variables: 900048

This table contains all the variables of all the datasets we have at Our World In Data. Note that this includes only the information about the variables like name and default display settings, not the data itself.

Data license: CC-BY

This data as json

id name unit description createdAt updatedAt code coverage timespan datasetId sourceId shortUnit display columnOrder originalMetadata grapherConfigAdmin shortName catalogPath dimensions schemaVersion processingLevel processingLog titlePublic titleVariant attributionShort attribution descriptionShort descriptionFromProducer descriptionKey descriptionProcessing licenses license grapherConfigETL type sort dataChecksum metadataChecksum
900048 Foreign policymaking free from foreign influence (best estimate, aggregate: average)     2024-04-23 09:12:41 2024-07-25 23:13:46     1789-2023 6481     
{
    "numDecimalPlaces": 2
}
 0     int_auton_vdem__estimate_best__aggregate_method_average grapher/democracy/2024-03-07/vdem/vdem_multi_with_regions#int_auton_vdem__estimate_best__aggregate_method_average 
{
    "filters": [
        {
            "name": "estimate",
            "value": "best"
        },
        {
            "name": "aggregate_method",
            "value": "average"
        }
    ],
    "originalName": "Foreign policymaking free from foreign influence (best estimate, aggregate: average)",
    "originalShortName": "int_auton_vdem"
}
 2     Foreign policymaking free from foreign influence (best estimate, aggregate: average)     Best estimate of the extent to which foreign policy is free from the interference of other states. Question: Is the state autonomous from the control of other states with respect to the conduct of its foreign policy? Responses: 0: Non-autonomous. Foreign policy is controlled by an external power, either de facto or de jure. The most common examples of this are colonial rule and military occupation (e.g. quadripartite occupation of Germany in 1945). Situations in which domestic actors provide de jure cover for de facto control by a foreign power should not be construed as semi-autonomy (e.g. Vichy France). Governments in exile that control underground forces waging unconventional warfare are not considered as mitigating an occupation regime (e.g. countries under German occupation during WWII). 1: Semi-autonomous. An external political actor directly constrains the ability of domestic actors to pursue an independent foreign policy course in some important areas. This may be the product of explicit treaty provisions or well-understood rules of the game from which the subject state cannot withdraw. Examples would include Soviet strictures over rule in so-called "satellite" states in Eastern Europe, and explicitly negotiated postwar settlements (e.g. Austria following WWII). 2: Autonomous. Domestic political actors exercise foreign policy free of the direct control of external political actors. Direct control is meant to exclude the exercise of constraint or the impact of interdependence in the international system. Treaties in which states concede some part of that control to a supra- or international organization voluntarily, and from which there is a possibility of exit should not be interpreted as a violation of autonomy. Indicator name: `v2svinlaut` 
[]
 The regional aggregates (including values for the World) have been estimated by averaging the country values.     
{
    "selectedEntityNames": [
        "Africa",
        "Asia",
        "Europe",
        "North America",
        "Oceania",
        "South America"
    ],
    "selectedEntityColors": {
        "asia": "#00847E",
        "africa": "#A2559C",
        "europe": "#4C6A9C",
        "oceania": "#9A5129",
        "northAmerica": "#C4523E",
        "southAmerica": "#883039"
    }
}
 float 
[]
 833c7e3e2b24727065f091547555f93a 692677a43487675b12c287f7875302a2

Links from other tables