sources: 15490

This table contains all the sources for our datasets. The description column contains JSON encoded as text that contains useful additional fields like a longer descriptive text "additionalInfo".

Data license: CC-BY

This data as json

id	name	description	createdAt	updatedAt	datasetId	additionalInfo	link	dataPublishedBy
15490	Susan D. Hyde (2011)	{ "link": "Data was kindly shared with OWID by Susan Hyde upon request.", "retrievedDate": "12/04/2018", "additionalInfo": "International election monitoring can be defined as the observation of an election by one or more independent parties, typically from another country or non-governmental organization (NGO). Election observers primarily assess the conduct of elections and factors influencing the prevailing electoral environment. As Hyde (2011) notes \"nearly 80 percent of all national elections are now monitored\". For further background information see Hyde's 2011 paper referenced above.\n\nThe percent of observed and criticized elections was calculated as:\n\n% observed and criticized elections = (no.of criticized elections/ total no. of elections) * 100\n\nThe percent of observed and not criticized elections was calculated as:\n\n% observed and not criticized elections = [(no. of observed elections - no. of criticized elections)/total number of elections] * 100\n \nCountries excluded from the analysis are microstates and the five independent states that did not hold any direct national elections between 1960 and 2006: China, Eritrea, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.", "dataPublishedBy": "Hyde, S.D., 2011. Catch us if you can: Election Monitoring and International Norm Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), pp.356-369.", "dataPublisherSource": "Author's original data." }	2018-04-12 11:05:04	2018-04-12 12:18:00	2756	International election monitoring can be defined as the observation of an election by one or more independent parties, typically from another country or non-governmental organization (NGO). Election observers primarily assess the conduct of elections and factors influencing the prevailing electoral environment. As Hyde (2011) notes "nearly 80 percent of all national elections are now monitored". For further background information see Hyde's 2011 paper referenced above. The percent of observed and criticized elections was calculated as: % observed and criticized elections = (no.of criticized elections/ total no. of elections) * 100 The percent of observed and not criticized elections was calculated as: % observed and not criticized elections = [(no. of observed elections - no. of criticized elections)/total number of elections] * 100 Countries excluded from the analysis are microstates and the five independent states that did not hold any direct national elections between 1960 and 2006: China, Eritrea, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.	Data was kindly shared with OWID by Susan Hyde upon request.	Hyde, S.D., 2011. Catch us if you can: Election Monitoring and International Norm Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), pp.356-369.

name

description

createdAt

updatedAt

datasetId

additionalInfo

link

dataPublishedBy

15490

Susan D. Hyde (2011)

{
    "link": "Data was kindly shared with OWID by Susan Hyde upon request.",
    "retrievedDate": "12/04/2018",
    "additionalInfo": "International election monitoring can be defined as the observation of an election by one or more independent parties, typically from another country or non-governmental organization (NGO). Election observers primarily assess the conduct of elections and factors influencing the prevailing electoral environment. As Hyde (2011) notes \"nearly 80 percent of all national elections are now monitored\". For further background information see Hyde's 2011 paper referenced above.\n\nThe percent of observed and criticized elections was calculated as:\n\n% observed and criticized elections = (no.of criticized elections/ total no. of elections) * 100\n\nThe percent of observed and not criticized elections was calculated as:\n\n% observed and not criticized elections = [(no. of observed elections - no. of criticized elections)/total number of elections] * 100\n \nCountries excluded from the analysis are microstates and the five independent states that did not hold any direct national elections between 1960 and 2006: China, Eritrea, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.",
    "dataPublishedBy": "Hyde, S.D., 2011. Catch us if you can: Election Monitoring and International Norm Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), pp.356-369.",
    "dataPublisherSource": "Author's original data."
}

2018-04-12 11:05:04

2018-04-12 12:18:00

2756

International election monitoring can be defined as the observation of an election by one or more independent parties, typically from another country or non-governmental organization (NGO). Election observers primarily assess the conduct of elections and factors influencing the prevailing electoral environment. As Hyde (2011) notes "nearly 80 percent of all national elections are now monitored". For further background information see Hyde's 2011 paper referenced above. The percent of observed and criticized elections was calculated as: % observed and criticized elections = (no.of criticized elections/ total no. of elections) * 100 The percent of observed and not criticized elections was calculated as: % observed and not criticized elections = [(no. of observed elections - no. of criticized elections)/total number of elections] * 100 Countries excluded from the analysis are microstates and the five independent states that did not hold any direct national elections between 1960 and 2006: China, Eritrea, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.

Data was kindly shared with OWID by Susan Hyde upon request.

Hyde, S.D., 2011. Catch us if you can: Election Monitoring and International Norm Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), pp.356-369.

Links from other tables

2 rows from sourceId in variables