variables: 900083

This table contains all the variables of all the datasets we have at Our World In Data. Note that this includes only the information about the variables like name and default display settings, not the data itself.

Data license: CC-BY

This data as json

id name unit description createdAt updatedAt code coverage timespan datasetId sourceId shortUnit display columnOrder originalMetadata grapherConfigAdmin shortName catalogPath dimensions schemaVersion processingLevel processingLog titlePublic titleVariant attributionShort attribution descriptionShort descriptionFromProducer descriptionKey descriptionProcessing licenses license grapherConfigETL type sort dataChecksum metadataChecksum
900083 Rigorous and impartial public administration (best estimate, aggregate: population-weighted average)     2024-04-23 09:12:45 2024-07-25 23:13:49     1789-2023 6481     
{
    "numDecimalPlaces": 2
}
 0     public_admin_vdem__estimate_best__aggregate_method_population_weighted_average grapher/democracy/2024-03-07/vdem/vdem_multi_with_regions#public_admin_vdem__estimate_best__aggregate_method_population_weighted_average 
{
    "filters": [
        {
            "name": "estimate",
            "value": "best"
        },
        {
            "name": "aggregate_method",
            "value": "population-weighted average"
        }
    ],
    "originalName": "Rigorous and impartial public administration (best estimate, aggregate: population-weighted average)",
    "originalShortName": "public_admin_vdem"
}
 2     Rigorous and impartial public administration (best estimate, aggregate: population-weighted average)     Best estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias. Question: Are public officials rigorous and impartial in the performance of their duties? Clarification: This question focuses on the extent to which public officials generally abide by the law and treat like cases alike, or conversely, the extent to which public administration is characterized by arbitrariness and biases (i.e., nepotism, cronyism, or discrimination). The question covers the public officials that handle the cases of ordinary people. If no functioning public administration exists, the lowest score (0) applies. Responses: 0: The law is not respected by public officials. Arbitrary or biased administration of the law is rampant. 1: The law is weakly respected by public officials. Arbitrary or biased administration of the law is widespread. 2: The law is modestly respected by public officials. Arbitrary or biased administration of the law is moderate. 3: The law is mostly respected by public officials. Arbitrary or biased administration of the law is limited. 4: The law is generally fully respected by the public officials. Arbitrary or biased administration of the law is very limited. Scale: Ordinal, converted to interval by the measurement model. Indicator name: `v2clrspct` 
[]
       
{
    "selectedEntityNames": [
        "Africa",
        "Asia",
        "Europe",
        "North America",
        "Oceania",
        "South America"
    ],
    "selectedEntityColors": {
        "asia": "#00847E",
        "africa": "#A2559C",
        "europe": "#4C6A9C",
        "oceania": "#9A5129",
        "northAmerica": "#C4523E",
        "southAmerica": "#883039"
    }
}
 float 
[]
 f38860d99289eea9c877fedc641ba45e fa12bbb51fd462787f21063985957792

Links from other tables