or leached plastic additives in humans. Continued research in this area is important to better understand the role of plastic within broader ecosystems and risk to human health.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>Plastic trade</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>The impact of China's trade ban</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Whilst we looked previously in this entry at the plastic waste generation in countries across the world, it's also important to understand how plastic waste is traded across the world. Recycled plastic waste is now a product within the global commodity market — it is sold and traded across the world.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This has important implications for managing global plastic waste: if countries with effective waste management systems – predominantly high-income countries – export plastic waste to middle to low-income countries with poor waste management systems, they could be adding to the ocean plastic problem in this way.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Plastics can be challenging to recycle, particularly if they contain additives and different plastic blends. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The implications of this complexity are two-fold: in many cases it is convenient for countries to export their recycled plastic waste (meaning they don't have to handle it domestically); and for importing countries, this plastic is often discarded if it doesn't meet the sufficient requirements for recycled or is contaminated by non-recyclable plastic. As such, traded plastic waste could eventually enter the ocean through poor waste management systems.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Collectively, China and Hong Kong have imported 72.4 percent of global traded plastic waste (with most imports to Hong Kong eventually reaching China).{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at: <a href="http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131</a>.{/ref} </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>This came to an end in 2017. At the end of that year China introduced a complete ban on the imports of non-industrial plastic waste.{ref}Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection, “Announcement of releasing the Catalogues of Imported Wastes Management,” (Announcement no. 39, 2017).{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>How much plastic waste did China import?</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In the chart we see the quantity of plastic waste China had to manage over the period from 2010 to 2016. This is differentiated by domestic plastic waste generation, shown in blue, and imported plastic waste shown in orange. The total plastic waste to manage is equal to the sum of domestic and imported plastic waste.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Over this period, China imported between 7 and 9 million tonnes of plastic waste per year. In 2016, this figure was 7.35 million tonnes. To put this in context, China's domestic plastic waste generation was around 61 million tonnes. Therefore, 10-11 percent of China's total plastic waste was imported from around the world.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/chinese-plastic-imports"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>Who were the main plastic exporters to China?</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Which countries export the most plastic waste to China? In the chart we see the quantity of plastic exported to China from the top 10 exporting countries. Collectively, these countries are responsible for around 76 percent of its imports.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>As we see, Hong Kong typically acts as an entry point for Chinese imports; it is therefore the largest 'exporting' country to China. Many high-income countries are included in this top 10: Japan, USA, Germany, Belgium, Australia and Canada are all major plastic exporters.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-exports-to-china"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":4} --> <h4>How much plastic will be displaced from the Chinese import ban?</h4> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>China has been increasing restrictions on its plastic waste imports since 2007. In 2010, it implemented its "Green Fence" program – a temporary restriction for plastic imports with significantly less contamination.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In 2017 it implemented a much stricter, permanent ban on non-industrial plastic imports.{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at: <a href="http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131</a>.{/ref} In the chart we see the estimated impact on the cumulative displacement of global plastic waste to 2030 as a result of the Chinese import ban.{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at: <a href="http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131</a>.{/ref} This is shown for three scenarios: assuming the maintained 100 percent import ban, in addition to the impact if this was reduced to 75 or 50 percent.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>By 2030, it's estimated that around 110 million tonnes of plastic will be displaced as a result of the ban. This plastic waste will have to be handled domestically or exported to another country. Brooks et al. (2018) suggest this ban has several implications:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:list --> <ul><li>exporting countries can use this as an opportunity to improve domestic recycled infrastructure and generate internal markets;</li><li>if recycling infrastructure is lacking, this provides further incentive for countries to reduce primary plastic production (and create more circular material models) to reduce the quantity of waste which needs to be handled;</li><li>it fundamentally changes the nature of global plastic trade, representing an opportunity to share and promote best practices of waste management, and harmonize technical standards on waste protocols;</li><li>some other countries may attempt to become a key plastic importer in place of China; one challenge is that many countries do not yet have sufficient waste management infrastructure to handle recycled waste imports;</li><li>countries considering importing significant quantities of plastic waste could consider an import tax specifically aimed at funding the development of sufficient infrastructure to handle such waste.</li></ul> <!-- /wp:list --> <!-- wp:html --> <iframe style="width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;" src="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/displaced-plastic-chinese-import-ban"></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>Additional FAQs on Plastics</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In addition to this main data entry we have collated some of the most common questions on plastics on our <a href="https://owid.cloud/faq-on-plastics">FAQ on Plastics</a> page. You may find the answer to additional questions on this topic there.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2>Data Quality & Definitions</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Data Definitions</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The definitions of key terms used in this entry are as follows:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Discarded: </strong>waste that is not recycled or incinerated; this includes waste that goes to landfill (closed or open), is littered, or lost to the natural environment.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Incineration: </strong>a method waste treatment which involves the burning of material at very high temperatures. In some cases, energy recovery from the incineration process is possible. The burning of plastics can release toxins to the air and surrounding environment and should therefore be carried out under controlled and regulated conditions.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Inadequately managed waste: </strong>waste is not formally managed and includes disposal in dumps or open, uncontrolled landfills, where it is not fully contained. Inadequately managed waste has high risk of polluting rivers and oceans. This does not include 'littered' plastic waste, which is approximately 2% of total waste (including high-income countries).{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., … & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768" target="_blank">http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Mismanaged waste: </strong>material that is either littered or inadequately disposed (the sum of littered and inadequately disposed waste). Inadequately disposed waste is not formally managed and includes disposal in dumps or open, uncontrolled landfills, where it is not fully contained. Mismanaged waste could eventually enter the ocean via inland waterways, wastewater outflows, and transport by wind or tides.{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., … & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768" target="_blank">http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading {"level":3} --> <h3>Plastic particles size categories</h3> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Plastic particles are typically grouped into categories depending on their size (as measured by their diameter). The table summarizes some standard ranges for a given particle category.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., … & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at: <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913</a>.{/ref}</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:table --> <figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Particle category</strong></td><td><strong>Diameter range<br>(mm = millimetres)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Nanoplastics</td><td>< 0.0001 mm (0.1μm)</td></tr><tr><td>Small microplastics</td><td>0.00001 - 1 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Large microplastics</td><td>1 - 4.75 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Mesoplastics</td><td>4.76 - 200 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Macroplastics</td><td>>200 mm</td></tr></tbody></table></figure> <!-- /wp:table --> | { "id": "wp-19690", "slug": "plastic-pollution", "content": { "toc": [], "body": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This article was first published in September 2018. It was updated in April 2022 based on the most recent research.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/plastic-pollution", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "\u2192 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/plastic-pollution", "children": [ { "text": "Open the Data Explorer", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " in a new tab.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This is our main data entry on plastics, with a particular focus on its pollution of the environment.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "We have also produced an ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://ourworldindata.org/faq-on-plastics", "children": [ { "text": "FAQs on Plastics", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " page which attempts to answer additional common questions on the topic.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "A slide-deck summary of global plastics is ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://slides.ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution", "children": [ { "text": "available here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The first synthetic plastic\u00a0\u2014 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Bakelite", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "\u00a0 \u2014 was produced in 1907, marking the beginning of the global plastics industry. However, rapid growth in global plastic production was not realized until the 1950s. Over the next 70 years, annual production of plastics ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/plastics#global-plastic-production", "children": [ { "text": "increased nearly 230-fold", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " to 460 million tonnes in 2019.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "entry-summary", "items": [ { "slug": "how-does-plastic-impact-wildlife-and-human-health", "text": "Plastic pollution is having a negative impact on our oceans and wildlife health" }, { "slug": "which-countries-produce-the-most-plastic-waste", "text": "High-income countries generate more plastic waste per person" }, { "slug": "which-countries-emit-the-most-plastic-into-the-oceans", "text": "But, most of the plastic that ends up in the ocean comes from rivers in low-to-middle income countries." }, { "slug": "which-countries-produce-the-most-mismanaged-plastic-waste", "text": "This is because they tend to have more mismanaged plastic waste, whereas high-income countries have much more effective waste management." }, { "slug": "how-much-of-ocean-plastics-come-from-land-and-marine-sources", "text": "Around 20% of all plastic waste in the oceans comes from marine sources. The other 80% comes from land." }, { "slug": "how-much-of-ocean-plastics-come-from-land-and-marine-sources", "text": "In some regions, marine sources dominate: More than 80% in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch (GPGP) come from fishing nets, ropes and lines" }, { "slug": "are-plastic-alternatives-better-for-the-environment", "text": "Plastic is a unique material with many benefits: it's cheap, versatile, lightweight, and resistant. This makes it a valuable material for many functions. It can also provide environmental benefits: it plays a critical role in maintaining food quality, safety and reducing food waste. The trade-offs between plastics and substitutes (or complete bans) are therefore complex and could create negative knock-on impacts on the environment." } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "How much plastic enters the world's oceans?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "To understand the magnitude of input of plastics to the natural environment and the world's oceans, we must understand various elements of the plastic production, distribution and waste management chain. This is crucial, not only in understanding the scale of the problem but in implementing the most effective interventions for reduction.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The data and visualizations which follow in this entry provide this overview step-by-step. This overview is summarized in the figure.{ref}The data used in this figure is based on the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Science", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " study: Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., \u2026 & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Science", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 347(6223), 768-771. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768", "children": [ { "text": "http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Here we see that in 2010:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "global primary production of plastic was 270 million tonnes;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "global plastic waste was 275 million tonnes \u2013 it did exceed annual primary production through wastage of plastic from previous years;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "plastic waste generated in coastal regions is most at risk of entering the oceans; in 2010 coastal plastic waste \u2013 generated within 50 kilometres of the coastline \u2013 amounted to 99.5 million tonnes;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "only plastic waste which is improperly managed (mismanaged) is at significant risk of leakage to the environment; in 2010 this amounted to 31.9 million tonnes;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "of this, 8 million tonnes \u2013 3% of global annual plastics waste \u2013 entered the ocean (through multiple outlets, including rivers);", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Plastics in the oceans' surface waters is several orders of magnitude lower than annual ocean plastic inputs. This discrepancy is known as the 'missing plastic problem' and is discussed ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem", "children": [ { "text": "h", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#where-does-our-plastic-accumulate-in-the-ocean-and-what-does-that-mean-for-the-future", "children": [ { "text": "e", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem", "children": [ { "text": "re", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The amount of plastic in surface waters is not very well known: estimates range from 10,000s to 100,000s tonnes.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "How much plastic does the world produce?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The chart shows the increase of global plastic production, measured in tonnes per year, from 1950 onwards.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In 1950 the world produced only 2 million tonnes per year. Since then, annual production has increased nearly 230-fold, reaching 460 million tonnes in 2019.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The short downturn in annual production in 2009 and 2010 was predominantly the result of the 2008 global financial crisis \u2014 a similar dent is seen across several metrics of resource production and consumption, ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-and-changing-energy-sources#global-total-energy-production-long-run-view-by-source", "children": [ { "text": "including energy", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-plastics-production", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Cumulative production", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "How much plastic has the world produced cumulatively? ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The chart shows that by 2019, the world had produced 9.5 billion tonnes of plastic \u2014 more than one tonne of plastic for every person alive today.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-global-plastics", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "How do we dispose of our plastic?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Plastic disposal methods", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "How has global plastic waste disposal method changed over time? In the chart we see the share of global plastic waste that is discarded, recycled or incinerated from 1980 through to 2015.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Prior to 1980, recycling and incineration of plastic was negligible; 100 percent was therefore discarded. From 1980 for incineration, and 1990 for recycling, rates increased on average by about 0.7 percent per year.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Science Advances", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "3", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(7), e1700782. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782", "children": [ { "text": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " In 2015, an estimated 55 percent of global plastic waste was discarded, 25 percent was incinerated, and 20 percent recycled.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If we extrapolate historical trends through to 2050\u00a0\u2014 as can be seen in the\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-fate-to-2050", "children": [ { "text": "chart here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "\u00a0\u2014 by 2050, incineration rates would increase to 50 percent; recycling to 44 percent; and discarded waste would fall to 6 percent. However, note that this is based on the simplistic extrapolation of historic trends and does not represent concrete projections.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-fate", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Global plastic production to fate", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In the figure we summarize global plastic production to final fate over the period 1950 to 2015.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Science Advances", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "3", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(7), e1700782. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782", "children": [ { "text": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " This is given in cumulative million tonnes.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "As shown:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "cumulative production of polymers, synthetic fibers and additives was 8300 million tonnes;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "2500 million tonnes (30 percent) of primary plastics was still in use in 2015;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "4600 million tonnes (55 percent) went straight to landfill or was discarded;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "700 million tonnes (8 percent) was incinerated;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "500 million tonnes (6 percent) was recycled (100 million tonnes of recycled plastic was still in use; 100 million tonnes was later incinerated; and 300 million tonnes was later discarded or sent to landfill).", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Of the 5800 million tonnes of primary plastic no longer in use, only 9 percent has been recycled since 1950.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "plastic-fate.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Which sectors produce the most plastic?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Plastic use by sector", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "To which industries and product uses is primary plastic production allocated? In the chart we see plastic production allocation by sector for 2015.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Packaging was the dominant use of primary plastics, with 42 percent of plastics entering the use phase.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Science Advances", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "3", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(7), e1700782. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782", "children": [ { "text": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " Building and construction was the second largest sector utilizing 19 percent of the total. Primary plastic production does not directly reflect plastic waste generation (as shown in the next section), since this is also influenced by the polymer type and ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic", "children": [ { "text": "lifetime of the end product", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Primary plastic production by polymer type can be ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-production-polymer", "children": [ { "text": "found here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-production-by-sector", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Plastic waste by sector", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This chart shows the use of primary plastics by sector; in the chart we show these same sectors in terms of plastic waste generation. Plastic waste generation is strongly influenced by primary plastic use, but also the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic", "children": [ { "text": "product lifetime", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Packaging, for example, has a very short 'in-use' lifetime (typically around 6 months or less). This is in contrast to building and construction, where plastic use has a ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic", "children": [ { "text": "mean lifetime", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " of 35 years.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Science Advances", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "3", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(7), e1700782. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782", "children": [ { "text": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " Packaging is therefore the dominant generator of plastic waste, responsible for almost half of the global total.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In 2015, primary plastics production was 407 million tonnes; around three-quarters (302 million tonnes) ended up as waste.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Plastic waste breakdown by polymer type can be ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-polymer", "children": [ { "text": "found here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-by-sector", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Plastic waste by country", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Which countries produce the most total plastic waste?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In the chart we see the per capita rate of plastic waste generation, measured in kilograms per person per day. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Here we see differences of around an order of magnitude: daily per capita plastic waste across the highest countries \u2013 Kuwait, Guyana, Germany, Netherlands, Ireland, the United States \u2013 is more than ten times higher than across many countries such as India, Tanzania, Mozambique and Bangladesh.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "These figures represent total plastic waste generation and do not account for differences in waste management, recycling or incineration. They therefore do not represent quantities of plastic at risk of loss to the ocean or other waterways.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-per-capita", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Related chart:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-generation-total", "type": "prominent-link", "title": "", "description": "", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Which countries produce the most mismanaged plastic waste?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Plastic will only enter rivers and the ocean if it\u2019s poorly managed. In rich countries, nearly all of its plastic waste is incinerated, recycled, or sent to well-managed landfills. It\u2019s not left open to the surrounding environment. Low-to-middle income countries tend to have poorer waste management infrastructure. Waste can be dumped outside of landfills, and landfills that do exist are often open, leaking waste to the surrounding environment.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Mismanaged", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "\u00a0waste in low-to-middle income countries is therefore much higher.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Mismanaged waste is material which is at high risk of entering the ocean via wind or tidal transport, or carried to coastlines from inland waterways. Mismanaged waste is the sum of material which is either littered or inadequately disposed. Inadequately disposed and littered waste are different, and are defined in the sections below.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/admin/charts/4873/edit", "children": [ { "text": "Per capita mismanaged waste", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "\u00a0in the Philippines is 100 times higher than in the UK. When we multiply by population (giving us\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/admin/charts/4880/edit", "children": [ { "text": "each country\u2019s total", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "), India, China, the Philippines, Brazil, and Nigeria top the list. Each country\u2019s share of global mismanaged waste is shown in the map.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-mismanaged-plastic-waste?country=Asia~Africa~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Related charts:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-mismanaged", "type": "prominent-link", "title": "", "description": "", "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mismanaged-plastic-waste-per-capita", "type": "prominent-link", "title": "", "description": "", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Probability that mismanaged plastic waste gets emitted to the ocean", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Not all mismanaged plastic waste has the same probability that it reaches river networks, and then the ocean. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The climate, terrain, land use, and distances within river basins affect the probability that mismanaged plastic waste is emitted to the ocean.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This interactive chart shows the probability that mismanaged waste is emitted to the ocean.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/probability-mismanaged-plastic-ocean?country=MYS~PHL~CHN~IND~LKA~BRA~NGA~TZA", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Which countries emit the most plastic into the oceans?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The distribution of plastic inputs is reflected on the world map. There we see each country\u2019s share of global plastic emissions.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The Philippines accounts for more than one-third (36%) of plastic inputs \u2013 unsurprising given the fact that it\u2019s home to seven of the top ten rivers. This is because the Philippines consists of many small islands where the majority of the population lives near the coast.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean?country=Africa~Asia~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Related charts:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean", "type": "prominent-link", "title": "", "description": "", "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-ocean-plastic-waste", "type": "prominent-link", "title": "", "description": "", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Plastic emitted to the ocean by region", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This chart shows how global plastics emitted into the oceans breaks down by region.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean?tab=chart&country=Africa~Asia~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "How much of ocean plastics come from land and marine sources?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Plastic in our oceans can arise from both land-based or marine sources. Plastics pollution from marine sources refers to the pollution caused by fishing fleets that leave behind fishing nets, lines, ropes, and sometimes abandoned vessels.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There is often intense debate about the relative importance of marine and land sources for ocean pollution. What is the relative contribution of each?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "At the global level, best estimates suggest that approximately 80 percent of ocean plastics come from land-based sources, and the remaining 20 percent from marine sources.{ref}Li, W. C., Tse, H. F., & Fok, L. (2016). Plastic waste in the marine environment: A review of sources, occurrence and effects.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Science of the Total Environment", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "566", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 333-349. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716310154", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716310154", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Of the 20 percent from marine sources, it's estimated that around half (10 percentage points) arises from fishing fleets (such as nets, lines and abandoned vessels). This is supported by figures from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) which suggests abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear contributes approximately 10 percent to total ocean plastics.{ref}UNEP & FAO (2009).\u00a0Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 523; UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 185. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0620e/i0620e00.htm", "children": [ { "text": "http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0620e/i0620e00.htm", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Other estimates allocate a slightly higher contribution of marine sources, at 28 percent of total ocean plastics.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific Reports", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "8", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1), 4666. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Although uncertain, it's likely that marine sources contribute between 20% to 30% of ocean plastics, but the dominant source remains land-based input at 70% to 80%.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Whilst this is the relative contribution as an aggregate of global ocean plastics, the relative contribution of different sources will vary depending on geographical location and context. For example, our most recent estimates of the contribution of marine sources to the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP) is that abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear make up 75% of 86% of floating plastic mass (greater than 5 centimeters).{ref}Lebreton, L., Royer, SJ., Peytavin, A.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "et al.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "\u00a0(2022). ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16529-0", "children": [ { "text": "Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific Rep", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "orts\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "12", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", 12666.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Previous studies (notably Lebreton et al. 2018) estimated that plastic lines, ropes, and fishing nets contributed just over half of the plastic mass in the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch'. More recent studies estimate that this share is higher \u2013 giving the 75% to 86% referenced here.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific Reports", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "8", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1), 4666. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} This research suggests that most of this fishing activity originates from five countries \u2013 Japan, South Korea, China, the United States and Taiwan.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "River inputs to the ocean", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "To tackle plastic pollution we need to know what rivers these plastics are coming from. It also helps if we understand\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "why", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "\u00a0these rivers emit so much.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Most of the world\u2019s largest emitting rivers are in Asia, with some also in East Africa and the Caribbean. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In the chart we see the ten largest contributors.{ref}This data comes from Meijer, L. J., van Emmerik, T., van der Ent, R., Schmidt, C., & Lebreton, L. (2021). ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5803", "children": [ { "text": "More than 1000 rivers account for 80% of global riverine plastic emissions into the ocean", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Science Advances", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "7", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(18), eaaz5803.{/ref} This is shown as each river\u2019s share of the global total. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "You can explore the data on the top 50 rivers using the ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "+Add river", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " button on the chart.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Seven of the top ten rivers are in the Philippines. Two are in India, and one in Malaysia. The Pasig River in the Philippines alone accounts for 6.4% of global river plastics. This paints a very different picture to earlier studies where it was Asia\u2019s largest rivers \u2013 the Yangtze, Xi, and Huangpu rivers in China, and Ganges in India \u2013 that were dominant.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "What are the characteristics of the largest emitting rivers?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "First, plastic pollution is dominant where the local waste management practices are poor. This means there is a large amount of mismanaged plastic waste that can enter rivers and the ocean in the first place. This makes clear that improving waste management is essential if we\u2019re to tackle plastic pollution. Second, the largest emitters tend to have cities nearby: this means there are a lot of paved surfaces where both water and plastic can drain into river outlets. Cities such as Jakarta in Indonesia and Manila in the Philippines are drained by relatively small rivers but account for a large share of plastic emissions. Third, the river basins had high precipitation rates (meaning plastics washed into rivers, and the flow rate of rivers to the ocean was high). Fourth, distance matters: the largest emitting rivers had cities nearby and were also very close to the coast.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The authors of the study illustrate the importance of the additional climate, basin terrain, and proximity factors with a real-life example. The Ciliwung River basin in Java is 275 times smaller than the Rhine river basin in Europe and generates 75% less plastic waste. Yet it emits 100 times as much plastic to the ocean each year (200 to 300 tonnes versus only 3 to 5 tonnes). The Ciliwung River emits much more plastic to the ocean, despite being much smaller because the basin\u2019s waste is generated very close to the river (meaning the plastic gets into the river network in the first place) and the river network is also much closer to the ocean. It also gets much more rainfall meaning the plastic waste is more easily transported than in the Rhine basin.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If you want to explore the plastic inputs from each of the world\u2019s rivers, the Ocean Cleanup Project\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://theoceancleanup.com/sources/", "children": [ { "text": "provides a beautiful interactive map", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "\u00a0where you can see this in more detail.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastics-top-rivers?country=Pasig+%28Philippines%29~Tullahan+%28Philippines%29~Ganges+%28India%29~Ulhas+%28India%29~Klang+%28Malaysia%29~Meycauayan+%28Philippines%29~Pampanga+%28Philippines%29~Libmanan+%28Philippines%29~Rio+Grande+de+Mindanao+%28Philippines%29~Agno+%28Philippines%29", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Which oceans have the most plastic waste?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Plastic enters the oceans from coastlines, rivers, tides, and marine sources. But once it is there, where does it go?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The distribution and accumulation of ocean plastics is strongly influenced by oceanic surface currents and wind patterns. Plastics are typically buoyant \u2013 meaning they float on the ocean surface \u2013, allowing them to be transported by the prevalent wind and surface current routes. As a result, plastics tend to accumulate in ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/gyre.html", "children": [ { "text": "oceanic gyres", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ",\u00a0with high concentrations of plastics at the centre of ocean basins, and much less around the perimeters. After entry to oceans from coastal regions, plastics tend to migrate towards the centre of ocean basins.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In the chart we see estimates of the mass of plastics in surface ocean waters by ocean basin. Eriksen et al. (2014) estimated that there was approximately 269,000 tonnes of plastic in surface waters across the world.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., \u2026 & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at:\u00a0 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913", "children": [ { "text": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "\u00a0Note that this at least an order of magnitude lower than estimated inputs of plastics to the ocean; the discrepancy here relates to a surprising, but long-standing question in the research literature on plastics: \"", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem", "children": [ { "text": "where is the missing plastic going?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "\".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "As we see, basins in the Northern Hemisphere had the highest quantity of plastics. This would be expected since the majority of the world's population \u2013 and in particular, coastal populations \u2013 live within the Northern Hemisphere. However, authors were still surprised by the quantity of plastic accumulation in Southern oceans \u2014 while it was lower than in the Northern Hemisphere, it was still of the same order of magnitude. Considering the lack of coastal populations and plastic inputs in the Southern Hemisphere, this was an unexpected result. The authors suggest this means plastic pollution can be moved between oceanic gyres and basins much more readily than previously assumed.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/surface-plastic-mass-by-ocean", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Plastic particles in the world's surface ocean", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "It's estimated that there are more than 5 trillion plastic particles in the world's surface waters.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., \u2026 & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at:\u00a0 ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913", "children": [ { "text": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " We can see this breakdown of plastic particles by ocean basin\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/surface-plastic-particles-by-ocean", "children": [ { "text": "here", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". The accumulation of a large ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "number", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " of particles tends to result from the breakdown of larger plastics \u2014 this results in an accumulation of plastic particles for a given mass.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The figure summarizes plastics in the ocean surface waters by basin. This is shown by particle size in terms of mass (left) and particle count (right). As shown, the majority of plastics by mass are large particles (macroplastics), whereas the majority in terms of particle count are microplastics (small particles).", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Surface-ocean-plastic.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "The 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP)", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The most well-known example of large plastic accumulations in surface waters is the so-called 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP). As shown in the chart here, the largest accumulation of plastics within ocean basins is the North Pacific. This results from the combined impact of large coastal plastic inputs in the region, alongside intensive fishing activity in the Pacific ocean.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In a\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Nature", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " study, Lebreton et al. (2018) attempted to quantify the characteristics of the GPGP.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific Reports", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "8", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1), 4666. Available at: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " The vast majority\u00a0of GPGP material is plastics\u00a0\u2014 trawling samples indicate an estimated 99.9 percent of all floating debris. The authors estimate the GPGP spanned 1.6 million km", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "2", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-superscript" }, { "text": ". This is\u00a0just over three times\u00a0the area of Spain, and slightly\u00a0larger in area to Alaska (the USA's largest state).{ref}The reported ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_area#Countries_greater_than_1.5_million_km2", "children": [ { "text": "land area of Spain", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " is approximately 500,000 square kilometres, and Alaska is an ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_area", "children": [ { "text": "estimated 1.5 million", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " square kilometres.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The GPGP comprised 1.8 trillion pieces of plastic, with a mass of 79,000 tonnes (approximately 29 percent of the 269,000 tonnes in the world's surface oceans). Over recent decades, the authors report there has been an exponential increase in concentration of surface plastics in the GPGP.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Our most recent estimates of the contribution of marine sources to the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP) is that abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear make up 75% of 86% of floating plastic mass (greater than 5 centimeters).{ref}Lebreton, L., Royer, SJ., Peytavin, A.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "et al.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "\u00a0(2022). ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16529-0", "children": [ { "text": "Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific Rep", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "orts\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "12", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", 12666.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Previous studies (notably Lebreton et al. 2018) estimated that plastic lines, ropes, and fishing nets contributed just over half of the plastic mass in the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch'. More recent studies estimate that this share is higher \u2013 giving the 75% to 86% referenced here.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific Reports", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "8", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1), 4666. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} This research suggests that most of this fishing activity originates from five countries \u2013 Japan, South Korea, China, the United States and Taiwan.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Where does our plastic accumulate in the ocean and what does that mean for the future?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "left": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The world now produces more than ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-much-plastic-does-the-world-produce", "children": [ { "text": "380 million tonnes", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " of plastic every year, which could end up as pollutants, entering our natural environment and oceans.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Of course, not all of our plastic waste ends up in the ocean, most ends up in landfills: it\u2019s estimated that the share of global plastic waste that enters the ocean is around 3%.{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., \u2026 & Law, K. L. (2015). ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768", "children": [ { "text": "Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Science", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 347(6223), 768-771.{/ref} In 2010 \u2013 the year for which we have the latest estimates \u2013 that was around 8 million tonnes.{ref}The estimates for this figure range from around 4 to 12 million tonnes, with 8 million as a midpoint. In the context of this discussion, the uncertainty in this value is less important: the difference between ocean plastic inputs and observed plastic in surface ocean waters are orders of magnitude \u2013 rather than multiples \u2013 apart.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Most of the plastic materials we produce are less dense than water and should therefore float at the ocean surface. But our best estimates of the amount of plastic afloat at sea are orders of magnitude lower than the amount of plastic that enters our oceans in a single year: as we show in the visualization, it\u2019s far lower than 8 million tonnes and instead in the order of 10s to 100s of thousands of tonnes. One of the most widely-quoted estimates is 250,000 tonnes.{ref}Eriksen, M. et al. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913", "children": [ { "text": "Plastic pollution in the world\u2019s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Plos One", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " 9, e111913 (2014).{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If we currently pollute our oceans with millions of tonnes of plastic each year, we must have released tens of millions of tonnes in recent decades. Why then do we find at least 100 times less plastics in our surface waters? ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This discrepancy is often referred to as the \u2018missing plastic problem\u2019.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific Reports", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "8", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1), 4666. Available at:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "children": [ { "text": " https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} It\u2019s a conundrum we need to address if we want to understand where plastic waste could end up, and what its impacts might be for wildlife, ecosystems and health.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "sticky-right", "right": [ { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png", "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "The \u2018missing plastic problem\u2019", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There are several hypotheses to explain the \u2018missing plastic problem\u2019.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "One possibility is that it is due to imprecise measurement: we might either grossly overestimate the amount of plastic waste we release into the ocean, or underestimate the amount floating in the surface ocean. Whilst we know that tracking ocean plastic inputs and their distribution is notoriously difficult{ref}Cressey, D. (2016). ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/news/bottles-bags-ropes-and-toothbrushes-the-struggle-to-track-ocean-plastics-1.20432", "children": [ { "text": "Bottles, bags, ropes and toothbrushes: the struggle to track ocean plastics", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Nature News", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "536", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(7616), 263.{/ref} the levels of uncertainty in these measurements are much less than the several orders of magnitude that would be needed to explain the missing plastic problem.{ref}Lebreton, L., Egger, M., & Slat, B. (2019). ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49413-5", "children": [ { "text": "A global mass budget for positively buoyant macroplastic debris in the ocean", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific reports", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "9", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1), 1-10.{/ref} ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "Another popular hypothesis is that ultraviolet light (UV) and mechanical wave forces break large pieces of plastic into smaller ones.These smaller particles, referred to as microplastics, are much more easily incorporated into sediments or ingested by organisms. And this is where the missing plastic might end up.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "One proposed \u2018sink\u2019 for ocean plastics was deep-sea sediments; a study which sampled deep-sea sediments across several basins found that microplastic was up to four orders of magnitude more abundant (per unit volume) in deep-sea sediments from the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean than in plastic-polluted surface waters.{ref}Woodall, L. C., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., Paterson, G. L., Coppock, R., Sleight, V., \u2026 & Thompson, R. C. (2014). ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/4/140317", "children": [ { "text": "The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ". ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Royal Society Open Science", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 1(4), 140317.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "But, new research may suggest a third explanation: that plastics in the ocean break down slower than previously thought, and that much of the missing plastic is washed up or buried in our shorelines.{ref}Lebreton, L., Egger, M., & Slat, B. (2019). ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49413-5", "children": [ { "text": "A global mass budget for positively buoyant macroplastic debris in the ocean", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific reports", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "9", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1), 1-10.{/ref} ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Plastics persist for decades and accumulate on our shorelines", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "To try to understand the conundrum of what happens to plastic waste when it enters the ocean, Lebreton, Egger and Slat (2019) created a global model of ocean plastics from 1950 to 2015. This model uses data on global plastic production, emissions into the ocean by plastic type and age, and transport and degradation rates to map not only the amount of plastic in different environments in the ocean, but also its age.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The authors aimed to quantify where plastic accumulates in the ocean across three environments: the shoreline (defined as dry land bordering the ocean), coastal areas (defined as waters with a depth less than 200 meters) and offshore (waters with a depth greater than 200 meters). They wanted to understand where plastic accumulates, and how old it is: a few years old, ten years or decades?\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In the visualization I summarized their results. This is shown for two categories of plastics: shown in blue are \u2018macroplastics\u2019 (larger plastic materials greater than 0.5 centimeters in diameter) and shown in red microplastics (smaller particles less than 0.5 centimeters).\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There are some key points we can take away from the visualization:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The vast majority \u2013 82 million tonnes of macroplastics and 40 million tonnes of microplastics \u2013 is washed up, buried or resurfaced along the world\u2019s shorelines.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Much of the macroplastics in our shorelines is from the past 15 years, but still a significant amount is older suggesting it can persist for several decades without breaking down.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In coastal regions most macroplastics (79%) are recent \u2013 less than 5 years old.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In offshore environments, older microplastics have had longer to accumulate than in coastal regions. There macroplastics from several decades ago \u2013 even as far back as the 1950s and 1960s \u2013 persist.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Most microplastics (three-quarters) in offshore environments are from the 1990s and earlier, suggesting it can take several decades for plastics to break down.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "What does this mean for our understanding of the \u2018missing plastic\u2019 problem?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Firstly", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", is that the majority of ocean plastics are washed, buried and resurface along our shorelines. Whilst we try to tally ocean inputs with the amount floating in gyres at the centre of our oceans, most of it may be accumulating around the edges of the oceans. This would explain why we find much less in surface waters than we\u2019d expect.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Secondly", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", accumulated plastics are much older than previously thought. Macroplastics appear to persist in the surface of the ocean for decades without breaking down. Offshore we find large plastic objects dating as far back as the 1950s and 1960s. This goes against previous hypotheses of the \u2018missing plastic\u2019 problem which suggested that UV light and wave action degrade and remove them from the surface in only a few years.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "alt": "", "size": "wide", "type": "image", "filename": "Where-does-plastic-accumulate.png", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "How much plastic will remain in surface oceans in the coming decades?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The study by Lebreton, Egger and Slat challenges the previous hypotheses that plastics in the surface ocean have a very short lifetime, quickly degrade into microplastics and sink to greater depths. Their results suggest that macroplastics can persist for decades; can be buried and resurfaced along shorelines; and end up in offshore regions years later.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If true, this matters a lot for how much plastic we would expect in our surface oceans in the decades which follow. The same study also modelled how the mass of plastics \u2013 both macro and micro \u2013 in the world\u2019s surface waters might evolve under three scenarios:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "numbered-list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "we stop emitting any plastics to our oceans by 2020;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "\u2018emissions\u2019 of plastic to the ocean continue to increase until 2020 then level off;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "\u2018emissions\u2019 continue to grow to 2050 in line with historic growth rates.{ref}Under growth scenarios, the authors assume annual\u00a0 growth rates continue in line with the average increase in global plastic production over the decade from 2005-2015.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Their results are shown in the charts.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The scenarios of continued emissions growth are what we\u2019d expect: if we continue to release more plastics to the ocean, we\u2019ll have more in our surface waters.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "What\u2019s more striking is that even if we stopped ocean plastic waste by 2020, macroplastics would persist in our surface waters for many more decades. This is because we have a large legacy of plastics buried and awash on our shorelines which would continue to resurface and be transported to offshore regions; and existing plastics can persist in the ocean environment for many decades.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The amount of microplastics in our surface ocean will increase under every scenario because the large plastics that we already have on our shorelines and surface waters will continue to breakdown. And, any additional plastics we add will contribute further. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This also matters for how we solve the problem of ocean pollution.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "If we want to rapidly reduce the amount of both macro- and microplastics in our oceans, these results suggest two priorities:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Number one", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " \u2014 we must stop plastic waste entering our waterways as soon as possible. Most of the plastic that ends up in our oceans does so because of ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#mismanaged-plastic-waste", "children": [ { "text": "poor waste management", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " practices \u2013 particularly in ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#what-determines-how-much-mismanaged-waste-we-produce", "children": [ { "text": "low-to-middle income countries", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": "; this means that good waste management across the world is essential to achieving this.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "But this ambitious target alone will not be enough. We have many decades of legacy waste to contend with.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This makes a ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "second priority", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " necessary\u2014 we have to focus our efforts on recapturing and removing plastics already in our offshore waters and shorelines. This is the goal of Slat, Lebreton and Egger \u2013 the authors of this paper \u2013 with their ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://theoceancleanup.com/", "children": [ { "text": "Ocean Cleanup", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " project.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/macroplastics-in-ocean", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/microplastics-in-ocean", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "How does plastic impact wildlife and human health?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There have been many documented incidences of the impact of plastic on ecosystems and wildlife. Peer-reviewed publications of plastic impacts date back to the 1980s. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "An analysis by\u00a0Rochman et al. (2016){ref}This data is also presented in the review by Law (2017): Law, K. L. (2017). Plastics in the marine environment.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Annual review of marine science", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "9", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 205-229. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} reviews the findings of peer-reviewed documentation of the impacts of marine plastic debris on animal life; the results of this study are presented in ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/ecological-impacts-of-marine-plastic-debris/", "children": [ { "text": "this table", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{ref}Rochman, C. M., Browne, M. A., Underwood, A. J., Van Franeker, J. A., Thompson, R. C., & Amaral\u2010Zettler, L. A. (2016). The ecological impacts of marine debris: unraveling the demonstrated evidence from what is perceived.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Ecology", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "97", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(2), 302-312. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/14-2070.1", "children": [ { "text": "https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/14-2070.1", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Nonetheless, despite many documented cases, it's widely acknowledged that the full extent of impacts on ecosystems is not yet known.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There are three key pathways by which plastic debris can affect wildlife{ref}Law, K. L. (2017). Plastics in the marine environment.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Annual review of marine science", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "9", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 205-229. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Entanglement", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " \u2013 the entrapping, encircling or constricting of marine animals by plastic debris. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Entanglement cases have been reported for at least 344 species to date, including all marine turtle species, more than two-thirds of seal species, one-third of whale species, and one-quarter of seabirds.{ref}K\u00fchn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine Anthropogenic Litter", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "\u00a0(pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham.\u00a0 Available at: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4", "children": [ { "text": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} Entanglement by 89 species of fish and 92 species of invertebrates has also been recorded.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Entanglements most commonly involve plastic rope and netting{ref}Gall, S. C., & Thompson, R. C. (2015). The impact of debris on marine life.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine pollution bulletin", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "92", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1-2), 170-179. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190719200908/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X14008571", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X14008571", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} and abandoned fishing gear.{ref}K\u00fchn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine Anthropogenic Litter", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "\u00a0(pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham.\u00a0 Available at: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4", "children": [ { "text": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} However, entanglement by other plastics such as packaging have also been recorded.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Ingestion", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ": ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Ingestion of plastic can occur unintentionally, intentionally, or indirectly through the ingestion of prey species containing plastic. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "It has been documented for at least 233 marine species, including all marine turtle species, more than one-third of seal species, 59% of whale species, and 59% of seabirds.{ref}K\u00fchn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine Anthropogenic Litter", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "\u00a0(pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham.\u00a0 Available at: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4", "children": [ { "text": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} Ingestion by 92 species of fish and 6 species of invertebrates has also been recorded.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The size of the ingested material is ultimately limited by the size of the organism. Very small particles such as plastic fibres can be taken up by small organisms such as filter-feeding oysters or mussels; larger materials such as plastic films, cigarette packets, and food packaging have been found in large fish species; and in extreme cases, documented cases of sperm whales have shown ingestion of very large materials including\u00a09m of rope, 4.5m of hose, two flowerpots, and large amounts of plastic sheeting.{ref}de Stephanis R, Gimenez J, Carpinelli E, Gutierrez-Exposito C, Canadas A. 2013. As main meal for sperm whales: plastics debris. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine Pollution Bulletin", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " 69:206\u201314.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Ingestion of plastics can have multiple impacts on organism health. Large volumes of plastic can greatly reduce stomach capacity, leading to poor appetite and false sense of satiation.{ref}Day RH, Wehle DHS, Coleman FC. 1985. Ingestion of plastic pollutants by marine birds. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Fate and Impact of Marine Debris, 27\u201329 November 1984, Honolulu, Hawaii, ed. RS Shomura, HO Yoshida, pp. 344\u201386. Tech. Memo. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFC-54. Washington, DC: Natl. Ocean. Atmos. Adm.{/ref} Plastic can also obstruct or perforate the gut, cause ulcerative lesions, or gastric rupture. This can ultimately lead to death.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In laboratory settings, biochemical responses to plastic ingestion have also been observed.\u00a0These responses include oxidative stress, metabolic disruption, reduced enzyme activity, and cellular necrosis.{ref}Browne MA, Niven SJ, Galloway TS, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC. 2013. Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Current Biology", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " 23:2388\u201392.{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": ",", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-superscript" }, { "text": "{ref}Cedervall T, Hansson LA, Lard M, Frohm B, Linse S. 2012. Food chain transport of nanoparticles affects behaviour and fat metabolism in fish. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "PLOS ONE", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " 7:e32254{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": ",", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-superscript" }, { "text": "{ref}Oliveira M, Ribeiro A, Hylland K, Guilhermino L. 2013. Single and combined effects of microplastics and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Teleostei, Gobiidae). ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Ecological Indicators", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " 34:641\u201347{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": ",", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-superscript" }, { "text": "{ref}Rochman CM, Hoh E, Kurobe T, Teh SJ. 2013. Ingested plastic transfers hazardous chemicals to fish and induces hepatic stress. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific Reports", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " 3:3263{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Interaction", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": " \u2013 interaction includes collisions, obstructions, abrasions or use as substrate.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There are multiple scenarios where this can have an impact on organisms.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Fishing gear, for example, has been shown to cause abrasion and damage to coral reef ecosystems upon collision. Ecosystem structures can also be impacted by plastics following interference of substrate with plastics (impacting on light penetration, organic matter availability and oxygen exchange).", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "What are the impacts of microplastics on health?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Impact of microplastics on wildlife", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "As discussed in the section on 'Impacts on Wildlife' above, there are several ways in which plastics can interact or influence wildlife. In the case of microplastics (particles smaller than 4.75 millimeter in diameter), the key concern is ingestion.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Ingestion of microplastics have been shown to occur for many organisms. This can occur through several mechanisms, ranging from uptake by filter-feeders, swallowing from surrounding water, or consumption of organisms that have previously ingested microplastics.{ref}Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Nature Ecology & Evolution", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "1", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(5), 0116. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There a number of potential effects of microplastics at different biological levels, which range from sub-cellular to ecosystems, but most research has focused on impacts in individual adult organisms.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Microplastic ingestion rarely causes mortality in any organisms. As such, 'lethal concentration' (LC) values which are often measured and reported for contaminants do not exist. There are a few exceptions: common ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goby", "children": [ { "text": "goby", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " exposure to polyethylene and\u00a0pyrene; Asian green mussels exposed to polyvinylchloride (PVC); and ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Daphnia magna", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "\u00a0neonates exposed to\u00a0polyethylene{ref}Oliveira, M., Ribeiro, A., Hylland, K. & Guilhermino, L. Single and combined effects of microplastics and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Pomatoschistus microps", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " (Teleostei, Gobiidae)", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": ". ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Ecological Indicators,", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "children": [ { "text": "34", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", 641\u2013647 (2013). Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X13002501", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X13002501", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": ",", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-superscript" }, { "text": "{ref}Rist, S. E. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "et al", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ". Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Perna viridis", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": ". ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine Pollution Bulletin", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "children": [ { "text": "111", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", 213\u2013220 (2016). Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": ",", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-superscript" }, { "text": "{ref}Ogonowski, M., Sch\u00fcr, C., Jars\u00e9n, \u00c5. & Gorokhova, E. The effects of natural and anthropogenic microparticles on individual fitness in ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Daphnia magna", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "children": [ { "text": "PLoS ONE", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "children": [ { "text": "11", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", e0155063 (2016). Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063", "children": [ { "text": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": " In such studies, however, concentrations and exposure to microplastics far exceeded levels which would be encountered in the natural environment (even a highly contaminated one).", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There is increasing evidence that microplastic ingestion can affect the consumption of prey, leading to energy depletion, inhibited growth and fertility impacts. When organisms ingest microplastics, it can take up space in the gut and digestive system, leading to reductions in feeding signals. This feeling of fullness can reduce dietary intake. Evidence of impacts of reduced food consumption include:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "slower metabolic rate and survival in Asian green mussels{ref}Rist, S. E. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "et al", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ". Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Perna viridis", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": ". ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine Pollution Bulletin", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "children": [ { "text": "111", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", 213\u2013220 (2016). Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "reduced reproducibility and survival in copepods{ref}Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C. & Galloway, T. The impact of polystyrene microplastics on feeding, function and fecundity in the marine copepod ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Calanus helgolandicus", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environment, Science & Technology,", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "children": [ { "text": "49", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", 1130\u20131137 (2015). Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563688", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563688", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "reduced growth and development of\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Daphnia", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "{ref}Ogonowski, M., Sch\u00fcr, C., Jars\u00e9n, \u00c5. & Gorokhova, E. The effects of natural and anthropogenic microparticles on individual fitness in ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": "Daphnia magna", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": ".\u00a0PLoS ONE,\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "11", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", e0155063 (2016). Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063", "children": [ { "text": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "reduced growth and development of langoustine{ref}Welden, N. A. C. & Cowie, P. R. Environment and gut morphology influence microplastic retention in langoustine, ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Nephrops norvegicus", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ".", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environmental\u00a0Pollution,", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "children": [ { "text": "214", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", 859\u2013865 (2016). Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://oro.open.ac.uk/47539/", "children": [ { "text": "http://oro.open.ac.uk/47539/", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "reduced energy stores in shore crabs and lugworms{ref}Watts, A. J. R., Urbina, M. A., Corr, S., Lewis, C. & Galloway, T. S. Ingestion of plastic microfibers by the crab ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Carcinus maenas", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": " and its effect on food consumption and energy balance.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environment, Science & Technology,", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "children": [ { "text": "49", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", 14597\u201314604 (2015). Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b04026", "children": [ { "text": "https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b04026", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref},{ref}Wright, S., Rowe, D., Thompson, R. C. & Galloway, T. S. Microplastic ingestion decreases energy reserves in marine worms", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "spanType": "span-newline" }, { "text": ". ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Current Biology.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "children": [ { "text": "23", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": ", 1031\u20131033 (2013). Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43097705.pdf", "children": [ { "text": "https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43097705.pdf", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Many organisms do not exhibit changes in feeding after microplastic ingestion. A number of organisms, including suspension-feeders (for example, oyster larvae, urchin larvae, European flat oysters, Pacific oysters) and detritivorous (for example, isopods, amphipods)\u00a0invertebrates show no impact of microplastics.{ref}Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Nature Ecology & Evolution", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "1", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(5), 0116. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} Overall, however, it's likely that for some organisms, the presence of microplastic particles in the gut (where food should be) can have negative biological impacts.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Impact of microplastics on humans", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There is, currently, very little evidence of the impact that microplastics can have on humans.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "For human health, it is the smallest particles \u2013 micro- and nano-particles which are small enough to be ingested \u2013 that are of greatest concern. There are several ways by which plastic particles can be ingested: orally through water, consumption of marine products which contain microplastics, through the skin via cosmetics (identified as highly unlikely but possible), or inhalation of particles in the air.{ref}Revel, M., Ch\u00e2tel, A., & Mouneyrac, C. (2018). Micro (nano) plastics: A threat to human health?.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "1", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 17-23. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584417300235", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584417300235", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "It is possible for microplastics to be passed up to higher levels in the food chain. This can occur when a species consumes organisms of a lower level in the food chain which has microplastics in the gut or tissue.{ref}Galloway T.S. (2015) Micro- and Nano-plastics and Human Health. In: Bergmann M., Gutow L., Klages M. (eds) ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine Anthropogenic Litter", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ". Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13", "children": [ { "text": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} The presence of microplastics at higher levels of the food chain (in fish) has been documented.{ref}G\u00fcven, O., G\u00f6kda\u011f, K., Jovanovi\u0107, B., & K\u0131dey\u015f, A. E. (2017). Microplastic litter composition of the Turkish territorial waters of the Mediterranean Sea, and its occurrence in the gastrointestinal tract of fish.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environmental Pollution", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "223", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 286-294. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116323910", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116323910", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} {ref}Jabeen, K., Su, L., Li, J., Yang, D., Tong, C., Mu, J., & Shi, H. (2017). Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environmental Pollution", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "221", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 141-149. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116311666", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116311666", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "One factor which possibly limits the dietary uptake for humans is that microplastics in fish tend to be present in the gut and digestive tract\u00a0\u2014 parts of the fish not typically eaten.{ref}Galloway T.S. (2015) Micro- and Nano-plastics and Human Health. In: Bergmann M., Gutow L., Klages M. (eds) ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine Anthropogenic Litter", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ". Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13", "children": [ { "text": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} The presence of microplastics in fish beyond the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. in tissue) remains to be studied in detail.{ref}Bouwmeester, H., Hollman, P. C., & Peters, R. J. (2015). Potential health impact of environmentally released micro-and nanoplastics in the human food production chain: experiences from nanotoxicology.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environmental Science & Technology", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "49", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(15), 8932-8947. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01090", "children": [ { "text": "https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01090", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} Micro- and nanoplastics in bivalves (mussels and oysters) cultured for human consumption have also been identified. However, neither human exposure nor potential risk have been identified or quantified.{ref}Van Cauwenberghe, L., & Janssen, C. R. (2014). Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environmental Pollution", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "193", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 65-70. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114002425", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114002425", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Plastic fibres have also been detected in other food items; for example, honey, beer and table salt.{ref}Liebezeit, G., & Liebezeit, E. (2013). Non-pollen particulates in honey and sugar.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "30", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(12), 2136-2140. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2013.843025", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2013.843025", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": ",", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-superscript" }, { "text": "{ref}Liebezeit, G., & Liebezeit, E. (2014). Synthetic particles as contaminants in German beers.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "31", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(9), 1574-1578. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2014.945099", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2014.945099", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": ",", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-superscript" }, { "text": "{ref}Yang, D., Shi, H., Li, L., Li, J., Jabeen, K., & Kolandhasamy, P. (2015). Microplastic pollution in table salts from China.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environmental Science & Technology", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "49", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(22), 13622-13627. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b03163", "children": [ { "text": "https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b03163", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} But the authors suggested negligible health risks as a result of this exposure.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Levels of microplastic ingestion are currently unknown. Even less is known about how such particles interact in the body. It may be the case that microplastics simply pass straight through the gastrointestinal tract without impact or interaction.{ref}Wang, J., Tan, Z., Peng, J., Qiu, Q., & Li, M. (2016). The behaviors of microplastics in the marine environment.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Marine Environmental Research", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "113", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 7-17. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113615300659", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113615300659", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} A study of North Sea fish, for example, revealed that 80 percent of fish with detected microplastics contained only one particle\u00a0\u2014 this suggests that following ingestion, plastic does not persist for long periods of time.{ref}Foekema, E. M., De Gruijter, C., Mergia, M. T., van Franeker, J. A., Murk, A. J., & Koelmans, A. A. (2013). Plastic in north sea fish.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environmental Science & Technology", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "47", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(15), 8818-8824. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es400931b", "children": [ { "text": "https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es400931b", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} Concentrations in mussels, in contrast, can be significantly higher.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "What could cause concern about the impact of microplastics?\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Three possible toxic effects of plastic particle have been suggested: the plastic particles themselves, the release of persistent organic pollutant adsorbed to the plastics,\u00a0and leaching of plastic additives.{ref}I\u00f1iguez, M. E., Conesa, J. A., & Fullana, A. (2017). Microplastics in Spanish Table Salt.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Scientific Reports", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "7\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": "(1), 8620. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09128-x", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09128-x", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "There has been no evidence of harmful effects to date \u2013 however, the precautionary principle would indicate that this is not evidence against taking exposure seriously. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Since microplastics are hydrophobic (insoluble), and are have a high surface area-to-volume ratio, they can sorb environmental contaminants.{ref}For example polychlorinated biphenyl; PCB.{/ref} If there was significant accumulation of environmental contaminants, there is the possibility that these concentrations could 'biomagnify' up the food chain to higher levels.{ref}Biomagnification (sometimes termed 'bioamplification' or 'biological magnification'), is the increasing concentration of a substance in the tissues of organisms at successively higher levels in a food chain. This occurs as organisms at higher trophic levels eat significant masses of contaminated organisms at lower levels; with increased consumption, these concentrations can increase.{/ref} Biomagnification of PCBs varies by organism and environmental conditions; multiple studies have shown no evidence of uptake by the organisms of PCBs despite ingestion{ref}Devriese, L. I., De Witte, B., Vethaak, A. D., Hostens, K., & Leslie, H. A. (2017). Bioaccumulation of PCBs from microplastics in Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus): An experimental study.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Chemosphere", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "186", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 10-16. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} whilst some mussels, for example, have shown capability to transfer some compounds into their digestive glands.{ref}Avio, C. G., Gorbi, S., Milan, M., Benedetti, M., Fattorini, D., d'Errico, G., \u2026 & Regoli, F. (2015). Pollutants bioavailability and toxicological risk from microplastics to marine mussels.\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "Environmental Pollution", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ",\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "children": [ { "text": "198", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-italic" }, { "text": ", 211-222. Available at: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724", "children": [ { "text": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "To date, there has been no clear evidence of the accumulation of persistent organic pollutants or leached plastic additives in humans. Continued research in this area is important to better understand the role of plastic within broader ecosystems and risk to human health.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Plastic trade", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "The impact of China's trade ban", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Whilst we looked previously in this entry at the plastic waste generation in countries across the world, it's also important to understand how plastic waste is traded across the world. Recycled plastic waste is now a product within the global commodity market\u00a0\u2014 it is sold and traded across the world.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This has important implications for managing global plastic waste: if countries with effective waste management systems \u2013 predominantly high-income countries \u2013 export plastic waste to middle to low-income countries with poor waste management systems, they could be adding to the ocean plastic problem in this way.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Plastics can be challenging to recycle, particularly if they contain additives and different plastic blends. ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The implications of this complexity are two-fold: in many cases it is convenient for countries to export their recycled plastic waste (meaning they don't have to handle it domestically); and for importing countries, this plastic is often discarded if it doesn't meet the sufficient requirements for recycled or is contaminated by non-recyclable plastic. As such, traded plastic waste could eventually enter the ocean through poor waste management systems.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Collectively, China and Hong Kong have imported 72.4 percent of global traded plastic waste (with most imports to Hong Kong eventually reaching China).{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131", "children": [ { "text": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "This came to an end in 2017. At the end of that year China introduced a complete ban on the imports of non-industrial plastic waste.{ref}Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection, \u201cAnnouncement of releasing the Catalogues of Imported Wastes Management,\u201d (Announcement no. 39, 2017).{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "How much plastic waste did China import?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In the chart we see the quantity of plastic waste China had to manage over the period from 2010 to 2016. This is differentiated by domestic plastic waste generation, shown in blue, and imported plastic waste shown in orange. The total plastic waste to manage is equal to the sum of domestic and imported plastic waste.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Over this period, China imported between 7 and 9 million tonnes of plastic waste per year. In 2016, this figure was 7.35 million tonnes. To put this in context, China's domestic plastic waste generation was around 61 million tonnes. Therefore, 10-11 percent of China's total plastic waste was imported from around the world.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/chinese-plastic-imports", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Who were the main plastic exporters to China?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Which countries export the most plastic waste to China? In the chart we see the quantity of plastic exported to China from the top 10 exporting countries. Collectively, these countries are responsible for around 76 percent of its imports.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "As we see, Hong Kong typically acts as an entry point for Chinese imports; it is therefore the largest 'exporting' country to China. Many high-income countries are included in this top 10: Japan, USA, Germany, Belgium, Australia and Canada are all major plastic exporters.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-exports-to-china", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "How much plastic will be displaced from the Chinese import ban?", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 4, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "China has been increasing restrictions on its plastic waste imports since 2007. In 2010, it implemented its \"Green Fence\" program \u2013 a temporary restriction for plastic imports with significantly less contamination.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In 2017 it implemented a much stricter, permanent ban on non-industrial plastic imports.{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131", "children": [ { "text": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} In the chart we see the estimated impact on the cumulative displacement of global plastic waste to 2030 as a result of the Chinese import ban.{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131", "children": [ { "text": "http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref} This is shown for three scenarios: assuming the maintained 100 percent import ban, in addition to the impact if this was reduced to 75 or 50 percent.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "By 2030, it's estimated that around 110 million tonnes of plastic will be displaced as a result of the ban. This plastic waste will have to be handled domestically or exported to another country. Brooks et al. (2018) suggest this ban has several implications:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "list", "items": [ { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "exporting countries can use this as an opportunity to improve domestic recycled infrastructure and generate internal markets;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "if recycling infrastructure is lacking, this provides further incentive for countries to reduce primary plastic production (and create more circular material models) to reduce the quantity of waste which needs to be handled;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "it fundamentally changes the nature of global plastic trade, representing an opportunity to share and promote best practices of waste management, and harmonize technical standards on waste protocols;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "some other countries may attempt to become a key plastic importer in place of China; one challenge is that many countries do not yet have sufficient waste management infrastructure to handle recycled waste imports;", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "countries considering importing significant quantities of plastic waste could consider an import tax specifically aimed at funding the development of sufficient infrastructure to handle such waste.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "url": "https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/displaced-plastic-chinese-import-ban", "type": "chart", "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Additional FAQs on Plastics", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "In addition to this main data entry we have collated some of the most common questions on plastics on our ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "https://owid.cloud/faq-on-plastics", "children": [ { "text": "FAQ on Plastics", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": " page. You may find the answer to additional questions on this topic there.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Data Quality & Definitions", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 2, "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Data Definitions", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "The definitions of key terms used in this entry are as follows:", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Discarded: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": "waste that is not recycled or incinerated; this includes waste that goes to landfill (closed or open), is littered, or lost to the natural environment.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Incineration: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": "a method waste treatment which involves the burning of material at very high temperatures. In some cases, energy recovery from the incineration process is possible. The burning of plastics can release toxins to the air and surrounding environment and should therefore be carried out under controlled and regulated conditions.", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Inadequately managed waste:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": "waste is not formally managed and includes disposal in dumps or open, uncontrolled landfills, where it is not fully contained. Inadequately managed waste has high risk of polluting rivers and oceans. This does not include 'littered' plastic waste, which is approximately 2% of total waste (including high-income countries).{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., \u2026 & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768", "children": [ { "text": "http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "children": [ { "text": "Mismanaged waste: ", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-bold" }, { "text": "material that is either littered or inadequately disposed (the sum of littered and inadequately disposed waste). Inadequately disposed waste is not formally managed and includes disposal in dumps or open, uncontrolled landfills, where it is not fully contained. Mismanaged waste could eventually enter the ocean via inland waterways, wastewater outflows, and transport by wind or tides.{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., \u2026 & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768", "children": [ { "text": "http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "text": [ { "text": "Plastic particles size categories", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "type": "heading", "level": 3, "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "text", "value": [ { "text": "Plastic particles are typically grouped into categories depending on their size (as measured by their diameter). The table summarizes some standard ranges for a given particle category.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., \u2026 & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at:\u00a0", "spanType": "span-simple-text" }, { "url": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913", "children": [ { "text": "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "spanType": "span-link" }, { "text": ".{/ref}", "spanType": "span-simple-text" } ], "parseErrors": [] }, { "type": "html", "value": "<div class=\"raw-html-table__container\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Particle category</strong></td><td><strong>Diameter range<br>(mm = millimetres)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Nanoplastics</td><td>< 0.0001 mm (0.1\u03bcm)</td></tr><tr><td>Small microplastics</td><td>0.00001 - 1 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Large microplastics</td><td>1 - 4.75 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Mesoplastics</td><td>4.76 - 200 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Macroplastics</td><td>>200 mm</td></tr></tbody></table></div>", "parseErrors": [] } ], "type": "article", "title": "Plastic Pollution", "authors": [ "Hannah Ritchie", "Max Roser" ], "excerpt": "The use of plastics has many benefits \u2013 it is affordable, versatile, resistant, and can help reduce other forms of waste \u2013 especially food waste. However, when poorly managed it can pollute the environment and our oceans.\nWhere does the plastic in our oceans come from and what can we do to reduce plastic pollution?", "dateline": "September 1, 2018", "subtitle": "The use of plastics has many benefits \u2013 it is affordable, versatile, resistant, and can help reduce other forms of waste \u2013 especially food waste. However, when poorly managed it can pollute the environment and our oceans.\nWhere does the plastic in our oceans come from and what can we do to reduce plastic pollution?", "sidebar-toc": false, "featured-image": "Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png" }, "createdAt": "2019-10-04T14:15:07.000Z", "published": false, "updatedAt": "2023-10-10T09:59:50.000Z", "revisionId": null, "publishedAt": "2018-09-01T14:31:25.000Z", "relatedCharts": [], "publicationContext": "listed" } |
{ "errors": [ { "name": "unhandled html tag found", "details": "Encountered the unhandled tag hr" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag separator" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag image" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag list" }, { "name": "unexpected wp component tag", "details": "Found unhandled wp:comment tag table" } ], "numBlocks": 195, "numErrors": 16, "wpTagCounts": { "html": 19, "list": 8, "image": 6, "table": 1, "column": 14, "columns": 7, "heading": 37, "paragraph": 156, "separator": 1, "owid/summary": 1, "owid/prominent-link": 5 }, "htmlTagCounts": { "p": 157, "h2": 13, "h3": 8, "h4": 16, "hr": 1, "ol": 1, "ul": 7, "div": 26, "table": 1, "figure": 7, "iframe": 18 } } |
2018-09-01 14:31:25 | 2024-02-16 14:22:39 | [ "Hannah Ritchie" ] |
The use of plastics has many benefits – it is affordable, versatile, resistant, and can help reduce other forms of waste – especially food waste. However, when poorly managed it can pollute the environment and our oceans. Where does the plastic in our oceans come from and what can we do to reduce plastic pollution? | 2019-10-04 14:15:07 | 2023-10-10 09:59:50 | https://ourworldindata.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png | {} |
This article was first published in September 2018. It was updated in April 2022 based on the most recent research. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/plastic-pollution"/> → [Open the Data Explorer](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/plastic-pollution) in a new tab. This is our main data entry on plastics, with a particular focus on its pollution of the environment. * We have also produced an [FAQs on Plastics](http://ourworldindata.org/faq-on-plastics) page which attempts to answer additional common questions on the topic. * A slide-deck summary of global plastics is [available here](https://slides.ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution). The first synthetic plastic — _Bakelite_ — was produced in 1907, marking the beginning of the global plastics industry. However, rapid growth in global plastic production was not realized until the 1950s. Over the next 70 years, annual production of plastics [increased nearly 230-fold](https://ourworldindata.org/plastics#global-plastic-production) to 460 million tonnes in 2019. ## How much plastic enters the world's oceans? To understand the magnitude of input of plastics to the natural environment and the world's oceans, we must understand various elements of the plastic production, distribution and waste management chain. This is crucial, not only in understanding the scale of the problem but in implementing the most effective interventions for reduction. The data and visualizations which follow in this entry provide this overview step-by-step. This overview is summarized in the figure.{ref}The data used in this figure is based on the _Science_ study: Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., … & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. _Science_, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at: [http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768](http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768).{/ref} Here we see that in 2010: * global primary production of plastic was 270 million tonnes; * global plastic waste was 275 million tonnes – it did exceed annual primary production through wastage of plastic from previous years; * plastic waste generated in coastal regions is most at risk of entering the oceans; in 2010 coastal plastic waste – generated within 50 kilometres of the coastline – amounted to 99.5 million tonnes; * only plastic waste which is improperly managed (mismanaged) is at significant risk of leakage to the environment; in 2010 this amounted to 31.9 million tonnes; * of this, 8 million tonnes – 3% of global annual plastics waste – entered the ocean (through multiple outlets, including rivers); * Plastics in the oceans' surface waters is several orders of magnitude lower than annual ocean plastic inputs. This discrepancy is known as the 'missing plastic problem' and is discussed [h](https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem)[e](https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#where-does-our-plastic-accumulate-in-the-ocean-and-what-does-that-mean-for-the-future)[re](https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem). * The amount of plastic in surface waters is not very well known: estimates range from 10,000s to 100,000s tonnes. <Image filename="Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png" alt=""/> ## How much plastic does the world produce? The chart shows the increase of global plastic production, measured in tonnes per year, from 1950 onwards. In 1950 the world produced only 2 million tonnes per year. Since then, annual production has increased nearly 230-fold, reaching 460 million tonnes in 2019. The short downturn in annual production in 2009 and 2010 was predominantly the result of the 2008 global financial crisis — a similar dent is seen across several metrics of resource production and consumption, [including energy](https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-and-changing-energy-sources#global-total-energy-production-long-run-view-by-source). <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-plastics-production"/> #### Cumulative production How much plastic has the world produced cumulatively? The chart shows that by 2019, the world had produced 9.5 billion tonnes of plastic — more than one tonne of plastic for every person alive today. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-global-plastics"/> ## How do we dispose of our plastic? #### Plastic disposal methods How has global plastic waste disposal method changed over time? In the chart we see the share of global plastic waste that is discarded, recycled or incinerated from 1980 through to 2015. Prior to 1980, recycling and incineration of plastic was negligible; 100 percent was therefore discarded. From 1980 for incineration, and 1990 for recycling, rates increased on average by about 0.7 percent per year.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. _Science Advances_, _3_(7), e1700782. Available at: [http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782](http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782).{/ref} In 2015, an estimated 55 percent of global plastic waste was discarded, 25 percent was incinerated, and 20 percent recycled. If we extrapolate historical trends through to 2050 — as can be seen in the [chart here](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-fate-to-2050) — by 2050, incineration rates would increase to 50 percent; recycling to 44 percent; and discarded waste would fall to 6 percent. However, note that this is based on the simplistic extrapolation of historic trends and does not represent concrete projections. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-fate"/> #### Global plastic production to fate In the figure we summarize global plastic production to final fate over the period 1950 to 2015.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. _Science Advances_, _3_(7), e1700782. Available at: [http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782](http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782).{/ref} This is given in cumulative million tonnes. As shown: * cumulative production of polymers, synthetic fibers and additives was 8300 million tonnes; * 2500 million tonnes (30 percent) of primary plastics was still in use in 2015; * 4600 million tonnes (55 percent) went straight to landfill or was discarded; * 700 million tonnes (8 percent) was incinerated; * 500 million tonnes (6 percent) was recycled (100 million tonnes of recycled plastic was still in use; 100 million tonnes was later incinerated; and 300 million tonnes was later discarded or sent to landfill). Of the 5800 million tonnes of primary plastic no longer in use, only 9 percent has been recycled since 1950. <Image filename="plastic-fate.png" alt=""/> ## Which sectors produce the most plastic? #### Plastic use by sector To which industries and product uses is primary plastic production allocated? In the chart we see plastic production allocation by sector for 2015. Packaging was the dominant use of primary plastics, with 42 percent of plastics entering the use phase.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. _Science Advances_, _3_(7), e1700782. Available at: [http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782](http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782).{/ref} Building and construction was the second largest sector utilizing 19 percent of the total. Primary plastic production does not directly reflect plastic waste generation (as shown in the next section), since this is also influenced by the polymer type and [lifetime of the end product](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic). Primary plastic production by polymer type can be [found here](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-production-polymer). <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-production-by-sector"/> #### Plastic waste by sector This chart shows the use of primary plastics by sector; in the chart we show these same sectors in terms of plastic waste generation. Plastic waste generation is strongly influenced by primary plastic use, but also the [product lifetime](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic). Packaging, for example, has a very short 'in-use' lifetime (typically around 6 months or less). This is in contrast to building and construction, where plastic use has a [mean lifetime](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic) of 35 years.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. _Science Advances_, _3_(7), e1700782. Available at: [http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782](http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782).{/ref} Packaging is therefore the dominant generator of plastic waste, responsible for almost half of the global total. In 2015, primary plastics production was 407 million tonnes; around three-quarters (302 million tonnes) ended up as waste. Plastic waste breakdown by polymer type can be [found here](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-polymer). <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-by-sector"/> ## Plastic waste by country ### Which countries produce the most total plastic waste? In the chart we see the per capita rate of plastic waste generation, measured in kilograms per person per day. Here we see differences of around an order of magnitude: daily per capita plastic waste across the highest countries – Kuwait, Guyana, Germany, Netherlands, Ireland, the United States – is more than ten times higher than across many countries such as India, Tanzania, Mozambique and Bangladesh. These figures represent total plastic waste generation and do not account for differences in waste management, recycling or incineration. They therefore do not represent quantities of plastic at risk of loss to the ocean or other waterways. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-per-capita"/> **Related chart:** ### https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-generation-total ### Which countries produce the most mismanaged plastic waste? Plastic will only enter rivers and the ocean if it’s poorly managed. In rich countries, nearly all of its plastic waste is incinerated, recycled, or sent to well-managed landfills. It’s not left open to the surrounding environment. Low-to-middle income countries tend to have poorer waste management infrastructure. Waste can be dumped outside of landfills, and landfills that do exist are often open, leaking waste to the surrounding environment. _Mismanaged_ waste in low-to-middle income countries is therefore much higher. Mismanaged waste is material which is at high risk of entering the ocean via wind or tidal transport, or carried to coastlines from inland waterways. Mismanaged waste is the sum of material which is either littered or inadequately disposed. Inadequately disposed and littered waste are different, and are defined in the sections below. [Per capita mismanaged waste](https://ourworldindata.org/admin/charts/4873/edit) in the Philippines is 100 times higher than in the UK. When we multiply by population (giving us [each country’s total](https://ourworldindata.org/admin/charts/4880/edit)), India, China, the Philippines, Brazil, and Nigeria top the list. Each country’s share of global mismanaged waste is shown in the map. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-mismanaged-plastic-waste?country=Asia~Africa~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania"/> **Related charts:** ### https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-mismanaged ### https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mismanaged-plastic-waste-per-capita ### Probability that mismanaged plastic waste gets emitted to the ocean Not all mismanaged plastic waste has the same probability that it reaches river networks, and then the ocean. The climate, terrain, land use, and distances within river basins affect the probability that mismanaged plastic waste is emitted to the ocean. This interactive chart shows the probability that mismanaged waste is emitted to the ocean. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/probability-mismanaged-plastic-ocean?country=MYS~PHL~CHN~IND~LKA~BRA~NGA~TZA"/> ### Which countries emit the most plastic into the oceans? The distribution of plastic inputs is reflected on the world map. There we see each country’s share of global plastic emissions. The Philippines accounts for more than one-third (36%) of plastic inputs – unsurprising given the fact that it’s home to seven of the top ten rivers. This is because the Philippines consists of many small islands where the majority of the population lives near the coast. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean?country=Africa~Asia~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania"/> **Related charts:** ### https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean ### https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-ocean-plastic-waste #### Plastic emitted to the ocean by region This chart shows how global plastics emitted into the oceans breaks down by region. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean?tab=chart&country=Africa~Asia~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania"/> ## How much of ocean plastics come from land and marine sources? Plastic in our oceans can arise from both land-based or marine sources. Plastics pollution from marine sources refers to the pollution caused by fishing fleets that leave behind fishing nets, lines, ropes, and sometimes abandoned vessels. There is often intense debate about the relative importance of marine and land sources for ocean pollution. What is the relative contribution of each? At the global level, best estimates suggest that approximately 80 percent of ocean plastics come from land-based sources, and the remaining 20 percent from marine sources.{ref}Li, W. C., Tse, H. F., & Fok, L. (2016). Plastic waste in the marine environment: A review of sources, occurrence and effects. _Science of the Total Environment_, _566_, 333-349. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716310154](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716310154).{/ref} Of the 20 percent from marine sources, it's estimated that around half (10 percentage points) arises from fishing fleets (such as nets, lines and abandoned vessels). This is supported by figures from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) which suggests abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear contributes approximately 10 percent to total ocean plastics.{ref}UNEP & FAO (2009). Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 523; UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 185. Available at: [http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0620e/i0620e00.htm](http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0620e/i0620e00.htm).{/ref} Other estimates allocate a slightly higher contribution of marine sources, at 28 percent of total ocean plastics.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. _Scientific Reports_, _8_(1), 4666. Available at: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w).{/ref} Although uncertain, it's likely that marine sources contribute between 20% to 30% of ocean plastics, but the dominant source remains land-based input at 70% to 80%. Whilst this is the relative contribution as an aggregate of global ocean plastics, the relative contribution of different sources will vary depending on geographical location and context. For example, our most recent estimates of the contribution of marine sources to the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP) is that abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear make up 75% of 86% of floating plastic mass (greater than 5 centimeters).{ref}Lebreton, L., Royer, SJ., Peytavin, A. _et al._ (2022). [Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16529-0). _Scientific Rep_orts **12**, 12666. Previous studies (notably Lebreton et al. 2018) estimated that plastic lines, ropes, and fishing nets contributed just over half of the plastic mass in the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch'. More recent studies estimate that this share is higher – giving the 75% to 86% referenced here. Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. _Scientific Reports_, _8_(1), 4666. Available at: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w).{/ref} This research suggests that most of this fishing activity originates from five countries – Japan, South Korea, China, the United States and Taiwan. ## River inputs to the ocean To tackle plastic pollution we need to know what rivers these plastics are coming from. It also helps if we understand _why_ these rivers emit so much. Most of the world’s largest emitting rivers are in Asia, with some also in East Africa and the Caribbean. In the chart we see the ten largest contributors.{ref}This data comes from Meijer, L. J., van Emmerik, T., van der Ent, R., Schmidt, C., & Lebreton, L. (2021). [More than 1000 rivers account for 80% of global riverine plastic emissions into the ocean](https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5803). _Science Advances_, _7_(18), eaaz5803.{/ref} This is shown as each river’s share of the global total. You can explore the data on the top 50 rivers using the _+Add river_ button on the chart. Seven of the top ten rivers are in the Philippines. Two are in India, and one in Malaysia. The Pasig River in the Philippines alone accounts for 6.4% of global river plastics. This paints a very different picture to earlier studies where it was Asia’s largest rivers – the Yangtze, Xi, and Huangpu rivers in China, and Ganges in India – that were dominant. What are the characteristics of the largest emitting rivers? First, plastic pollution is dominant where the local waste management practices are poor. This means there is a large amount of mismanaged plastic waste that can enter rivers and the ocean in the first place. This makes clear that improving waste management is essential if we’re to tackle plastic pollution. Second, the largest emitters tend to have cities nearby: this means there are a lot of paved surfaces where both water and plastic can drain into river outlets. Cities such as Jakarta in Indonesia and Manila in the Philippines are drained by relatively small rivers but account for a large share of plastic emissions. Third, the river basins had high precipitation rates (meaning plastics washed into rivers, and the flow rate of rivers to the ocean was high). Fourth, distance matters: the largest emitting rivers had cities nearby and were also very close to the coast. The authors of the study illustrate the importance of the additional climate, basin terrain, and proximity factors with a real-life example. The Ciliwung River basin in Java is 275 times smaller than the Rhine river basin in Europe and generates 75% less plastic waste. Yet it emits 100 times as much plastic to the ocean each year (200 to 300 tonnes versus only 3 to 5 tonnes). The Ciliwung River emits much more plastic to the ocean, despite being much smaller because the basin’s waste is generated very close to the river (meaning the plastic gets into the river network in the first place) and the river network is also much closer to the ocean. It also gets much more rainfall meaning the plastic waste is more easily transported than in the Rhine basin. If you want to explore the plastic inputs from each of the world’s rivers, the Ocean Cleanup Project [provides a beautiful interactive map](https://theoceancleanup.com/sources/) where you can see this in more detail. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastics-top-rivers?country=Pasig+%28Philippines%29~Tullahan+%28Philippines%29~Ganges+%28India%29~Ulhas+%28India%29~Klang+%28Malaysia%29~Meycauayan+%28Philippines%29~Pampanga+%28Philippines%29~Libmanan+%28Philippines%29~Rio+Grande+de+Mindanao+%28Philippines%29~Agno+%28Philippines%29"/> ## Which oceans have the most plastic waste? Plastic enters the oceans from coastlines, rivers, tides, and marine sources. But once it is there, where does it go? The distribution and accumulation of ocean plastics is strongly influenced by oceanic surface currents and wind patterns. Plastics are typically buoyant – meaning they float on the ocean surface –, allowing them to be transported by the prevalent wind and surface current routes. As a result, plastics tend to accumulate in [oceanic gyres](https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/gyre.html), with high concentrations of plastics at the centre of ocean basins, and much less around the perimeters. After entry to oceans from coastal regions, plastics tend to migrate towards the centre of ocean basins. In the chart we see estimates of the mass of plastics in surface ocean waters by ocean basin. Eriksen et al. (2014) estimated that there was approximately 269,000 tonnes of plastic in surface waters across the world.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., … & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at: [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913](http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913).{/ref} Note that this at least an order of magnitude lower than estimated inputs of plastics to the ocean; the discrepancy here relates to a surprising, but long-standing question in the research literature on plastics: "[where is the missing plastic going?](https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem)". As we see, basins in the Northern Hemisphere had the highest quantity of plastics. This would be expected since the majority of the world's population – and in particular, coastal populations – live within the Northern Hemisphere. However, authors were still surprised by the quantity of plastic accumulation in Southern oceans — while it was lower than in the Northern Hemisphere, it was still of the same order of magnitude. Considering the lack of coastal populations and plastic inputs in the Southern Hemisphere, this was an unexpected result. The authors suggest this means plastic pollution can be moved between oceanic gyres and basins much more readily than previously assumed. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/surface-plastic-mass-by-ocean"/> #### Plastic particles in the world's surface ocean It's estimated that there are more than 5 trillion plastic particles in the world's surface waters.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., … & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at: [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913](http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913).{/ref} We can see this breakdown of plastic particles by ocean basin [here](https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/surface-plastic-particles-by-ocean). The accumulation of a large _number_ of particles tends to result from the breakdown of larger plastics — this results in an accumulation of plastic particles for a given mass. The figure summarizes plastics in the ocean surface waters by basin. This is shown by particle size in terms of mass (left) and particle count (right). As shown, the majority of plastics by mass are large particles (macroplastics), whereas the majority in terms of particle count are microplastics (small particles). <Image filename="Surface-ocean-plastic.png" alt=""/> #### The 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP) The most well-known example of large plastic accumulations in surface waters is the so-called 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP). As shown in the chart here, the largest accumulation of plastics within ocean basins is the North Pacific. This results from the combined impact of large coastal plastic inputs in the region, alongside intensive fishing activity in the Pacific ocean. In a _Nature_ study, Lebreton et al. (2018) attempted to quantify the characteristics of the GPGP.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. _Scientific Reports_, _8_(1), 4666. Available at: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w).{/ref} The vast majority of GPGP material is plastics — trawling samples indicate an estimated 99.9 percent of all floating debris. The authors estimate the GPGP spanned 1.6 million km2. This is just over three times the area of Spain, and slightly larger in area to Alaska (the USA's largest state).{ref}The reported [land area of Spain](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_area#Countries_greater_than_1.5_million_km2) is approximately 500,000 square kilometres, and Alaska is an [estimated 1.5 million](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_area) square kilometres.{/ref} The GPGP comprised 1.8 trillion pieces of plastic, with a mass of 79,000 tonnes (approximately 29 percent of the 269,000 tonnes in the world's surface oceans). Over recent decades, the authors report there has been an exponential increase in concentration of surface plastics in the GPGP. Our most recent estimates of the contribution of marine sources to the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch' (GPGP) is that abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear make up 75% of 86% of floating plastic mass (greater than 5 centimeters).{ref}Lebreton, L., Royer, SJ., Peytavin, A. _et al._ (2022). [Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16529-0). _Scientific Rep_orts **12**, 12666. Previous studies (notably Lebreton et al. 2018) estimated that plastic lines, ropes, and fishing nets contributed just over half of the plastic mass in the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch'. More recent studies estimate that this share is higher – giving the 75% to 86% referenced here. Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. _Scientific Reports_, _8_(1), 4666. Available at: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w).{/ref} This research suggests that most of this fishing activity originates from five countries – Japan, South Korea, China, the United States and Taiwan. <Image filename="Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch.png" alt=""/> ## Where does our plastic accumulate in the ocean and what does that mean for the future? The world now produces more than [380 million tonnes](https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-much-plastic-does-the-world-produce) of plastic every year, which could end up as pollutants, entering our natural environment and oceans. Of course, not all of our plastic waste ends up in the ocean, most ends up in landfills: it’s estimated that the share of global plastic waste that enters the ocean is around 3%.{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., … & Law, K. L. (2015). [Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean](http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768). _Science_, 347(6223), 768-771.{/ref} In 2010 – the year for which we have the latest estimates – that was around 8 million tonnes.{ref}The estimates for this figure range from around 4 to 12 million tonnes, with 8 million as a midpoint. In the context of this discussion, the uncertainty in this value is less important: the difference between ocean plastic inputs and observed plastic in surface ocean waters are orders of magnitude – rather than multiples – apart.{/ref} Most of the plastic materials we produce are less dense than water and should therefore float at the ocean surface. But our best estimates of the amount of plastic afloat at sea are orders of magnitude lower than the amount of plastic that enters our oceans in a single year: as we show in the visualization, it’s far lower than 8 million tonnes and instead in the order of 10s to 100s of thousands of tonnes. One of the most widely-quoted estimates is 250,000 tonnes.{ref}Eriksen, M. et al. [Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea](https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913). _Plos One_ 9, e111913 (2014).{/ref} If we currently pollute our oceans with millions of tonnes of plastic each year, we must have released tens of millions of tonnes in recent decades. Why then do we find at least 100 times less plastics in our surface waters? This discrepancy is often referred to as the ‘missing plastic problem’.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., … & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. _Scientific Reports_, _8_(1), 4666. Available at:[ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w).{/ref} It’s a conundrum we need to address if we want to understand where plastic waste could end up, and what its impacts might be for wildlife, ecosystems and health. <Image filename="Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png" alt=""/> #### The ‘missing plastic problem’ There are several hypotheses to explain the ‘missing plastic problem’. One possibility is that it is due to imprecise measurement: we might either grossly overestimate the amount of plastic waste we release into the ocean, or underestimate the amount floating in the surface ocean. Whilst we know that tracking ocean plastic inputs and their distribution is notoriously difficult{ref}Cressey, D. (2016). [Bottles, bags, ropes and toothbrushes: the struggle to track ocean plastics](https://www.nature.com/news/bottles-bags-ropes-and-toothbrushes-the-struggle-to-track-ocean-plastics-1.20432). _Nature News_, _536_(7616), 263.{/ref} the levels of uncertainty in these measurements are much less than the several orders of magnitude that would be needed to explain the missing plastic problem.{ref}Lebreton, L., Egger, M., & Slat, B. (2019). [A global mass budget for positively buoyant macroplastic debris in the ocean](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49413-5). _Scientific reports_, _9_(1), 1-10.{/ref} Another popular hypothesis is that ultraviolet light (UV) and mechanical wave forces break large pieces of plastic into smaller ones.These smaller particles, referred to as microplastics, are much more easily incorporated into sediments or ingested by organisms. And this is where the missing plastic might end up. One proposed ‘sink’ for ocean plastics was deep-sea sediments; a study which sampled deep-sea sediments across several basins found that microplastic was up to four orders of magnitude more abundant (per unit volume) in deep-sea sediments from the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean than in plastic-polluted surface waters.{ref}Woodall, L. C., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., Paterson, G. L., Coppock, R., Sleight, V., … & Thompson, R. C. (2014). [The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris](http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/4/140317). _Royal Society Open Science_, 1(4), 140317.{/ref} But, new research may suggest a third explanation: that plastics in the ocean break down slower than previously thought, and that much of the missing plastic is washed up or buried in our shorelines.{ref}Lebreton, L., Egger, M., & Slat, B. (2019). [A global mass budget for positively buoyant macroplastic debris in the ocean](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49413-5). _Scientific reports_, _9_(1), 1-10.{/ref} #### Plastics persist for decades and accumulate on our shorelines To try to understand the conundrum of what happens to plastic waste when it enters the ocean, Lebreton, Egger and Slat (2019) created a global model of ocean plastics from 1950 to 2015. This model uses data on global plastic production, emissions into the ocean by plastic type and age, and transport and degradation rates to map not only the amount of plastic in different environments in the ocean, but also its age. The authors aimed to quantify where plastic accumulates in the ocean across three environments: the shoreline (defined as dry land bordering the ocean), coastal areas (defined as waters with a depth less than 200 meters) and offshore (waters with a depth greater than 200 meters). They wanted to understand where plastic accumulates, and how old it is: a few years old, ten years or decades? In the visualization I summarized their results. This is shown for two categories of plastics: shown in blue are ‘macroplastics’ (larger plastic materials greater than 0.5 centimeters in diameter) and shown in red microplastics (smaller particles less than 0.5 centimeters). There are some key points we can take away from the visualization: * The vast majority – 82 million tonnes of macroplastics and 40 million tonnes of microplastics – is washed up, buried or resurfaced along the world’s shorelines. * Much of the macroplastics in our shorelines is from the past 15 years, but still a significant amount is older suggesting it can persist for several decades without breaking down. * In coastal regions most macroplastics (79%) are recent – less than 5 years old. * In offshore environments, older microplastics have had longer to accumulate than in coastal regions. There macroplastics from several decades ago – even as far back as the 1950s and 1960s – persist. * Most microplastics (three-quarters) in offshore environments are from the 1990s and earlier, suggesting it can take several decades for plastics to break down. What does this mean for our understanding of the ‘missing plastic’ problem? **Firstly**, is that the majority of ocean plastics are washed, buried and resurface along our shorelines. Whilst we try to tally ocean inputs with the amount floating in gyres at the centre of our oceans, most of it may be accumulating around the edges of the oceans. This would explain why we find much less in surface waters than we’d expect. **Secondly**, accumulated plastics are much older than previously thought. Macroplastics appear to persist in the surface of the ocean for decades without breaking down. Offshore we find large plastic objects dating as far back as the 1950s and 1960s. This goes against previous hypotheses of the ‘missing plastic’ problem which suggested that UV light and wave action degrade and remove them from the surface in only a few years. <Image filename="Where-does-plastic-accumulate.png" alt=""/> #### How much plastic will remain in surface oceans in the coming decades? The study by Lebreton, Egger and Slat challenges the previous hypotheses that plastics in the surface ocean have a very short lifetime, quickly degrade into microplastics and sink to greater depths. Their results suggest that macroplastics can persist for decades; can be buried and resurfaced along shorelines; and end up in offshore regions years later. If true, this matters a lot for how much plastic we would expect in our surface oceans in the decades which follow. The same study also modelled how the mass of plastics – both macro and micro – in the world’s surface waters might evolve under three scenarios: 0. we stop emitting any plastics to our oceans by 2020; 1. ‘emissions’ of plastic to the ocean continue to increase until 2020 then level off; 2. ‘emissions’ continue to grow to 2050 in line with historic growth rates.{ref}Under growth scenarios, the authors assume annual growth rates continue in line with the average increase in global plastic production over the decade from 2005-2015.{/ref} Their results are shown in the charts. The scenarios of continued emissions growth are what we’d expect: if we continue to release more plastics to the ocean, we’ll have more in our surface waters. What’s more striking is that even if we stopped ocean plastic waste by 2020, macroplastics would persist in our surface waters for many more decades. This is because we have a large legacy of plastics buried and awash on our shorelines which would continue to resurface and be transported to offshore regions; and existing plastics can persist in the ocean environment for many decades. The amount of microplastics in our surface ocean will increase under every scenario because the large plastics that we already have on our shorelines and surface waters will continue to breakdown. And, any additional plastics we add will contribute further. This also matters for how we solve the problem of ocean pollution. If we want to rapidly reduce the amount of both macro- and microplastics in our oceans, these results suggest two priorities: _Number one_ — we must stop plastic waste entering our waterways as soon as possible. Most of the plastic that ends up in our oceans does so because of [poor waste management](https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#mismanaged-plastic-waste) practices – particularly in [low-to-middle income countries](https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#what-determines-how-much-mismanaged-waste-we-produce); this means that good waste management across the world is essential to achieving this. But this ambitious target alone will not be enough. We have many decades of legacy waste to contend with. This makes a _second priority_ necessary— we have to focus our efforts on recapturing and removing plastics already in our offshore waters and shorelines. This is the goal of Slat, Lebreton and Egger – the authors of this paper – with their [Ocean Cleanup](https://theoceancleanup.com/) project. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/macroplastics-in-ocean"/> <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/microplastics-in-ocean"/> ## How does plastic impact wildlife and human health? There have been many documented incidences of the impact of plastic on ecosystems and wildlife. Peer-reviewed publications of plastic impacts date back to the 1980s. An analysis by Rochman et al. (2016){ref}This data is also presented in the review by Law (2017): Law, K. L. (2017). Plastics in the marine environment. _Annual review of marine science_, _9_, 205-229. Available at: [https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409](https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409).{/ref} reviews the findings of peer-reviewed documentation of the impacts of marine plastic debris on animal life; the results of this study are presented in [this table](https://ourworldindata.org/ecological-impacts-of-marine-plastic-debris/).{ref}Rochman, C. M., Browne, M. A., Underwood, A. J., Van Franeker, J. A., Thompson, R. C., & Amaral‐Zettler, L. A. (2016). The ecological impacts of marine debris: unraveling the demonstrated evidence from what is perceived. _Ecology_, _97_(2), 302-312. Available at: [https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/14-2070.1](https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/14-2070.1).{/ref} Nonetheless, despite many documented cases, it's widely acknowledged that the full extent of impacts on ecosystems is not yet known. There are three key pathways by which plastic debris can affect wildlife{ref}Law, K. L. (2017). Plastics in the marine environment. _Annual review of marine science_, _9_, 205-229. Available at: [https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409](https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409).{/ref}: **Entanglement** – the entrapping, encircling or constricting of marine animals by plastic debris. Entanglement cases have been reported for at least 344 species to date, including all marine turtle species, more than two-thirds of seal species, one-third of whale species, and one-quarter of seabirds.{ref}Kühn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In _Marine Anthropogenic Litter_ (pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham. Available at: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4).{/ref} Entanglement by 89 species of fish and 92 species of invertebrates has also been recorded. Entanglements most commonly involve plastic rope and netting{ref}Gall, S. C., & Thompson, R. C. (2015). The impact of debris on marine life. _Marine pollution bulletin_, _92_(1-2), 170-179. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X14008571](https://web.archive.org/web/20190719200908/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X14008571).{/ref} and abandoned fishing gear.{ref}Kühn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In _Marine Anthropogenic Litter_ (pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham. Available at: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4).{/ref} However, entanglement by other plastics such as packaging have also been recorded. **Ingestion**: Ingestion of plastic can occur unintentionally, intentionally, or indirectly through the ingestion of prey species containing plastic. It has been documented for at least 233 marine species, including all marine turtle species, more than one-third of seal species, 59% of whale species, and 59% of seabirds.{ref}Kühn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In _Marine Anthropogenic Litter_ (pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham. Available at: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4).{/ref} Ingestion by 92 species of fish and 6 species of invertebrates has also been recorded. The size of the ingested material is ultimately limited by the size of the organism. Very small particles such as plastic fibres can be taken up by small organisms such as filter-feeding oysters or mussels; larger materials such as plastic films, cigarette packets, and food packaging have been found in large fish species; and in extreme cases, documented cases of sperm whales have shown ingestion of very large materials including 9m of rope, 4.5m of hose, two flowerpots, and large amounts of plastic sheeting.{ref}de Stephanis R, Gimenez J, Carpinelli E, Gutierrez-Exposito C, Canadas A. 2013. As main meal for sperm whales: plastics debris. _Marine Pollution Bulletin_ 69:206–14.{/ref} Ingestion of plastics can have multiple impacts on organism health. Large volumes of plastic can greatly reduce stomach capacity, leading to poor appetite and false sense of satiation.{ref}Day RH, Wehle DHS, Coleman FC. 1985. Ingestion of plastic pollutants by marine birds. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Fate and Impact of Marine Debris, 27–29 November 1984, Honolulu, Hawaii, ed. RS Shomura, HO Yoshida, pp. 344–86. Tech. Memo. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFC-54. Washington, DC: Natl. Ocean. Atmos. Adm.{/ref} Plastic can also obstruct or perforate the gut, cause ulcerative lesions, or gastric rupture. This can ultimately lead to death. In laboratory settings, biochemical responses to plastic ingestion have also been observed. These responses include oxidative stress, metabolic disruption, reduced enzyme activity, and cellular necrosis.{ref}Browne MA, Niven SJ, Galloway TS, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC. 2013. Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. _Current Biology_ 23:2388–92.{/ref},{ref}Cedervall T, Hansson LA, Lard M, Frohm B, Linse S. 2012. Food chain transport of nanoparticles affects behaviour and fat metabolism in fish. _PLOS ONE_ 7:e32254{/ref},{ref}Oliveira M, Ribeiro A, Hylland K, Guilhermino L. 2013. Single and combined effects of microplastics and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Teleostei, Gobiidae). _Ecological Indicators_ 34:641–47{/ref},{ref}Rochman CM, Hoh E, Kurobe T, Teh SJ. 2013. Ingested plastic transfers hazardous chemicals to fish and induces hepatic stress. _Scientific Reports_ 3:3263{/ref} **Interaction** – interaction includes collisions, obstructions, abrasions or use as substrate. There are multiple scenarios where this can have an impact on organisms. Fishing gear, for example, has been shown to cause abrasion and damage to coral reef ecosystems upon collision. Ecosystem structures can also be impacted by plastics following interference of substrate with plastics (impacting on light penetration, organic matter availability and oxygen exchange). ### What are the impacts of microplastics on health? #### Impact of microplastics on wildlife As discussed in the section on 'Impacts on Wildlife' above, there are several ways in which plastics can interact or influence wildlife. In the case of microplastics (particles smaller than 4.75 millimeter in diameter), the key concern is ingestion. Ingestion of microplastics have been shown to occur for many organisms. This can occur through several mechanisms, ranging from uptake by filter-feeders, swallowing from surrounding water, or consumption of organisms that have previously ingested microplastics.{ref}Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. _Nature Ecology & Evolution_, _1_(5), 0116. Available at: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116).{/ref} There a number of potential effects of microplastics at different biological levels, which range from sub-cellular to ecosystems, but most research has focused on impacts in individual adult organisms. Microplastic ingestion rarely causes mortality in any organisms. As such, 'lethal concentration' (LC) values which are often measured and reported for contaminants do not exist. There are a few exceptions: common [goby](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goby) exposure to polyethylene and pyrene; Asian green mussels exposed to polyvinylchloride (PVC); and _Daphnia magna_ neonates exposed to polyethylene{ref}Oliveira, M., Ribeiro, A., Hylland, K. & Guilhermino, L. Single and combined effects of microplastics and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby _Pomatoschistus microps_ (Teleostei, Gobiidae) . _Ecological Indicators,_**34**, 641–647 (2013). Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X13002501](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X13002501).{/ref},{ref}Rist, S. E. _et al_. Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel _Perna viridis_ . _Marine Pollution Bulletin_**111**, 213–220 (2016). Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380).{/ref},{ref}Ogonowski, M., Schür, C., Jarsén, Å. & Gorokhova, E. The effects of natural and anthropogenic microparticles on individual fitness in _Daphnia magna_. _PLoS ONE_**11**, e0155063 (2016). Available at: [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063](http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063).{/ref} In such studies, however, concentrations and exposure to microplastics far exceeded levels which would be encountered in the natural environment (even a highly contaminated one). There is increasing evidence that microplastic ingestion can affect the consumption of prey, leading to energy depletion, inhibited growth and fertility impacts. When organisms ingest microplastics, it can take up space in the gut and digestive system, leading to reductions in feeding signals. This feeling of fullness can reduce dietary intake. Evidence of impacts of reduced food consumption include: * slower metabolic rate and survival in Asian green mussels{ref}Rist, S. E. _et al_. Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel _Perna viridis_ . _Marine Pollution Bulletin_**111**, 213–220 (2016). Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380).{/ref} * reduced reproducibility and survival in copepods{ref}Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C. & Galloway, T. The impact of polystyrene microplastics on feeding, function and fecundity in the marine copepod _Calanus helgolandicus_. _Environment, Science & Technology,_**49**, 1130–1137 (2015). Available at: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563688](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563688).{/ref} * reduced growth and development of _Daphnia_{ref}Ogonowski, M., Schür, C., Jarsén, Å. & Gorokhova, E. The effects of natural and anthropogenic microparticles on individual fitness in Daphnia magna_. PLoS ONE, **11**, e0155063 (2016). Available at: [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063](http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063)._{/ref} * reduced growth and development of langoustine{ref}Welden, N. A. C. & Cowie, P. R. Environment and gut morphology influence microplastic retention in langoustine, _Nephrops norvegicus_. _Environmental Pollution,_**214**, 859–865 (2016). Available at: [http://oro.open.ac.uk/47539/](http://oro.open.ac.uk/47539/).{/ref} * reduced energy stores in shore crabs and lugworms{ref}Watts, A. J. R., Urbina, M. A., Corr, S., Lewis, C. & Galloway, T. S. Ingestion of plastic microfibers by the crab _Carcinus maenas_ and its effect on food consumption and energy balance. _Environment, Science & Technology,_**49**, 14597–14604 (2015). Available at: [https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b04026](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b04026).{/ref},{ref}Wright, S., Rowe, D., Thompson, R. C. & Galloway, T. S. Microplastic ingestion decreases energy reserves in marine worms . _Current Biology._**23**, 1031–1033 (2013). Available at: [https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43097705.pdf](https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43097705.pdf).{/ref} Many organisms do not exhibit changes in feeding after microplastic ingestion. A number of organisms, including suspension-feeders (for example, oyster larvae, urchin larvae, European flat oysters, Pacific oysters) and detritivorous (for example, isopods, amphipods) invertebrates show no impact of microplastics.{ref}Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. _Nature Ecology & Evolution_, _1_(5), 0116. Available at: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116).{/ref} Overall, however, it's likely that for some organisms, the presence of microplastic particles in the gut (where food should be) can have negative biological impacts. #### Impact of microplastics on humans There is, currently, very little evidence of the impact that microplastics can have on humans. For human health, it is the smallest particles – micro- and nano-particles which are small enough to be ingested – that are of greatest concern. There are several ways by which plastic particles can be ingested: orally through water, consumption of marine products which contain microplastics, through the skin via cosmetics (identified as highly unlikely but possible), or inhalation of particles in the air.{ref}Revel, M., Châtel, A., & Mouneyrac, C. (2018). Micro (nano) plastics: A threat to human health?. _Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health_, _1_, 17-23. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584417300235](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584417300235).{/ref} It is possible for microplastics to be passed up to higher levels in the food chain. This can occur when a species consumes organisms of a lower level in the food chain which has microplastics in the gut or tissue.{ref}Galloway T.S. (2015) Micro- and Nano-plastics and Human Health. In: Bergmann M., Gutow L., Klages M. (eds) _Marine Anthropogenic Litter_. Available at: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13).{/ref} The presence of microplastics at higher levels of the food chain (in fish) has been documented.{ref}Güven, O., Gökdağ, K., Jovanović, B., & Kıdeyş, A. E. (2017). Microplastic litter composition of the Turkish territorial waters of the Mediterranean Sea, and its occurrence in the gastrointestinal tract of fish. _Environmental Pollution_, _223_, 286-294. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116323910](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116323910).{/ref} {ref}Jabeen, K., Su, L., Li, J., Yang, D., Tong, C., Mu, J., & Shi, H. (2017). Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China. _Environmental Pollution_, _221_, 141-149. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116311666](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116311666).{/ref} One factor which possibly limits the dietary uptake for humans is that microplastics in fish tend to be present in the gut and digestive tract — parts of the fish not typically eaten.{ref}Galloway T.S. (2015) Micro- and Nano-plastics and Human Health. In: Bergmann M., Gutow L., Klages M. (eds) _Marine Anthropogenic Litter_. Available at: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13).{/ref} The presence of microplastics in fish beyond the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. in tissue) remains to be studied in detail.{ref}Bouwmeester, H., Hollman, P. C., & Peters, R. J. (2015). Potential health impact of environmentally released micro-and nanoplastics in the human food production chain: experiences from nanotoxicology. _Environmental Science & Technology_, _49_(15), 8932-8947. Available at: [https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01090](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01090).{/ref} Micro- and nanoplastics in bivalves (mussels and oysters) cultured for human consumption have also been identified. However, neither human exposure nor potential risk have been identified or quantified.{ref}Van Cauwenberghe, L., & Janssen, C. R. (2014). Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption. _Environmental Pollution_, _193_, 65-70. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114002425](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114002425).{/ref} Plastic fibres have also been detected in other food items; for example, honey, beer and table salt.{ref}Liebezeit, G., & Liebezeit, E. (2013). Non-pollen particulates in honey and sugar. _Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A_, _30_(12), 2136-2140. Available at: [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2013.843025](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2013.843025).{/ref},{ref}Liebezeit, G., & Liebezeit, E. (2014). Synthetic particles as contaminants in German beers. _Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A_, _31_(9), 1574-1578. Available at: [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2014.945099](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2014.945099).{/ref},{ref}Yang, D., Shi, H., Li, L., Li, J., Jabeen, K., & Kolandhasamy, P. (2015). Microplastic pollution in table salts from China. _Environmental Science & Technology_, _49_(22), 13622-13627. Available at: [https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b03163](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b03163).{/ref} But the authors suggested negligible health risks as a result of this exposure. Levels of microplastic ingestion are currently unknown. Even less is known about how such particles interact in the body. It may be the case that microplastics simply pass straight through the gastrointestinal tract without impact or interaction.{ref}Wang, J., Tan, Z., Peng, J., Qiu, Q., & Li, M. (2016). The behaviors of microplastics in the marine environment. _Marine Environmental Research_, _113_, 7-17. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113615300659](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113615300659).{/ref} A study of North Sea fish, for example, revealed that 80 percent of fish with detected microplastics contained only one particle — this suggests that following ingestion, plastic does not persist for long periods of time.{ref}Foekema, E. M., De Gruijter, C., Mergia, M. T., van Franeker, J. A., Murk, A. J., & Koelmans, A. A. (2013). Plastic in north sea fish. _Environmental Science & Technology_, _47_(15), 8818-8824. Available at: [https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es400931b](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es400931b).{/ref} Concentrations in mussels, in contrast, can be significantly higher. What could cause concern about the impact of microplastics? Three possible toxic effects of plastic particle have been suggested: the plastic particles themselves, the release of persistent organic pollutant adsorbed to the plastics, and leaching of plastic additives.{ref}Iñiguez, M. E., Conesa, J. A., & Fullana, A. (2017). Microplastics in Spanish Table Salt. _Scientific Reports_, _7 _(1), 8620. Available at: [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09128-x](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09128-x).{/ref} There has been no evidence of harmful effects to date – however, the precautionary principle would indicate that this is not evidence against taking exposure seriously. Since microplastics are hydrophobic (insoluble), and are have a high surface area-to-volume ratio, they can sorb environmental contaminants.{ref}For example polychlorinated biphenyl; PCB.{/ref} If there was significant accumulation of environmental contaminants, there is the possibility that these concentrations could 'biomagnify' up the food chain to higher levels.{ref}Biomagnification (sometimes termed 'bioamplification' or 'biological magnification'), is the increasing concentration of a substance in the tissues of organisms at successively higher levels in a food chain. This occurs as organisms at higher trophic levels eat significant masses of contaminated organisms at lower levels; with increased consumption, these concentrations can increase.{/ref} Biomagnification of PCBs varies by organism and environmental conditions; multiple studies have shown no evidence of uptake by the organisms of PCBs despite ingestion{ref}Devriese, L. I., De Witte, B., Vethaak, A. D., Hostens, K., & Leslie, H. A. (2017). Bioaccumulation of PCBs from microplastics in Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus): An experimental study. _Chemosphere_, _186_, 10-16. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724).{/ref} whilst some mussels, for example, have shown capability to transfer some compounds into their digestive glands.{ref}Avio, C. G., Gorbi, S., Milan, M., Benedetti, M., Fattorini, D., d'Errico, G., … & Regoli, F. (2015). Pollutants bioavailability and toxicological risk from microplastics to marine mussels. _Environmental Pollution_, _198_, 211-222. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724).{/ref} To date, there has been no clear evidence of the accumulation of persistent organic pollutants or leached plastic additives in humans. Continued research in this area is important to better understand the role of plastic within broader ecosystems and risk to human health. ## Plastic trade ### The impact of China's trade ban Whilst we looked previously in this entry at the plastic waste generation in countries across the world, it's also important to understand how plastic waste is traded across the world. Recycled plastic waste is now a product within the global commodity market — it is sold and traded across the world. This has important implications for managing global plastic waste: if countries with effective waste management systems – predominantly high-income countries – export plastic waste to middle to low-income countries with poor waste management systems, they could be adding to the ocean plastic problem in this way. Plastics can be challenging to recycle, particularly if they contain additives and different plastic blends. The implications of this complexity are two-fold: in many cases it is convenient for countries to export their recycled plastic waste (meaning they don't have to handle it domestically); and for importing countries, this plastic is often discarded if it doesn't meet the sufficient requirements for recycled or is contaminated by non-recyclable plastic. As such, traded plastic waste could eventually enter the ocean through poor waste management systems. Collectively, China and Hong Kong have imported 72.4 percent of global traded plastic waste (with most imports to Hong Kong eventually reaching China).{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at: [http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131](http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131).{/ref} This came to an end in 2017. At the end of that year China introduced a complete ban on the imports of non-industrial plastic waste.{ref}Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection, “Announcement of releasing the Catalogues of Imported Wastes Management,” (Announcement no. 39, 2017).{/ref} #### How much plastic waste did China import? In the chart we see the quantity of plastic waste China had to manage over the period from 2010 to 2016. This is differentiated by domestic plastic waste generation, shown in blue, and imported plastic waste shown in orange. The total plastic waste to manage is equal to the sum of domestic and imported plastic waste. Over this period, China imported between 7 and 9 million tonnes of plastic waste per year. In 2016, this figure was 7.35 million tonnes. To put this in context, China's domestic plastic waste generation was around 61 million tonnes. Therefore, 10-11 percent of China's total plastic waste was imported from around the world. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/chinese-plastic-imports"/> #### Who were the main plastic exporters to China? Which countries export the most plastic waste to China? In the chart we see the quantity of plastic exported to China from the top 10 exporting countries. Collectively, these countries are responsible for around 76 percent of its imports. As we see, Hong Kong typically acts as an entry point for Chinese imports; it is therefore the largest 'exporting' country to China. Many high-income countries are included in this top 10: Japan, USA, Germany, Belgium, Australia and Canada are all major plastic exporters. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-exports-to-china"/> #### How much plastic will be displaced from the Chinese import ban? China has been increasing restrictions on its plastic waste imports since 2007. In 2010, it implemented its "Green Fence" program – a temporary restriction for plastic imports with significantly less contamination. In 2017 it implemented a much stricter, permanent ban on non-industrial plastic imports.{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at: [http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131](http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131).{/ref} In the chart we see the estimated impact on the cumulative displacement of global plastic waste to 2030 as a result of the Chinese import ban.{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at: [http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131](http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131).{/ref} This is shown for three scenarios: assuming the maintained 100 percent import ban, in addition to the impact if this was reduced to 75 or 50 percent. By 2030, it's estimated that around 110 million tonnes of plastic will be displaced as a result of the ban. This plastic waste will have to be handled domestically or exported to another country. Brooks et al. (2018) suggest this ban has several implications: * exporting countries can use this as an opportunity to improve domestic recycled infrastructure and generate internal markets; * if recycling infrastructure is lacking, this provides further incentive for countries to reduce primary plastic production (and create more circular material models) to reduce the quantity of waste which needs to be handled; * it fundamentally changes the nature of global plastic trade, representing an opportunity to share and promote best practices of waste management, and harmonize technical standards on waste protocols; * some other countries may attempt to become a key plastic importer in place of China; one challenge is that many countries do not yet have sufficient waste management infrastructure to handle recycled waste imports; * countries considering importing significant quantities of plastic waste could consider an import tax specifically aimed at funding the development of sufficient infrastructure to handle such waste. <Chart url="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/displaced-plastic-chinese-import-ban"/> ## Additional FAQs on Plastics In addition to this main data entry we have collated some of the most common questions on plastics on our [FAQ on Plastics](https://owid.cloud/faq-on-plastics) page. You may find the answer to additional questions on this topic there. ## Data Quality & Definitions ### Data Definitions The definitions of key terms used in this entry are as follows: **Discarded: **waste that is not recycled or incinerated; this includes waste that goes to landfill (closed or open), is littered, or lost to the natural environment. **Incineration: **a method waste treatment which involves the burning of material at very high temperatures. In some cases, energy recovery from the incineration process is possible. The burning of plastics can release toxins to the air and surrounding environment and should therefore be carried out under controlled and regulated conditions. **Inadequately managed waste: **waste is not formally managed and includes disposal in dumps or open, uncontrolled landfills, where it is not fully contained. Inadequately managed waste has high risk of polluting rivers and oceans. This does not include 'littered' plastic waste, which is approximately 2% of total waste (including high-income countries).{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., … & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at: [http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768](http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768).{/ref} **Mismanaged waste: **material that is either littered or inadequately disposed (the sum of littered and inadequately disposed waste). Inadequately disposed waste is not formally managed and includes disposal in dumps or open, uncontrolled landfills, where it is not fully contained. Mismanaged waste could eventually enter the ocean via inland waterways, wastewater outflows, and transport by wind or tides.{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., … & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at: [http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768](http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768).{/ref} ### Plastic particles size categories Plastic particles are typically grouped into categories depending on their size (as measured by their diameter). The table summarizes some standard ranges for a given particle category.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., … & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at: [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913](http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913).{/ref} <div class="raw-html-table__container"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Particle category</strong></td><td><strong>Diameter range<br>(mm = millimetres)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Nanoplastics</td><td>< 0.0001 mm (0.1μm)</td></tr><tr><td>Small microplastics</td><td>0.00001 - 1 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Large microplastics</td><td>1 - 4.75 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Mesoplastics</td><td>4.76 - 200 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Macroplastics</td><td>>200 mm</td></tr></tbody></table></div> | { "id": 19690, "date": "2018-09-01T15:31:25", "guid": { "rendered": "https://owid.cloud/?page_id=19690" }, "link": "https://owid.cloud/plastic-pollution", "meta": { "owid_publication_context_meta_field": [], "owid_key_performance_indicators_meta_field": { "raw": "* It is estimated that **8 million tonnes** enter the world\u2019s oceans each year.", "rendered": "<ul>\n<li>It is estimated that <strong>8 million tonnes</strong> enter the world\u2019s oceans each year.</li>\n</ul>\n" } }, "slug": "plastic-pollution", "tags": [], "type": "page", "title": { "rendered": "Plastic Pollution" }, "_links": { "self": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/19690" } ], "about": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/types/page" } ], "author": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/users/17", "embeddable": true } ], "curies": [ { "href": "https://api.w.org/{rel}", "name": "wp", "templated": true } ], "replies": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/comments?post=19690", "embeddable": true } ], "wp:term": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/categories?post=19690", "taxonomy": "category", "embeddable": true }, { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/tags?post=19690", "taxonomy": "post_tag", "embeddable": true } ], "collection": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/pages" } ], "wp:attachment": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/media?parent=19690" } ], "version-history": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/19690/revisions", "count": 29 } ], "wp:featuredmedia": [ { "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/media/24884", "embeddable": true } ], "predecessor-version": [ { "id": 58235, "href": "https://owid.cloud/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/19690/revisions/58235" } ] }, "author": 17, "parent": 0, "status": "publish", "content": { "rendered": "\n<div class=\"blog-info\">\n<p>This article was first published in September 2018. It was updated in April 2022 based on the most recent research.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<iframe class=\"wp-block-full-content-width\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/plastic-pollution\" style=\"width: 100%; min-height: 740px; max-height: 950px; height: 100vh; border: 0px none !important;\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2192 <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/plastic-pollution\">Open the Data Explorer</a> in a new tab.</p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"/>\n\n\n\n<p>This is our main data entry on plastics, with a particular focus on its pollution of the environment.</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>We have also produced an <a href=\"http://ourworldindata.org/faq-on-plastics\">FAQs on Plastics</a> page which attempts to answer additional common questions on the topic.</li><li>A slide-deck summary of global plastics is <a href=\"https://slides.ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution\">available here</a>.</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The first synthetic plastic \u2014 <em>Bakelite</em> \u2014 was produced in 1907, marking the beginning of the global plastics industry. However, rapid growth in global plastic production was not realized until the 1950s. Over the next 70 years, annual production of plastics <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastics#global-plastic-production\">increased nearly 230-fold</a> to 460 million tonnes in 2019.</p>\n\n\n\t<div class=\"wp-block-owid-summary\">\n\t\t<h2>Summary</h2>\n\t\t\n\n<ul><li><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-does-plastic-impact-wildlife-and-human-health\">Plastic pollution is having a negative impact on our oceans and wildlife health</a></li><li><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#which-countries-produce-the-most-plastic-waste\">High-income countries generate more plastic waste per person</a></li><li><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#which-countries-emit-the-most-plastic-into-the-oceans\">But, most of the plastic that ends up in the ocean comes from rivers in low-to-middle income countries.</a></li><li><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#which-countries-produce-the-most-mismanaged-plastic-waste\">This is because they tend to have more <em>mismanaged</em> plastic waste, whereas high-income countries have much more effective waste management.</a></li><li>This makes the improvement of waste management systems across the world critical to reducing plastic pollution.</li><li><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-much-of-ocean-plastics-come-from-land-and-marine-sources\">Around 20% of all plastic waste in the oceans comes from marine sources. The other 80% comes from land.</a></li><li><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-much-of-ocean-plastics-come-from-land-and-marine-sources\">In some regions, marine sources dominate: More than 80% in the <em>Great Pacific Garbage Patch</em> (GPGP) come from fishing nets, ropes and lines</a></li><li><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/faq-on-plastics#are-plastic-alternatives-better-for-the-environment\">Plastic is a unique material with many benefits: it’s cheap, versatile, lightweight, and resistant. This makes it a valuable material for many functions. It can also provide environmental benefits: it plays a critical role in maintaining food quality, safety and reducing food waste. The trade-offs between plastics and substitutes (or complete bans) are therefore complex and could create negative knock-on impacts on the environment.</a></li></ul>\n\n\n\t</div>\n\n\n<h2>How much plastic enters the world’s oceans?</h2>\n\n\n\n<p>To understand the magnitude of input of plastics to the natural environment and the world’s oceans, we must understand various elements of the plastic production, distribution and waste management chain. This is crucial, not only in understanding the scale of the problem but in implementing the most effective interventions for reduction.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The data and visualizations which follow in this entry provide this overview step-by-step. This overview is summarized in the figure.{ref}The data used in this figure is based on the <em>Science</em> study: Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., \u2026 & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. <em>Science</em>, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at: <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768\" target=\"_blank\">http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here we see that in 2010:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>global primary production of plastic was 270 million tonnes;</li><li>global plastic waste was 275 million tonnes \u2013 it did exceed annual primary production through wastage of plastic from previous years;</li><li>plastic waste generated in coastal regions is most at risk of entering the oceans; in 2010 coastal plastic waste \u2013 generated within 50 kilometres of the coastline \u2013 amounted to 99.5 million tonnes;</li><li>only plastic waste which is improperly managed (mismanaged) is at significant risk of leakage to the environment; in 2010 this amounted to 31.9 million tonnes;</li><li>of this, 8 million tonnes \u2013 3% of global annual plastics waste \u2013 entered the ocean (through multiple outlets, including rivers);</li><li>Plastics in the oceans’ surface waters is several orders of magnitude lower than annual ocean plastic inputs. This discrepancy is known as the ‘missing plastic problem’ and is discussed <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem\">h</a><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#where-does-our-plastic-accumulate-in-the-ocean-and-what-does-that-mean-for-the-future\">e</a><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem\">re</a>. </li><li>The amount of plastic in surface waters is not very well known: estimates range from 10,000s to 100,000s tonnes.</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"800\" height=\"491\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-800x491.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-24884\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-800x491.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-150x92.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-400x246.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-768x472.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" /></a></figure></div>\n\n\n\n<h2>How much plastic does the world produce?</h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart shows the increase of global plastic production, measured in tonnes per year, from 1950 onwards.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1950 the world produced only 2 million tonnes per year. Since then, annual production has increased nearly 230-fold, reaching 460 million tonnes in 2019.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The short downturn in annual production in 2009 and 2010 was predominantly the result of the 2008 global financial crisis \u2014 a similar dent is seen across several metrics of resource production and consumption, <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-and-changing-energy-sources#global-total-energy-production-long-run-view-by-source\" target=\"_blank\">including energy</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-plastics-production\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h4>Cumulative production</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>How much plastic has the world produced cumulatively? </p>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart shows that by 2019, the world had produced 9.5 billion tonnes of plastic \u2014 more than one tonne of plastic for every person alive today.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-global-plastics\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h2>How do we dispose of our plastic?</h2>\n\n\n\n<h4>Plastic disposal methods</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>How has global plastic waste disposal method changed over time? In the chart we see the share of global plastic waste that is discarded, recycled or incinerated from 1980 through to 2015.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prior to 1980, recycling and incineration of plastic was negligible; 100 percent was therefore discarded. From 1980 for incineration, and 1990 for recycling, rates increased on average by about 0.7 percent per year.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>3</em>(7), e1700782. Available at: <a href=\"http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782\">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> In 2015, an estimated 55 percent of global plastic waste was discarded, 25 percent was incinerated, and 20 percent recycled.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>If we extrapolate historical trends through to 2050 \u2014 as can be seen in the <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-fate-to-2050\">chart here</a> \u2014 by 2050, incineration rates would increase to 50 percent; recycling to 44 percent; and discarded waste would fall to 6 percent. However, note that this is based on the simplistic extrapolation of historic trends and does not represent concrete projections.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-fate\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h4>Global plastic production to fate</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>In the figure we summarize global plastic production to final fate over the period 1950 to 2015.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>3</em>(7), e1700782. Available at: <a href=\"http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782\">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> This is given in cumulative million tonnes.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>As shown:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>cumulative production of polymers, synthetic fibers and additives was 8300 million tonnes;</li><li>2500 million tonnes (30 percent) of primary plastics was still in use in 2015;</li><li>4600 million tonnes (55 percent) went straight to landfill or was discarded;</li><li>700 million tonnes (8 percent) was incinerated;</li><li>500 million tonnes (6 percent) was recycled (100 million tonnes of recycled plastic was still in use; 100 million tonnes was later incinerated; and 300 million tonnes was later discarded or sent to landfill).</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Of the 5800 million tonnes of primary plastic no longer in use, only 9 percent has been recycled since 1950.</p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/plastic-fate.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"605\" height=\"550\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/plastic-fate-605x550.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-20291\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/plastic-fate-605x550.png 605w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/plastic-fate-150x136.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/plastic-fate-400x363.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/plastic-fate-768x698.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/plastic-fate.png 1747w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 605px) 100vw, 605px\" /></a></figure></div>\n\n\n\n<h2>Which sectors produce the most plastic?</h2>\n\n\n\n<h4>Plastic use by sector</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>To which industries and product uses is primary plastic production allocated? In the chart we see plastic production allocation by sector for 2015.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Packaging was the dominant use of primary plastics, with 42 percent of plastics entering the use phase.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>3</em>(7), e1700782. Available at: <a href=\"http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782\">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> Building and construction was the second largest sector utilizing 19 percent of the total. Primary plastic production does not directly reflect plastic waste generation (as shown in the next section), since this is also influenced by the polymer type and <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">lifetime of the end product</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Primary plastic production by polymer type can be <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-production-polymer\">found here</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-production-by-sector\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h4>Plastic waste by sector</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>This chart shows the use of primary plastics by sector; in the chart we show these same sectors in terms of plastic waste generation. Plastic waste generation is strongly influenced by primary plastic use, but also the <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic\" target=\"_blank\">product lifetime</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Packaging, for example, has a very short ‘in-use’ lifetime (typically around 6 months or less). This is in contrast to building and construction, where plastic use has a <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mean-product-lifetime-plastic\" target=\"_blank\">mean lifetime</a> of 35 years.{ref}Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>3</em>(7), e1700782. Available at: <a href=\"http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782\">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> Packaging is therefore the dominant generator of plastic waste, responsible for almost half of the global total.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2015, primary plastics production was 407 million tonnes; around three-quarters (302 million tonnes) ended up as waste.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plastic waste breakdown by polymer type can be <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-polymer\">found here</a>.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-by-sector\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h2>Plastic waste by country</h2>\n\n\n\n<h3>Which countries produce the most total plastic waste?</h3>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>In the chart we see the per capita rate of plastic waste generation, measured in kilograms per person per day. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here we see differences of around an order of magnitude: daily per capita plastic waste across the highest countries \u2013 Kuwait, Guyana, Germany, Netherlands, Ireland, the United States \u2013 is more than ten times higher than across many countries such as India, Tanzania, Mozambique and Bangladesh.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>These figures represent total plastic waste generation and do not account for differences in waste management, recycling or incineration. They therefore do not represent quantities of plastic at risk of loss to the ocean or other waterways.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-per-capita\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Related chart:</strong></p>\n\n\n <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-generation-total</link-url>\n <title></title>\n <content></content>\n <figure></figure>\n </block></div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h3>Which countries produce the most mismanaged plastic waste?</h3>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>Plastic will only enter rivers and the ocean if it\u2019s poorly managed. In rich countries, nearly all of its plastic waste is incinerated, recycled, or sent to well-managed landfills. It\u2019s not left open to the surrounding environment. Low-to-middle income countries tend to have poorer waste management infrastructure. Waste can be dumped outside of landfills, and landfills that do exist are often open, leaking waste to the surrounding environment. </p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Mismanaged</em> waste in low-to-middle income countries is therefore much higher.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mismanaged waste is material which is at high risk of entering the ocean via wind or tidal transport, or carried to coastlines from inland waterways. Mismanaged waste is the sum of material which is either littered or inadequately disposed. Inadequately disposed and littered waste are different, and are defined in the sections below.</p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/admin/charts/4873/edit\">Per capita mismanaged waste</a> in the Philippines is 100 times higher than in the UK. When we multiply by population (giving us <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/admin/charts/4880/edit\">each country\u2019s total</a>), India, China, the Philippines, Brazil, and Nigeria top the list. Each country\u2019s share of global mismanaged waste is shown in the map.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-mismanaged-plastic-waste?country=Asia~Africa~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Related charts:</strong></p>\n\n\n <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-mismanaged</link-url>\n <title></title>\n <content></content>\n <figure></figure>\n </block>\n\n <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/mismanaged-plastic-waste-per-capita</link-url>\n <title></title>\n <content></content>\n <figure></figure>\n </block></div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h3>Probability that mismanaged plastic waste gets emitted to the ocean</h3>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>Not all mismanaged plastic waste has the same probability that it reaches river networks, and then the ocean. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>The climate, terrain, land use, and distances within river basins affect the probability that mismanaged plastic waste is emitted to the ocean.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This interactive chart shows the probability that mismanaged waste is emitted to the ocean.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/probability-mismanaged-plastic-ocean?country=MYS~PHL~CHN~IND~LKA~BRA~NGA~TZA\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h3>Which countries emit the most plastic into the oceans?</h3>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>The distribution of plastic inputs is reflected on the world map. There we see each country\u2019s share of global plastic emissions.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Philippines accounts for more than one-third (36%) of plastic inputs \u2013 unsurprising given the fact that it\u2019s home to seven of the top ten rivers. This is because the Philippines consists of many small islands where the majority of the population lives near the coast.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean?country=Africa~Asia~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Related charts:</strong></p>\n\n\n <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean</link-url>\n <title></title>\n <content></content>\n <figure></figure>\n </block>\n\n <block type=\"prominent-link\" style=\"is-style-thin\">\n <link-url>https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-ocean-plastic-waste</link-url>\n <title></title>\n <content>\n\n<p></p>\n\n</content>\n <figure></figure>\n </block></div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h4>Plastic emitted to the ocean by region</h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>This chart shows how global plastics emitted into the oceans breaks down by region.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-global-plastic-waste-emitted-to-the-ocean?tab=chart&country=Africa~Asia~Europe~South+America~North+America~Oceania\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h2>How much of ocean plastics come from land and marine sources?</h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Plastic in our oceans can arise from both land-based or marine sources. Plastics pollution from marine sources refers to the pollution caused by fishing fleets that leave behind fishing nets, lines, ropes, and sometimes abandoned vessels.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is often intense debate about the relative importance of marine and land sources for ocean pollution. What is the relative contribution of each?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the global level, best estimates suggest that approximately 80 percent of ocean plastics come from land-based sources, and the remaining 20 percent from marine sources.{ref}Li, W. C., Tse, H. F., & Fok, L. (2016). Plastic waste in the marine environment: A review of sources, occurrence and effects. <em>Science of the Total Environment</em>, <em>566</em>, 333-349. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716310154\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716310154</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of the 20 percent from marine sources, it’s estimated that around half (10 percentage points) arises from fishing fleets (such as nets, lines and abandoned vessels). This is supported by figures from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) which suggests abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear contributes approximately 10 percent to total ocean plastics.{ref}UNEP & FAO (2009). Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 523; UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 185. Available at: <a href=\"http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0620e/i0620e00.htm\">http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0620e/i0620e00.htm</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Other estimates allocate a slightly higher contribution of marine sources, at 28 percent of total ocean plastics.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Although uncertain, it’s likely that marine sources contribute between 20% to 30% of ocean plastics, but the dominant source remains land-based input at 70% to 80%.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Whilst this is the relative contribution as an aggregate of global ocean plastics, the relative contribution of different sources will vary depending on geographical location and context. For example, our most recent estimates of the contribution of marine sources to the ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ (GPGP) is that abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear make up 75% of 86% of floating plastic mass (greater than 5 centimeters).{ref}Lebreton, L., Royer, SJ., Peytavin, A. <em>et al.</em> (2022). <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16529-0\">Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre</a>. <em>Scientific Rep</em>orts <strong>12</strong>, 12666.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Previous studies (notably Lebreton et al. 2018) estimated that plastic lines, ropes, and fishing nets contributed just over half of the plastic mass in the ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’. More recent studies estimate that this share is higher \u2013 giving the 75% to 86% referenced here.<br><br>Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref} This research suggests that most of this fishing activity originates from five countries \u2013 Japan, South Korea, China, the United States and Taiwan.</p>\n\n\n\n<h2>River inputs to the ocean</h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>To tackle plastic pollution we need to know what rivers these plastics are coming from. It also helps if we understand <em>why</em> these rivers emit so much.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Most of the world\u2019s largest emitting rivers are in Asia, with some also in East Africa and the Caribbean. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the chart we see the ten largest contributors.{ref}This data comes from Meijer, L. J., van Emmerik, T., van der Ent, R., Schmidt, C., & Lebreton, L. (2021). <a href=\"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5803\">More than 1000 rivers account for 80% of global riverine plastic emissions into the ocean</a>. <em>Science Advances</em>, <em>7</em>(18), eaaz5803.{/ref} This is shown as each river\u2019s share of the global total. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>You can explore the data on the top 50 rivers using the <em>+Add river</em> button on the chart.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Seven of the top ten rivers are in the Philippines. Two are in India, and one in Malaysia. The Pasig River in the Philippines alone accounts for 6.4% of global river plastics. This paints a very different picture to earlier studies where it was Asia\u2019s largest rivers \u2013 the Yangtze, Xi, and Huangpu rivers in China, and Ganges in India \u2013 that were dominant.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>What are the characteristics of the largest emitting rivers?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>First, plastic pollution is dominant where the local waste management practices are poor. This means there is a large amount of mismanaged plastic waste that can enter rivers and the ocean in the first place. This makes clear that improving waste management is essential if we\u2019re to tackle plastic pollution. Second, the largest emitters tend to have cities nearby: this means there are a lot of paved surfaces where both water and plastic can drain into river outlets. Cities such as Jakarta in Indonesia and Manila in the Philippines are drained by relatively small rivers but account for a large share of plastic emissions. Third, the river basins had high precipitation rates (meaning plastics washed into rivers, and the flow rate of rivers to the ocean was high). Fourth, distance matters: the largest emitting rivers had cities nearby and were also very close to the coast.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The authors of the study illustrate the importance of the additional climate, basin terrain, and proximity factors with a real-life example. The Ciliwung River basin in Java is 275 times smaller than the Rhine river basin in Europe and generates 75% less plastic waste. Yet it emits 100 times as much plastic to the ocean each year (200 to 300 tonnes versus only 3 to 5 tonnes). The Ciliwung River emits much more plastic to the ocean, despite being much smaller because the basin\u2019s waste is generated very close to the river (meaning the plastic gets into the river network in the first place) and the river network is also much closer to the ocean. It also gets much more rainfall meaning the plastic waste is more easily transported than in the Rhine basin.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want to explore the plastic inputs from each of the world\u2019s rivers, the Ocean Cleanup Project <a href=\"https://theoceancleanup.com/sources/\">provides a beautiful interactive map</a> where you can see this in more detail.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastics-top-rivers?country=Pasig+%28Philippines%29~Tullahan+%28Philippines%29~Ganges+%28India%29~Ulhas+%28India%29~Klang+%28Malaysia%29~Meycauayan+%28Philippines%29~Pampanga+%28Philippines%29~Libmanan+%28Philippines%29~Rio+Grande+de+Mindanao+%28Philippines%29~Agno+%28Philippines%29\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\"></iframe>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h2>Which oceans have the most plastic waste?</h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Plastic enters the oceans from coastlines, rivers, tides, and marine sources. But once it is there, where does it go?</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The distribution and accumulation of ocean plastics is strongly influenced by oceanic surface currents and wind patterns. Plastics are typically buoyant \u2013 meaning they float on the ocean surface \u2013, allowing them to be transported by the prevalent wind and surface current routes. As a result, plastics tend to accumulate in <a href=\"https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/gyre.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">oceanic gyres</a>, with high concentrations of plastics at the centre of ocean basins, and much less around the perimeters. After entry to oceans from coastal regions, plastics tend to migrate towards the centre of ocean basins.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the chart we see estimates of the mass of plastics in surface ocean waters by ocean basin. Eriksen et al. (2014) estimated that there was approximately 269,000 tonnes of plastic in surface waters across the world.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., \u2026 & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at: <a href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913\">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> Note that this at least an order of magnitude lower than estimated inputs of plastics to the ocean; the discrepancy here relates to a surprising, but long-standing question in the research literature on plastics: “<a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#the-missing-plastic-problem\">where is the missing plastic going?</a>“.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>As we see, basins in the Northern Hemisphere had the highest quantity of plastics. This would be expected since the majority of the world’s population \u2013 and in particular, coastal populations \u2013 live within the Northern Hemisphere. However, authors were still surprised by the quantity of plastic accumulation in Southern oceans \u2014 while it was lower than in the Northern Hemisphere, it was still of the same order of magnitude. Considering the lack of coastal populations and plastic inputs in the Southern Hemisphere, this was an unexpected result. The authors suggest this means plastic pollution can be moved between oceanic gyres and basins much more readily than previously assumed.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/surface-plastic-mass-by-ocean\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h4>Plastic particles in the world’s surface ocean</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>It’s estimated that there are more than 5 trillion plastic particles in the world’s surface waters.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., \u2026 & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at: <a href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913\">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> We can see this breakdown of plastic particles by ocean basin <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/surface-plastic-particles-by-ocean\">here</a>. The accumulation of a large <em>number</em> of particles tends to result from the breakdown of larger plastics \u2014 this results in an accumulation of plastic particles for a given mass.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The figure summarizes plastics in the ocean surface waters by basin. This is shown by particle size in terms of mass (left) and particle count (right). As shown, the majority of plastics by mass are large particles (macroplastics), whereas the majority in terms of particle count are microplastics (small particles).</p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Surface-ocean-plastic.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"750\" height=\"331\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Surface-ocean-plastic-750x331.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-20224\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Surface-ocean-plastic-750x331.png 750w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Surface-ocean-plastic-150x66.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Surface-ocean-plastic-400x176.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Surface-ocean-plastic-768x339.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px\" /></a></figure></div>\n\n\n\n<h4>The ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ (GPGP)</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The most well-known example of large plastic accumulations in surface waters is the so-called ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ (GPGP). As shown in the chart here, the largest accumulation of plastics within ocean basins is the North Pacific. This results from the combined impact of large coastal plastic inputs in the region, alongside intensive fishing activity in the Pacific ocean.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a <em>Nature</em> study, Lebreton et al. (2018) attempted to quantify the characteristics of the GPGP.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> The vast majority of GPGP material is plastics \u2014 trawling samples indicate an estimated 99.9 percent of all floating debris. The authors estimate the GPGP spanned 1.6 million km<sup>2</sup>. This is just over three times the area of Spain, and slightly larger in area to Alaska (the USA’s largest state).{ref}The reported <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_area#Countries_greater_than_1.5_million_km2\">land area of Spain</a> is approximately 500,000 square kilometres, and Alaska is an <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_area\">estimated 1.5 million</a> square kilometres.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The GPGP comprised 1.8 trillion pieces of plastic, with a mass of 79,000 tonnes (approximately 29 percent of the 269,000 tonnes in the world’s surface oceans). Over recent decades, the authors report there has been an exponential increase in concentration of surface plastics in the GPGP.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Our most recent estimates of the contribution of marine sources to the ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ (GPGP) is that abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear make up 75% of 86% of floating plastic mass (greater than 5 centimeters).{ref}Lebreton, L., Royer, SJ., Peytavin, A. <em>et al.</em> (2022). <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16529-0\">Industrialised fishing nations largely contribute to floating plastic pollution in the North Pacific subtropical gyre</a>. <em>Scientific Rep</em>orts <strong>12</strong>, 12666.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Previous studies (notably Lebreton et al. 2018) estimated that plastic lines, ropes, and fishing nets contributed just over half of the plastic mass in the ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’. More recent studies estimate that this share is higher \u2013 giving the 75% to 86% referenced here.<br><br>Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref} This research suggests that most of this fishing activity originates from five countries \u2013 Japan, South Korea, China, the United States and Taiwan.</p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"750\" height=\"430\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch-750x430.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-20267\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch-750x430.png 750w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch-150x86.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch-400x230.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch-768x441.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2018/08/Great-Pacific-Garbage-Patch.png 1974w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px\" /></a></figure></div>\n\n\n\n<h2>Where does our plastic accumulate in the ocean and what does that mean for the future?</h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p>The world now produces more than <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#how-much-plastic-does-the-world-produce\">380 million tonnes</a> of plastic every year, which could end up as pollutants, entering our natural environment and oceans.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of course, not all of our plastic waste ends up in the ocean, most ends up in landfills: it\u2019s estimated that the share of global plastic waste that enters the ocean is around 3%.{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., \u2026 & Law, K. L. (2015). <a href=\"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768\">Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean</a>. <em>Science</em>, 347(6223), 768-771.{/ref} In 2010 \u2013 the year for which we have the latest estimates \u2013 that was around 8 million tonnes.{ref}The estimates for this figure range from around 4 to 12 million tonnes, with 8 million as a midpoint. In the context of this discussion, the uncertainty in this value is less important: the difference between ocean plastic inputs and observed plastic in surface ocean waters are orders of magnitude \u2013 rather than multiples \u2013 apart.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Most of the plastic materials we produce are less dense than water and should therefore float at the ocean surface. But our best estimates of the amount of plastic afloat at sea are orders of magnitude lower than the amount of plastic that enters our oceans in a single year: as we show in the visualization, it\u2019s far lower than 8 million tonnes and instead in the order of 10s to 100s of thousands of tonnes. One of the most widely-quoted estimates is 250,000 tonnes.{ref}Eriksen, M. et al. <a href=\"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913\">Plastic pollution in the world\u2019s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea</a>. <em>Plos One</em> 9, e111913 (2014).{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>If we currently pollute our oceans with millions of tonnes of plastic each year, we must have released tens of millions of tonnes in recent decades. Why then do we find at least 100 times less plastics in our surface waters? </p>\n\n\n\n<p>This discrepancy is often referred to as the \u2018missing plastic problem\u2019.{ref}Lebreton, L., Slat, B., Ferrari, F., Sainte-Rose, B., Aitken, J., Marthouse, R., \u2026 & Noble, K. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>8</em>(1), 4666. Available at:<a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w\"> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w</a>.{/ref} It\u2019s a conundrum we need to address if we want to understand where plastic waste could end up, and what its impacts might be for wildlife, ecosystems and health.</p>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column\">\n<p> </p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"3326\" height=\"2043\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-24884\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean.png 3326w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-150x92.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-400x246.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-768x472.png 768w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-800x491.png 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 3326px) 100vw, 3326px\" /></figure>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n\n\n<h4>The \u2018missing plastic problem\u2019</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>There are several hypotheses to explain the \u2018missing plastic problem\u2019. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>One possibility is that it is due to imprecise measurement: we might either grossly overestimate the amount of plastic waste we release into the ocean, or underestimate the amount floating in the surface ocean. Whilst we know that tracking ocean plastic inputs and their distribution is notoriously difficult{ref}Cressey, D. (2016). <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/news/bottles-bags-ropes-and-toothbrushes-the-struggle-to-track-ocean-plastics-1.20432\">Bottles, bags, ropes and toothbrushes: the struggle to track ocean plastics</a>. <em>Nature News</em>, <em>536</em>(7616), 263.{/ref} the levels of uncertainty in these measurements are much less than the several orders of magnitude that would be needed to explain the missing plastic problem.{ref}Lebreton, L., Egger, M., & Slat, B. (2019). <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49413-5\">A global mass budget for positively buoyant macroplastic debris in the ocean</a>. <em>Scientific reports</em>, <em>9</em>(1), 1-10.{/ref} <br><br>Another popular hypothesis is that ultraviolet light (UV) and mechanical wave forces break large pieces of plastic into smaller ones.These smaller particles, referred to as microplastics, are much more easily incorporated into sediments or ingested by organisms. And this is where the missing plastic might end up.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>One proposed \u2018sink\u2019 for ocean plastics was deep-sea sediments; a study which sampled deep-sea sediments across several basins found that microplastic was up to four orders of magnitude more abundant (per unit volume) in deep-sea sediments from the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean than in plastic-polluted surface waters.{ref}Woodall, L. C., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., Paterson, G. L., Coppock, R., Sleight, V., \u2026 & Thompson, R. C. (2014). <a href=\"http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/4/140317\">The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris</a>. <em>Royal Society Open Science</em>, 1(4), 140317.{/ref}<br><br>But, new research may suggest a third explanation: that plastics in the ocean break down slower than previously thought, and that much of the missing plastic is washed up or buried in our shorelines.{ref}Lebreton, L., Egger, M., & Slat, B. (2019). <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49413-5\">A global mass budget for positively buoyant macroplastic debris in the ocean</a>. <em>Scientific reports</em>, <em>9</em>(1), 1-10.{/ref} </p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Plastics persist for decades and accumulate on our shorelines</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>To try to understand the conundrum of what happens to plastic waste when it enters the ocean, Lebreton, Egger and Slat (2019) created a global model of ocean plastics from 1950 to 2015. This model uses data on global plastic production, emissions into the ocean by plastic type and age, and transport and degradation rates to map not only the amount of plastic in different environments in the ocean, but also its age.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The authors aimed to quantify where plastic accumulates in the ocean across three environments: the shoreline (defined as dry land bordering the ocean), coastal areas (defined as waters with a depth less than 200 meters) and offshore (waters with a depth greater than 200 meters). They wanted to understand where plastic accumulates, and how old it is: a few years old, ten years or decades? </p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the visualization I summarized their results. This is shown for two categories of plastics: shown in blue are \u2018macroplastics\u2019 (larger plastic materials greater than 0.5 centimeters in diameter) and shown in red microplastics (smaller particles less than 0.5 centimeters). </p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are some key points we can take away from the visualization:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The vast majority \u2013 82 million tonnes of macroplastics and 40 million tonnes of microplastics \u2013 is washed up, buried or resurfaced along the world\u2019s shorelines.</li><li>Much of the macroplastics in our shorelines is from the past 15 years, but still a significant amount is older suggesting it can persist for several decades without breaking down.</li><li>In coastal regions most macroplastics (79%) are recent \u2013 less than 5 years old.</li><li>In offshore environments, older microplastics have had longer to accumulate than in coastal regions. There macroplastics from several decades ago \u2013 even as far back as the 1950s and 1960s \u2013 persist. </li><li>Most microplastics (three-quarters) in offshore environments are from the 1990s and earlier, suggesting it can take several decades for plastics to break down.</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>What does this mean for our understanding of the \u2018missing plastic\u2019 problem?</p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Firstly</strong>, is that the majority of ocean plastics are washed, buried and resurface along our shorelines. Whilst we try to tally ocean inputs with the amount floating in gyres at the centre of our oceans, most of it may be accumulating around the edges of the oceans. This would explain why we find much less in surface waters than we\u2019d expect. </p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Secondly</strong>, accumulated plastics are much older than previously thought. Macroplastics appear to persist in the surface of the ocean for decades without breaking down. Offshore we find large plastic objects dating as far back as the 1950s and 1960s. This goes against previous hypotheses of the \u2018missing plastic\u2019 problem which suggested that UV light and wave action degrade and remove them from the surface in only a few years. </p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"800\" height=\"396\" src=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Where-does-plastic-accumulate-800x396.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-24886\" srcset=\"https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Where-does-plastic-accumulate-800x396.png 800w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Where-does-plastic-accumulate-150x74.png 150w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Where-does-plastic-accumulate-400x198.png 400w, https://owid.cloud/app/uploads/2019/09/Where-does-plastic-accumulate-768x380.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" /></figure>\n\n\n\n<h4>How much plastic will remain in surface oceans in the coming decades?</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The study by Lebreton, Egger and Slat challenges the previous hypotheses that plastics in the surface ocean have a very short lifetime, quickly degrade into microplastics and sink to greater depths. Their results suggest that macroplastics can persist for decades; can be buried and resurfaced along shorelines; and end up in offshore regions years later. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>If true, this matters a lot for how much plastic we would expect in our surface oceans in the decades which follow. The same study also modelled how the mass of plastics \u2013 both macro and micro \u2013 in the world\u2019s surface waters might evolve under three scenarios:</p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>we stop emitting any plastics to our oceans by 2020;</li><li>\u2018emissions\u2019 of plastic to the ocean continue to increase until 2020 then level off;</li><li>\u2018emissions\u2019 continue to grow to 2050 in line with historic growth rates.{ref}Under growth scenarios, the authors assume annual growth rates continue in line with the average increase in global plastic production over the decade from 2005-2015.{/ref}</li></ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Their results are shown in the charts.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The scenarios of continued emissions growth are what we\u2019d expect: if we continue to release more plastics to the ocean, we\u2019ll have more in our surface waters. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>What\u2019s more striking is that even if we stopped ocean plastic waste by 2020, macroplastics would persist in our surface waters for many more decades. This is because we have a large legacy of plastics buried and awash on our shorelines which would continue to resurface and be transported to offshore regions; and existing plastics can persist in the ocean environment for many decades.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The amount of microplastics in our surface ocean will increase under every scenario because the large plastics that we already have on our shorelines and surface waters will continue to breakdown. And, any additional plastics we add will contribute further. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>This also matters for how we solve the problem of ocean pollution.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>If we want to rapidly reduce the amount of both macro- and microplastics in our oceans, these results suggest two priorities:<br><br> <em>Number one</em> \u2014 we must stop plastic waste entering our waterways as soon as possible. Most of the plastic that ends up in our oceans does so because of <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#mismanaged-plastic-waste\">poor waste management</a> practices \u2013 particularly in <a href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#what-determines-how-much-mismanaged-waste-we-produce\">low-to-middle income countries</a>; this means that good waste management across the world is essential to achieving this.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>But this ambitious target alone will not be enough. We have many decades of legacy waste to contend with.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This makes a <em>second priority</em> necessary\u2014 we have to focus our efforts on recapturing and removing plastics already in our offshore waters and shorelines. This is the goal of Slat, Lebreton and Egger \u2013 the authors of this paper \u2013 with their <a href=\"https://theoceancleanup.com/\">Ocean Cleanup</a> project.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/macroplastics-in-ocean\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<iframe src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/microplastics-in-ocean\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h2>How does plastic impact wildlife and human health?</h2>\n\n\n\n<p>There have been many documented incidences of the impact of plastic on ecosystems and wildlife. Peer-reviewed publications of plastic impacts date back to the 1980s. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>An analysis by Rochman et al. (2016){ref}This data is also presented in the review by Law (2017): Law, K. L. (2017). Plastics in the marine environment. <em>Annual review of marine science</em>, <em>9</em>, 205-229. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409\">https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409</a>.{/ref} reviews the findings of peer-reviewed documentation of the impacts of marine plastic debris on animal life; the results of this study are presented in <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https://ourworldindata.org/ecological-impacts-of-marine-plastic-debris/\" target=\"_blank\">this table</a>.{ref}Rochman, C. M., Browne, M. A., Underwood, A. J., Van Franeker, J. A., Thompson, R. C., & Amaral\u2010Zettler, L. A. (2016). The ecological impacts of marine debris: unraveling the demonstrated evidence from what is perceived. <em>Ecology</em>, <em>97</em>(2), 302-312. Available at: <a href=\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/14-2070.1\">https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/14-2070.1</a>.{/ref} </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nonetheless, despite many documented cases, it’s widely acknowledged that the full extent of impacts on ecosystems is not yet known.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are three key pathways by which plastic debris can affect wildlife{ref}Law, K. L. (2017). Plastics in the marine environment. <em>Annual review of marine science</em>, <em>9</em>, 205-229. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409\">https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409</a>.{/ref}:</p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Entanglement</strong> \u2013 the entrapping, encircling or constricting of marine animals by plastic debris. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Entanglement cases have been reported for at least 344 species to date, including all marine turtle species, more than two-thirds of seal species, one-third of whale species, and one-quarter of seabirds.{ref}K\u00fchn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em> (pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham. Available at: <a href=\"https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4\">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4</a>.{/ref} Entanglement by 89 species of fish and 92 species of invertebrates has also been recorded.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Entanglements most commonly involve plastic rope and netting{ref}Gall, S. C., & Thompson, R. C. (2015). The impact of debris on marine life. <em>Marine pollution bulletin</em>, <em>92</em>(1-2), 170-179. Available at: <a href=\"https://web.archive.org/web/20190719200908/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X14008571\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X14008571</a>.{/ref} and abandoned fishing gear.{ref}K\u00fchn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em> (pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham. Available at: <a href=\"https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4\">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4</a>.{/ref} However, entanglement by other plastics such as packaging have also been recorded.</p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Ingestion</strong>: </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ingestion of plastic can occur unintentionally, intentionally, or indirectly through the ingestion of prey species containing plastic. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>It has been documented for at least 233 marine species, including all marine turtle species, more than one-third of seal species, 59% of whale species, and 59% of seabirds.{ref}K\u00fchn, S., Rebolledo, E. L. B., & van Franeker, J. A. (2015). Deleterious effects of litter on marine life. In <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em> (pp. 75-116). Springer, Cham. Available at: <a href=\"https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4\">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_4</a>.{/ref} Ingestion by 92 species of fish and 6 species of invertebrates has also been recorded.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>The size of the ingested material is ultimately limited by the size of the organism. Very small particles such as plastic fibres can be taken up by small organisms such as filter-feeding oysters or mussels; larger materials such as plastic films, cigarette packets, and food packaging have been found in large fish species; and in extreme cases, documented cases of sperm whales have shown ingestion of very large materials including 9m of rope, 4.5m of hose, two flowerpots, and large amounts of plastic sheeting.{ref}de Stephanis R, Gimenez J, Carpinelli E, Gutierrez-Exposito C, Canadas A. 2013. As main meal for sperm whales: plastics debris. <em>Marine Pollution Bulletin</em> 69:206\u201314.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ingestion of plastics can have multiple impacts on organism health. Large volumes of plastic can greatly reduce stomach capacity, leading to poor appetite and false sense of satiation.{ref}Day RH, Wehle DHS, Coleman FC. 1985. Ingestion of plastic pollutants by marine birds. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Fate and Impact of Marine Debris, 27\u201329 November 1984, Honolulu, Hawaii, ed. RS Shomura, HO Yoshida, pp. 344\u201386. Tech. Memo. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFC-54. Washington, DC: Natl. Ocean. Atmos. Adm.{/ref} Plastic can also obstruct or perforate the gut, cause ulcerative lesions, or gastric rupture. This can ultimately lead to death.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>In laboratory settings, biochemical responses to plastic ingestion have also been observed. These responses include oxidative stress, metabolic disruption, reduced enzyme activity, and cellular necrosis.{ref}Browne MA, Niven SJ, Galloway TS, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC. 2013. Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. <em>Current Biology</em> 23:2388\u201392.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Cedervall T, Hansson LA, Lard M, Frohm B, Linse S. 2012. Food chain transport of nanoparticles affects behaviour and fat metabolism in fish. <em>PLOS ONE</em> 7:e32254{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Oliveira M, Ribeiro A, Hylland K, Guilhermino L. 2013. Single and combined effects of microplastics and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Teleostei, Gobiidae). <em>Ecological Indicators</em> 34:641\u201347{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Rochman CM, Hoh E, Kurobe T, Teh SJ. 2013. Ingested plastic transfers hazardous chemicals to fish and induces hepatic stress. <em>Scientific Reports</em> 3:3263{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Interaction</strong> \u2013 interaction includes collisions, obstructions, abrasions or use as substrate.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are multiple scenarios where this can have an impact on organisms.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fishing gear, for example, has been shown to cause abrasion and damage to coral reef ecosystems upon collision. Ecosystem structures can also be impacted by plastics following interference of substrate with plastics (impacting on light penetration, organic matter availability and oxygen exchange).</p>\n\n\n\n<h3>What are the impacts of microplastics on health?</h3>\n\n\n\n<h4>Impact of microplastics on wildlife</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>As discussed in the section on ‘Impacts on Wildlife’ above, there are several ways in which plastics can interact or influence wildlife. In the case of microplastics (particles smaller than 4.75 millimeter in diameter), the key concern is ingestion.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ingestion of microplastics have been shown to occur for many organisms. This can occur through several mechanisms, ranging from uptake by filter-feeders, swallowing from surrounding water, or consumption of organisms that have previously ingested microplastics.{ref}Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. <em>Nature Ecology & Evolution</em>, <em>1</em>(5), 0116. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There a number of potential effects of microplastics at different biological levels, which range from sub-cellular to ecosystems, but most research has focused on impacts in individual adult organisms.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Microplastic ingestion rarely causes mortality in any organisms. As such, ‘lethal concentration’ (LC) values which are often measured and reported for contaminants do not exist. There are a few exceptions: common <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goby\">goby</a> exposure to polyethylene and pyrene; Asian green mussels exposed to polyvinylchloride (PVC); and <i>Daphnia magna</i> neonates exposed to polyethylene{ref}Oliveira, M., Ribeiro, A., Hylland, K. & Guilhermino, L. Single and combined effects of microplastics and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby <em>Pomatoschistus microps</em> (Teleostei, Gobiidae)<br>. <em>Ecological Indicators,</em> <strong>34</strong>, 641\u2013647 (2013). Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X13002501\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X13002501</a>.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Rist, S. E. <em>et al</em>. Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel <em>Perna viridis</em><br>. <em>Marine Pollution Bulletin</em> <strong>111</strong>, 213\u2013220 (2016). Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380</a>.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Ogonowski, M., Sch\u00fcr, C., Jars\u00e9n, \u00c5. & Gorokhova, E. The effects of natural and anthropogenic microparticles on individual fitness in <em>Daphnia magna</em>.<br> <em>PLoS ONE</em> <strong>11</strong>, e0155063 (2016). Available at: <a href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063\">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p> In such studies, however, concentrations and exposure to microplastics far exceeded levels which would be encountered in the natural environment (even a highly contaminated one).</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is increasing evidence that microplastic ingestion can affect the consumption of prey, leading to energy depletion, inhibited growth and fertility impacts. When organisms ingest microplastics, it can take up space in the gut and digestive system, leading to reductions in feeding signals. This feeling of fullness can reduce dietary intake. Evidence of impacts of reduced food consumption include:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>slower metabolic rate and survival in Asian green mussels{ref}Rist, S. E. <em>et al</em>. Suspended micro-sized PVC particles impair the performance and decrease survival in the Asian green mussel <em>Perna viridis</em><br>. <em>Marine Pollution Bulletin</em> <strong>111</strong>, 213\u2013220 (2016). Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X16305380</a>.{/ref}</li><li>reduced reproducibility and survival in copepods{ref}Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C. & Galloway, T. The impact of polystyrene microplastics on feeding, function and fecundity in the marine copepod <em>Calanus helgolandicus</em>.<br> <em>Environment, Science & Technology,</em> <strong>49</strong>, 1130\u20131137 (2015). Available at: <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563688\">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563688</a>.{/ref}</li><li>reduced growth and development of <em>Daphnia</em>{ref}Ogonowski, M., Sch\u00fcr, C., Jars\u00e9n, \u00c5. & Gorokhova, E. The effects of natural and anthropogenic microparticles on individual fitness in <br>Daphnia magna<em>. PLoS ONE, <strong>11</strong>, e0155063 (2016). Available at: <a href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063\">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155063</a>.</em>{/ref}</li><li>reduced growth and development of langoustine{ref}Welden, N. A. C. & Cowie, P. R. Environment and gut morphology influence microplastic retention in langoustine, <em>Nephrops norvegicus</em>.<br> <em>Environmental Pollution,</em> <strong>214</strong>, 859\u2013865 (2016). Available at: <a href=\"http://oro.open.ac.uk/47539/\">http://oro.open.ac.uk/47539/</a>.{/ref}</li><li>reduced energy stores in shore crabs and lugworms{ref}Watts, A. J. R., Urbina, M. A., Corr, S., Lewis, C. & Galloway, T. S. Ingestion of plastic microfibers by the crab <em>Carcinus maenas</em> and its effect on food consumption and energy balance.<br> <em>Environment, Science & Technology,</em> <strong>49</strong>, 14597\u201314604 (2015). Available at: <a href=\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b04026\">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b04026</a>.{/ref},{ref}Wright, S., Rowe, D., Thompson, R. C. & Galloway, T. S. Microplastic ingestion decreases energy reserves in marine worms<br>. <em>Current Biology.</em> <strong>23</strong>, 1031\u20131033 (2013). Available at: <a href=\"https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43097705.pdf\">https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43097705.pdf</a>.{/ref}</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Many organisms do not exhibit changes in feeding after microplastic ingestion. A number of organisms, including suspension-feeders (for example, oyster larvae, urchin larvae, European flat oysters, Pacific oysters) and detritivorous (for example, isopods, amphipods) invertebrates show no impact of microplastics.{ref}Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. <em>Nature Ecology & Evolution</em>, <em>1</em>(5), 0116. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0116</a>.{/ref} Overall, however, it’s likely that for some organisms, the presence of microplastic particles in the gut (where food should be) can have negative biological impacts.</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>Impact of microplastics on humans</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>There is, currently, very little evidence of the impact that microplastics can have on humans.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>For human health, it is the smallest particles \u2013 micro- and nano-particles which are small enough to be ingested \u2013 that are of greatest concern. There are several ways by which plastic particles can be ingested: orally through water, consumption of marine products which contain microplastics, through the skin via cosmetics (identified as highly unlikely but possible), or inhalation of particles in the air.{ref}Revel, M., Ch\u00e2tel, A., & Mouneyrac, C. (2018). Micro (nano) plastics: A threat to human health?. <em>Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health</em>, <em>1</em>, 17-23. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584417300235\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584417300235</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is possible for microplastics to be passed up to higher levels in the food chain. This can occur when a species consumes organisms of a lower level in the food chain which has microplastics in the gut or tissue.{ref}Galloway T.S. (2015) Micro- and Nano-plastics and Human Health. In: Bergmann M., Gutow L., Klages M. (eds) <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em>. Available at: <a href=\"https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13\">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13</a>.{/ref} The presence of microplastics at higher levels of the food chain (in fish) has been documented.{ref}G\u00fcven, O., G\u00f6kda\u011f, K., Jovanovi\u0107, B., & K\u0131dey\u015f, A. E. (2017). Microplastic litter composition of the Turkish territorial waters of the Mediterranean Sea, and its occurrence in the gastrointestinal tract of fish. <em>Environmental Pollution</em>, <em>223</em>, 286-294. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116323910\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116323910</a>.{/ref} {ref}Jabeen, K., Su, L., Li, J., Yang, D., Tong, C., Mu, J., & Shi, H. (2017). Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China. <em>Environmental Pollution</em>, <em>221</em>, 141-149. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116311666\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116311666</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>One factor which possibly limits the dietary uptake for humans is that microplastics in fish tend to be present in the gut and digestive tract \u2014 parts of the fish not typically eaten.{ref}Galloway T.S. (2015) Micro- and Nano-plastics and Human Health. In: Bergmann M., Gutow L., Klages M. (eds) <em>Marine Anthropogenic Litter</em>. Available at: <a href=\"https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13\">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_13</a>.{/ref} The presence of microplastics in fish beyond the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. in tissue) remains to be studied in detail.{ref}Bouwmeester, H., Hollman, P. C., & Peters, R. J. (2015). Potential health impact of environmentally released micro-and nanoplastics in the human food production chain: experiences from nanotoxicology. <em>Environmental Science & Technology</em>, <em>49</em>(15), 8932-8947. Available at: <a href=\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01090\">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01090</a>.{/ref} Micro- and nanoplastics in bivalves (mussels and oysters) cultured for human consumption have also been identified. However, neither human exposure nor potential risk have been identified or quantified.{ref}Van Cauwenberghe, L., & Janssen, C. R. (2014). Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption. <em>Environmental Pollution</em>, <em>193</em>, 65-70. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114002425\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114002425</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plastic fibres have also been detected in other food items; for example, honey, beer and table salt.{ref}Liebezeit, G., & Liebezeit, E. (2013). Non-pollen particulates in honey and sugar. <em>Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A</em>, <em>30</em>(12), 2136-2140. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2013.843025\">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2013.843025</a>.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Liebezeit, G., & Liebezeit, E. (2014). Synthetic particles as contaminants in German beers. <em>Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A</em>, <em>31</em>(9), 1574-1578. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2014.945099\">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19440049.2014.945099</a>.{/ref}<sup>,</sup>{ref}Yang, D., Shi, H., Li, L., Li, J., Jabeen, K., & Kolandhasamy, P. (2015). Microplastic pollution in table salts from China. <em>Environmental Science & Technology</em>, <em>49</em>(22), 13622-13627. Available at: <a href=\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b03163\">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b03163</a>.{/ref} But the authors suggested negligible health risks as a result of this exposure.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Levels of microplastic ingestion are currently unknown. Even less is known about how such particles interact in the body. It may be the case that microplastics simply pass straight through the gastrointestinal tract without impact or interaction.{ref}Wang, J., Tan, Z., Peng, J., Qiu, Q., & Li, M. (2016). The behaviors of microplastics in the marine environment. <em>Marine Environmental Research</em>, <em>113</em>, 7-17. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113615300659\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113615300659</a>.{/ref} A study of North Sea fish, for example, revealed that 80 percent of fish with detected microplastics contained only one particle \u2014 this suggests that following ingestion, plastic does not persist for long periods of time.{ref}Foekema, E. M., De Gruijter, C., Mergia, M. T., van Franeker, J. A., Murk, A. J., & Koelmans, A. A. (2013). Plastic in north sea fish. <em>Environmental Science & Technology</em>, <em>47</em>(15), 8818-8824. Available at: <a href=\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es400931b\">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es400931b</a>.{/ref} Concentrations in mussels, in contrast, can be significantly higher.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>What could cause concern about the impact of microplastics? </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Three possible toxic effects of plastic particle have been suggested: the plastic particles themselves, the release of persistent organic pollutant adsorbed to the plastics, and leaching of plastic additives.{ref}I\u00f1iguez, M. E., Conesa, J. A., & Fullana, A. (2017). Microplastics in Spanish Table Salt. <em>Scientific Reports</em>, <em>7 </em>(1), 8620. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09128-x\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09128-x</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>There has been no evidence of harmful effects to date \u2013 however, the precautionary principle would indicate that this is not evidence against taking exposure seriously. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>Since microplastics are hydrophobic (insoluble), and are have a high surface area-to-volume ratio, they can sorb environmental contaminants.{ref}For example polychlorinated biphenyl; PCB.{/ref} If there was significant accumulation of environmental contaminants, there is the possibility that these concentrations could ‘biomagnify’ up the food chain to higher levels.{ref}Biomagnification (sometimes termed ‘bioamplification’ or ‘biological magnification’), is the increasing concentration of a substance in the tissues of organisms at successively higher levels in a food chain. This occurs as organisms at higher trophic levels eat significant masses of contaminated organisms at lower levels; with increased consumption, these concentrations can increase.{/ref} Biomagnification of PCBs varies by organism and environmental conditions; multiple studies have shown no evidence of uptake by the organisms of PCBs despite ingestion{ref}Devriese, L. I., De Witte, B., Vethaak, A. D., Hostens, K., & Leslie, H. A. (2017). Bioaccumulation of PCBs from microplastics in Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus): An experimental study. <em>Chemosphere</em>, <em>186</em>, 10-16. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724</a>.{/ref} whilst some mussels, for example, have shown capability to transfer some compounds into their digestive glands.{ref}Avio, C. G., Gorbi, S., Milan, M., Benedetti, M., Fattorini, D., d’Errico, G., \u2026 & Regoli, F. (2015). Pollutants bioavailability and toxicological risk from microplastics to marine mussels. <em>Environmental Pollution</em>, <em>198</em>, 211-222. Available at: <a href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724\">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653517311724</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p>To date, there has been no clear evidence of the accumulation of persistent organic pollutants or leached plastic additives in humans. Continued research in this area is important to better understand the role of plastic within broader ecosystems and risk to human health.</p>\n\n\n\n<h2>Plastic trade</h2>\n\n\n\n<h3>The impact of China’s trade ban</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Whilst we looked previously in this entry at the plastic waste generation in countries across the world, it’s also important to understand how plastic waste is traded across the world. Recycled plastic waste is now a product within the global commodity market \u2014 it is sold and traded across the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>This has important implications for managing global plastic waste: if countries with effective waste management systems \u2013 predominantly high-income countries \u2013 export plastic waste to middle to low-income countries with poor waste management systems, they could be adding to the ocean plastic problem in this way.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plastics can be challenging to recycle, particularly if they contain additives and different plastic blends. </p>\n\n\n\n<p>The implications of this complexity are two-fold: in many cases it is convenient for countries to export their recycled plastic waste (meaning they don’t have to handle it domestically); and for importing countries, this plastic is often discarded if it doesn’t meet the sufficient requirements for recycled or is contaminated by non-recyclable plastic. As such, traded plastic waste could eventually enter the ocean through poor waste management systems.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Collectively, China and Hong Kong have imported 72.4 percent of global traded plastic waste (with most imports to Hong Kong eventually reaching China).{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at: <a href=\"http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131\">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131</a>.{/ref} </p>\n\n\n\n<p>This came to an end in 2017. At the end of that year China introduced a complete ban on the imports of non-industrial plastic waste.{ref}Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection, \u201cAnnouncement of releasing the Catalogues of Imported Wastes Management,\u201d (Announcement no. 39, 2017).{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<h4>How much plastic waste did China import?</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>In the chart we see the quantity of plastic waste China had to manage over the period from 2010 to 2016. This is differentiated by domestic plastic waste generation, shown in blue, and imported plastic waste shown in orange. The total plastic waste to manage is equal to the sum of domestic and imported plastic waste.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>Over this period, China imported between 7 and 9 million tonnes of plastic waste per year. In 2016, this figure was 7.35 million tonnes. To put this in context, China’s domestic plastic waste generation was around 61 million tonnes. Therefore, 10-11 percent of China’s total plastic waste was imported from around the world.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/chinese-plastic-imports\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h4>Who were the main plastic exporters to China?</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Which countries export the most plastic waste to China? In the chart we see the quantity of plastic exported to China from the top 10 exporting countries. Collectively, these countries are responsible for around 76 percent of its imports.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>As we see, Hong Kong typically acts as an entry point for Chinese imports; it is therefore the largest ‘exporting’ country to China. Many high-income countries are included in this top 10: Japan, USA, Germany, Belgium, Australia and Canada are all major plastic exporters.</p>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/plastic-exports-to-china\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h4>How much plastic will be displaced from the Chinese import ban?</h4>\n\n\n\n<p>China has been increasing restrictions on its plastic waste imports since 2007. In 2010, it implemented its “Green Fence” program \u2013 a temporary restriction for plastic imports with significantly less contamination.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2017 it implemented a much stricter, permanent ban on non-industrial plastic imports.{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at: <a href=\"http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131\">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131</a>.{/ref} In the chart we see the estimated impact on the cumulative displacement of global plastic waste to 2030 as a result of the Chinese import ban.{ref}Brooks, A. L., Wang, S., & Jambeck, J. R. (2018). The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Science Advances, 4(6), eaat0131. Available at: <a href=\"http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131\">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaat0131</a>.{/ref} This is shown for three scenarios: assuming the maintained 100 percent import ban, in addition to the impact if this was reduced to 75 or 50 percent.</p>\n\n\n\n<p>By 2030, it’s estimated that around 110 million tonnes of plastic will be displaced as a result of the ban. This plastic waste will have to be handled domestically or exported to another country. Brooks et al. (2018) suggest this ban has several implications:</p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>exporting countries can use this as an opportunity to improve domestic recycled infrastructure and generate internal markets;</li><li>if recycling infrastructure is lacking, this provides further incentive for countries to reduce primary plastic production (and create more circular material models) to reduce the quantity of waste which needs to be handled;</li><li>it fundamentally changes the nature of global plastic trade, representing an opportunity to share and promote best practices of waste management, and harmonize technical standards on waste protocols;</li><li>some other countries may attempt to become a key plastic importer in place of China; one challenge is that many countries do not yet have sufficient waste management infrastructure to handle recycled waste imports;</li><li>countries considering importing significant quantities of plastic waste could consider an import tax specifically aimed at funding the development of sufficient infrastructure to handle such waste.</li></ul>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 600px; border: 0px none;\" src=\"https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/displaced-plastic-chinese-import-ban\"></iframe>\n\n\n\n<h2>Additional FAQs on Plastics</h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition to this main data entry we have collated some of the most common questions on plastics on our <a href=\"https://owid.cloud/faq-on-plastics\">FAQ on Plastics</a> page. You may find the answer to additional questions on this topic there.</p>\n\n\n\n<h2>Data Quality & Definitions</h2>\n\n\n\n<h3>Data Definitions</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The definitions of key terms used in this entry are as follows:</p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Discarded: </strong>waste that is not recycled or incinerated; this includes waste that goes to landfill (closed or open), is littered, or lost to the natural environment.</p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Incineration: </strong>a method waste treatment which involves the burning of material at very high temperatures. In some cases, energy recovery from the incineration process is possible. The burning of plastics can release toxins to the air and surrounding environment and should therefore be carried out under controlled and regulated conditions.</p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Inadequately managed waste: </strong>waste is not formally managed and includes disposal in dumps or open, uncontrolled landfills, where it is not fully contained. Inadequately managed waste has high risk of polluting rivers and oceans. This does not include ‘littered’ plastic waste, which is approximately 2% of total waste (including high-income countries).{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., \u2026 & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at: <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768\" target=\"_blank\">http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Mismanaged waste: </strong>material that is either littered or inadequately disposed (the sum of littered and inadequately disposed waste). Inadequately disposed waste is not formally managed and includes disposal in dumps or open, uncontrolled landfills, where it is not fully contained. Mismanaged waste could eventually enter the ocean via inland waterways, wastewater outflows, and transport by wind or tides.{ref}Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., \u2026 & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Available at: <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768\" target=\"_blank\">http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/768</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<h3>Plastic particles size categories</h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Plastic particles are typically grouped into categories depending on their size (as measured by their diameter). The table summarizes some standard ranges for a given particle category.{ref}Eriksen, M., Lebreton, L. C., Carson, H. S., Thiel, M., Moore, C. J., Borerro, J. C., \u2026 & Reisser, J. (2014). Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PloS one, 9(12), e111913. Available at: <a href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913\">http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111913</a>.{/ref}</p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Particle category</strong></td><td><strong>Diameter range<br>(mm = millimetres)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Nanoplastics</td><td>< 0.0001 mm (0.1\u03bcm)</td></tr><tr><td>Small microplastics</td><td>0.00001 – 1 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Large microplastics</td><td>1 – 4.75 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Mesoplastics</td><td>4.76 – 200 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Macroplastics</td><td>>200 mm</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>\n", "protected": false }, "excerpt": { "rendered": "The use of plastics has many benefits \u2013 it is affordable, versatile, resistant, and can help reduce other forms of waste \u2013 especially food waste. However, when poorly managed it can pollute the environment and our oceans.\nWhere does the plastic in our oceans come from and what can we do to reduce plastic pollution?", "protected": false }, "date_gmt": "2018-09-01T14:31:25", "modified": "2023-10-10T10:59:50", "template": "", "categories": [ 49, 185 ], "menu_order": 285, "ping_status": "closed", "authors_name": [ "Hannah Ritchie" ], "modified_gmt": "2023-10-10T09:59:50", "comment_status": "closed", "featured_media": 24884, "featured_media_paths": { "thumbnail": "/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-150x92.png", "medium_large": "/app/uploads/2019/09/Pathway-of-plastic-to-ocean-768x472.png" } } |