sources: 16192

This table contains all the sources for our datasets. The description column contains JSON encoded as text that contains useful additional fields like a longer descriptive text "additionalInfo".

Data license: CC-BY

This data as json

id	name	description	createdAt	updatedAt	datasetId	additionalInfo	link	dataPublishedBy
16192	V-Dem Dataset Version 8 (2018)	{ "link": "https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy18", "additionalInfo": "This variable was imported into the OWID database from Version 8 of the V-Dem Dataset. Here is the original metadata given by the V-Dem Codebook:\n\nIndicator Name: Deliberative democracy index\n\nIndicator Code: v2x_delibdem\n\nShort definition: To what extent is the ideal of deliberative democracy achieved?\n\nLong definition: The deliberative principle of democracy focuses on the process by which decisions are reached in a polity. A deliberative process is one in which public reasoning focused on the common good motivates political decisions --- as contrasted with emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion. According to this principle, democracy requires more than an aggregation of existing preferences. There should also be respectful dialogue at all levels --- from preference formation to final decision --- among informed and competent participants who are open to persuasion. To make it a measure of not only the deliberative principle but also of democracy, the index also takes the level of electoral democracy into account.\n\nData release: 4-8. Release 1-3 used a different, preliminary aggregation formula.\n\nAggregation method: The index is aggregated using this formula: <br>v2x_ delibdem =<br>.25* v2x_polyarchy^1.585 + .25* v2x_ delib + .5* v2x_polyarchy ^1.585* v2x_ delib", "dataPublishedBy": "V-Dem Institute", "dataPublisherSource": "Coppedge, Michael, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, and Jan Teorell (2015). \"Measuring High Level Democratic Principles using the V-Dem Data,\" V-Dem Working Paper Series 2015 (6); Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Haakon Gjerl\u00f8w, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Joshua Krusell, Anna L\u00fchrmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Moa Olin, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundtr\u00f6m, Eitan Tzelgov, Luca Uberti, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt (2018). \"V-Dem Codebook v8\" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project; Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, M. Steven Fish, Agnes Cornell, Sirianne Dahlum, Haakon Gjerl\u00f8w, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Joshua Krusell, Anna L\u00fchrmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Moa Olin, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Josefine Pernes, Johannes von R\u00f6mer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Jeffrey Staton, Natalia Stepanova, Aksel Sundstr\u00f6m, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, Steven Wilson, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2018. \"V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v8\". Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy18" }	2018-10-03 13:26:02	2018-10-03 13:26:02	3073	This variable was imported into the OWID database from Version 8 of the V-Dem Dataset. Here is the original metadata given by the V-Dem Codebook: Indicator Name: Deliberative democracy index Indicator Code: v2x_delibdem Short definition: To what extent is the ideal of deliberative democracy achieved? Long definition: The deliberative principle of democracy focuses on the process by which decisions are reached in a polity. A deliberative process is one in which public reasoning focused on the common good motivates political decisions --- as contrasted with emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion. According to this principle, democracy requires more than an aggregation of existing preferences. There should also be respectful dialogue at all levels --- from preference formation to final decision --- among informed and competent participants who are open to persuasion. To make it a measure of not only the deliberative principle but also of democracy, the index also takes the level of electoral democracy into account. Data release: 4-8. Release 1-3 used a different, preliminary aggregation formula. Aggregation method: The index is aggregated using this formula: <br>v2x_ delibdem =<br>.25* v2x_polyarchy^1.585 + .25* v2x_ delib + .5* v2x_polyarchy ^1.585* v2x_ delib	https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy18	V-Dem Institute

name

description

createdAt

updatedAt

datasetId

additionalInfo

link

dataPublishedBy

16192

V-Dem Dataset Version 8 (2018)

{
"link": "https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy18",
"additionalInfo": "This variable was imported into the OWID database from Version 8 of the V-Dem Dataset. Here is the original metadata given by the V-Dem Codebook:\n\nIndicator Name: Deliberative democracy index\n\nIndicator Code: v2x_delibdem\n\nShort definition: To what extent is the ideal of deliberative democracy achieved?\n\nLong definition: The deliberative principle of democracy focuses on the process by which decisions are reached in a polity. A deliberative process is one in which public reasoning focused on the common good motivates political decisions --- as contrasted with emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion. According to this principle, democracy requires more than an aggregation of existing preferences. There should also be respectful dialogue at all levels --- from preference formation to final decision --- among informed and competent participants who are open to persuasion. To make it a measure of not only the deliberative principle but also of democracy, the index also takes the level of electoral democracy into account.\n\nData release: 4-8. Release 1-3 used a different, preliminary aggregation formula.\n\nAggregation method: The index is aggregated using this formula: <br>v2x_ delibdem =<br>.25* v2x_polyarchy^1.585 + .25* v2x_ delib + .5* v2x_polyarchy ^1.585* v2x_ delib",
"dataPublishedBy": "V-Dem Institute",
"dataPublisherSource": "Coppedge, Michael, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, and Jan Teorell (2015). \"Measuring High Level Democratic Principles using the V-Dem Data,\" V-Dem Working Paper Series 2015 (6); Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, Agnes Cornell, M. Steven Fish, Haakon Gjerl\u00f8w, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Joshua Krusell, Anna L\u00fchrmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Moa Olin, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Jeffrey Staton, Aksel Sundtr\u00f6m, Eitan Tzelgov, Luca Uberti, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, and Daniel Ziblatt (2018). \"V-Dem Codebook v8\" Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project; Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, M. Steven Fish, Agnes Cornell, Sirianne Dahlum, Haakon Gjerl\u00f8w, Adam Glynn, Allen Hicken, Joshua Krusell, Anna L\u00fchrmann, Kyle L. Marquardt, Kelly McMann, Valeriya Mechkova, Juraj Medzihorsky, Moa Olin, Pamela Paxton, Daniel Pemstein, Josefine Pernes, Johannes von R\u00f6mer, Brigitte Seim, Rachel Sigman, Jeffrey Staton, Natalia Stepanova, Aksel Sundstr\u00f6m, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Tore Wig, Steven Wilson, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2018. \"V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v8\". Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy18"
}

2018-10-03 13:26:02

3073

This variable was imported into the OWID database from Version 8 of the V-Dem Dataset. Here is the original metadata given by the V-Dem Codebook: Indicator Name: Deliberative democracy index Indicator Code: v2x_delibdem Short definition: To what extent is the ideal of deliberative democracy achieved? Long definition: The deliberative principle of democracy focuses on the process by which decisions are reached in a polity. A deliberative process is one in which public reasoning focused on the common good motivates political decisions --- as contrasted with emotional appeals, solidary attachments, parochial interests, or coercion. According to this principle, democracy requires more than an aggregation of existing preferences. There should also be respectful dialogue at all levels --- from preference formation to final decision --- among informed and competent participants who are open to persuasion. To make it a measure of not only the deliberative principle but also of democracy, the index also takes the level of electoral democracy into account. Data release: 4-8. Release 1-3 used a different, preliminary aggregation formula. Aggregation method: The index is aggregated using this formula: <br>v2x_ delibdem =<br>.25* v2x_polyarchy^1.585 + .25* v2x_ delib + .5* v2x_polyarchy ^1.585* v2x_ delib

https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy18

V-Dem Institute

Links from other tables

1 row from sourceId in variables