variables: 900202

This table contains all the variables of all the datasets we have at Our World In Data. Note that this includes only the information about the variables like name and default display settings, not the data itself.

Data license: CC-BY

This data as json

id name unit description createdAt updatedAt code coverage timespan datasetId sourceId shortUnit display columnOrder originalMetadata grapherConfigAdmin shortName catalogPath dimensions schemaVersion processingLevel processingLog titlePublic titleVariant attributionShort attribution descriptionShort descriptionFromProducer descriptionKey descriptionProcessing licenses license grapherConfigETL type sort dataChecksum metadataChecksum
900202 Access to justice for women (best estimate) (re-estimate)     2024-04-23 09:13:00 2024-07-25 23:14:01     1789-2023 6481     
{
    "numDecimalPlaces": 0
}
 0     accessjust_w_row__estimate_best grapher/democracy/2024-03-07/vdem/vdem_multi_without_regions#accessjust_w_row__estimate_best 
{
    "filters": [
        {
            "name": "estimate",
            "value": "best"
        }
    ],
    "originalName": "Access to justice for women (best estimate) (re-estimate)",
    "originalShortName": "accessjust_w_row"
}
 2     Access to justice for women (best estimate)     Best estimate whether women have access to justice. Question: Do women enjoy equal, secure, and effective access to justice? Clarification: This question specifies the extent to which women can bring cases before the courts without risk to their personal safety, trials are fair, and women have effective ability to seek redress if public authorities violate their rights, including the rights to counsel, defense, and appeal. This question does not ask you to assess the relative access to justice men and women. Thus, it is possible to assign the lowest possible score to a country even if men and women enjoy equal — and extremely limited — access to justice. Responses: 0: Secure and effective access to justice for women is non-existent. 1: Secure and effective access to justice for women is usually not established or widely respected. 2: Secure and effective access to justice for women is inconsistently observed. Minor problems characterize most cases or occur rather unevenly across different parts of the country. 3: Secure and effective access to justice for women is usually observed. 4: Secure and effective access to justice for women is almost always observed. Scale: Ordinal, converted to interval by the measurement model. 
[]
 We employ Lührmann et al.'s criteria and use a threshold of 3 to classify the original indicator (`v2clacjstw_osp*`) into two categories: 0 ("No") and 1 ("Yes"). While RoW covers the years since 1900, we use V-Dem's historical data from 1789 to 1899 to expand the classification's coverage back in time. We expand the years covered by V-Dem further: To expand the time coverage of today's countries and include more of the period when they were still non-sovereign territories, we identified the historical entity they were a part of and used that regime's data whenever available For example, V-Dem only provides regime data since Bangladesh's independence in 1971. There is, however, regime data for Pakistan and the colony of India, both of which the current territory of Bangladesh was a part. We, therefore, use the regime data of Pakistan for Bangladesh from 1947 to 1970, and the regime data of India from 1789 to 1946. We did so for all countries with a past or current population of more than one million.       int 
[]
 cd5cbc69a7a8917a7d956dc851b07551 733b98ccb8196fc5836537c260965309

Links from other tables